Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Squeamish school librarians, screaming at a single word they deemed "offensive," have put the screws to an award-winning children's book.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

You Say Scrotum, I Say Hoo-Ha

By Susie Bright, SusieBright.com. Posted February 21, 2007.


Squeamish school librarians, screaming at a single word they deemed "offensive," have put the screws to an award-winning children's book.
Advertisement

Squeamish school librarians, screaming at a single word they deemed "offensive," have put the screws to a scrumptious award-winning children's book called, of all things, The Higher Power of Lucky.

Have our public-knowledge custodians lost their scruples?

With One Word, Children's Book Sets Off Uproar

by Julie Bosman

The word "scrotum" does not often appear in polite conversation. Or children's literature, for that matter ...

Yet there it is on the first page of The Higher Power of Lucky by Susan Patron, this year's winner of the Newbery Medal, the most prestigious award in children's literature. The book's heroine, a scrappy 10-year-old orphan named Lucky Trimble, hears the word through a hole in a wall when another character says he saw a rattlesnake bite his dog, Roy, on the scrotum.

"'Scrotum' sounded to Lucky like something green that comes up when you have the flu and cough too much," the book continues. "It sounded medical and secret, but also important."

The inclusion of the word has shocked some school librarians, who have pledged to ban the book from elementary schools, and reopened the debate over what constitutes acceptable content in children's books ...

"This book included what I call a Howard-Stern-type shock treatment just to see how far they could push the envelope, but they didn't have the children in mind," Dana Nilsson, a teacher and librarian in Durango, Colo., wrote on LM_Net, a mailing list that reaches more than 16,000 school librarians. "How very sad."...

Andrea Koch, the librarian at French Road Elementary School in Brighton, N.Y., said she anticipated angry calls from parents if she ordered it. "I don't think our teachers, or myself, want to do that vocabulary lesson," she said in an interview ...

Ms. Nilsson, reached at Sunnyside Elementary School in Durango, Colo., said she had heard from dozens of librarians who agreed with her stance. "I don't want to start an issue about censorship," she said. "But you won't find men's genitalia in quality literature."

Let's uncover the anatomy of a literary sex panic, shall we?

A couple dozen prudes got squicked-out, starting with the strangely un-investigated Ms. Nilsson, who is leading the tiny parade of shocked citizens. Reporter Bosman and the Times kicked up the rest of the shocking-pink dust, without diligent reporting.

Ms. Nilsson isn't just a "teacher," she's a leader from the Durango Christian Science Church. When the media reports on issues of language or sexual attitudes and customs, it's incumbent on them to inquire about their informant's religious background and how it affects their decision-making. Who cares what Dana Nilsson thinks about librarianship, if her first priority is her Scriptural views of morality?

This story has pushed the Flying Spaghetti Monster envelope. Ever since Kansas ruled against evolution, and our current President encouraged a world-view that was created in seven days, there is a sense among scientific and empirically-minded Americans that our educational system has lost its marbles. These people, including myself, are the majority, not the Sunday School of the Week Club. We're easily alarmed by any evidence that we've have been swallowed into a Jonah's Whale of a fairy tale that never stops spouting off.

The Times' sample of quotes reveal a group of obvious religious conservatives who betray more about their own ignorance, phobias, and lack of library professionalism than they do about the state of the English vocabulary -- in literature or social life.

Anyone who says that "male genitalia are not in quality literature" needs to have their resumé examined. What's more, this is hardly the first time that the word "scrotum" has appeared in children's books. Think again, Ms. Bosman!


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: books, libraries, censorship

Susie Bright is an author, editor, and journalist known for her original and pioneering work in sexual politics and erotic expression. She writes about sex and politics every day at her blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Sanctimonious Prigs
Posted by: maggie2 on Feb 21, 2007 1:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those sanctimonious and censorious prigs who are ranting on about the use of "scrotum" in a children's book should be as concerned about the abuse of and the abject poverty in which millions of children on this planet are forced to exist. The utter hypocrisy of these folks is mindblowing and deeply disturbing to say the very least. Hurrah for Susan Patron ! I hope she will publish a sequel soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did Lucky survive?
Posted by: WhatNow? on Feb 21, 2007 2:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope so.

Boy! I am glad my parents were not christians. Luckily they wanted their children to have a vocabulary and an education. I've used the word penis as long as I can remember. I do not remember using the word scrotum as a little child but they would not have been upset if I had. They would have been disappointed if I used slang like a "cute little family name for it," thinking it signified a lack of intellegence and maturity.

It's a shame these christians can not find something better to do with their time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Did Lucky survive? Posted by: bloggeddowninMKE
» RE: Did Lucky survive? Posted by: bloggeddowninMKE
Illiterates speaking on literature, now THAT's classic.
Posted by: DaBear on Feb 21, 2007 6:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I don't want to start an issue about censorship," she said. "But you won't find men's genitalia in quality literature.""

I laughed my ass (oh, 'scuse me, "glutes") off when I read this winger line. Obviously that chick has never read a line of Shakespeare. Every other line in some of his work is rife with puns and wordplay on male genitalia. What a bunch of boobs... I mean, mammeries. Get a job Xtian nutballs!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OMG... When will they ever learn.... or die off?
Posted by: actorguy1 on Feb 21, 2007 8:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a great article. I am so tired of the "right" trying to ignore our humanity. So what we see a "boobie" during the Super Bowl. Get over it and grow up.

I have a scrotum, you have a vagina? What is the problem? Sigh. I would have thought that we would have evolved by this point but no... we must "whisper" about these things. Arrggghh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:OMG...The Vagina Posted by: christininrome
Jennie
Posted by: Jennie on Feb 22, 2007 2:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scrotum is a 7 letter word not a 4 letter one. Grow up Christian idiots - even my 3 year ols grandson knows that Mummy and Grannies don't have penises or scrotums.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why do we have such weird words for sexual organs?
Posted by: Dboy on Feb 22, 2007 4:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who thought up "scrotum" anyway? And for that matter, who thought up "pink taco"? Just wondering.

Dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kids need to know about their bodies.
Posted by: Allison on Feb 22, 2007 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The concept that "scrotum" is a naughty word boggles me. My mom always said "use the proper word" if she caught me saying cock or nuts or whatever - there wasn't any suggestion that I not talk about it at all. I even had a book about sex as a kid, it taught me the anatomy involved in simple kid terms, and that the people in 70's sex ed books always look like hippies ;)

Anyway this lady should be ashamed to call herself "librarian", the real librarians need a bookish, bespectacled SWAT team to deal with situations like this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keep kids dumb at their risk
Posted by: jdham137 on Feb 22, 2007 5:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My wife and I recently adopted a 4 year old boy. Part of the adoption process in the state of Maine is mandatory parenting classes. One of the nuggets of information we were given was to teach our children the actual anatomical names of sexual body parts for their own safety. According to the instructors, child molestors who encounter children who know the actual names of body parts, as opposed to using words like thingy, hoohah, etc., know they are the kids who actually talk to their parents about sex and are more likely to tell their parents if they are molested. So they tend to stay away from more informed children. Keep in mind, this is just what the instructor told us, I didn't fact check her, but it makes sense. So go ahead you Christian Fundamentalists, keep the truth from your kids. Chances are they'll do the same thing with you.

John David
www.maxmpg.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't confuse "Christian Science" and "Christian"
Posted by: Jim on Feb 22, 2007 5:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some are responding as if it were a librarian was a leader of a Christian Church, not a Christian Science Church, that objected to the word "scrotum". Christian Science is quite differenent from what one usually means by Christian. Christian science is a form of philisophical idealism, proclaiming that ideas are the only reality, not the material world. Christians accept the reality of a physical world, created "good" by God. To a Christian Science Christ means "the ideal truth that comes as a divine manifestation to destroy incarnate error." To Christians, Christ is one of the titles of Jesus, meaning the annointed one, the Messiah, whom God send to reconcile people and God.

For many of us Christians, "scrotum" is not a dirty or forbidden word. I talked over this story with my home-schooled son at breakfast, laughing at the nonsense. In fact, many of us Christians are even -- o how shocking! -- nudists. God created people in his image and declared it "very good."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Your HOME SCHOOLED child? Posted by: Ellie1
Don't confuse "Christian Science" and "Christian"
Posted by: Jim on Feb 22, 2007 5:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some are responding as if it were a librarian was a leader of a Christian Church, not a Christian Science Church, that objected to the word "scrotum". Christian Science is quite differenent from what one usually means by Christian. Christian science is a form of philisophical idealism, proclaiming that ideas are the only reality, not the material world. Christians accept the reality of a physical world, created "good" by God. To a Christian Science Christ means "the ideal truth that comes as a divine manifestation to destroy incarnate error." To Christians, Christ is one of the titles of Jesus, meaning the annointed one, the Messiah, whom God send to reconcile people and God.

For many of us Christians, "scrotum" is not a dirty or forbidden word. I talked over this story with my home-schooled son at breakfast, laughing at the nonsense. In fact, many of us Christians are even -- o how shocking! -- nudists. God created people in his image and declared it "very good."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's all about prudery
Posted by: goeswithness on Feb 22, 2007 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anybody remember a Ladies' Home Journal cover sometime around 1972 or 1973, which had a reproduction of a painting of a naked Eve on the cover? We had one at home, because my mother was a subscriber. I remember being in a small grocery store one day, seeing the magazine on the stand, and someone had cut out a paper dress and taped it over Eve's lovely body. It still makes me laugh, but it made my mother quite huffy and we left and went somewhere else.

Another memory I have is of being about six and going on vacation in Florida. Again, we were in a grocery store buying fruit to take back to the hotel. I have no idea why it was on my mind, but I asked my mother, kind of loudly I guess "Do you like sex?" She was mortified, but whispered back "Yes. We'll talk about it later."

This is how I was raised using correct terms and with a guilt free conscious, and my father was a Baptist minister. It was important to my parents that I saw sex as a gift from God, not something placed in my way as a temptation. I admit that in today's culture, where so much sex in the media is so UNsexy, not to mention issues of exploitation and destructive messages, my mother has pulled back a bit from her liberal views and my niece doesn't get quite the near-encouragement that we did, but still, in our family sex is too much a source of humor to be hidden from her and her curiosity and questions are honored.

Still a Christian family...if there's a God, he/she gave us these bits and obviously wanted us to use them. The questions become one of ethics - respect, reponsibility, smart decision-making.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Use the proper term!
Posted by: mewhins24 on Feb 22, 2007 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was younger, my mom used to say that Major League baseball player Ricky Henderson had a "face like a scrotum," and often referred to him as "Scrotum Face." While this can be pretty uncomfortable for an adolescent girl to hear coming from her mother, I have always been grateful to grow up with parents who encouraged proper vocabulary. My mother also encouraged a love of all literature; having grown up with a mother who took her to see a priest after finding her copy of Catcher in the Rye under her mattress, she wasn't a fan of censorship or prudishness in literature. An uproar over the use of "scrotum" in a book is nothing short of childish absurdity!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How will they describe Bush's
Posted by: Diego on Feb 22, 2007 7:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
empty man sack? "Yes, Son, President Bush can indeed have a scrotum, even if there's nothing in it".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I.e. WHAT A STUPID FUCKED UP CULTURE
Posted by: fifthworld on Feb 22, 2007 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(or are y'all squeamish progressives gonna censor ME for saying so?)

Fucked up, that's right - both the testicularly squeamish and the faux-liberated liberals, who merely hide their natural "prudery" and hang-ups, that we all have, and don't let them hang out.

Hangin' in..... over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» faux-liberated liberals ?? Posted by: StoneRiley
Children's lit
Posted by: RisaQ on Feb 22, 2007 9:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My niece and nephews have a very much loved book -- which made me laugh out loud the first time I saw and read it -- "The Story of the Little Mole Who Went in Search of Whodunit" (about a mole who had the misfortune to have his head pooped on and who, in searching for the culprit, discovers what a lot of other critters' poop looks like).

It's cute, it's funny, it's clever, it's educational -- and it caters to children's curiousity to all-things-bodily-related. What it is not is "dirty" or "disgusting" or "inappropriate". Kids are curious. We should be encouraging that curiousity -- and giving them truthful answers. It's the "hoo-ha" mentality that's does more damage to growing minds than just giving kids the facts. What's so terribly wrong and harmful in calling a scrotum a scrotum? That's what it is....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wicked witch of the west
Posted by: lee slaughter on Feb 22, 2007 9:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WOW!! what is so "inappropriate" about teaching children the correct medical term for human body parts? as a practing nurse for 30 yrs, i am amazed at how illiterate people are about their bodies. Can we Please teach children the english language and talk openly about something as fundamental as OUR BODIES!!!! And people wonder why we have unwanted/unplanned pregnancies....there is a connection here. Will the uptight prudes that are offended by basic language and its' usage please just stop looking at books and leave the rest of us alone so we can get on with educating our children. Find a real life, leave the rest of us to ours please. Go get laid, and leave the rest of us in peace. thank you very much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dick-you-lust Posted by: leighsure
» RE: dick-you-lust Posted by: lee slaughter
» RE: dick-you-lust Posted by: MyLeftFoot
Labeling incorrect all around
Posted by: mb50 on Feb 22, 2007 11:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please do not consider all school librarians OR even those calling themselves librarians to be educated in the field of librarianship. Most librarians fight all forms of censorship anad are among the strongest supporters of the freedom to read (who won the real test against the Patroit Acts access to library records...) All of these so=called librarians who want to censor materials need to refer to their organization's selection policies and the ALA's Freedom to Read materials.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

... And the reporting's not so hot either
Posted by: bcarson on Feb 22, 2007 12:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm no big fan of the genitalia police, but the reporter's a little nutty too.

She refers to Librarian.net as an "electronic mailing list" (note to NYT: it's called a "blog")

She cites Frederick Muller as saying, "I think it’s a good case of an author not realizing her audience." Curiously, Muller has written a review of the book, which was posted on LM_Net and on his blog (http://mullerinthemiddle.blogspot.com/). Muller concludes his review by saying he thinks The Higher Power of Lucky "will be great for elementary students." Maybe he's flip-flopping but I can't help wondering whether he's been either misquoted or quoted out of context.

As for Ms. Nilsson, she does indeed seem to be a piece of work: she really does believe that quality children's literature is free of genitalia (four words, Ms. Nilsson: In the Night Kitchen), but the comment about Howard Stern seems to be one that she was quoting from another "librarian" supporting her position.

Lastly, as a professional librarian I'm tired of reporters assuming that everyone who works in a library -- or even everyone who is in charge of a library -- has earned the title "librarian." Not even everyone with the job title "Librarian" is in fact a librarian.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MARKETING 101
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Feb 22, 2007 3:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no idea whether or not this is a GOOD book. I do know that carefully inserting a no-no word will sell lots of copies. I don't think it goes much deeper than that. And it's a word that is sure to make kids giggle. Some words are just funny. Scrotum is one of them. People should stop wringing their hands over this. Kids don't have enough fun these days. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MARKETING 101
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Feb 22, 2007 3:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no idea whether or not this is a GOOD book. I do know that carefully inserting a no-no word will sell lots of copies. I don't think it goes much deeper than that. And it's a word that is sure to make kids giggle. Some words are just funny. Scrotum is one of them. People should stop wringing their hands over this. Kids don't have enough fun these days. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JaneE
Posted by: JaneE on Feb 22, 2007 3:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please don't make sweeping assumptions about Christians or Christian Scientists based on one person's opinion. Ms. Nilson's opinion is her own, and personal, and it does not appear from the story that she evoked her religious affiliation as a reason for her opinion. Why did you make that leap? One can be uncomfortable about the use of language for a variety of reasons without making it a big religious deal. The Christian Science church is not engaged in issues about censorship of language, and as someone who attends church in this denomination myself, I can tell you that we have a tradition of great respect for constitutional freedoms, as well as the freedom to express individual conscience. I personally find the scrotum word harmless and more tasteful than other slang expressions, as I suspect do many people of my generation, regardless of our religious affiliation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JaneE Posted by: bob t
SHE KNOWS NOTHING . . .
Posted by: Naoma on Feb 22, 2007 3:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When my daughter was 3 she knew all the correct names of body parts. She was out on the porch talking with a little friend who said: "My Mommy is going to have a baby and it is in her tummy." My daughter came storming into the house and said: "She knows nothing of the womb!" She already knew that most children used word other than the correct ones.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hilarious review
Posted by: RevZafod on Feb 23, 2007 9:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I followed the book link to Amazon.com and found this excerpt in one of the comments.

Joyce Shumway (American Fork, UT)
"...As noted, the use of the word "scrotum" at the beginning and the end of the book left a very bad taste in my mouth..."

What advice would you give her...?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hilarious review Posted by: bronx_girl
» RE: Hilarious review Posted by: 9wicket
» RE: Hilarious review Posted by: bob t
Regarding the girl with the itch
Posted by: bluepilgrim on Feb 24, 2007 2:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just why did the teacher need know if she had intended "number 1" or "number 2" anyway? Was only "number 2" allowed that day? Does her particular physical need go on her permanent record? Was the school having a problem with their toilet paper inventory? What else is needed for a teacher to know but that a student must leave the classroom to use the restroom? I could write more on this, but I need to do number 11 now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Christian Science vs. Scientology
Posted by: domenico234 on Feb 24, 2007 8:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for correcting the writer of the post that confused the above: I intended to write but for the life of me could not remember "Mary Baker Eddy"...at 73 I am losing my mind, I fear. Not my "sanity" but my "mind" which I consider in this context to be the sum total of what I have learned in these many years...

Again thanks! (The name would likely have come to me around 3:45 tomorrow morning. You saved me from a sleepless night!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of scrotums (or scrota) and other sticky classroom issues
Posted by: LibrariaAnne on Feb 24, 2007 5:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a school librarian - the job description I much prefer to media specialist, as I don't see a thing wrong with the library encompassing media rather than vice versa. I'm also a doctoral student in children's literature and on a listserv for teachers, librarians, authors, and academics in the field.

A few observations:

It has been so interesting the last few days to see the word "scrotum" in the subject line of the listserv emails. Trust me, this rarely happens.

Lucky isn't bitten by the rattlesnake on her scrotum, as Lucky is female. The scrotum (I'm having a lot of fun with this; can you tell?) is the property of a dog which to my mind renders the whole shock and horror even more absurd.

My librarian aide, or parapro, as they are usually called, is much more conservative than I am. I also have the deepest respect for her and appreciate the chance to get an opinion different from my own. We read the NYT article together, and she asked me how I would handle it as a teacher, if someone asked me in class what that word meant. I told her that much of my own sex education had been procured through the dictionary, and I would simply offer up a dictionary definition and move on. I told her about what is probably my proudest moment in the classroom. In the late seventies, I was a 22-year-old second-year teacher. A kid in my 7th grade class class was reading Time or Newsweek, and raised his hand. "This is a funny word. What does orgasm mean?" Without missing a beat, I said, "Wade, that would be the peak of the sexual experience." He got it in one, said thanks, and I swear, not one eyebrow went up. Anyone who teaches seventh grade will appreciate that. My parapro smiled and agreed that this really did make a lot of sense.

Most librarians are really going to be pretty cool with Lucky, no matter what sensationalist trash NYT prints.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Link Spammer poetry? wow, like!
Posted by: Pathman on Feb 26, 2007 2:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Looks like some "Comment-Spam-Troll-Link-Bot" may have unwittingly created some poetry...Must be the first time Ever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I dunno what I would have called it...
Posted by: Pathman on Feb 26, 2007 3:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
except that here in sweden we tend to use an almost exact translation of scrotum: pungen; that means "the pouch" or "the little sack". And that made it a little more easy to tell my father where the ants bit me.;) Poor english-speakers; having no useful word for it acceptable to doctors too. But for the rest of the equipment we have use "snoppen"="the willie" or something like that, and it seems to work quite good(even the small girls use it sometimes without anyone batting an eybrow). Their own parts still seems mostly unmentionable(poor things!). But in Medicine we still mostly use the latin. Latin, though, as a language is not required to learn for aspiring doctors anymore, just the medical terms. O Tempera, O Mores!... And a Goodnight to you "over there" as the Clock is nearing Midnight and beddie-bye-time for pathmans(First Yearly Big Book-Sale Day Breakfast at our local Book-store at 7AM and me personally invited, too).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

just wondering about the classics
Posted by: thogatthog on Feb 28, 2007 3:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if the wingnuts are next going to pick on the complete works of Honore de Balzac?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shame on you!
Posted by: lbrantley on Mar 1, 2007 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get your heads out of the sand and welcome to the "real world". These ten year olds can turn to any cable TV show and hear alot worst..maybe if sex education was tought in elementary school maybe the divorce rate in this country would go down. This is censorship and its disgusting..no wonder our school children are less educated than those in other countries..what a shame!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

did you miss this one?
Posted by: dannrusso on Mar 3, 2007 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this story is from Oklahoma, but I'm not sure...

A woman called and complained to a theatre showing the (Vagina) Monologues that she had to explain to her 9-year-old NIECE what a vagina was as they drove by the theatre. They redid the marquee with "hoo-hoo monologues"

umm...does this mean civilization as we know it is over?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How LUCKY could this dog be if it gets bit on the scrotum?
Posted by: Ellie1 on Mar 4, 2007 3:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps we should start calling George W. Lucky. or Sucky.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]