Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

What's an Opinion Worth?

By Sean Gonsalves, AlterNet. Posted March 23, 2007.


How to combat the anti-intellectual virus.
Gonsalves

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Sean Gonsalves

Will Wikileaks Revolutionize Journalism?
While journalists should view Wikileaks with some skepticism, it cannot be ignored. Welcome to the brave new world of investigative reporting.
Jul 7, 2008

Who Cares About the Vice President?
The VP used to be a bench-warmer called in to perform PR tasks. When did vice presidents become important political figures?
Jun 24, 2008

What Liberal Media?
If the media are so liberal, why did most mainstream news outlets swallow Bush's lies about Iraq?
Jun 17, 2008

More stories by Sean Gonsalves

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Unless you become as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. -- Jesus

My daughters Shanice and Jasmine have asked me over the years: how do you write your column? And my son, Sean Jr., I pray, will one day raise the same question. I'll leave the technical details aside and instead tell you about the framework I use.

Your grandmother tells me I never did crawl before I learned to stand on my own two feet. I just up and started walking -- no running -- at 10 months old. It wasn't until I had become a full-fledged member of the upright that I began to experience the joy of groveling around on my hands and knees. And that's pretty much been the story of my life, up to this point (minus the diapers, though not the groveling).

So it shouldn't surprise you to know, I started writing this column two or three years before the Irish luck in my first name landed me a job as a reporter. It usually works the other way around. Reporter first. Then, if you're lucky, a column.

I'm sure there's some psychological/developmental hang-ups spawned by my hurry-up-and-wait DNA but there are advantages to being impatiently ambitious -- one being: it can go a long way in convincing someone to actually pay you to write, which is no small feat considering that every literate human being on earth can communicate through the written word, on some level.

Even though I disagree deep in my bones with just about every non-baseball related column George Will has ever written, he's the one who led me to column-writing. One day I saw him being interviewed on C-Span and he said something like: "I have the best job in the world. I get paid to read, write and talk to people."

I said to myself: that is the best job in the world! I should do that. And I did. In my case, I wanted to play the role of witch-doctor confronting the Anti-Intellectual (AI) virus ravaging this country and to help develop the atrophied muscle of human empathy concerning "the least of these among us," to borrow Jesus' words.

If you choose to step into the ring -- and writin' is fightin' -- watch out for the anti-intellectual virus, as seen in the un-scientific opinion of those who equate evolution with creationism while arguing against the scientific consensus on global warming.

A strain of the AI virus young people are particularly susceptible to contracting I call the one-opinion-is-as-good-as-the-next disease. It attacks the mind's eye, misleading its victim into thinking that all opinions are created equal. There are knee-jerk opinions, which you can hear all day long on right wing radio, and then there are informed opinions. The virus also attacks the mind's ear.

To the afflicted, this all sounds "elitist." But there's three guiding principles that will help you separate the wheat from the chaff. The first principle of sound opinion: intellectual honesty. It's not about being "objective." It's about the honest pursuit of truth, with a bias toward the voiceless and powerless, affirming the values explicitly laid out by Joseph Pulitzer himself (and implicit in biblical ethics) while acknowledging the inherent worth of informed dissenting opinions.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: column writing, opinion

Sean Gonsalves is a Cape Cod Times staff reporter and a syndicated columnist.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Educating Intellectuals
Posted by: aethr on Mar 23, 2007 6:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"... come out the closet ..."

Are you black? You sound black.

We've come to think of education as elitism and job training as education. Engineers and businessmen and all sorts of similar tradesman are important to society but they're not educated. Education is art and science. Science and art teach us about human knowledge and experience and their limits - where the questions are. If we want out children to be intellectuals we must give them real educations, not just job training.

That's my hobby horse. And if you think I'm racist from the "black" comment, remember I saw your picture before I wrote this post. I have a very dry, get-me-in-trouble sense of humor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Educating Intellectuals Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: ducating Intellectuals Posted by: lynned2002
» RE: Educating Intellectuals Posted by: Edward George
» RE: ducating Intellectuals Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: ducating Intellectuals Posted by: ABetterFuture
Who is an Intellectual?
Posted by: BobbyGreyFriar on Mar 23, 2007 8:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the quote of Jesus is a very dubious one; but that depends on how it is interpreted—it seems be an admonishment of taking responsibility for one’s self, instead putting ones care in the hands of some higher authority. It seems to me to be both anti-intellectual and illiberal. Perhaps I am mistaken though.

I think the term anti-intellectual is widely abused. In general it is used by liberal academics who seem to feel they should be treated like celebrities. When one reads the nonsense that comes out of the academy (e.g. postmodern philosophy) it is hard to feel sympathetic—esp. when there are so many serious problems that desperately need attention.

Finally, how do you define intellectualism? Reading books? Certainly not tasks that require a great deal of mental effort. If this were the case then mechanics would be regarded as leading intellectuals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who is an Intellectual? Posted by: TerryS
» RE: Who is an Intellectual? Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: Who is an Intellectual? Posted by: bluepilgrim
» Matthew 18:3 Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Matthew 18:3 -- mechanics Posted by: bluepilgrim
You really disappoint me .....I mistakenly thought your column showed some...
Posted by: ekipnrut on Mar 24, 2007 3:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
compassionate insight...WTF was I thinking??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nope. Wrong. Posted by: ABetterFuture
A mind is a terrible thing to waste.....
Posted by: willymack on Mar 24, 2007 7:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Too bad it's so friggen popular.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I disagree
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Mar 25, 2007 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
700 words is more than enough to make your point if you write in plain English, stay focused, and avoid self-indulgence. I don't need to hear about your sports knowledge, your love-hate relationship with George Will, or a bunch of quotes to show that you're deep and well-read.

Many "intellectuals" like to be wordy and rattle off volumes in order to impress each other and feed their egos. Not that you necessarily fit that description, but you know what I'm talking about.

On the plus side, you may have something with Jesus and the children. Few things in the Bible make sense, except the things that Jesus spoke about in simple terms: the good Samaritan, the widow, the prodigal son...

The best way to combat anti-intellectualism is to stop being an intellectual. Practice writing your column so your children can understand it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I disagree Posted by: sayswho
scientific method is the basis of rationalism
Posted by: drblack on Mar 25, 2007 6:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have discissed this topic many times with friends.
We all agree with you. Opinions about what one likes are all equal, but opinion about things like public policy ,the effects of substances on the body, how old the world is etc. are not at all equal and often have nothing to do with opinions.
It is sad that Americans no longer seperate their personal opinions from their opinions on public policy.
I find theistic religion and gansta rap to be the height of stupidity in my personal opinion. My public policy opinion is that people should listen to and believe in what they want.
Americans should understand the scientific method ,and learn to use it. Science is what has propelled every advancement in the last 150 years.
Asia is turning out scientists in much larger numbers then the USA and we will become a third world country if that doesn't change.
We would all be speaking German if it wasn't for the past excellence of American science. WW2 took men of courage and excellent technology to win.
In order to move beyond our dependence on petroleum we need science.
With science all things are possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Offer any opinions; they are worth much to me
Posted by: Betsy L. Angert on Mar 25, 2007 7:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Sean Gonsalves . . .

Months ago I was scheduled to teach an elective course in writing. I pondered why pupils might choose to take the course. In writing the curriculum, I too posed the question. I decided to answer it for myself.

I, like you could not wait. I began walking, talking, and toilet trained myself at eight months. However, as the adults looked on in wonderment, I felt there were expectations. I feared failing and being successful.

You write . . . "I'm sure there's some psychological/developmental hang-ups spawned by my hurry-up-and-wait DNA but there are advantages to being impatiently ambitious -- one being: it can go a long way in convincing someone to actually pay you to write, which is no small feat considering that every literate human being on earth can communicate through the written word, on some level." I admire you gumption and your gift. I was late in realizing my preference and passion.

I too write about the indelicate issues. Public policy, pedagogy, puberty, and philosophical ponderings are my subjects, you know, the taboos . . . religion, sex, and politics.

I discuss these knowing; no one can change the mind of another. We, authors and all others, can ask questions and stimulate deep thought. That is why I write. Perhaps my words will have an effect on the next generation, [or even those still in power.]

I hope some day soon, we, throughout this planet will live with the Seventh Generation in mind.

I invite you to read Why I Write and Write, Then Write Again or any of my other missives. I offer a few possibilities below. Please ponder as a child might; infinite curiosity allows for impossible dreams coming true.

Offer any opinions; they are worth much to me.
Evolutionary Biology Lost By Design; Scientific-Creationism Rises?
Sex Education; Abstinence or Advancing Knowledge?

Betsy L. Angert
BeThink.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes!
Posted by: RobbieUMD on Mar 26, 2007 10:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a columnist for a college newspaper and this really resonated with me. Thank you, Mr. Gonsalves!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]