Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Supreme Court's decision this week that global warming is a problem the EPA can't ignore any longer should be an incentive for the rest of us to keep up the political pressure.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Supreme Court Puts the Pressure On

By Bill McKibben, Grist.org. Posted April 4, 2007.


The Supreme Court's decision this week that global warming is a problem the EPA can't ignore any longer should be an incentive for the rest of us to keep up the political pressure.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Bill McKibben

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 

Bill McKibben, an AlterNet guest columnist, is spearheading the Step It Up 2007 campaign. A scholar-in-residence at Middlebury College, McKibben's newest book is the forthcoming Deep Economy: The Wealth of Communities and the Durable Future. His column is reprinted by permission from Grist. For more environmental news and humor sign up for Grist's free email service.

Everyone's getting into the act!

The news this week that the Supreme Court has decided global warming is a problem, and the U.S. EPA can't just ignore it, is significant for two reasons. One, it's the law of the land. And two, just as importantly, it's one more sign that the tide has finally begun to turn.

Official Washington has spent two decades pretending that the laws of physics and chemistry don't apply inside the Beltway. But now Congress is taking it seriously, and so is the Supreme Court. The White House is the last bunker, and even there people must be turning a bit pale at reports from the front.

That's why it's more important than ever that those of us who know enough and care enough to take action ratchet up the pressure. The oil companies and the coal barons read the newspapers too -- they know that their days of a free ride are coming to a close, and the only question now is how high the fare is going to be.

But the answer to that question will decide the climatic future. You can be sure that they're preparing to sign on to the weakest deal possible -- and announce it as a triumph, the first step forward. CEOs will pose with congressfolk, editorialists will delight. But if the deal stinks -- if it falls short of the targets scientists now tell us are necessary -- than the celebration will be short-lived. Instead of a solution, it will mean only that the lid's been knocked off the pot and the pressure dissipated.

This moment won't arrive again for a few years (it's been 15 years since health-care reform disappeared from the congressional agenda) and by the time it finally does, the deepest kind of damage will be done. The White House is in a bunker, but there's another bunker to fall back to, and that's what's so perilous about the politics of the moment.

Which is why 80 percent by 2050 as a rallying cry is more important than ever. We need to remind both our opponents and our allies that compromise on the essentials simply isn't going to do the trick. It's not a political problem -- it's a problem of chemistry, and chemical reactions don't bargain.

We will pass the 1,200 rally mark today at Step It Up '07. In every corner of the country, people are demanding real action. And they're starting to be heard.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: supreme court, global warming, stepitup2007, bill mckibben, climate change

Bill McKibben is the author of "The End of Nature" and "Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
We Don't Have That Long
Posted by: NoPCZone on Apr 4, 2007 2:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Things were great at Pearl Harbor on the evening of 6 December, 1941 and nobody had any reason, from what could be seen, to expect anything to be different the next day. 12 hours later the world had changed forever, thousands were dead, the bulk of the Navy's Pacific Battleships were damaged or destroyed, the bulk of the Army Air Corps' bomber fleet lay wasted and the United States knew it was at war.

There is an additional threat that will tie into the global warming phenomenon and complicate things immensely. That thing is Peak Oil. It has it's own set of dire consequences, implications and also has been birthed by the world's addiction to fossil fuels. Peak Oil is for real and will force the world in an economically disruptive way if we don't get on with it.

The wonderful thing about looking at both issues is that much of what will address Peak Oil will also mitigate global warming. It's time we got going.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Since when does Bushie care about the Supreme Court nm
Posted by: cbcb on Apr 4, 2007 6:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
nm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

80% 80 or fight
Posted by: edith on Apr 5, 2007 1:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
slogans are great and McKibben has his 80% slogan. Until he spells out in detail how it will affect the average suburban worker/commuter's paycheck and job, he and the Big Emissions Cut lobby are open to quick punctures from oil and auto lobbyists who will point out that cap and trade or whatever McKibben actually wants to implement(how does he intend to cut 80%?) will impoversh the middle class. Would the middle class rather gradually cook and write off beachfront property than face loss of the backyard amenities and the van to haul the Kids around? You bet.

I'm not arguing for inertia. If we have to live early 20th century lives, fine by me. But, full disclosure and no green bull please. We've had enough Crawford Bull to foreswer BBQ for quite a while, thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The U.S Government is doing this!
Posted by: saywhat on Apr 5, 2007 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The U.S. EPA should look up at the sky at the toxic spraying by our own government. Chemtrails (that absorb rain) have been sprayed by our own government into the sky all over the U.S.A. for more than five years now, (almost every day for five years in my small town). And over much of the world. What do they expect?
The US Government is doing this!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fear mongers
Posted by: ng1944 on Apr 5, 2007 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Still remember all these crazy ideas about earth becoming
ice ball. As soon as we got rid of reps fear mongers,
we got dems fear mongers.
If democrats wants to win presidency in 2008, they have
to stay away from all these mad greens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Toxic Spray over the U.S. Wake up America!
Posted by: saywhat on Apr 5, 2007 11:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A method of modifying the weather, U.S. patent number 6315213 was filed November 13, 2001. This describes an alarming procedure. A Wright Patterson Air Force scientist stated at the time, that the planes are spraying barium salt, polymer fibers, aluminum oxide and other chemicals into the atmosphere to modify the weather and for military communications purposes. The patent specifically states: “The polymer is dispersed into the cloud and the wind of the storm agitates the mixture causing the polymer to absorb the rain. This reaction forms a gelatinous substance which precipitate to the surface below. Thus, diminishing the cloud’s ability to rain.” During this same time period the Saturday Review stated that a CIA report indicated that the U.S. government had the ability to massively manipulate the weather for war purposes. The jet chemtrail grid patterns now seen throughout the United States and the world are very likely this technology applied for military purposes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]