Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The new attack ad against Hillary Clinton seems to blur the lines between what we should be buying and who we should be voting for.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Vote Mac?

By Annalee Newitz, AlterNet. Posted March 26, 2007.


The new attack ad against Hillary Clinton seems to blur the lines between what we should be buying and who we should be voting for.
Advertisement

A Barack Obama fan, supposedly operating on his own time and not as part of the campaign, recently released a rather clumsy attack ad smearing Hilary Clinton on YouTube. No, it's not particularly amazing that spin-doc wannabes are splattering DIY attack ads on video-sharing networks. What's surprising is the content of this particular ad, which rips off an old Macintosh commercial from the 1980s.

The message? Vote Obama because he's just like an Apple computer. The ad is a mashup of Apple's infamous Big Brother commercial that aired just once, during the 1984 Super Bowl.

Directed by Ridley Scott (Blade Runner), it depicts a black-and-white world of industrial hell where only Macs can save us from fascism. Slack-jawed office slaves file into an auditorium where Big Brother delivers a garbled speech from an immense television screen. Just when the grimness gets overwhelming, a woman appears in bright red shorts and a Macintosh T-shirt. She runs through the auditorium in slow motion, wielding a sledgehammer, fleeing police. As Big Brother's speech reaches a crescendo, she hurls her hammer into the screen and shatters it. A few words scroll into view over the storm of glass dust: "On January 24th, Apple Computer will introduce Macintosh. And you'll see why 1984 won't be like '1984.'"

The only difference between the Obama ad and the old Mac commercial is that Hilary Clinton has been pasted into Big Brother's place on screen. She's droning out some speech about everybody working together, and the final words on screen read, "On January 14, the Democratic Primary will begin. And you'll see why 2008 won't be like '1984.'"

I'm weirded out by the idea that it's meaningful to compare the Democratic primary to the release of a new technological gizmo. Are we really supposed to feel stirred by the notion that our political leaders are computers designed by marketers?

Or that the only symbol the grassroots politicos can come up with to represent their candidate of choice is a computer that's been obsolete for 20 years? How, exactly, did we wind up with such impoverished political imaginations?

The fact is we didn't. Macintoshes are just the latest pop culture symbol that politicians have seized on to fake their connection to everyday American life. Hell, even Ben Franklin pulled the old pop culture trick when he plopped a coonskin hat on his head so that he'd look folksy when he arrived in France to round up some cash to fund the Revolutionary War.

Two centuries later, Bill Clinton used the Fleetwood Mac song "Don't Stop Thinking about Tomorrow" to symbolize his hipness when he was inaugurated. Obama's supporters are using hippie computers instead of hippie rock to make the same point.

Think about it: Apple computers of the '80s represent a hopefulness about the power of technology to bring us together that the country has all but forgotten. Sort of the way we forgot about prog rock.

But do Apple computers represent what they used to back in the day? Not if you are keeping up with the times. Over the past few months, in fact, Apple has launched its own series of attack ads on the Windows PC. You know the ads I mean -- the ones where the Macintosh is personified as a snotty, black-clad hipster type who goes around feeling sorry for the PC, a bumbling, nerdy guy in a suit who can never quite get his peripherals to work.

Unfortunately for Apple, the attack ads have backfired. The PC character is played by John Hodgman, a popular satirist who appears regularly on The Daily Show and This American Life. His PC comes across as a populist everyman being unfairly taunted by a younger, cuter model with lots of nice hair but no brains.

Everybody wants Hodgman in the living room, even if he crashes occasionally. He's us. He's America. The only person who wants that annoying Mac guy around is, well, the sort of person who thinks it's brilliant to change one tiny aspect of an old TV commercial and rebroadcast it online as if it's the new citizen media taking on the political system. If Obama is the Mac, then I'm voting PC.

No, wait, I'm buying a PC! Oh crap -- am I at the store or in a voting booth? It's so hard to tell the difference.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: election08, barack obama, hillary clinton, apple, mac

Annalee Newitz (annalee@techsploitation.com) is a surly media nerd who figures all the voting machines are rigged to vote for the Zune anyway.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
wtf?
Posted by: evopsycho on Mar 26, 2007 5:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The point wasn't the COMPUTER it was the SETTING. Yes, Obama replaces Macintosh in the ad, but what part of Hilary Clinton being Big Brother did you miss?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: wtf? Posted by: aethr
So ...
Posted by: just john on Mar 26, 2007 5:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... where's the Linux?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Collision between tech and politics, reality and surreality.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Mar 26, 2007 6:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you (in the general sense) don't like something and you adopt the role of Jonny the Amateur Political Campaign Strategeorizer, everything is "fascist" or "racist" or "1984" incarnate. Hence the DIY addvertisement for Obama, which focuses on Clinton's faults (of which there are many) instead of Obama's positives (which remain vague, even to his colleagues--but at least "articulate" has fallen off the radar for a while).

Macintoshes are just the latest pop culture symbol that politicians have seized on to fake their connection to everyday American life.

Everyday Americans buy a techturd that says "Dell" on the front and call up tech support once per quarter. This analysis missed the mark; old geeks (well, baby boomer's baby geeks) remember McApple as the company that squandered it's dominance by insisting on highly restrictive licensing and proprietary hardware-software interfaces. McApple made it "my way or the highway" and everyone pretty much jumped on the superhighway exit labeled "information" by way of DOS, even though the only thing that the first three versions could do was respond to input with "bad command or filename". Back on point, to "everyday Americans", McApple is a music distribution company that is trying to reinvent itself into what it what it might it might have been.

Like one of the other posters, the "where's linux" is an apt question. Political linuxes (lini?) are out there, and they are waiting for the day that America wakes up and realizes that two (2.00) political parties can not hope to represent the disparate interests of three hundred million (300,000,000.00) Americans.

As an aside, my PC is for games, and my Linux laptop is for work. If it wasn't for the money in developing computer entertainment, Windows probably wouldn't stand a chance against a fast, stable, free-as-in-beer distro like Ubuntu. Not that I'm advocating Hilary and Co.'s stance on video game censorship...just an aside that struck me at the moment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Spare us the ageist clichés
Posted by: wwittman on Mar 26, 2007 9:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Hippies" didn't make or buy Apple computers and "hippies' didn't make or buy Fleetwood Mac.

Spare us the generational bullshit.

It makes whatever your point was seem as petty as this bit of name calling nonsense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Way Off The Track
Posted by: NoPCZone on Mar 26, 2007 10:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm guessing you were not a film or lit major in college. Talk about missing the point of both the original Apple ad and the remix for Obama. Just a note- I do not support Obama for President, although I see him doing O.K. as a Senator so far.

In 1984, the IBM PC was on the market and was seen as dominating the world, running a command line program that was difficult, at best, for the average Joe or Jane to use. There was no choice as to PC vendors as the IBM system was a closed platform and IBM was widely seen as a monolithic and authoritarian dominator of all information systems. Enter the Macintosh.

The Macintosh introduced computing to the general public in the manner that today's users of LInux, UNIX, Macs or Windows PCs see as normal. Where a mouse using graphic icons and menus direct the complicated code underneath, replacing the arcane code commands for common tasks. Instead of a desktop with icons and menus, a PC presented you with a blank screen and a command prompt like this:

C: /
or
A: /

If you didn't know what to tell it- precisely- you were out of luck. The Macintosh was simple enough that most anybody could quickly learn how to use it. In PC world it wasn't until the launch of Windows 95, 11 years later, that most PC users would discover the joys of using a mouse or trackpad.

The Apple 1984 ad was aired around the launch of the Macintosh computer, announcing to the world that there was another option- that IBM's way was not the only one. The fact that the year was 1984 made the imagery of Orwell's classic novel, widely referenced in the popular culture of the time, a natural choice. The IBM PC running PC DOS did die a slow death with the launch of Microsoft Windows which has continued to ape the look, feel and function of the Macintosh to this very day.

The 1984 tie-in is also an obvious one for Billary. She has raised so much money and already opted out of public financing, hoping to buy the nomination before anyone else could get in. Once Obama's candidacy became a possibility, the field has opened up and she doesn't look like the shoe-in the DLC was hoping for.

As to the swipe at the Macintosh and Apple, some of us like to actually use our computers rather than babysit them. The old tag line of 'It just works' still applies. To put it in Clintonese:

Why a Mac?
"It Just Works, Stupid."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dirty Trickster
Posted by: Canaan on Mar 26, 2007 10:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You do know that the 'Barack Obama fan' was a political professional--with a track record of vicious dirty tricks in Ohio--who worked for Obama's media team, don't you? Not only did the guy pirate Apple's intellectual property for self-promotion, the concept was a direct rip-off of a 2006 anti-Lieberman ad (and we know how that turned out).

The ad has backfired against Obama. You have to be drinking the anti-Hillary kool-aid to get the 'Big Brother' symbolism some people talk about. Zogby poll shows most people--outside the lefty blogosphere--were offended by the attack. (Just like Mac has, what, 5% market share--and I'm a Mac person.) The irony is 1984 didn't turn out that well either for the 'Beefless' candidate Gary Hart, or for the eventual far left nominee Walter Mondale. I certainly hope 2008 is not like 1984 - a Giuliani landslide.

And speaking as a media pro myself, the disrespect to Obama by ParkRidge47 is revealing. I would never mess with a client's 'brand' like that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DavidCPowell
Posted by: DavidCPowell on Mar 27, 2007 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Annalee

Forget how the Mac and PC actors look. The real message is that the Mac is a better, easier to use computer. No, I’m not a young guy with nice hair. I am 80 years old with little hair but plenty of brains. My retirement community has more Mac than PC users. Does that tell you something about ease of use?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DIE MAC DIE!
Posted by: charlieparisek on Mar 27, 2007 10:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kisses and sweets to Annalee!

Anything to keep Macs on the shelves and out of the hands of consumers is OK by me!

I'd be financially fucked if I couldn't bail out clients who are so absorbed with their Wintel networks (and the Byzantine complexity of the Windows OS) that they can't see the forest for the tress.

In the meantime, I got work to do. Back to my Mac....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gatesware slaves
Posted by: DaBear on Mar 27, 2007 4:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately for Apple, the attack ads have backfired. The PC character is played by John Hodgman, a popular satirist who appears regularly on The Daily Show and This American Life. His PC comes across as a populist everyman being unfairly taunted by a younger, cuter model with lots of nice hair but no brains. Everybody wants Hodgman in the living room, even if he crashes occasionally. He's us. He's America. The only person who wants that annoying Mac guy around is, well, the sort of person who thinks it's brilliant to change one tiny aspect of an old TV commercial and rebroadcast it online as if it's the new citizen media taking on the political system.

Uh, no. I know I'm not the only one who identifies with the hipster kid feeling bad for the put-upon PC dope. I'm here to annoy ya', Annalee... big time ('cept my hair is short and I gotta beard!). In no way have I ever even imagined empathy with Hodgson. His character is a stupid schmuck and accurately portrayed as the poor stoopid 'Merkaans who insist on using a cheaper, poorly made knockoff of a real machine.

The saddest thing is, no matter how stuck up Jobs may be, his company builds a better product, period. My entire family switched to Macs after years of fighting virus after virus (not that Macs don't get their share but that share is way lower overall), wrestling with "where'd my file go" and other manner of stoopid shit thanks to Gatesware crap. Annalee, if your not using a PC with linux, you'd better be using a Mac... otherwise, I've lost all respect for 'ya.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Gatesware slaves Posted by: lamar
AF
Posted by: catfish on Mar 27, 2007 6:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The hipster kid is a major turnoff. And so is the smarmy attitude of Mac cultists everywhere.

I'm attracted to the product but the condescension of its users I could really do without.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No offense
Posted by: gjames on Mar 28, 2007 12:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But isn't the logic that you would want the guy who doesn't work right rather than the one who does the same logic that brought us President George W. Bush? The answer is yes :P

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wait... two points
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 28, 2007 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First off... that line is already thoroughly blurred. Please don't be so blind to the role of consumerism

Secondly, How utterly idiotic is it to conflate the ad in this way? I thought you techno-hipsters understood this whole ironic 80s reference thing... I guess you're just easily confused... that, or you just had a deadline and nothing to write about... because you aren't willing to take anything but the "gee-ain't-it-neat-and-unquestionably-good-and-wonderful" tack when writing about technology... and when there is no new product or service coming out that is really flashy and sexy... you have to really scrape the barrel to come up with something to write.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wait... two points Posted by: lamar
» RE: Wait... two points Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Wait... two points Posted by: lamar
Hmm...
Posted by: McJulie on Mar 28, 2007 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately for Apple, the attack ads have backfired.

While I agree that the actor representing the PC is more charming than the one representing the Mac, this does not demonstrate that the ads have backfired. Apple losing ground in the marketplace and people citing those ads as a reason would demonstrate that the ads have backfired.

But the H.Clinton 1984 thing bothers me a lot, because I was hoping that maybe this time around the Democrats could avoid ragging on the other Democrats, and rag on the Republicans instead.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The primaries are a year away...
Posted by: xconservative on Mar 28, 2007 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and people are obsessing over a home-made ad? Wake me up when the silly season ends.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

1984
Posted by: undercover on Mar 30, 2007 12:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A lot of you seem to be missing the fact that many if not most of the people watching the video on Youtube were not even alive in 1984 (or, like me, were too young to remember the famous Superbowl ad). For us, the ad is about Fascism vs Democracy, not Mac vs PC. Unless the ad is linked to the original Superbowl commercial (I haven't checked) don't expect those of us who were born in the 80s to get the marketing tactic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Irony in 1984 copyright issue
Posted by: lamar on Apr 2, 2007 8:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of note, the owners of the copyright for 1984 sent a chill letter to the makers of the anti-Hillary ad. What irony that the new owners of the copyright are using it to stop a political advertisement. Of course, the owners (Rosenblum Productions) are the embodiment of the term "copyright vulture." Disclosure: I am in favor of copyright, but right now copyright law seems to be cranked as loud as it will go. The more the industry lobbies Congress for copyright perks, the more chill letters will be sent out, the more cases will be won by the media interests and the less free our country will be. The Rosenblums jumped the gun, but if we do nothing, anything you say about 1984 could get you sued. Stupid sexy copyright vultures.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Like To Hear You Think
Posted by: hole11 on Apr 16, 2007 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just wish I could figure out how to get a link every time she posts new commentary.

Finally a female writer I like.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]