Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The story of the leak of the Pentagon Papers to The New York Times is famous, but how they got published as a book, with Gravel’s face on the jacket, reads like a John Grisham novel.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Time Is Right for New Pentagon Papers

By Amy Goodman, King Features Syndicate. Posted June 27, 2007.


The story of the leak of the Pentagon Papers to The New York Times is famous, but how they got published as a book, with Gravel’s face on the jacket, reads like a John Grisham novel.
Advertisement

Of the Democratic presidential candidates, Sen. Mike Gravel is probably the least well recognized. His dark-horse candidacy may be the butt of jokes on the late-night comedy shows, but that doesn’t faze former Pentagon analyst Daniel Ellsberg: “Here is a senator who was not afraid to look foolish. That is the fear that keeps people in line all their lives.”

The famed whistle-blower joined Gravel this past weekend on a panel commemorating the 35th anniversary of the publication of the Pentagon Papers by the Beacon Press, a small, nonprofit publisher affiliated with the Unitarian Universalist Association. It was this publisher that Gravel turned to in 1971, after dozens of others had turned him down, to publish the 7,000 pages that Ellsberg had delivered to Gravel to put into the public record.

The story of the leak of the Pentagon Papers to The New York Times is famous, but how they got published as a book, with Gravel’s face on the jacket, reads like a John Grisham novel.

Ellsberg was a military analyst working for the RAND Corp. in the 1960s when he was asked to join an internal Pentagon group tasked with creating a comprehensive, secret history of U.S. involvement in Vietnam. Ellsberg photocopied thousands of documents and leaked them to The New York Times, which published excerpts in June 1971.

President Richard Nixon immediately got a restraining order, stopping the newspaper from printing more. It was the first time in U.S. history that presses were stopped by federal court order. The Times fought the injunction, and won in the Supreme Court case New York Times Co. v. United States. Following that decision, The Washington Post also began running excerpts. Ellsberg gave the Pentagon Papers to the Post on the condition that one of its editors, Ben Bagdikian, deliver a copy to Gravel.

Gravel recalled the exchange, which he set up at midnight outside the storied Mayflower Hotel in Washington, D.C.: “I used to work in intelligence; I know how to do these things.” Gravel pulled his car up to Bagdikian’s, the two opened their trunks and Gravel heaved the boxes personally, worried that only he could claim senatorial immunity should they get caught with the leaked documents. His staff aides were posted as lookouts around the block.

Thwarted in his attempt to read the Pentagon Papers into the public record as a filibuster to block the renewal of the draft, Gravel called a late-night meeting of the obscure Subcommittee on Buildings and Grounds, which he chaired, and began reading the papers aloud there. He broke down crying while reading the details of Vietnamese civilian deaths. Because he had begun the reading, he was legally able to enter all 7,000 pages of the Pentagon Papers, once top-secret, into the public record.

Though ridiculed by the press for his emotional display, Gravel was undaunted. He wanted the Pentagon Papers published as a book so Americans could read what had been done in their name. Only Beacon Press accepted the challenge.

Robert West, the president of the Unitarian Universalist Association at the time, approved the publication. With that decision, he said, “We started down a path that led through two and a half years of government intimidation, harassment and threat of criminal punishment.” As Beacon weathered subpoenas, FBI investigations of its bank accounts and other chilling probes, Gravel attempted to extend his senatorial immunity to the publisher. The bid failed in the U.S Supreme Court (the first time that the U.S. Senate appeared before the court), but not without a strongly worded dissent from Justice William O. Douglas: “In light of the command of the First Amendment we have no choice but to rule that here government, not the press, is lawless.”

Which brings us to today. Sitting next to West and Gravel, Ellsberg repeated the plea that he is making in speeches all over the United States: “The equivalent of the Pentagon Papers exist in safes all over Washington, not only in the Pentagon, but in the CIA, the State Department and elsewhere. My message is to them: Take the risk, reveal the truth under the lies of your own bosses and your superiors, obey your oath to the Constitution, which every one of those officials took, not to the commander in chief, but to the Constitution of the United States.”

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: media, pentagon papers, daniel ellsberg

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hooray for Beacon Press.
Posted by: guleblanc on Jun 27, 2007 11:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a Unitarian, but I didn't know this story. I've never been very impressed with Beacon Press, but now I am. Hooray for them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks for the story.
Posted by: WhatNow? on Jun 27, 2007 7:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gravel for President

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impressed before, now even more...
Posted by: Bozly on Jun 28, 2007 11:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Found an MISSING honesty in Gavel, was NOT remembering anything he had to do with P-Paperings....but in your recounting, found more to be admirable (and a BOO to those that attempted to ridicule him /his exposed emotions--hard to imagine but would guess such claim THEY are of true "christian" heart/mind/soul and fail to comprehend how far NOT such is real for them....!!!!) A good majority of "us" ordinaries are NOT syncophant dolts and we ARE indeed tired of the bullschitte that keeps getting paraded as IF in OUR best interests or by those supposedly attempting to insure our best interests first and foremost/etc. We are tired of the candidates facading whatever just to APPEAR appealing, tired of being pandered to and most of us have base intelligence that we can and do discern the difference--we may feel rather powerless, but perhaps just biding time til the NEXT revolution where a wipe out of the present field of dilimmas can allow us a second chance to get this repulblic back on track to a FUNCTIONING democracy of FOR and BY the people and for the GREATER COMMON GOOD OF ALL !!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's shout it From the Mountains--Gravel the next President
Posted by: ccluelessfl60 on Jun 29, 2007 5:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Progressive want a voice and we have one in Gravel.The man is fearless and that is what we need. If we all repeat and repeat his name maybe some one will notice. He is what made America great. Expose the lies and admit Errors and then do your best to clean it up. He was right when he said the other candidates worried him .They worry us all for we can see 8 more years of indecision and suppression of the will of the people and legislation by corporate lobbyists. We need a principled leader to undo all the damage done to our government by this administration and the Republicans goal to undo all the progress made in the last century towards a more perfect union of the people ,by the people and for the people. He is not perfect but principles trump charisma. He is a voice in the wilderness right now, so let us tell it on the mountain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Profiles in Courage - Giraffes
Posted by: Jo1028 on Jun 29, 2007 10:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Time is also right for recounting more of these Profiles in Courage. I didn't remember Gravel's involvement, but Ellsberg certainly deserves much acclaim for his courage in the face of the persecution he endured. Remember Nixon's Plumbers went after his medical file to try and discredit him. Whistleblowers deserve more than lip-service protection; their stories should be preserved, written in history books and biographies so young people can learn from their models. There is a middle school curriculum called The Giraffe Project, that collects examples of 'giraffes', people who stand up and stick their necks out. Students study the stories, find and write about 'giraffes' in their lives, and discover ways they can be 'giraffes' as well. It's a good example of how we should be educating our children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks Amy, thanks Daniel and Gravel..
Posted by: wmGreybeard on Jul 24, 2007 4:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am obviously a little late finding this article.

Exposing all those lies is worth the risk of the consequences we may have to suffer if caught by the criminals in charge.

We must expose these liars and we must, demand real campaign finance reform.

The only system to assure integrity in government is by public campaign financing with spending limits with no exceptions for billionaires.

It must be as simple as possible while accountable to openness and honesty. The more complex it is, the more loopholes will be found

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]