Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Gender equality has come a long way when the press doesn't differentiate between homicidal maniacs who are men, and those who are women.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Lisa Nowak, Astronaut

By Annalee Newitz, AlterNet. Posted February 20, 2007.


Gender equality has come a long way when the press doesn't differentiate between homicidal maniacs who are men, and those who are women.
Advertisement

I live in a world where there are sensationalistic news stories about female astronauts going on possibly murderous rampages. Let me tell you why this makes me a happy person.

But first let's recap. Lisa Nowak is a former astronaut who two weeks ago attacked Colleen Shipman, a woman whom she considered a romantic rival. What Nowak did was violent, stupid, and wrong -- as well as fairly typical for a crazed stalker. But the facts of the case were undeniably salacious headline bait. Nowak is famous for flying in the space shuttle, so you've got the celebrity angle. She committed a crime for love, which is always sort of thrilling; and the way she did it was bizarro. As you'll recall from newspaper accounts, she zoomed to a rendezvous with Shipman in a grueling, 12-hour cross-country trip, wearing adult diapers so she wouldn't have to take bathroom breaks (something she no doubt learned on the shuttle). She'd packed her trunk with a BB gun, a mallet, rubber hoses, and garbage bags. When she attacked Shipman with pepper spray, she was wearing a strange wig and freaking out.

Now charged with attempted murder, Nowak has been widely described in the press as having developed some sort of post-space traumatic syndrome because she knew she would never fly the soon-to-be-retired shuttle again. And this is where I start to feel happy. It would have been easy for pundits and sensation-loving journalists to paint Nowak's situation as an example of why women crack under the pressure of being astronauts. But you know why they couldn't do that? Because there are too many female astronauts, such as Eileen Collins and Bonnie Dunbar, who didn't crack and are leading perfectly normal lives. Even better, there are men such as early astronaut Buzz Aldrin, who did crack up -- in a big way -- when he got back to Earth and had to shed his "hero" identity. Aldrin became an alcoholic and was consumed with depression for many years after his moon walk, and he's talked about this openly in some of the stories about Nowak.

Nearly every story I've read about Nowak's actions -- in both small and large publications -- has attributed her breakdown to stress over having such a high-profile job. There are no hints that she suffered from girly nerves or that women can't juggle home life and work life. Instead, the entire situation is reported exactly the way it would have been if she'd been a famous man who lost it for reasons that have nothing to do with gender. I like living in a world where we explain women's sensational crimes in the context of their careers rather than their gender or their families.

The other thing that makes me happy about the Nowak case is that it confirms something I've always known to be true: women can be as physically dangerous as men. In courtrooms and pop culture, women have traditionally been viewed as essentially passive, capable of violence only under extraordinary circumstances. As a result, women have often gotten lighter sentences than men for everything from murder to battery. Ann Jones's sociological study Women Who Kill is in large part a chronicle of how judges have refused to convict women of murdering their children because the ladies are considered victims of postpartum depression. (Men under similar circumstances are given harsh penalties for filicide.)

In a twisted way, the public reaction to Nowak's assault on Shipman -- the fact that she was accused of attempted murder and that her violence was taken seriously -- is heartening. Nobody is framing this incident as a catfight; nobody is saying Nowak is innocent because she was going through menopause or something absurd like that. She is being treated like the dangerous and potentially homicidal person that she is. Nobody is fishing around for a way to let her off the hook because she's a chick.

I like living in a world where women are dangerous. Even better, I like living in a world where people acknowledge that women are dangerous, so they're less likely to fuck with us. By the same token, when women do go on violent rampages, I want them held responsible for their actions and punished the same way men are. That's not p.c. equality. That's the real thing.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: nowak, astronauts, women, dangerous women, gener equality

Annalee Newitz (annalee@techsploitation.com) is a surly media nerd who has paid for her violent crimes.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Post-Modern Conservative
Posted by: freeda'all on Feb 20, 2007 9:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Newitz commits the ultimate sin of third wave feminism and that is to claim that a state of equality exists by denying the existence of differences between the sexes, social, actual and biological.

Newitz seems to think that the murderous act alone should be the defining event in how people are treated/punished for it. In order to make real her perception of 'equality' Newitz would rather bury the differences between men who kill their wives out of hate and women who kill their husbands to escape them. Newitz does not want to look at why women may murder but rather takes satisfaction in that fact that a rare few do and holds that up as a sign of 'equality' between the sexes.

Ann Jones's sociological study Women Who Kill is in large part a chronicle of how judges have refused to convict women of murdering their children because the ladies are considered victims of postpartum depression. (Men under similar circumstances are given harsh penalties for filicide.)

This is factually untrue. Women are convicted of these murders on a regular basis without post-partum depression being factored in at all. Remember PPD was rejected in the case of Andrea Yates and she was convicted and sentenced on capital murder charges. It was only on a retrial that she was found not guilty by reason of insanity and she still faces a lengthy involuntary incarceration for it. Susan Smith was convicted of killing her children. This seems to be a serious misreading of the book on the part of Newitz and she does a serious disservice to women by implying that we have some sort of unfair & unreal advantage over men through the mechanisms of post-partum depression. Newitz also seems to suggest that in the name of equality PPD shouldn't be considered. What Newitz wants to happen here is nothing more than to undo the past thirty years of gain that women have achieved in bringing to light the realities of our lives.

I would expect Rush Limbaugh to attempt to evidence a complaint that post-partum depression gives women an unfair advantage over men. Perhaps Newitz should give him a call.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Post-Modern Conservative Posted by: freeda'all
» RE: The Post-Modern Conservative Posted by: freeda'all
Excellent article
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Feb 21, 2007 4:07 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Warped, spot-on, and to the point. Love it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why spoil the fun?
Posted by: colinmeister on Feb 21, 2007 4:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the story hit the press, it gave many of us a good free laugh. Here was one of those "Right stuff" people who children should "Look up to" being shown to be a total idiot frolicing around in diapers threatening a romantic rival.

Writing an article like this takes away the fun of sticking it to a society which creates "Heroes" to be worshipped!

The term "Space cadet" never had a more apt use than to describe this astronaut.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't Worry Annalee
Posted by: Dboy on Feb 21, 2007 5:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I like living in a world where women are dangerous. Even better, I like living in a world where people acknowledge that women are dangerous, so they're less likely to fuck with us. "

Don't worry Annalee, there's not a man in America who has any interest at all in "fucking" you.

Dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't Worry Annalee Posted by: freeda'all
» Speak for yourself Dboy. Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: Don't Worry Annalee Posted by: LazyEight
Consistent feminism
Posted by: pomes on Feb 21, 2007 10:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you Annalee, for being in a small minority of the feminism movement that is actually consistent in their beliefs, who is not afraid to say that women too are flawed, aggressive, naturally capable of violence, and should be held to the same standard of accountability that men are when it comes to answering for their actions. I would expect nothing less from a fellow geek, especially one of your caliber.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AstroNut
Posted by: Maxwell House on Feb 21, 2007 12:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for the well written article. I agree with you completely. Unfortunately, our local paper went the opposite way, and we got day after day of "gee, the poor thing was just in love and who hasn't gone a little crazy when consumed with jealousy?", and even a day or two of people confessing their former stalking sins (scary). It drove me crazy, but not to the point where I drove to the paper's HQ with a mallet, rubber hose and garbage bags in my car to take it up with the writers. (It's only 15 minutes from here so I can skip the diapers, unless I go during rush hour.)

TPing a house or egging a car when you're 16 and find out your BF is doing the school skank is one thing; an adult planning a murder is another. This is a serious offense, and I am glad that it is being taken as such, even though in six months or less we'll probably have to endure multiple made- for-TV movies ala "The Runaway Bride". But hey, anything to lure our attention away from the robber barons known as BushCo.

And yes, women can be just as dangerous as men, so watch out, you fuckwits- you'd better treat us right!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: AstroNut Posted by: mindcryme
» RE: AstroNut Posted by: don't jolive my olive.
Interesting
Posted by: H_H on Feb 21, 2007 4:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, if you believe in equal punishment...

What's your position on the "Battered Woman Syndrome" which says that a woman who murders a man in his sleep is only acting in self-defense?

Since "self-defense" requires imminent danger and there's no imminent danger from a sleeping person, the idea seems pretty laughable on its face.

And since there's no "Battered Man Defense", this is a pretty clear-cut double-standard, wouldn't you agree?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Interesting Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Interesting Posted by: Aussie Kim
You've come a long way ladies...A couple of mass murderers and
Posted by: ekipnrut on Feb 21, 2007 9:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you will have arrived...Hallelujah...

The basic premise of her absolutely moronic howl is that there should exist completely undifferentiated treatment with respect tp gender in terms of assessing accountability for alleged criminal behavior. Do the crime..Do the time...the presence of
female genitalia are in no way, shape or fashion a mitigating
factor. Absolute zero tolerance of anything other than iron clad
adherence to no consideration of gender. ME Tarzan..You Tarzan. The point is argued by offering a series of absurd 'arguments' each logically impermissible in its own right much less as grounds for any valid inference in the context of her intended use. E.g. "one can't draw any inference about womEn being more emotionally susceptible to the rigors of being an astronaut based on the situation of the individual womAn
Nowak"....Hey...Little Miss MensaLiTe...you don't need to cite
an (insufficient) number of women who did not crack or men
who did to establish this as an invalid argument on its face.
The reason this simple false non sequitur was not offered up by pundits and others may simply be that they are not fools.
Moreover neither highlighting the two women who thus far have not 'cracked' nor bird dog pointing to Aldrin advances the feminist agenda as a matter (again) of logic.
The author goes on to characterize Nowak's situation as a
cause for celebration because the infotainment media has
depicted her actions as having other than 'girlygirly' origins and hence supportive of the androgynous absolutely gender flat earth to which our little ms. geek aspires. Also the episode
speaks to another issue which in the author's view is an obscure and virtually unheard of fact: women can become violent.!!!
A few points:
1)One can conclude that the author gives unqualified support to the repeal of TitleIX and each and every similar piece of state or fed equal opportunity legislation banning discrimination based on gender.If having a vagina should brook no quarter in the courtroom...then so be it in the Boardroom..the Law or Med School classroom..etc.,etc.
2)The article is racist.....Black women and young girls are repeatedly demonized as violence prone ...moreover there
is a significant, predictably enough,element of black female upon black female violence amongst young adolescents.
On the other hand white women historically have been more that willing to exhibit violence both physical and psychological
towards black women. Globally..women of color and white women exist in a sea of violence..genital mutilation...white slavery in Eastern Europe...rape in Darfur..child prostitution in
SE Asia. The notion that women and violence are unacquainted with one another...is childish.
3) Last but by no means least..Nowak is a mother of three..two little girls and a teen son. Furthermore she was
obviously a role model for thousands of little girls and young women...What exactly the Fuck is there to 'celebrate' about Nowak's situation??? With 'feminists' like this, you all (women) don't need male oppressors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

...
Posted by: freeda'all on Feb 21, 2007 11:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The premise of this article is entirely flawed, ficticious and naive. Women are no where near having the ability, the conditioning or the means to be as violent as men. For that we'd have to have our own armies, our own unbringing as superior & entitled beings, our own religions giving us the power & permission to be violent, buttloads of testosterone and thousands of years of history behind us. We'd also have to have a widespread support for our activities in the public media, pornography that eroticizes & normalizes horrific violence against men and widespread permission to laugh off their complaints.

Newitz thinks she sees 'equality' in the way this story is treated compared to others and goes on to project this 'equality' into other areas without qualification.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ... Posted by: richenza
Pornography causes violence...
Posted by: H_H on Feb 22, 2007 6:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...much in the same way that Loony Tunes causes people to drop anvils on each other.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Hidden Hand of Women.
Posted by: TheFount1 on Feb 24, 2007 8:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suspect that even women themselves are not entirely aware of their social potency.

Communication is *key* to the *mana* of women.

Power transfers most efficiently in this medium.

Developments of this era will *thrust* the identity of "Woman" into completely uncharted territory.


As far as "aggressive inclinations" - one need only be a student of anthropology to view the reality of the capacity for this overt behavior.

On an island in the South Pacific: Women dominate material affairs while men *merely* gossip.

Perhaps no humans elsewhere do so(idle talk) to such an extent.


Or, the Best Example: In 1914, a German peasant woman - chunky in appearance, as *all* members of that social class tended to be(save famine) - is hunched over, facing the soldiers departing on the train with a bouquet of flowers.

Nice tidings were *not* on her mind.

She reminds me of the Spartan mother who said to the son: "Come back with your shield...or be *carried* on it!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]