Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Making an Example of Ehren Watada

By Norman Solomon, AlterNet. Posted February 6, 2007.


Those who resist this war deserve our gratitude and our support. And our willingness to resist as well.
Normon Solomon

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Norman Solomon

Obama's Triumph Over Media Frivolity
Obama's Tuesday win represents a victory over a press corps fixated on fluff over substance.
May 7, 2008

Let's Party Like It’s 1932
Obama has the potential to become as great a president as FDR, while activists have the potential to prompt change comparable to the New Deal.
Apr 21, 2008

NPR: National Pentagon Radio?
When even public radio parrots the military's official line on the war in Iraq, what hope is there for unbiased, quality reporting?
Mar 27, 2008

More stories by Norman Solomon

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The people running the Iraq war are eager to make an example of Ehren Watada.

They've convened a kangaroo court-martial. But the man on trial is setting a profound example of conscience -- helping to undermine the war that the Pentagon's top officials are so eager to protect.

"The judge in the case against the first U.S. officer court-martialed for refusing to ship out for Iraq barred several experts in international and constitutional law from testifying Monday about the legality of the war," the Associated Press reported.

While the judge was hopping through the military's hoops at Fort Lewis in Washington state, an outpouring of support for Watada at the gates reflected just how broad and deep the opposition to this war has become.

The AP dispatch merely stated that "outside the base, a small group that included actor Sean Penn demonstrated in support of Watada." But several hundred people maintained an antiwar presence Monday at the gates, where a vigil and rally -- led by Iraq war veterans and parents of those sent to kill and be killed in this horrific war -- mirrored what is happening in communities across the United States.

Many of the most compelling voices against the Iraq war come from the men and women who were ordered into a conflagration that should never have begun. Opinions may be debatable, but experiences are irrefutable. And the devastating slaughter that the U.S. war effort continues to inflict on Iraqi people has a counterpoint in the suffering of Americans who are left with unspeakable grief.

In direct resistance to the depravity of the Bush administration as it escalates this war, Lieutenant Watada is taking a clear and uplifting position. Citing international law and the U.S. Constitution, he points out that the Iraq war is "manifestly illegal." And he adds: "As the order to take part in an illegal act is ultimately unlawful as well, I must as an officer of honor and integrity refuse that order. It is my duty not to follow unlawful orders and not to participate in things I find morally reprehensible."

Watada says: "My participation would make me party to war crimes."

Outside the fence at Fort Lewis -- while the grim farce of Watada's court-martial proceeded with virtually all substance ruled out of order -- the criminality of the war and the pain it has brought were heavy in the air.

Darrell Anderson was a U.S. soldier in Iraq. He received a Purple Heart. Later, he refused orders to return for a second tour of duty. Now, he gives firsthand accounts of the routine killing of Iraqi civilians. He speaks as an eyewitness and a participant in a war that is one long war crime. And he makes a convincing case that "the GI resistance" is emerging and pivotal: "You can't call yourself antiwar if you're not supporting the resistance."

At Fort Lewis, outside the gates, I met Carlos Arredondo. He's traveling the country in a long black hearse-like station wagon, with big photos and letters from his son Alexander plastered on the sides of the vehicle. At age 20, more than two years ago, Alexander died in Iraq. Now, a conversation with Carlos Arredondo is likely to leave you in tears, feeling his grief and his rage against this war.

"When the Marines came to inform Arredondo of his son's death and stayed after he asked them to leave, he set their van on fire, burning over a quarter of his body in the process," the Boston Globe has reported. Carlos and his wife Melida Arredondo are now members of Military Families Speak Out.

Among the speakers at a nearby event the night before Watada's court-martial began was Helga Aguayo, whose husband Agustin Aguayo is a U.S. Army medic now charged with desertion. After deployment to Iraq in 2004, he applied for recognition as a conscientious objector, without success. During a year in the war zone, he refused to put ammunition in his weapon. Today, he is looking at the prospect of up to seven years in prison.

Many others in uniform are struggling to extricate themselves from the war machine.

Soldiers have to choose from options forced upon them by the commander in chief and Congress. Those who resist this war deserve our gratitude and our support. And our willingness to resist as well.

Ehren Watada faces four years in prison. Half of that potential sentence has to do with the fact that he made public statements against the war. The war-makers want such honest courage to stop. But it is growing every day.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: watada, resistance, resistor, iraq war

Norman Solomon is the author of the new book, "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The deal!
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Feb 6, 2007 6:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This had nothing to do with the war..an officer refused orders -the military is not a democracy.. he doesn't get to pick and choose.. and he knew that when he joined - he knew what he was doing and what the consequences were ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The deal! Posted by: Fiona
» RE: The deal! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: The deal! Posted by: badkitty
» RE: The deal! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: The deal! Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» RE: The deal! Posted by: yacek1
» RE: The deal! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: The deal! Posted by: douglashoyt
» RE: The deal! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: The deal! Posted by: buffeliscious
» RE: The deal! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: The deal! Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: The deal! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: The deal! Posted by: Gisele
» RE: The deal! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: The deal! Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: The deal! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: The deal! Posted by: DaBear
» RE: The deal! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: The deal! BS! Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: The deal! BS! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: The deal! BS! Posted by: blitzmesser
» blitzmesser pathetic??? Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Conservasaurus is an idiot! Still! Posted by: common intelligence
» RE: The deal! Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: The deal! Posted by: spanky
» RE: The deal! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: The deal! Posted by: spanky
» RE: The deal! Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: The deal! Posted by: spanky
» RE: The deal! Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: The deal! Posted by: spanky
» RE: The deal! Posted by: EagleMB
This soldier is providing the kind of leadership we need.
Posted by: Sojourner on Feb 6, 2007 7:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What America lacks is leadership. Instead, we have politicians, preachers, and reporters who are for sale to the highest bidder.

As Fiona indicates above, it was the US and its allies that established at Nuremberg (and it is codified in the US military code, I understand) that soldiers are to disobey illegal orders.

However, all of that means nothing until we have leaders who are willing to obey the overlooked (inconvenient?) codes written by victors to punish the conquered. Somehow when the shoe is on the other foot, it's barbarity before civilization.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lawful Order??
Posted by: Oilygarch on Feb 7, 2007 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was in the military there was such a thing as having the right to legitimately not follow an unlawful order. This is a matter which came up frequently during the Mai-Lai massacre.
We need perspective, to determine our future. Let this add to the perspective.
Hannah Arendt wrote of the war crimes trial of Adolf Eichman, of which she witnessed in person. She wrote of his defense of his efforts in exterminating Jews, that, instead of appearing an evil character he instead appeared quite ordinary. He claimed that he was just doing his job. She coined the phrase 'the banality of evil' to describe it.
Hold that thought.
Now consider the social experiments of Stanley Milgram, wherein he tests how far people will go in the pursuit of their job, whether they will choose duty over the value of human life. Look it up, it's very interesting (and no people were ever harmed, BTW).
The point that I'm trying to illustrate is this-- that we are, or should be, individually responsible for what we do, even if that is under orders.
I HATE to come to this conclusion, because it might mean that my country could be in the wrong for things it is doing and did in the past. And I realize there are many conclusions to consider in the decision to go to war, and how far to take it. Perhaps (*-COUGH-*) this is precisely when and why we should subject the leadership of our country (whichever government that may be) to the closest scrutiny possible, and hold them accountable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THIS COMBAT VETERAN SUPPORTS LT. WATADA
Posted by: kc10ken on Feb 7, 2007 7:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
13 years time in service including 3 tours in the middle east and I am ADAMANTLY OPPOSED to the GOP PNAC QUAGMIRE in Iraq.

Lt. Watada is a brave man let me tell you.

ANYONE who bucks the trend in the military is in for MASSIVE reprisals within the ranks. This is why although 72% of our soldiers in Iraq today oppose the war and want us to leave, you barely EVER see any active duty soldiers, in uniform, speaking out against the war. This human shitwave masquerading as an administration and the chickenhawks at the Pentagon make it EXTRAORDINARILY DIFFICULT for active duty soldiers to voice their TRUE opinions about dumbya's QUAGMIRE in Iraq.

Hat's off and a big salute to Lt. Watada FOR DOING THE RIGHT THING. The UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) SPECIFICALLY states that a soldier is bound by UCMJ to DISOBEY AN UNLAWFUL ORDER and report it to higher authority. Well....what happens when the "higher authority" was the IMBECILE who gave the order?

This combat Veteran is here to tell you that the Pentagon and the administration is doing a GREAT job at subduing dissent among the ranks. Threats, jail, involuntary extensions and shitty assignments come to those who speak out against "der fuhrer" or his QUAGMIRE in Iraq.

To date.....over 8000 US Soldiers are AWOL and have refused orders to mobilize and go to Iraq. Ever hear about THAT in the "liberal " media?

Lt. Watada is the first in a LONG line of officers and enlisted who oppose dumbya's QUAGMIRE in Iraq because it is ILLEGAL and therefore refused to mobilize with his unit. Look for more in the next two years as dumbya gets REALLY desperate and begins activating more National Guard and Reserves to feed into his meatgrinder called Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» right on, kc10ken Posted by: porgygirl
» RE: right on, kc10ken Posted by: willymack
unfortunate he'll only do four years
Posted by: Steve007 on Feb 7, 2007 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Guess he forgot, when he signed on the dotted line, that you don't get to pick and choose your wars. The military judge appears to have shot a large hole in his defense, by telling him that he can't argue the illegality of the war because it's irrelevant. (He's charged, among other things, with disobeying a lawful order.)


And I wonder if he's a West Pointer (unlikely) or ROTC grad (more likely)--in which case the military paid for all or part of his education. If he's now unwilling to fulfill his part of the bargain, I wonder if he's also offering to pay all that money back? And for that matter, all of his pay and benefits, which he's also collected fraudulently, if he refuses to comply with legal orders.

He will spend time in Jail (4 years, probably) and a Dishonorable Discharge will follow him for the rest of his life. One can argue whether that is punishment enough (bring back public hanging!), but we are a nation of laws. If he chooses to break the law he will have to pay the price, and will have to be punished if convicted according to the law. It's not enough, though. imo

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dishonorable Discharge is a Badge of Courage Posted by: common intelligence
If Watada had a RIch DADDY like George Bushit
Posted by: Ellie1 on Feb 7, 2007 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
he wouldn't even have had to show up. He could have spent his enlistment hiding under a bar stool, like our chicken hawk president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Watada will be a martyr
Posted by: porgygirl on Feb 7, 2007 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He has to be found guilty--if it's ruled okay for military folks to say no to an order (however unlawful), then the military will fall apart, so they have to crucify him. The system has been put to the use of evildoers, so the righteous have to be sacrificed to save the system. We've seen this in the past.

Watada will be punished, but the guilty ones are Bush and the rest of the criminally insane horde that created this nightmare. Watada will eventually be vindicated--and hopefully, ultimately pardoned--for refusing to take part in it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

re' only having 4 years to serve
Posted by: qidproquo on Feb 7, 2007 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that no one has remembered that in the International Court of justice in the Hague, nazi soldiers defended themselves by saying that they were just following orders.They were found guilty as charged, since the court decided that it was THEIR responsibility to refuse orders contrary to the established (1864) Geneva Convention.This is callled accountability of actions (hear me Dubya?) How can Lt. Watada be charged for complying with the findings of the Internatioanl Court of Justice? Seems to me our military demands intellectually and morally deprived soldiers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stephennnn
Posted by: stephennnn on Feb 7, 2007 12:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Such a sad commentary: When an insignificant soldier is able to stand up and state truth to power and is punished!!! Whereas a spineless congress is unable pass an insignificant resolution condeming this President and even worse a military that can fight an illegal war yet, cannot face the truth. Watada's only mistake was that he read and believed the Military field manual. A good, honorable soldier does not follow or carry-out illegal acts. We condemned the German soldiers, now we must condemn ourselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stephennnn Posted by: DaBear
BREAKING NEWS ON WATADA: JUDGE HAS CALLED A MISTRIAL
Posted by: Prophit on Feb 7, 2007 5:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its great news and its on Truthout.org. Go read about it, the prosecution screwed up royal.... yippee...... and the defense attorney played it for all it was worth, forcing the judge to end the trial in a mistrial. Its being commented that its unlikely the military will try him again.

I think that is wise.... better to keep your friends close and your enemies closer. They have a better chance of getting out from making Wataba a hero for all Americans if he is still in Uniform and quietly sitting behind a desk in some office cubicle. LOL I think that is where he is going.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Heros
Posted by: mountainmama on Feb 7, 2007 6:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This guy is a hero in every way. So are the others. He is risking it all for integrity, morals and ethics! Something Bush and his henchmen have no understanding of and never will. Evil is as evil does.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hakuna Watada!!!
Posted by: Oilygarch on Feb 8, 2007 1:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hakuna Watada!!!
They called it a Mistrial!!

See article!!

Although the Judge came across as “benevolent” and “with the best interests of his accused” in mind. Might it be worth mentioning that neither does he forget for whom he works and may have realized that what would have been on trial might have been the definition, if not, the foundation of ‘’Lawful Order’’. As one drills down to the basis argumentum of said Lawfulness, one hits rock bottom when finding that it bases itself on the foundation that would litmus whether or not our campaign is legal internationally, let alone nationally. The verdict, therefore would not solely apply to Watada, but rather, to every man and woman in uniform who for whoever’s sake are ‘’just following orders, Sir or Ma’am’’. New remarks beg perhaps the same global question which once was asked post WW-II about simply following orders. Yet, simply raising the issue might just constitute such a mailai that it could plausibly disrupt social order as we know it on a global scale.

The comments herein do not constitute a confirmation or denial of their origin, alien-nation or a philly-ation to any cause, clause, ideology, organic, inorganic autonomous or forced under duress by means of corporal or out of body experiences. While hypocracy and hypocritical oaths may appear dissociative, consuetudinal societal practices would appear to indicate that these practices go hand in hand for the primal sake of survival.



And may G-d continue to bless America, as well as the rest of its siblings: i.e. the oft-forgotten: humankind.



In my view, we all need to chip in to help chart a course for a positive resolution to the almost unfathomable momentum which has been created, then actually trek through it.



Please enjoy your day

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]