Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Other than the desire to shock listeners -- and thereby create controversy, grow audiences and sell advertising -- the current spate of repulsive shock-jock gibberish all share something else: a salary from CBS.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

How to End the Reign of Shock Jocks

By Rory O'Connor, AlterNet. Posted May 16, 2007.


Other than the desire to shock listeners -- and thereby create controversy, grow audiences and sell advertising -- the current spate of repulsive shock-jock gibberish all share something else: a salary from CBS.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Rory O'Connor

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

What do recent radio references to "nappy-headed hos," raping Condi Rice, and "slimp flied lice" have in common?

Other than the desire to shock listeners -- and thereby create controversy, grow audiences and sell advertising -- the current spate of repulsive shock-jock gibberish all share something else: a salary from CBS.

Once peacock-proud of its self-styled "Tiffany" network -- so-called for its supposed devotion to quality -- the corporate heirs of William Paley traded public service for private profit long ago. But now no amount of filthy lucre can perfume away the stench wafting from the current trench of programming sewage being shoveled our way of late by such CBS on-air alleged "talent" as Opie & Anthony, JV and Elvis, and Don "I-Man" Imus.

It was CBS, of course, that offered Imus $40 million to render services of an "irreverent" and "controversial" nature -- and then fired him when he did the job too well. And it was CBS that hired JV and Elvis to crack wise on "The Dog House" before the "Imus effect" thankfully led to the cancellation of that program, after the hosts made a racist, sexist and homophobic on-air prank call ordering "slimp flied lice" from a Chinese restaurant.

And it was CBS that re-hired Opie and Anthony after dumping them five years ago for staging an on-air sex contest, complete with live coverage of a couple having sex in Saint Patrick's Cathedral. After outraged Catholics protested the desecration of their church, the duo looked for other employment -- and eventually found it, not only on XM satellite radio, where they staged their latest repellent stunt, but also on New York's WFNY-FM, where they are employed by -- wait, wait, don't tell me! -- CBS Radio.

Now that JV and Elvis are no longer in the house, having joined Imus on the unemployment line, and their Asian-mocking joking has left CBS execs with more community opprobrium, angry advertisers, and another gaping hole in their schedule, their fellow shock jocks Opie and Anthony should swiftly follow all three out the door. Maybe then their corporate overlords at CBS will finally learn that "making fun" of people because of their race, gender or sexual orientation really isn't funny, and that encouraging rape and violent assault is a criminal and not a comic act.

Unlike the CBS execs, the dopey duo -- whose real names are Gregg Hughes and Anthony Cumia -- at least had the sense to apologize last week after a guest on their XM satellite show advocated raping Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, First Lady Laura Bush and Queen Elizabeth of Britain. Here's a sample of their shocking "humor," as the hosts laugh and fantasize about the horror for Rice as studio guest "Homeless Charlie" is "holdin' her down" and assaulting her:

Voice 1 (Charlie): I tell you what -- what that George Bush bitch, Rice? Condoleezza Rice?

Voice 2 (Host): Condoleezza Rice.

V1: I'd love to fuck that bitch, man. (Laughter) She needs to fuck a man. I'd fuck her.

V2: I can just imagine the horror on Condoleezza Rice's face when she realized what was going on. (laughter)

V3 (Host 2): You were all just holdin' her down and, you know, fuckin' her. (laughter)

V1: Punch her all in the fuckin' face, saying, "Shut up, bitch." (laughter)

V3: That's exactly what I meant. (laughter)

(To hear the exchange, go Breitbart.tv">here)

So given the Imus effect, given the JV and Elvis situation, and given the known history of Opie and Anthony ... what did CBS do and say about the 'raping Rice' bit on XM?

Nothing and no comment, beyond the following statement by CBS Radio spokeswoman Karen Mateo: "Fortunately, we have standards that did not and would not ever let something like this make our air." No -- nothing like this -- just lame jokes about Asians and gays and stupid slurs against young, accomplished black women ...

The reaction from XM satellite radio was similarly curt. Asked whether the company would discipline Opie and Anthony, XM spokesman Nathaniel Brown said only, "We deplore the comments made on Wednesday's 'Opie & Anthony Show.'" It wasn't until almost a week later that the company announced that it would suspend the two jocks and cease broadcast of the show for 30 days ... an apology of sorts that only came, a company press release stated, after comments made by the pair on a May 14 broadcast "put into question whether they appreciate the seriousness of the matter. The management of XM Radio decided to suspend Opie and Anthony to make clear that our on-air talent must take seriously the responsibility that creative freedom requires of them."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: cbs, imus, shock jock

Filmmaker and journalist Rory O'Connor writes the Media Is A Plural blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Where Have You Gone, Lenny Bruce?
Posted by: Tom Degan on May 16, 2007 12:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
August 3, 2006 marked the fortieth anniversay of the death of comedian Lenny Bruce. One can't help but ponder the irony that the material that was getting him thrown in jail in 1964 seems positively quaint when compared to the "humor" that is being broadcast every morning during drive time from the studios of scores of radio stations across the country. While the so-called "shock jocks" of today might idolize Lenny Bruce, the similarities, if any, end right there. Lenny was an artist and a poet. He never once told a dirty joke; seriously!

At least Don Imus, occassional crude humor aside, was capable of discussing the serious issues facing this country with a variety of guests. The rest of these Shock Jocks are posessed of absolutely no redeeming social value. That being the case, why do these people thrive? The possible answer to that question has to be the dumbing down of the American people in the last thirty years or so.

Think about it: In the first half of the twentieth century, this country had a virtual glut of humorists. - I'm not referring to comedians, I'm talking about humorists - people who took comedy seriously and put a lot of thought into it: Mark Twain, Robert Benchly, Dorothy Parker, Fred Allen, Alexander Woolcott, S.J. Perelman. There used to be the Algonquin Roundtable, where the giants of literary humor would meet nightly for drinks and discussion. In 1933, when told that the colorless Calvin Coolidge was dead, Parker, without missing a beat quipped, "My goodness, how can they tell"? These people were funny!

No question about it a rebirth of American humor is long overdue.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Seeking out offensive speech
Posted by: JohnWalker on May 16, 2007 2:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm appalled at the use of Lenny Bruce to use as an attempt of how one thing is funny and the other is not. His life was tortured because people were disgusted with what he said. Now you are taking a one minute clip from a 5 hour weekly show and basing your judgement on that? Opie and Anthony did not even say those things. Barred that, you sought out the clip which was from a paid platform safely away from you with parental restrictions. We all know that parental restrictions can literally be used for parents because we cannot speak like adults anymore. You have to take some responsibilty. You were warned beforehand and still clicked the clip and you are outraged? Think before you let you loose your emotional argument which is completely subjective and has many ramifcations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Seeking out offensive speech Posted by: Conservasaurus
An Outlet for Anger
Posted by: sofla100 on May 16, 2007 2:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These guys basically appeal to an undercurrent of anger and frustration in America life. They use to rant more against the "liberals," "immigrants, or "minorities," but when that got old and the American Empire Project (Iraq) went South, they started to eat their own. Should any of us really be all that surprised? The frustrated masses, driving to work in the morning, stuck in another 2 hour traffic jam, burning unaffordable gas, all to go to a suck ass job that pays hardly enough to make the bills. Then to go home after work, to a spouse and kids who basically hate them anyway. Oh well, flip on the TV, pop a beer and zone out. Such is the American way of life. The jocks at least are an outlet for all the anger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: An Outlet for Anger Posted by: notabilia
» RE: mizani Posted by: bob t
» RE: An Outlet for Anger Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: An Outlet for Anger Posted by: peterx
More media hypocrisy.
Posted by: TheTruthSeeker on May 16, 2007 2:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Visit Rory O'Connor's blog -- Media Is A Plural -- and you will find an article titled “The Price of Press Freedom” that states the following:

“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression. And this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

Yet in his AlterNet piece, O'Connor proposes that radio listeners pressure “all the other advertisers on all Opie and Anthony programs to withdraw their support -- or face consumer boycotts of their products until they do so.”

Have I missed something? Would not such action interfer with Opie and Anthony’s right to “seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers”?

O’Connor clearly believes what his blog title says -- "Media is a Plural." One media he approves which should not be interfered with and another media his disapproves which should be hounded off the air. There’s a name for that kind of two-face belief system. Hypocrisy.

Speaking of hypocrisy, for the truth about our two-faced president, visit King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: More media hypocrisy. Posted by: dannrusso
» RE: More media hypocrisy. Posted by: DBachmozart
» You're missing the point Posted by: NthnBrazil
slimp flied lice?
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 16, 2007 3:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The PC crowd is loving this wave they're riding. How far will they go?

Calling a take-out place and asking for "slimp flied lice" is funny. Why can't the shock jocks do more of this stuff than the gratuitous sleaze they usually crank out? Oh wait...They can't anymore.

All of these radio characters are a reflection of our culture in all its ugliness. Once we're done suppressing, sanitizing and purging them, what will we replace them with? Political correctness is not funny, unless you're making fun of it.

To be honest, I won't miss these guys at all, because I never listen to them. I tune-in to NPR, BBC, and Democracy Now, but not because they're funny.

Everyone with a sense of humor should be stocking your underground shelter with videos of "All in the Family", George Carlin, etc. before it's too late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: slimp flied lice? Posted by: davewuxi
» RE: Kepstein7777 Posted by: bob t
RMP
Posted by: chronic on May 16, 2007 4:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This phase of political correct police trying to get every "shock jock" or other radio personalities fired from their jobs will pass. Advertisers will always buy their time on shows that have high ratings. These are actually the shows that are in question as of late. They need each other. As much as we need more people to listen to NPR and Air America, etc., this is not what the majority is interested in. It may be unfortunate, but it's true. The majority of people actually believe what they see and hear on the news is true. They also have more interest in Anna Nicole Smith and Britney Spears than our corrupt government and all those being killed in Iraq. When the advertisers are left without high rate air time to get their message on, they will tolerate anything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CBS NEEDS AN EXTREME MAKEOVER
Posted by: xbj on May 16, 2007 4:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sumner, I am NOT kidding. CALL or EMAIL ME; we MUST do LUNCH.

There IS money in class. And I know where.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Turnabout is fair play
Posted by: graylegend on May 16, 2007 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think those of us that feel the other way – that these firings and suspensions are craven capitulations to small noisy groups that can’t take a joke – should organize our own boycotts too. Any sponsor that threatens to pull their ads to force a personality off the air won’t get my business. Why should I support censorship by proxy?

I enjoy some of the shock jocks, like Howard Stern and Opie and Anthony. Their irreverence is refreshing in a world of canned news and bland entertainment. They tend to be equal-opportunity offenders, mostly going after self-important celebrities who really need to be taken down a peg. On occasion they gore one of my sacred oxen, and I change the station. Really, all this outrage is over the fact that *someone else* may be listening and chuckling when Imus makes a rude remark. When did we become a nation of uptight church ladies anyway?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Turnabout is fair play Posted by: JohnWalker
» Church ladies Posted by: kepstein7777
bigtime
Posted by: pnut on May 16, 2007 5:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We, you are outraged about what the I=man and others say, you think they are bad to the bone, how about this? one of the greatest news people we have, he did the most stupid things I have ever seen, on the evening news-or any place, after all the murder of the good people in Iraq, after the good men and women we have lost in Iraq, this man had the like of brains to ask Mr. Tony B if he would attack Iraq again if he had it to do over again-and tony said with out thinking (how could he think any way?) yes I would do it again, and this news man (who is better than the I-man) let this man off with his answer. Now how could any man ask a stupid question like that? After the killing of good people and the terriost it created by attacking Iraq, the money it cost us good Americans, the hell the good people of Iraq have had to suffer, now the I-man ask said ho or what ever is one thing but to ask would you do it again is unbelievable and tony to say I would do it again is more unbelievable and this mighty news man let him off look he never said a word to tony. Now how stupid is this? What kind of low life person would attack Iraq again? Bigtime

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Slippery slope
Posted by: yogachick on May 16, 2007 6:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it is hypocritical of people to be screaming about our freedoms being taken away one minute and endorsing silencing free speech the next. While I don't agree with what a homeless man said on Opie and Anthony's show last week, I do endorse the right for him and them to say whatever they want-free speech is absolute-there can be no exceptions. Once you start allowing for exceptions-we are really in trouble. This statement was said on XM Radio, which is a subscription service-those of us that like Opie and Anthony have to pay $12.95 a month and seek them out in order to hear them. If you don't like what they are saying-you can block their channel if you are a subscriber. You can also change to another channel-that is what they made the tuner button for. If you don't pay for it-you can't hear it at all. I think this country has gone mad-we have bigger issues to deal with here and we are focusing on this. Unbelievable

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Slippery slope Posted by: lamar
Are you saying that American culture has gotten rotten?
Posted by: Sojourner on May 16, 2007 6:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Public decency has become antiquated? Americans enjoy being entertained by garbage? Distortions that once were confined to the fictive perversions of yellow journalism are now mainline?

And it's all OK because Americans need distractions from the mind-numbing reality we inhabit? Is that what you're saying, Bubby?

There is no bottom in a race to the bottom. Competition keeps up the momentum. So hold on. We have a long way to go yet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Speaking of "Shock Jocks"...
Posted by: jimidee on May 16, 2007 6:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why not consider the godfather of shock, Jerry Falwell. With his message of divisiveness and condemnation, intolerance and radical political agenda, these other jock imposters of shock pale by comparison. Slimp flied lice...really! Nappy headed hos...is that the best ye' got?

I guess God finally got tired of his immoral minority message and withdrew his sponsorship.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Common Connection
Posted by: NoPCZone on May 16, 2007 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mel Karmazin- now running Sirius Satellite Radio. Most of what you lay at the feet of CBS came along when they bought his Infinity Radio operation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't like it, don't listen to it.
Posted by: lamar on May 16, 2007 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a boring, lame, monolithic world you want, O'Connor. Let me get this straight: not only do YOU not want to listen to shock jocks, but you believe that nobody should have the choice to do so. Do you know why shock jocks make a lot of money? Because a lot of Americans are classless assholes. But no worries!!! Rory O'Connor is going to clean the place up....

I have yet to hear a decent reply to "if you don't like it, don't listen to it." Turning this whole thing into a cultural zeitgeist is ridiculous. It smacks of "English only" initiatives, only here they would be "tasteful humor only" initiatives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For the lamenters, check out last night's Colbert Report
Posted by: haystack1317 on May 16, 2007 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After posting above about Stephen Colbert, I checked out some of last night's show and I urge you to do the same. In about 5 minutes, the sections on the McNulty resignation as Deputy Attorney General ("Ding Dong, the witch is dead!") and on a college student who complained to Fox News about having to watch An Incovenient Truth in class, Colbert delivers absolutely world-class satire. Both sections are hilarious and cutting.

If you go to www.comedycentral.com you'll see some icons on the left for different parts last night's show. If you click on them the motherload player will come up and then you can choose from the different sections. All are hilarious, of course, and the interview with the author of a new Einstein biography is a delight, but if you have only a few minutes to confirm that the Twain-like American humorist is not extinct, check out the McNulty and College sections.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I agree, Colbert is awesome.... Posted by: mrcentrist
Another symptom of American infantileism
Posted by: sausage on May 16, 2007 7:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yesterday, in a discussion on an unrelated topic, a commentor noted that "...more of us are acting like teenagers[.]" I am assuming, naturally, that by "us" the poster was referring to we Americans.

But as the Boomer generation moves into retirement it desparately clings to the facade of the "Youth Movement" of the Sixties. And, in some respects, not going gently into that long good night is good.

But American infantielism also has its downside, and the phenomena of the "shock jock" is one.

These radio clowns feed into the Boomers' desire to maintain a perpetual state of adolescent rebellion. Yet the shock jocks' targets of ire and ridicule, like that of the high school "jock" bullies, is not established power and the status quo but the weak, the outcast, the outsider, the powerless. Shock jocks' stock in trade is the mockery and disdain of foreigners, homosexuals, women and intellectuals.

What can be done? I have no answer. Their speech is protected by the First Amendment. The best solution may be to call up the local radio station and complain to the station manager about shock jocks. Or set up organizations, on the lines of these so-called "Christian-family" groups, to threaten product boycotts everytime one of these cases of arrested adolescent development make a stupid, bigoted statement on air.

The bottom line, shock jocks are not funny.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is it about "FREE" in free speech that people don't seem to grasp?
Posted by: MAD on May 16, 2007 7:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not sure if any of you have been following the Naomi Wolf vs. Alan Wolfe debate that has been raging over on the Guardian CiF, but judging by the material we're debating here on Alternet, it certainly appears that America is indeed on the road to fascism. A few excerpts from Ms. Wolf:

"I don't doubt that the press in America is working, but I am really scared about the fact that the free press is now a target of the Bush administration in exactly the way dictators classically target the press when they wish to close down an open society. I am worried that 'the media' has been listed on a US Army website as a security threat - dictators often target independent reporting as 'a threat to national security' - just as I am worried about the many examples of critical journalists who have been harassed by the Bush administration both here and, more violently, in Iraq."

"The press doesn't stop publishing, by the way, in a fascist escalation; it simply watches what it says. That too can be an incremental process, and the pace at which the free press polices itself depends on how journalists are targeted."

Ok - couple of points. Rape scenarios involving Condie and prank calls like the aforementioned are in extremely bad taste, but who the fuck are you (purveyors of refined taste that you are) to determine what is suitable for a wider audience and what is not? Are the offended who suffer the slings and arrows of "Shlimp Flied Lice" prank calls to be the sole arbiters of what gets censored and what doesn't? How about black females or the morbidly obese or homosexuals? Where does it stop? God knows that Alternet's readership would go straight in the tank if the anti-semitic remarks that so frequently grace this board were a measure of a site's worthiness.

When do we declare that the only right you have as a listener is the right to turn the dial or flip the switch. Jesus, this nanny state we're creating is the slow creep towards an all out Big Brother Apparatus. Come down here to Latin America where you can find the president of Brazil threatening lawsuits against press outlets who dare print negative comments about his performance. We're only a hop, skip and a jump from there now.

There will always be racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia and any number of other intolerant, ignorant stances, but stifling free speech is not the answer. You act as if by cutting Imus or some other obnoxious shock jock, American rednecks, bigots, xenophobes, etc. are going to enter into some prolonged period of introspection and arrive at the conclusion that making fun of the Asian inability to properly pronounce our "R" was hateful and wrong. Perhaps isolating and belittling these morons by using the right to free speech is the solution. Cuts both ways ya know.

Moreover, all we're doing is hastening the exodus to satellite radio where all bets are really off. Howard Stern has found a raunchy home at Sirius to the tune of $100 million a year. Don Imus will probably be next along with a host of other immature romper room playmates. It won't be long before the Gubment steps in to heavily regulate satellite radio as well I'm sure.

A lot of people warned you about the Imus backlash and it looks like the chickens have come home to roost. All is good now because our media moguls are sifting through the supposed chaff (politically incorrect) of broadcast journalists, but eventually they're going to zap a progressive media idol like Colbert and then you'll be left mouth agape wondering how something like this could happen when in fact the precedent had already been set for quite some time. Hello 1984!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Free speech is a lie... Posted by: frosty86
Copacetic?
Posted by: MartianBachelor on May 16, 2007 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm so glad to see both AlterNet and O'Lielly are entirely on the same page with regard to this Opie & Anthony business...

If shocks jocks are, well, occasionally shocking, aren't they just doing their jobs? I know everyone is confused and everything is topsy-turvy these days, but shouldn't Opie & Anthony be getting bonuses and not fired?

The curious thing to which more attention should be paid is that only those who are first to say or express a particular phrase or line of thinking get their heads handed to them, not the endless train of those who then get shocked, I say SHOCKED, and go on to repeat the exact same Bad Stuff. If this isn't a double standard against originality, which we need more of not less of, I don't know what is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When your argument sucks, construct a strawman and leave out some unfortunate facts
Posted by: NthnBrazil on May 16, 2007 7:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If O'Connor had bothered to research his piece a bit more, he would have known that Opie & Anthony never aired a live sex act. In fact, the "Sex for Sam 3" contest ('For Sam' because it was sponsored by Sam Adams beer, and # 3 because it had already run for 2 + years and was in its third run) urged couples to report where and when they would have sex in a public place so that a member of the show could be there and confirm via cell-phone. The couples were never on air during the acts. Full details at the Wikipedia entry, but telling the story accurately is inconvenient to O'Connor's argument.

One other interesting factoid left out by O'Connor is that the "outraged catholics" were none other than the Catholic League and the loathesome Bill Donohue. The very same Bill Donohue who has been (rightly) villified on this site for pressuring John Edwards' bloggers to resign, the Columbia U. Gook Joke nonsense , and the Chocolate Jesus protests I guess O'Connor didn't want to get any "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" vibes attached to his position. Unfortunately, when you attack free speech, you earn nasty bedfellows.

Why is this hit piece on a "progressive" website?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Start singing "I wish I was an Oscar Meyer weiner!"
Posted by: apeshow on May 16, 2007 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because our society is turning into a "Demolition Man" PC society where commercials rule the public airways. Oh wait, don't they already?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rape is not funny
Posted by: anniedine on May 16, 2007 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's not ok to joke about rape

ever

anywhere

for any reason

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: rape is not funny Posted by: JohnWalker
» RE: rape is not funny Posted by: anotheropinion
get it through your thick heads
Posted by: anniedine on May 16, 2007 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's not ok to joke about rape

ever

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: get it through your thick heads Posted by: haystack1317
» RE: get it through your thick heads Posted by: anotheropinion
» In a sense, yes Posted by: brunowe
» RE: In a sense, yes Posted by: frosty86
Misplaced Outrage
Posted by: cpt_safety on May 16, 2007 9:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love it when ACLU-minded liberals who hold up Lenny Bruce as a cultural icon get all self righteous when someone makes a horrible joke. What's that about? There's a glut of media out there and some carry some great humorists. Read the New Yorker, watch Colbert, buy the latest George Carlin CD. You don't HAVE to subscribe to XM and sift through hours of Opie and Anthony until you're offended enough to write an article in AlterNet.

I would never condone the jokes these people said, but Imus, for example spent a week's worth of his show apologizing and displaying his regret for his stupidity. Imus only said stupid crap occasionally. Usually, he was plugging his wife's environmental products and conducting some of the best interviews in the business with some serious newsmakers. Who's left to do that now? O'Reilly? Please.

Last I knew, none of these shock jocks were ever on "Morning Edition." How did Rory O'Connor ever hear about these "Shock Jocks?"

They all (jocks) were stupid to allow the edge (that some sponsor was forced to notice) to be crossed, but the self righteous drivel is just as repulsive, especially when Fox News and Limbaugh, etc. regularly make misogynistic, racist, anti-gay and anti-immigrant comments in the guise of REAL NEWS. Let's not forget the newly late, great Jerry Falwell or Pat Robertson? Where's the outrage from these same liberals?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Misplaced Outrage Posted by: haystack1317
» I like your first paragraph... Posted by: kepstein7777
End the shock jock filth the same way as filth rappers...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on May 16, 2007 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...don't rely on the heavy hand of government.

Just don't imbibe, or as Nancy Regan said, "just say no" to having it in the house or in the car.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Feminism is to blame
Posted by: apeshow on May 16, 2007 9:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Men are brought up to believe that only the rich and sports stars are real men. The rest are emasculated and told to shut up. Did you not expect a backlash?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My entertainment is better than your entertainment
Posted by: lamar on May 16, 2007 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By the looks of the comments thus far, I'd say the trial balloon on this issue has been shot down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Actually, I had planned on continuing to not listen to them
Posted by: brunowe on May 16, 2007 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The boycott strategy essentially allows to noisiest and most militant groups to define what gets issued over the airwaves. Like it or not, we share a country with enough people who actually want to listen to this stuff to keep it on the air. Get rid of the Imuses and Opie and Anthonys and they'll just find someone else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THIS IS WHY
Posted by: FBUSH on May 16, 2007 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is why I cannot identify myself with the left. I am far from being a republican however I agree with many of their views. I think it's absurd for anyone to try to ban radio host, words, music, movies etc. If you dont like that show then DONT tune it in! What is so hard about that concept? Dont ever for even one moment think that you should pick and choose what I get to enjoy. I wont pick and choose for you. Neo Liberals are out of control. The neocons want world domination and the New Liberals want to be dominated. This is America leave my rights alone!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: THIS IS WHY Posted by: fork
» RE: THIS IS WHY Posted by: elfinito
» RE: THIS IS WHY Posted by: lamar
» GREAT COMMENT ( Posted by: elfinito
» THANKS! Posted by: lamar
» RE: THIS IS WHY Posted by: babs
» RE: THIS IS WHY Posted by: elfinito
yesthe artickle is saying what people should like..but not asking congress to!!!
Posted by: elfinito on May 16, 2007 11:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article is cal those THAT AGREE...of course the article outlineas an argument with an attempt to persuade people to her belief...but thats fine...that's what opinion pieces are about.

The article is calling on the Laws and Congressional.FCC bans on shock-jocks, just on the people to stand-up. She thinks that teh market will speak....I think she is wrong, and all these articles are actually going to di is increase the ratings...because it proves that the shows are testing boundaries of our PC nation, and many people love it, and hate the PC thought police.

Her boycott methods, are actually more outside true capitalism, if its harassment by a few too overcome the actual market.

But attempting to convert to your views, to change the maket is a noble and true grass-roots method, necessary in Capitalism, that has been lost by America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OMG! Are those two guys givin' us the finger? Pass the smelling salts.
Posted by: fork on May 16, 2007 12:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I could've sworn that when I scanned Alternet this morning, those two guys in the accompanying picture on the homepage were extending their middle fingers.

But now it's all fuzzed out, so I can't tell what they're doing (rolls eyes).

Maybe I'm mistaken and the gesture was fuzzed out this morning. Anyone else remember?

Either way, is this for real? What is the purpose of the fuzzing out?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

not just the shock jocks...
Posted by: bemf on May 16, 2007 12:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think those of us interested in battling the misogyny, racism, and homophobia that dominates the radio landscape need to remember that it's not just the well-known "shock jocks" that promote these attitudes, but the whole radio establishment. Here in Grand Rapids (M