Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

When a small Idaho newspaper held a mirror up to their community and exposed rampant pedophilia, they paid a heavy price at first. But their courageous journalism eventually paid off.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Mirror, Mirror: Journalism Takes a Look at Itself

By Rory O'Connor, AlterNet. Posted June 18, 2007.


When a small Idaho newspaper held a mirror up to their community and exposed rampant pedophilia, they paid a heavy price at first. But their courageous journalism eventually paid off.
Advertisement

In Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, the beautiful but wicked Queen would ask her mirror each day, "Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the fairest one of all?" And the talking mirror would respond, "Oh My Queen, it seems to me, there is none fairer in the land than thee!"

The fairy tale sprang to mind recently at the first annual Mirror Awards for "the best in media industry reporting," sponsored by Syracuse University's S.I Newhouse School of Public Communications. It's no secret (at least in media circles) that the media loves nothing as much as awards ceremonies. This is especially true when the awards are being presented to the media ... And given this century's explosion of new forms of media content and technology, with its concomitant boom in reporting about that media, it's not surprising that awards ceremonies for media about the media would soon follow. The Mirror Awards, which honor reporters, editors and teams of writers "who hold a mirror to their own industry for the public's benefit," are but the latest entrant in the media awards sweepstakes.

As someone who regularly reports, comments on and criticizes "the media industry" (this meta-media post -- a media commentary about media about media -- was inevitable) I welcomed news of the competition, which drew 140 entries in seven categories. (Variety editor-in-chief Peter Bart received the inaugural Lifetime Achievement Award.) The winners were feted at a Manhattan luncheon attended by "the media's top writers, readers and leaders" and hosted by Meredith Vieira who, having worked variously for ABC, NBC and CBS, is kinda meta-media herself! Vieira began by citing "the vital journalistic activity of reporting on the media," which she opined was "something completely new," and noted "journalists covering the media are watching the watchdogs and holding a mirror up to the media."

So who's the fairest of them all? To my mind, not the Big Media boys like David Carr of The New York Times, whose his weekly column won for 'Best Commentary,' or Philip Weiss and Clive Thompson of New York magazine, who won for 'Best Profile' and 'Best Single Article,' respectively -- as worthy as their entries may have been.

Instead, my favorite was culled from Nieman Reports, the small (and, to some of "the media's top writers, readers and leaders" in attendance, obscure) publication of The Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. The category was 'Best Coverage of Breaking Industry News,' and the author is Dean Miller, executive editor of the definitely small and obscure Post Register in Idaho Falls, Idaho.

Miller's article in the Summer 2006 Issue of Nieman Reports, entitled "A Local Newspaper Endures a Stormy Backlash," tells an amazing story of how his paper exposed Boy Scout pedophiles and those who failed to kick them out of the scouting program," and how "three of our community's big forces ... the community's majority religion, the richest guys in town, and the conservative machine that controls Idaho," tried to punish the paper for doing so. Why? Because Miller and his team chose "to tell the story of powerless people who'd been hurt by powerful people who counted on the public never learning what they'd done."

Here's what happened: after receiving a tip that a pedophile caught at a local scout camp in 1997 had not two victims (as the paper reported at the time) but actually dozens, Post Register reporters went to the courthouse to look for a civil suit filed by victims, only to be told that there was no such case. They later learned that the national Boy Scouts of America and its local Council had hired two of Idaho's best-connected law firms to seal the files -- thus covering up the entire affair.

Or so they thought ... But the Post Register went to court and "dragged the case file into the light of day." What reporters found astonished them; scout leaders had been warned about the pedophile years earlier, but hired him (again!) anyway. Lawyers for the Boy Scouts knew about more victims, but never told those boys' parents. Top local and national leaders of the Mormon Church, which sponsors almost all area scout troops, had also been warned.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: pedophilia, idaho, mirror awards

Filmmaker and journalist Rory O'Connor writes the Media Is A Plural blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What other untold evils remain?
Posted by: lessbread on Jun 18, 2007 4:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because Miller and his team chose "to tell the story of powerless people who'd been hurt by powerful people who counted on the public never learning what they'd done."

Bravo to them. Thanks for giving this story more attention. Let's hope it inspires other media sources to make the same choice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Calling
Posted by: Urstrly on Jun 20, 2007 4:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just shows that courage is good for the bottom line. These small papers who take great risks are truly heroic. If journalists took their reporting as seriously as patriarchical religionists guard their power, we'd have a fair fight. Incidentally, Mormons require their boys to join the Scouts, so they have a disproportionate influence on the organization. But I draw a distinction between Mormon leaders who would (like much of the Roman Catholic hierarchy) subject children and gays to abuse rather than look at their own corruption and the rank and file who hope their boys will learn good values and experience the out-of-doors. Reaction to the paper's reporting shows they didn't bargain for pedophilia.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow. Great story!
Posted by: hagwind on Jun 20, 2007 4:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
nm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Couragious newspaper
Posted by: jenvon on Jun 21, 2007 1:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder what presidentail candidate Mitt Romney would have to say about what this newspaper uncovered?????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Boy Scouts
Posted by: dangerouslysane on Jun 23, 2007 12:39 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Several years ago, the Boy Scouts maintained the right to discriminate against gays. Their policy was upheld in the courts.

How is it that the people who were in power in the organization and in that Idaho community would want to protect the pedophiles?

Of course, it would have been just as bad if the scout leaders were exploiting girls as well as boys, but it's clear that the abuse involved homoerotic activity on the part of the authority figures who had been entrusted to set examples of character for the scouts.

Anyway, the paper did a phenomenal job in reporting this story and in not buckling under the pressure.

Bravo!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Boy Scouts Posted by: MsCasey
» RE: The Boy Scouts Posted by: JBravoEcho11
» RE: The Boy Scouts Posted by: badkitty
» RE: The Boy Scouts Posted by: JB Max
This IS a great story . . .
Posted by: hagwind on Jun 23, 2007 7:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So why are there only five comments so far? Why aren't more people reading it??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Best thing for Idaho-ans (Ida-hos?)
Posted by: eddie torres on Jun 25, 2007 1:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get the hell out of your state and join the military. Then you'll be free of the crazy religious and corporate freaks who order you to commit heinous crimes against other people.

Oh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I laughed n/t Posted by: ateo
Excellent!
Posted by: talkville on Jun 25, 2007 1:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first invasion, occupation and colonization is that of consciousness - each of us experiences it at birth. Let the Whales save themselves; support the Minnows! Hope this article gets the attention it warrants in these dark dark times.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Backlash on the AlterNet.
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 25, 2007 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The public outrage against Idaho’s Post Register painfully reminds me of the abuse I experienced on AlterNet the past five months.

I say “painfully” because the insults hurled at me in response to my comments were so hurtful, I found myself skipping the replies and never returning to the applicable threads.

Later, I realized that retreating from the AlterNet field of battle made me just as cowardly as my anonymous provocateurs --– mean-spirited persons like “Edith” and “ThoughtCriminal.”

So instead of ingnoring their vindictive responses, I began rebutting each one. Now I look forward to the literary jousting -- an entertaining way of keeping my creative juices flowing.

The outing of a gay Post Register reporter by angry Boy Scout supporters also got my attention. It reminded me of the many times my AlterNet adversaries called me a “phony” because I promoted my anti-Bush administration website, King-George.biz.

Like the Post Register, I wanted maximum coverage for a news story – in my case, the “Bogus Bush Bio Caper.” Reported by the press in February 2004, it told how I scooped thousands of Web-surfing journalists by finding a falsified presidential biography someone in the White House had inadvertently posted on a U.S. State Department website.

For NEW AlterNet visitors unfamiliar with George W.’s fabricated Guard history, it claimed he flew F102s almost SIX years when the actual time was 27 months. The text contained other misrepresentations as well -- all intentional, not typos or mistaken dictation.

For example, the bogus bio asserted that Bush spent four years helping to keep two F102s on strip alert. In truth, he was only qualified for alert duty 22 months and the last 60 days were plagued by pilot problems attributed to poor airmanship, excessive drinking and a rumored fear of flying.

So why was the phony bio written? you might wonder

According to my case theory, in 2000 then-Texas Governor Bush inflated his weekend warrior duty to make him competitive with his only viable Republican opponent, Senator John McCain, who spent five and a half years as a POW during the Vietnam War.

After he won the New Hampshire primary, McCain was targeted for dirty GOP campaign tricks reportedly orchestrated by Karl Rove. The tactics worked. McCain dropped out the race and copies of the bogus bios were shredded except for the one accidentally sent to the State Department website manager.

Republicans will argue that Shrub never knew about the bogus State Department bio. However, specific details such as "two F102s on round-the-clock alert" were most likely known only by him.

Shrub also had a reputation for a fiery temper and maintaining tight management control. It is inconceivable that a member of the 2000 campaign team would risk his wrath and certain termination by publishing a false ANG record for public consumption without Bush's approval.

To validate my Internet discovery, I called the Boston Globe. Impressed, it ran the story the next morning, on 02/28/04, under the headline, “Bush Bio on Web Inflates Guard Service,” and gave me credit as the source.

Unfortunately for voters in 2004 who deserved to know about Dub-ya's bogus bio, not one U.S. paper or media outlet carried the story. Why? My best guess is -- because the Globe article was published on a Saturday. Apparently back then, people in the news business took weekends off instead of serving the public good.

Again for NEW AlterNeters, you can learn more about the “Bogus Bush Bio Caper” by visiting my NONPROFIT website, King-George.biz, which features 60 cartoons, photos and other Bushwhacking illustrations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» noticed Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: How, how, how, how, HOW???? Posted by: deltadancer
» Not a fair comparison Posted by: l_m_n
» Poorly-made point Posted by: l_m_n
Dying by inches vs Living fearlessly
Posted by: DanYHKim on Jun 25, 2007 5:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The effect on circulation and readership is a striking example to me of the hunger our society has for acts of courage and leadership. While other media outlets sometimes do their best not to offend, their readership slowly declines. On the other hand, an act of courageous persistence will boost circulation in spite of the controversy.

This is an especially important lesson for our politicians. By speaking carefully chosen words, candidates reduce themselves into a uniform, inoffensive mush. I think that any presidential candidate who plainly speaks their mind and demonstrates real conviction will pull far ahead of the field, even while they lose all corporate sponsorship.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A lesson in good journalism
Posted by: Ed of Dayton on Jun 25, 2007 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Publishing uncomfortable truths needn't be an act of hot-blooded courage; it should be a cool-headed excercise in focus..."

The last paragraph of this story should be the mantra to every writer, journalist, and anyone worth their salt in getting the truth out. I LOVE this story! It is one of the best stories I've read on AlterNet, no, perhaps in the past five years.

What courage! It takes courage to get the story out, to make the story plain to readers, to see it through, and not play favorites with anyone. Telling the truth can set a person free and for those young men hopefully getting the truth out on these Scoutmasters (if you can call them that) prooves how light shinned can expose the insects of the world and ready them for extermination.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Man Bites Dog Proven, Once Again!
Posted by: Carl Street on Jun 25, 2007 7:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Great American Media Myth of "Spunky Free-Thinkiing Honest Journalists" is once again proven to be false by the exception. This is "News" because it IS unusual; NOT because it is common.

Most Americans are too ignornt to know that the media is NOT in the "news" business; they are in the ADVERTISING business. As a former employer once told me over 40 years ago, "Don't go getting any ideas about breaking controversial stories, the ONLY reason we even have editorial is to keep the ads from banging into each other."

Month after month I saw stories killed and reporters disciplined for even attempting to break stories that management did not agree with. Sharing my experience with others from my peer group only confirmed my worst fears -- it was NOT just where I worked; it was ACROSS the whole spectrum -- print, radio, TV, etc. And it was everywhere from New York, Chicago, San Francisco, etc.

But the REALLY hard thing to stomach was the incredible ignorance of the typical American bubble-head. I would almost gag at social gatherings when people would come up to me and say, "It sure is a good thing we have a free press here in the USA". When I tried to tell them the truth, I was villified by both left and right. NO ONE wants to be told there is NO Santa CLaus.

Personally, I believe stories like the above are promoted to continue the illusion of a "free press". You will note that despite the inconvenience to some local Nobodies in Nowhere, Idaho, the "heroic" efforts detailed NEVER come close to threatening anyone of political significance outside this dog-patch county. So, I suspect this is just another attempt to keep the ignorant believing in the impossible dream -- in short, show business.

The mere fact that activity like this is news PROVES my point beyond anything I could say.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Courageous journalism
Posted by: farmer's daughter on Jun 25, 2007 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ya gotta love the sound of that phrase!! Let it be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Courageous journalism Posted by: alternetrose
How does Alternet choose which stories to promote?
Posted by: leighsure on Jun 25, 2007 12:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I got to this great story through the auspices of TomPaine.com. They recognized what a fantastic example of journalistic courage this was. Which is not to say that Alternet was asleep at the switch, just that as a daily reader of many of the Alternet postings, I know I never saw this one at the top of a page with bold headlines.
I have the sneaking suspicion that because this was not initially given priority few people were able to find it and comment on it. Like Google "hits", I think the stuff that is viewed most often on Alternet is what gets the most promotion, and thus continues the self-fulfilling "ranking" it was given to start with. Am I wrong?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Information is the story - and the desire to control information
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 25, 2007 3:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a great story, because it reveals the pressures that established interests will go to to keep information from the public. The fact that "three of our community's big forces ... the community's majority religion, the richest guys in town, and the conservative machine that controls Idaho" all got together to fight the story is pretty revealing.

The job of the press is to reveal the truth to the public and to sort out the gossip and rumors from the factual information. This benefits everyone (for example, parents who let the Boy Scouts anywhere near their kids) except for those who have something to hide.

Right now, the corporatocracy that runs the American empire has a whole lot to hide, as do their various servants and hangers-on. There are ridiculous levels of corruption in all areas of government as well as in the private sector. The response of the government has been to fire US Attorneys who prosecute corporate and government corruption. The response of the private sector has been to move corporate ownership into ever-more-secretive nets of hedge funds and banks and holding companies stacked on top of each other.

The press is supposed to report on all this secretive activity - but they've been thoroughly bought out and compromised by corporate interests. Any honest investigative reporting would have revealed that Iraq had no capacity for nuclear and biological weapons production before the war had started, for example.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cry me a river
Posted by: lawstudent08 on Jun 25, 2007 4:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your melodrama is a little bit too much and completely unrelated to this story. You're just some guy who posts on this website, not a reporter. You show an astonishing conceit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You are judged by the company you keep.
Posted by: Nuanced on Jun 25, 2007 8:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today Mitt Romney went to home of Frank VanderSloot, the multimillionaire in the article who tried to destroy the newspaper and who persecuted the reporters in order to protect the pedophiles. He attended a $250 a plate fundraiser at Mr. VanderSloots ranch. They are apparently old friends with many members of the VanderSloot family being big contributors to his campaign. Since the media has made a big deal about some of the "questionable" people connected to other candidates it will be interested to see the treatment Romney gets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Small potatoes
Posted by: danielgeery on Jun 25, 2007 10:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad the Post Register is finally actually doing some reporting. I saw a great many cases that they let slide, because it would be too upsetting to "the powers that be."

My own was one of them, which I've long since posted online, My Fun Days in Education, but which the Post Register would not go near with a ten foot pole--except to deliver my letter exposing the Shelley School District to the school district's lawyer, in a flagrant conflict of interest, which actually got me fired from a tenured teaching position.

I can say from firsthand experience that the whole political and legal system of Idaho amounts to a daisy ring of Good Old Boys who can't let go of each other. Bravo for the Post Register on this one, but this is barely last year's dusting of snow on a very ancient glacier.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternative Media
Posted by: TerryS on Jun 25, 2007 10:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, what an amazing story!

What's especially heartening is that so many
of the Idaho Falls residents supported the
newspaper and their circulation actually went
up.

On the question of what to do about a corrupt
corporate media. The answer is to boycott it and
instead support alternative media (i.e. independently
owned newspapers, blogs and online news).

Way to go Post Register and Idaho Falls !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pedophilia
Posted by: magistre on Jun 26, 2007 1:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not to get side-tracked, pedophilia may be the largest scandal (rising very high in the Feral Government and The Rich). If the true extent is ever known the poor may pay a return visit to "Judge Lynch".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WITCH HUNT
Posted by: Just Curious on Jun 29, 2007 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It sounds a little bit like a McCarthyite style witch hunt to me. What's so brave about these journos - all they seem to be doing is acting as self-appointed guardians of public morals as defined by the state; they'd just as easily be denouncing communists in an earlier era and many of you so-called Liberals would be cheering them on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]