Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Libby, "The Fall Guy"

By Rory O'Connor, AlterNet. Posted March 6, 2007.


Scooter Libby faces up to 25 years in prison for obstructing the investigation into the leak of a CIA agent's identity, but he didn't do it alone ...
Rory O'Connor

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Rory O'Connor

Is the Tyranny of Right-Wing Radio Coming to an End?
The notion that the days of right-wing dominance of the airwaves may well be numbered is rapidly becoming a reality.
Jun 20, 2008

Talk Radio's Last Stand?
Talk radio "shock jocks" are fretting publicly about the supposed return of the long-defunct Fairness Doctrine.
Jun 11, 2008

Laura Ingraham: Right-Wing Radio's High Priestess of Hate
Shock radio host Ingraham is a master of sounding funny and appealing while dishing out the same hate speech as Sean Hannity.
Jun 7, 2008

More stories by Rory O'Connor

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

''It was said a number of times, what are we doing with this guy here?" Denis Collins recalled his fellow jurors asking, as he spoke to the press immediately following the pronouncement that Scooter Libby was guilty on four of five felony counts. "Where's Rove? Where are these other guys?

"I'm not saying we didn't think Mr. Libby was guilty of the things we found him guilty of," Collins added. "It seemed like he was, as Mr. Wells put it, he was the fall guy.''

Collins is correct: It WAS Libby's own lead defense attorney Ted Wells who had claimed weeks ago in his opening statement that his client was being made a scapegoat to protect key White House political operative Karl Rove, so as not to endanger President Bush's 2004 reelection campaign. It was good that the jury reminded us -- and also good that they paid such attention to detail, undertook such painstaking analysis of the evidence and ultimately came to the correct conclusion. But most of all it was good that they were still asking those many unanswered questions.

But before the rest of us join in the jurors' "tremendous amount of sympathy for Mr. Libby," let's remember that the sword Libby has fallen on to protect his higher-ups will likely yet prove to be a blunt one.

After the verdict was announced, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said, "It's about time someone in the Bush administration has been held accountable for the campaign to manipulate intelligence and discredit war critics." I agree. But is that really what has just happened? I think not -- although ample evidence exists of such a campaign, the Libby trial was obviously (and properly) much more narrow in its scope, as both Judge Reggie B. Walton and chief prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald rightly kept the focus on the issue before them of whether or not Libby had lied and obstructed justice.

And it's certainly true that the Libby trial "revealed deeper truths about Vice President Cheney's role in this sordid affair," as Reid concluded. But the likelihood that President Bush will act on Reid's suggestion and "pledge not to pardon Libby for his criminal conduct" is so low as to be laughable. Ted Wells says he will submit a motion for a new trial, and that if that motion is denied, he will appeal. But Libby's presidential pardon is due to arrive sometime in January -- long before his guilty verdict will ever be overturned on appeal.

Libby, of course, is the only person ever indicted after a multiyear investigation that ultimately reached deep inside the White House. The central issue in that investigation revolved around allegations that someone within the White House illegally disclosed classified information during the late spring and early summer of 2003, when it was revealed that Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who had criticized the Iraq policy, was married to an undercover CIA operative, Valerie Plame.

No one was ever charged with the leak -- which turned out to have emanated originally not from the White House but from the State Department in the person of Richard Armitage -- but the results of the investigation nonetheless involved both the administration and the lapdog Washington press corps, and told us much about the top-level nexus of Big Politics and Big Media, "casting a harsh light on the way power and information flows in Washington," as the Washington Post put it, "the uneasy symbiosis between an elite tier of Washington journalists and their confidential sources inside the government."

In particular, the trial demonstrated conclusively that Scooter Libby's boss -- Vice President Cheney -- was far more involved in the campaign against Joseph Wilson than had previously been apparent. The prosecution showed that the vice president dictated specific talking points he wanted Libby and others to use to against Wilson, helped select journalists to talk to, and even had the president declassify secret intelligence reports to undercut Wilson's criticism.

"There is a cloud over what the vice president did," Fitzgerald told jurors in his closing argument. "That's not something we put there. That cloud is not something you can pretend is not there."

The fact is that this is the first trial of the criminal Bush-Cheney Iraq war -- and unless Scooter is taken care of, it won't be the last. That's why the pardon is a certainty. If the sword Libby falls on doesn't prove to be blunt, it could well reveal a double-edge -- and there's no telling who might then be cut or how deep those cuts would be.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: cia, plame, libby

Filmmaker and journalist Rory O'Connor writes the Media Is A Plural blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Democrats MUST impeach, even if he ends up not convicted
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Mar 6, 2007 2:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republicans impeached Bill Clinton for perjury about consensual sex. Thus the standard is set awfully low. How can the Democrats not impeach Cheney for lying in order to get the country into a war? The Founders would think you were wimps if you didn't do it -- and there really is no political downside, is there?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Too true to believe Posted by: Lincoln fan
Key Defense is Shameful for Government Service
Posted by: thehousedog on Mar 6, 2007 4:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The key defense was that Mr. Libby was a very forgetful person - that he may not remember what somebody said to him in the morning later that day.

What kind of people do we have in government who would HIRE somebody like this in the first place? And to think that somebody who can't remember critical information is serving the Vice President?

Oh - well, I guess it does make sense now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Libby, other neocons were obsessed with Israel
Posted by: Moonray on Mar 6, 2007 4:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iraq isn't about the oil, although the oil is the sweetener. Iraq is about Israel -- more specifically, protecting Israel from a new generation of weapons, especially missiles, that were being developed by Saddam and are still being developed by Iran.

Scooter Libby, Doug Feith, Richard Perle and several other neocons are closely linked to the Israel Lobby and since the 1990s most have advocated the U.S. attacking Iraq and Iran.

Oddly, the pivotal role of the Israel Lobby in all this is rarely mentioned. That needs to change, and Americans need to discuss these matters fully and openly without fear of being labeled anti-Semites. For more info, Google the key players and the Israel Lobby.

We need to stop pretending that Libby, Cheney and the others railroaded the U.S. into attacking Iraq merely on a whim or for the bogus WMD story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CHENEY WILL RESIGN
Posted by: drricklippin on Mar 6, 2007 5:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last Feb our Vice-President accidentally shot a lawyer in the face.(not our VP's worst mistake but a metaphor for his meltdown)

It's really been downhill ever since.

Today his former chief of staff was found guilty for lying to a Federal Grand Jury and will go to jail.

Mr.Cheney is implicated in so many scandals himself it's hard to keep track of them.

Also the stress is obviously wearing on him. In addition to his bad heart he now has blood clots in his legs to say nothing of the recent explosion he narrowly avoided. A U.S. senator literally called him "delusional" about a month ago.

As a physician I'd really rather that he not die in office.

I do believe for his own sake, for his family's sake and, most importantly, for the sake of our nation that Mr.Cheney deliver his letter of resignation as soon as possible.

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CHENEY WILL RESIGN Posted by: ChicagoPaul
mr.ed
Posted by: mr.ed on Mar 6, 2007 7:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know lots of attorneys, including my sister, who prosecutes other lawyers for their licenses. Unless they're mentally impaired, not one forgets anything anybody ever said concerning a legal matter. Ever.
Lube up, Irv Libby. It's gonna be a long vacation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Halliburton In Iran Despite Sanctions - Next, PUNISH Halliburton !!
Posted by: Jason Jordan on Mar 6, 2007 7:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NBC's Investigative Unit has video of a Halliburton drilling operation with Halliburton logos everywhere - but it's in Iran, where the company gained a contract in January to drill in the massive Pars gas field.

"I am baffled that any American company would want to have employees operating in Iran," says Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine. "I would think they'd be ashamed."

Halliburton says the operation — videotaped by NBC News — is entirely legal. It's run by a subsidiary called "Halliburton Products and Services Limited," based outside the U.S. In fact, the law allows foreign subsidiaries of U.S. corporations to do business in Iran under strict conditions.

..."I am formally announcing my intention to cut off all trade and investment with Iran," announced President Bill Clinton in 1995.

Sources close to the Halliburton investigation tell NBC News that after that announcement, Halliburton decided that business with Iran, then conducted through at least five companies, would all be done through a subsidiary incorporated in the Cayman Islands.

"It's gotten around the sanctions and the very spirit and reasons for the sanctions," says Victor Comras, a former State Department expert on sanctions.

For Halliburton to have done this legally, the foreign subsidiary operating in Iran must be independent of the main operation in Texas. Yet, when an NBC producer approached managers in Iran, he was sent to company officials in Dubai. But they said only Halliburton headquarters in Houston could talk about operations in Iran. Still, Halliburton maintains its Iran subsidiary does make independent business decisions.
Now Halliburton is under federal investigation - the focus being on whether it was their intention all along to evade sanctions. Congress is looking at closing the loophole in the law.

Halliburton says they will pull out of Iran - in three years when the contract ends.

But I've a question - if their old boss Dick Cheney manages to get his way and the US attacks Iran, would Halliburton get government compensation for it's destroyed equipment and potential profits? If not, then maybe they know for sure something the rest of us can only wonder about concerning the likelihood of such an attack.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

O'Connor Right on Target
Posted by: Democritus on Mar 7, 2007 4:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are several reasons to think that O'Connor is correct in his assessment that Libby is going to get a pardon. After the required amount of stalling in asking for a new trial and then an appeal, the heat will have been turned down and Bush can issue the get-out-of-jail-free card. After all, Bush can't blacken his reputation any more than it has been blackened. Libby knows too much about Bush's involvement, and what easier way to keep him quiet except by pardoning him.

There is ample precedent for a presidential pardon. Remember Caspar Weinberger, Oliver North, and Elliott Abrams? All three were pardoned for their much more serious acts of treason during the Iran-Contra affair. Elliott Abrams has been recycled, and he has taken Libby's place as Cheney's right-hand man.

The Libby defense team really put on a "non defense." Both Cheney and Rove were supposed to testify, but they didn't do so. Why was that? It's likely that the fix was in, and Libby was being given a nod and a wink that he wouldn't have to serve any jail time. The defense team put all their emphasis on Libby's having forgotten several conversations. How plausible is that for someone as smart as Libby? The jury didn't find it plausible at all.

Cheney really has the hammer here. As much as I'd like to see him resign over this, the chances are slim to none. The chances are far greater that Cheney and Bush made a deal: Bush gets to keep Rove out of hot water, and Libby takes the fall. But then Bush pardons Libby, and all is again sweetness and light.

I sincerely hope that I'm mistaken, and that Libby will rat out his boss to cut a deal on his sentencing. For the reasons I've mentioned, however, I don't think that's going to happen. That's why, even though Libby's conviction is a win for our legal system, I'm giving it only two cheers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But ISRAEL is about OIL
Posted by: fluffmuffinmom on Mar 7, 2007 7:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only reason the neocons care two shits about Israel is because they need a stronghold in the mideast for access to the oil. They believe they need someone on their side with nukes to keep the others "in line."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dick
Posted by: rtmyth on Mar 7, 2007 8:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Neocon Libby , like Larry Franklin and others in the Admin,was motivated by his strong loyalty to Israel. The neocons are loyal to Israel, and put its interests above all others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ŧhe Baffled Republican Senator from Maine
Posted by: boing007 on Mar 7, 2007 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no idea why Susan Collins is baffled that
an American company would do business with its declared enemies,
they do it all the time. As do many other countries in
this world of ours. It happened during the First World
War, the Second World War, ad nauseum. I heard that
the U.S. not too long ago sold Iran F-14s.
True or false?

We're all being taken for a ride, whether you're Russian, French, British, American, Canadian, Chinese, Indian, Iraqi, etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Put the SYMPATHY in correct column
Posted by: Bozwell on Mar 7, 2007 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..."But before the rest of us join in the jurors' "tremendous amount of sympathy for Mr. Libby," let's remember that the sword Libby has fallen on to protect his higher-ups will likely yet prove to be a blunt one. "....uh, lets NOT FORGET TOO, that Libby CHOSE his path and his loyalty's' and was as well quite complicit in making "choices" whether TO DO or NOT TO DO...Holding little sympathy for Cheney aide Scooter..has been noted and known as Chenys' MOST trusted insider.LOL, Scooter use to trek to Cheny house and then carpooled to the office. Scooter also known for tending well to "details" and fabulous "recall" ability of those details to keep such lined up and in order. Now to even consider an iota of sympathy is rather absurd for Scooter has been one of the neocon warriors bent on getting the neocon agenda "actualized". THE most ironic thing in this is the likely "PARDONOME" he will most likely receive from George...LOL, Scooter was a prime promoter/manipulator of that INFAMOUS Mark Rich pardon that Clinton gave--the one Clinton is chastised to this day over and over and over. For George Jr. not all that much will bother him , Poppy let Casper off via a pardon, so Poppy set the Bush clan precedent and surely Junior will accommodate Scooter..Hallmark of this Bush administration is how LOYAL they are to each other..over and above their loyalty to the nation is obvious and obviously the truer tragedy.
It is NOT likely that ONLY Scooter bears responsibility in all the deeds, his greatest error was perhaps caused by arrogance thinking he was above the basic law. Congratulations to Fitz for NOT allowing such infringement,;thanks too to the jury members who did right by the law and their duties even if thinking sympathetically that was a seemingly 'minor' issue and a high price for one to have to pay. Will we EVER know the full depth of the depravity that had high administrators DECEIVE US INTO INSTIGATING AN UN-NECCESSARY WAR ? As too many Dems cowered and failed their elected responsibility to represent US/the citizens best interests and only tried to protect their own employment positions, thinking they would be harassed as UN-AMerican (which quite frankly fits as a tag to all those that went along JUST to get along ) IF THEY had done their homework, IF they had done even some cursory research --there was indeed much info out and about and it all required due diligence to seek and verify..Many in the public shouted out NO, far more than even to this day are being acknowledged (check the polls of the time, even THEN, the majority said NO TO INSTIGATING WAR, the switch came when once instigated, support was given as thought would jeopardize those military doing the grunt work of it all and assumed a "united" front needed to be presented to show such "support" but only further allowed NEEDLESS DEATH AND DESTRUCTION and the present QUAGMIRE and ENFLAMEMENT WORLDWIDE !!! )
THEY ALL ARE MISSING THE POINT..the citizenry is angry and dissatisfied with the way they ALL are administrating and governing and most especially, that NONE ARE BEING HELD ACCOUNTABLE...not the Bush Brigade folks, not the neocons, not the advisors and appointees , not the various electeds of ANY party..THAT anger and disgust is only increasing and seems in DC, they still do NOT comprehend that fact.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

9/11: The Event that Created All the Scadals
Posted by: edgar_michel on Mar 7, 2007 12:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
9/11 is the pivotal event that enraged Americans sufficiently to allow the wars in Afghanistan/Iraq to be prosecueted. Nothing else needs ot be considered. The fact that the Mossad were videotaping the orchestrated attack on the twin towers on the morning of September 11, 2001, is at least supicious and probably more than that. See The Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9-11 and FBI evidence of Mossad involvement in September 11 attacks on the U.S.?! (you have to go to Aljazeera.net and search for the topic in blue as alternet doesn't allow strings over 60 characters. Select the characters in blue then click the blue characters and paste into the Aljazeera search box to find the story. Same for the next) and CNN INTERVIEWS CHRISTOPHER BOLLYN, 9/11 RESEARCHER (you have to go to www.rumormillnews.com and search for the topic in blue as alternet doen't allow strings over 60 characters)

You might want to watch the video 9/11 Press for Truth (you have to go to http://video.google.com/ and search for the topic in blue as alternet doesn't allow strings over 60 characters. Select the characters in blue, click the characters in blue and then paste into the search box at the site) to get a sense of just how broad the cover-up is

I also want you to notice here how the box column in the center of the picture is cut at an angle with slag dripping over the end closest to the camera. If the 47 core box columns were sheared at their bottom, the tower would collapse in on itself from the top down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Libby as a Distraction from 9/11 Posted by: edgar_michel
History repeats itself?
Posted by: monkeywrench on Mar 7, 2007 8:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Libby guilty on four of five counts; evidence against Cheney, as thick as mud and as black as his heart, fingering him as the person who instigated the outing of Valerie Plame (and, by association, possibly the deaths of some of the other operatives she had contact with); evidence of lawbreaking by the Bush administration so massive and conclusive that, in a sane culture, he and his whole cabal would get 1,000 years in prison each.

And what has all this come to thus far? Besides the conviction of a waterboy named "scooter," nothing. Cheney skates, doesn't testify; Bush goes on doing the bidding of The Forces of Darkness, while the media still insists that he and his administration care about world opinion, public image, and the rule of law. Get real, people; the old social constraints – you know, those stodgy ideas that have held civilization together for millenia – mean nothing to these people. The Court of Public opinion was adjourned in 2000, right after the Bloodless Coup that was the Supreme court selection of Dumya for emperor...er...president.

What is happening today – the flaunting of law, the immasculated, worthless congress, the wholesale disenfranchisement of voters, the cynical restructuring of the justice system so that it no longer metes out justice for those in high office, the scared, "anything for safety" public – all of it smacks of the conditions that brought about the Nazi Party in the 1930's.

Please note that it took a World War and the nearly complete destruction of an entire continent to stop their murderous aggression. Is this what we have to look forward to once again?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Libby rewarded Pardon for silence
Posted by: shhazam4 on Mar 8, 2007 1:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It will be surprising if Libby is sentenced the full 23 years in prison for his crime; but, with only 1 and months left on GWB's presidency, its likely, if Libby requests it, GWB will grant his pardon.

Thats what, maybe 1 year at most in prison, likely a Federal country club prison for Libby IF HE REMAINS SILENT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]