Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Images of the Future

By Annalee Newitz, AlterNet. Posted July 24, 2007.


Every generation dreams they'll be the first to cheat death. But too many of our other dreams are likely to spell the end of humanity.
Annalee Newitz

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Annalee Newitz

My Last Column
After 9 long years, it's time to move on. One final thought: don't ever stop ruthlessly criticizing everything that exists.
Jul 2, 2008

Three Myths About the Internet That Refuse to Die
The Internet will not magically bring the world together; nor is it likely to destroy us.
Jun 20, 2008

Using Sci-Fi to Change the World
Science fiction isn't escapist; it can help us envision how to make the world a better place.
Jun 5, 2008

More stories by Annalee Newitz

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The future is a crowded graveyard, full of dead possibilities. Each headstone marks a timeline that never happened, and there's something genuinely mournful about them. I get misty-eyed looking at century-old drawings of the zeppelin-crammed skyline over "tomorrow's cities." It reminds me that the realities we think are just around the corner may die before they're born.

A few weeks ago I was trolling YouTube and stumbled across a now-hilarious documentary from 1972, Future Shock, based on the 1970 futurist book of the same name by Alvin Toffler. The documentary focused on a few themes from the book and tarted them up by throwing in a lot of trippy effects and sticking in Orson Welles as a narrator.

As Welles intones ponderously about how fast the future is arriving, we learn that "someday soon" everybody will be linked via computers. Essentially, it was an extremely accurate prediction about Internet culture. Score one for old Toffler.

Things go tragically incorrect when the documentary turns to biology. Very soon, Welles assures his audience, people will have complete control over the genome and drugs will cure everything from anxiety to aging. Through the wonders of pharmaceuticals, we'll become a race of immortal super-humans. It sounds almost exactly like the kinds of crap that futurists say now, 37 years later. Singularity peddlers like futurist Ray Kurzweil and genomics robber baron Craig Venter are always crowing about how we're just about to seize control over our genomes and live forever. So far we haven't. But every generation dreams about it, hoping they'll be the first humans to cheat death.

Some dreams of the future, however, shouldn't outlast the generation that first conceived them. Suburbia is one of those dreams. In the fat post-war years of the 1940s and '50s, it seemed like a great idea to build low-density housing to blanket the harsh desert landscapes of the Southwest. But now the green lawns of Southern California have become an environmental nightmare of water-sucking parasitism. Just think of the atrocious carbon footprint left behind when you lay pavement, wires, and pipes over a vast area so that nuclear families can each have huge yards and swimming pools instead of living intelligently in high-density green skyscrapers surrounded by organic farms.

Oh wait -- I just gave away my own crazy futurist dreams, inspired by urban environmentalism. Today, many of us imagine that the future will be like the green city of Dongtan, an ecofriendly community being built outside Shanghai using recycled water, green building materials, and urban gardens that will allow no cars within its limits. The hope is that Dongtan will have a teeny tiny carbon footprint and be a model of urban life for the future. Of course, that's what suburbia was supposed to be too -- a model of a good future life. No future is ever perfect.

Perhaps the saddest dead futures, though, are the ones whose end may mean the end of humanity. I suppose one could argue that the death of an environmentally conscious future is in that category. But what I'm talking about are past predictions that humans would colonize the moon and outer space. As the dream of a Mars colony withers and the idea of colonizing the moons of Saturn and Jupiter becomes more of a fantasy than ever before, I feel real despair.

Maybe my desperate hopes for space colonization are my version of Kurzweil's prediction that one day we'll take drugs that will make us immortal. Somehow, I think, if we could just have diverted the global war machine into a space-colony machine sometime back in the 1930s, then everything would be all right. Today the planet wouldn't be suffering from overpopulation, plague, and starvation. We'd all be spread out across the solar system, tending our terraforming machines and growing weird crops in the sands of Mars.

Of course, we might just be polluting every planet we touch and bringing our stupid dreams of conquering the genome to a bunch of poor nonhuman creatures with no defenses. But I still miss that future of outer-space colonies. I can't help but think it would be better than the future we've got.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: future, media

Annalee Newitz (annalee@techsploitation.com) is a surly media nerd whose Martian colony has a better space elevator than yours.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yeah but, our future was stolen
Posted by: EinMD on Jul 24, 2007 12:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In order to feed the military industrial complex and the neo-con agenda.

I don't think the dream is dead. I just think it's been delayed a bit. We've got lots of serious issues to tackle in the next five, ten, fifteen, twenty years and most people can't see past the next episode of American Idol. But that's ok, they're stating to wake up.

I think that we will still colonize Mars. However it just won't be in our lifetimes. But you're right, if we'd diverted the 500 billion dollars we've wasted blowing up innocent brown people in Iraq into the space program we'd already be on Mars.

And i'm sure some neo-con asshat is gonna start barking now about how the people we're bombing are terrorists, and I'm not supporting the troops, and we need to make sacrifices, and global warming isn't man made, and whatever other bullshit neo-con talking point they're using these days. Whatever. I'll be sure to tell all that to Abeer Qassim al-Janabi next time I see her. Oh wait that's right, we raped and murdered her and her whole family and killed upwards of 655,000 of her countrymen as of last years count. Oopsie!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Delayed could mean denied Posted by: abstractedaway
Yeah...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jul 24, 2007 7:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can keep your highrise self-contained green city arcologies. If it comes to living in something like that or giving up the ammenities... I know which one I pick.

but, then, thats the only one that is actually sustainable in any serious fashion and DOESN'T keep the alienation of our current lifestyles intact.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yeah... Posted by: abstractedaway
All the different strokes
Posted by: talkville on Jul 25, 2007 1:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some would institute what we have and make it eternal; others would work on what we have and make it more human. Some say this world is Nothing and is worth Nothing - they simply wait for a "next world" where they really live eternally. This world is simply busy-ness. We are making the future right now. There's always "one child born and a world to carry on". The status of Human is not static but dynamic. Even Alvin Toffler dies, much as he wishes not to. The Fascists in Spain used to cry their motto: "viva la muerte" (long live death). We are living and dying each moment; these are not sequential but simultaneous processes. What matters is how we are living now and who determines these things. A better world is possible. Viva la vida y viva la democracia. Those who deny death are usually those who most wish for it. Any future that's human is in the making right now, and history helps or hinders in the making. Technology can help us in becoming free or in becoming slaves. It's up to each and all of us while we're living.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Grammatical Ignorance Is A Turn-Off
Posted by: Patuxet on Jul 25, 2007 4:23 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who writes "Every generation dreams they'll be the first to cheat death" instead of "it'll be the first" is immediately suspect of sloppy thinking and probably not worth reading.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» How utterly idiotic. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: How utterly idiotic. Posted by: jmp3954
We will be...
Posted by: Pirate1 on Jul 25, 2007 10:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we will be. Teach your children well. Teach them about where they are, what they are and everything you can that is known as to what must be done to sustain life as we know it. Death is a natural occurence. Cheating it or even trying to is as stupid as slitting the atom and the consequences will be at least as dire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

incorrect grammar plus
Posted by: slinks on Jul 25, 2007 12:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I learned about Dongtan, but where and what is the arc
of this article? What is the topic? Cities, suburbs, or the fear of death? "The future" is an enormous subject; what about something specific, like those people in CA who pay to cryofreeze their bodies after death? What drugs will those people try to take to be immortal?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mick3
Posted by: mick3 on Jul 25, 2007 5:25 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Virtual immortality? In my experience, females are based in reality whereas the male, it seems, comes into this world believing that only by some cosmic error was he not born immortal, a god. Like those evil thoughts of cruelty and dominance that the churches ascribe to both genders but are really almost exclusive to the male, fear of dying seems essentially a male thing. Has anyone considered that over-extended lifetimes could--must--mean the end of propagation? Surely anyone who would enlist in such an effort must first be castrated (anything less could be circumvented). As it is, we've been reproducing as incontinently as vermin, without any thought of the consequences of overpopulation. As a result, the planet has about 2 1/2 times as many humans as it can sustain. Does anyone remember "quality over quantity"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mick3 Posted by: jmp3954
» I know plenty of female immortalists. Posted by: advancedatheist
Don't anthropomorphize death.
Posted by: advancedatheist on Aug 2, 2007 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"But every generation dreams about it, hoping they'll be the first humans to cheat death."

Death has no rights or claims for us to "cheat."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]