Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Silence of the Bombs

By Norman Solomon, AlterNet. Posted June 11, 2007.


The numbers of Americans fighting and dying in Iraq are not a reliable measure of U.S. culpability in the continuing slaughter of Iraqis.
Normon Solomon

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Norman Solomon

Obama's Triumph Over Media Frivolity
Obama's Tuesday win represents a victory over a press corps fixated on fluff over substance.
May 7, 2008

Let's Party Like It’s 1932
Obama has the potential to become as great a president as FDR, while activists have the potential to prompt change comparable to the New Deal.
Apr 21, 2008

NPR: National Pentagon Radio?
When even public radio parrots the military's official line on the war in Iraq, what hope is there for unbiased, quality reporting?
Mar 27, 2008

More stories by Norman Solomon

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Three years have passed since most Americans came to the conclusion that the Iraq war was a "mistake." Reporting the results of a Gallup poll in June 2004, USA Today declared: "It is the first time since Vietnam that a majority of Americans has called a major deployment of U.S. forces a mistake." And public opinion continued to move in an antiwar direction. But such trends easily coexist with a war effort becoming even more horrific.

In Washington, over the past 25 years, top masters of war have preened themselves in the glow of victory after military triumphs in Grenada, Panama, the 1991 Gulf War, Yugoslavia and Afghanistan. During that time, with the exception of the current war in Iraq, the Pentagon's major aggressive ventures have been cast in a light of virtue rewarded -- in sync with the implicit belief that American might makes right.

"The problem after a war is with the victor," longtime peace activist A. J. Muste observed several decades ago. "He thinks he has just proved that war and violence pay."

The present situation has a different twist along the same lines. The Iraq war drags on, the United States is certainly not the victor -- and the U.S. president, a fervent believer in war and violence, still has a lot to prove.

Faith that American might makes right is apt to be especially devout among those who command the world's most powerful military -- and have the option of trying to overcome wartime obstacles by unleashing even more lethal violence.

These days, there's a lot of talk about seeking a political solution in Iraq -- but the Bush administration and the military leaders who answer to the commander in chief are fundamentally engaged in a very different sort of project. Looking ahead, from the White House, the key goal is to seem to be winding down the U.S. war effort while actually reconfiguring massive violence to make it more effective.

Two sets of figures have paramount importance in mainline U.S. media and politics -- the number of U.S. troops stationed in Iraq and the number of them dying there. Often taking cues from news media and many lawmakers on Capitol Hill, antiwar groups have tended to buy into the formula, emphasizing those numbers and denouncing them as intolerably high.

Meanwhile, the Iraqis killed by Americans don't become much of an issue in the realms of U.S. media and politics. News coverage provides the latest tallies of Iraqis who die from "sectarian violence" and "terrorist attacks," but the reportage rarely discusses how the U.S. occupation has been an ascending catalyst for that carnage. It's even more rare for the coverage to focus on the magnitude of Iraqi deaths that are direct results of American firepower.

In the United States, many advocates of U.S. withdrawal from Iraq have focused on what the war has been doing to Americans. This approach may seem like political pragmatism and tactical wisdom, but in the long run it's likely to play into the hands of White House strategists who will try to regain domestic political ground by reducing American losses while boosting the use of high-tech weaponry against Iraqi people.

Every night, I receive an email bulletin that's called "U.S. Air Force Print News." It's one of countless ways the Pentagon does continual outreach to journalists with messages that encourage favorable coverage of what the military is doing. Those messages are filled with stories about the bravery, compassion and towering stature of -- in the words of retired Gen. Colin Powell a decade ago -- "those wonderful men and women who do such a great job."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: media, iraqis, colateral damage, civilians, withdraw, iraq war

Norman Solomon is the author of the new book, "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death." The new documentary film of the same name, based on his book is being released directly to DVD in mid-June. For information about the full-length movie, produced by the Media Education Foundation and narrated by Sean Penn, go to: www.WarMadeEasyTheMovie.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The continuing slaughter....
Posted by: Michael Boldin on Jun 11, 2007 11:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sadly, this is the nature of war. It's all the more reason to oppose every single war this government wants to wage.

Aggressive war was once punished as a war crime back at Nuremburg. In my opinion, the murders in this aggressive war against Iraq hold serious moral and legal implications for all those involved.

The time to end the killing is now.

Some follow up reading:

"Collateral Damage is Murder" - click here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The continuing slaughter.... Posted by: Kitty Lady Oregon
Death and destruction come from policy, not the weapons
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Jun 11, 2007 12:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article but I will once again point out that the real issue is not the types of weapons used in a war it is the decision to go to war itself. One can debate the reprehensibility of cluster bombs vs. automatic .223 gunfire in urban areas but, at the end of the day, we are still fighting a war and the people that we want to kill will be killed. The issue is not the types of weapons being used the issue is how a nation uses its mililtary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Caesar77
Posted by: Caesar77 on Jun 12, 2007 3:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The American mainstream media is more intrested in Paris Hilton's mislead life, than innocent Iraqs dying at the hands of the Bush madness. We are either to lazy or in denial to seek the truth about the mess we have created in the Middle East.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BLACK SOLDIERS BETRAYED
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jun 12, 2007 4:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why hasn't the main stream media reported on the vote caging that took place in the "swing states" of Florida, Ohio and New Mexico? Please, when you're done reading all of the great pieces and responces on AlterNet, have a look at the piece I wrote on "The Rant" called, BLACK SOLDIERS BETRAYED
Also, I strongly suggest you read Armed Madhouse by the great journalist, Greg Palast.

Peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE REASON IS SIMPLE....THEIR SKIN IS BROWN
Posted by: kc10ken on Jun 12, 2007 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it so hard to understand that Americans have absolutely no compassion, care or concern about the deaths of over 655,000 innocent Iraqis while Halliburton and ole "5 deferrment" Dick Cheney enrich themselves at our expense?

Racists.....plain and simple.

The majority of supporters of dumbya's QUAGMIRE in Iraq are republican RACISTS. Yes, I said it and I mean it.

I haven't met a republican yet who isn't a racist under the skin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One More Thing....
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jun 12, 2007 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I forgot to make my main point....Last autumn, the death toll of innocent Iraqi men women and little children was estimated to be over 655,000 - not by the Bush Mob, to be sure, but by a group of people from - I believe - John Hopkins University who had carefully studied the matter. By now it should be nearing the 700,000 mark - or maybe even three quarters of a million!

If there is any justice in this world, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and the rest will be handed over to the Hague to be put on trial for war crimes. What's the point of even having international law if the leaders of powerful countrie like the United States and merrie ole England can break those laws without the fear of serious consequences?

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One More Thing.... Posted by: alternetrose
To put it succinctly
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jun 12, 2007 3:49 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George Bush is nothing but a murderer. He should be tried and executed for the murder of thousands, including the thousands of our soldiers who died for his ill thought out war. He is a monster. I hope to live to spit on his grave. That is the only reason I would ever go to Texas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The key goal is the oil
Posted by: Richar on Jun 12, 2007 5:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can’t agree with ‘the key goal is to seem to be winding down the U.S. war effort’. Surely, the key goals are to complete the theft of Iraq’s oil and make it permanent.

It is a plan that will go on record as the world’s greatest act of piracy. The Bush petro cartel expected the oil to be signed over to them in March, but the frenzied Iraqi resistance this year has been resisting that process. The main purpose for the military bases, built secretly at multi-billion dollars cost to the US taxpayer, is to defend the oil fields that Bush wants to develop. The only thing that could stop this would be a nuclear bomb on each from Iran. Iran has no such bombs and could not for several years, but Bush keeps talking of Iraq as a threat and, with already well-nuclear-armed Israel, wants to cripple Iran so it never could.

The only peaceful, and even honorable, end to this war would be the arrest of Bush, Cheney and many others for war crimes. Then Nancy Pelosi, as automatic new President, could apologize to the Islamic world and start making amends.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sign the oil law - have peace!
Posted by: Jersey Devil on Jun 12, 2007 6:22 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Silly Iraqis, don't they know all they have to do is sign away all their oil to American Corporations and the US forces will bail out leaving only 40,000 soldiers to guard the oil wells.
Wake up! the Republican War in Iraq is all about Oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not a Mistake, a Criminal Atrocity
Posted by: BobbyGreyFriar on Jun 13, 2007 9:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is important to emphasize that apropos of motives (and in many other respects, too) the Iraq War is very different from the Vietnam War. However, the viable solution for winning, i.e., conquering the the country, is the same in this case as it was in Vietnam: Killing a huge number of civilians, enough so that the rest will give up (a very difficult task it turns out)*. Unlike Vietnam, in the case of Iraq nothing short of total conquest will do. The war is not to stop a popular effort at liberation from an Imperial power, as in Vietnam. The war is to take control of Middle East oil; not to dominate the Middle East, but to dominate the world. Of course, in both cases the same fundemental operative desire was and is at work: Power (pecuniary profit comes a distant second in the hierarchy of priorities).

*"Against partisans backed by the entire population, colonial armies are helpless. They have only one way of escaping from the harassment which demoralizes them and tends towards a Dien Bien Phu. This is to eliminate the civilian population. As it is the unity of a whole people that is containing the conventional army, the only anti-guerrilla strategy which will be effective is the destruction of that people, in other words, the civilians, women and children."
(Jean-Paul Sartre, "On Genocide": for the Bertrand Russell War Crimes Tribunal, 1967)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]