Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

His Dark Materials yields more religious propaganda than anti-religious content.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Anti-Christian Mythology of Phillip Pullman

By Annalee Newitz, AlterNet. Posted January 23, 2007.


His Dark Materials yields more religious propaganda than anti-religious content.
Advertisement

For several years I've heard Philip Pullman's young-adult fantasy trilogy His Dark Materials called an anti-religious response to the mega-Christian Chronicles of Narnia. Progressive fantasy about troubles with an otherworldly version of the Christian right? I'm there. So I snapped up Pullman's three novels -- The Golden Compass, The Subtle Knife, and The Amber Spyglass -- each named after a magical device that aids our heroes in a quest through parallel universes, including a parallel Oxford, England.

Right away, however, I discovered that these are not antireligious novels. Certainly, there are some bad Christians, but there are also a god and tons of angels. Plus, all the universes are united via a spiritual substance called Dust -- or, in our world, dark matter. Turns out dark matter is a kind of psychic life-essence that fuels angels and souls. The Dust thing really bugged me. I expect magic in fantasy worlds, but Pullman turns astrophysics into spiritual goo. It was a rhetorical move right out of Jesusland, where believers have managed to convert science into intelligent design. There's a difference between creating a magical world with its own rules and claiming that scientifically observable phenomena in our own world can actually be explained with angels.

So why has this trilogy been touted by the London Telegraph and countless grumpy evangelicals as anti-Christian? Probably because Pullman portrays the ruling Christian sects in a parallel England as bloodthirsty and cruel. In this enchanted version of our world, all humans have an animal familiar who represents an aspect of their souls -- the emotional part that takes pleasure in worldly things. The government is disturbed by the anti-Christian sensuality represented by the human-familiar bond and gives some Christians money to experiment with separating children from their familiars so that they won't ever become "fallen." After these operations, the "severed" children are either mentally broken or so overwhelmed with grief that they kill themselves. It's a pretty nifty little allegory for all the freaky shit Christians have done to kids to crush their sexual urges.

But the problem here isn't Christianity itself. It's with a bunch of antipleasure adults who want to torture erotic desire out of kids in the name of God. In addition, as we learn in the later books, a similar social problem has emerged in the world of angels. The Christian God is actually a frail old creature being kept alive by fascistic, high-level angels who are using his reputation to reestablish the authority of the kingdom of heaven throughout all the parallel universes. And somehow, because our heroes are fighting to stop these power-mad angels and bad-actor Christians, we're supposed to think the book is antireligion?

Perhaps the West is so steeped in Christian mythology that we can't imagine an outside to Christianity. Pullman gets to be antireligious simply because he criticizes one aspect of Christianity. Instead of pushing hierarchy and sexual repression, he celebrates individualism and sexual expression -- as long as everybody is heterosexual, in love, and conforms to appropriate gender roles.

Lyra, an adventurous little girl from parallel Oxford who rescues a bunch of children from the evil Christian sect in The Golden Compass, defies God but remains in thrall to biblical gender roles. The closer to puberty she gets, the more she hands off her power to violent, strong men. Eventually, she reaches puberty and falls in love with Will, whose "subtle knife" can cut doorways between worlds. After the two young teens have sex, they radiate enough Dust to help save the world. This moment of sex-positivity is Pullman's way of signaling to us that the new "republic of heaven" will be better than the old one.

But many other tenets of Christianity remain intact: the belief that spirituality, rather than science, can explain the world; and the idea that it is natural for women to subordinate themselves to men. When Lyra returns to her Oxford, where only men attend university, she can only hope to be educated at a less-prestigious women's college. And her attachment to Will has robbed her of her only power: reading the golden compass of truth. If Lyra's transformation from hero to second-class citizen is what passes for anti-Christian storytelling, maybe we should be looking for a new way out of the religion problem.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: books, religion, christian right, fantasy

Annalee Newitz (annalee@techsploitation.com) is a surly media nerd who would rather open the doorways between worlds than kill a God who doesn't exist anyway.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
spirituality and science
Posted by: myshele on Jan 23, 2007 11:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why can't spirituality and science BOTH explain the universe? They're not necessarily mutually exclusive, they can be complimentary, in the way of science and poetry or music. One thing that Pullman challenges is the narrowness of both the scientific and dogmatic/religious explanations of reality. Unfortunately, he gets it caught up in Christian symbolism and gender roles (good points!) but fundamentally it seems a useful exercise in imagining new connections -- which is an enormous threat to the Powers That Be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: spirituality and science Posted by: jtalley
» RE: spirituality and science Posted by: skiffer
» Sort of. Posted by: kittynboi
London Telegraph?
Posted by: colinmeister on Jan 24, 2007 6:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no such publication as the "London Telegraph". If the writer meant "The Daily Telegraph", why didn't she write that? I am sick and tired of writers using fictitious names for newspapers, and it happens all too frequently on AlterNet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's the thing
Posted by: wawa on Jan 24, 2007 6:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“There are two Christianities in our midst. One worships a punitive father and seeks obedience at all costs. It is patriarchal, demonizes woman, the earth, science, gays, lesbians, and deep thought. It builds on fear and it supports empire-builders. Its theology includes a punitive father in the sky and teaches original sin.

"The other Christianity recognizes the original blessing that all beings derive from. We recognize awe, not sin, not guilt, as the starting point of true religion. We recognize a divinity who is source of all things and is as much mother as father, as much female as male. We honor creation and diversity.

"When God created everything, He pronounced it all good. We are here to make love to life.

"Yes, we are here to make love to life. Delight in creation and take your dreams into our politics and institutions.

"We live in the midst of a suicidal economy, motivated by love of money. We have reached a dead end. What we need to turn it around are hearts in love with life.

"How do we do it? We first must move from domination to partnership, and we begin by educating our young in awe and wonder, not how to take tests. Awe leads to reverence, which leads to gratitude, which will reinvent our species. This is the task of our generation: to regain awe. The three Rs need to be balanced by the ten Cs: contemplation, creativity, chaos, compassion, courage, critical consciousness, community, celebration, ceremony, and character.

“In community, people remain united, despite everything that divides them. In capitalist society, people are isolated, separated, despite everything that should hold them together. We are in the midst of an epic struggle between community and capitalistic society. We need a new narrative. It is the economy of materialism; it is the virus of affluenza that has weakened family life.”

-Father Matthew Fox at TIKKUN's first conference Network Spiritual Progressives excerpted from
"KEEP HOPE ALIVE" Chapter 12: The Revolution Has Begun
by eileen fleming,
http://www.wearewideawake.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rembember Harry Potter ... ??
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Jan 24, 2007 7:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, let's face it, Rowling just REEKS of modern mainstream British liberal parenting theory: self esteem, gender equality, the dignity of the child, the goodness of most-but-not-all adults, the value of courage, curiosity, integrity etc etc.

But the right wing evangelical attack on the Potter books as 'Satanist' and "Occultist" made no sense whatever

... UNLESS you understand the "Trouble in River City" strategy: the more visible the object you attack, the more visible you become as well. (The 700 Club wouldn't be getting many new members by attacking the Albigensian Heresy or the Cathar movment, for example.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And
Posted by: McJulie on Jan 24, 2007 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read the first book and part of the second, and liked it as imaginative fantasy, but it really bugged me that the daemons of adult "servants" were all dogs. That spoke of a classism and career-determinism that seemed to go completely against all his stated aims of religious egalitarianism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Heard an interview with Pullman on the Radio once
Posted by: Bab5nutz on Jan 24, 2007 7:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He spent over half the interview running down 'Narnia' and 'Lord of the Rings'. He complained that they did not have enough sex in them.
Okay, I believe in freedom of speech. At the same time LOTR and Narnia paved the way for writers such as him.
Right now, he is a popular author. It would be interesting to check back in a hundred years, and see if his books, along with LOTR and Narnia are still around.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

try reading the books
Posted by: ryandake on Jan 24, 2007 8:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
try reading the books again, getting the facts right (for example: the young pair having sex does not cause a radiation of Dust, etc., etc., etc.), then writing a retraction. be professional.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: try reading the books Posted by: bengardella
» RE: try reading the books Posted by: lindalee
Letting Them Win
Posted by: madmac10 on Jan 24, 2007 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it another example of the ostracising smugness of the left, or is it just another example of their complete ineptitude waging the so-called Culture War? In the first case, such hubris (i.e., that the opposition is so incapable of winning America's hearts and minds) alienates more people than it embraces. In the latter, we are committing one of the most atrocious blunders in warfare: allowing the enemy to determine the battlefield. I am convinced of the latter, as time and again, we let the right wing xtian fundamentalist faction define terms.

This is such a tried-and-true rovian tactic. Our grand-daughters will accuse us of equal culpability when their right to choose has been taken away because we have allowed ourselves to poorly defend our "anti-life" position. Our grandsons will be fighting and dying for a non-existent constitution because we couldn't keep from appearing to hate America. Our grandchildren will believe that God created the Grand Canyon simply because we couldn't properly address Intelligent Design. And our literature will be as interesting as "Pilgrim's Progress" because all we seem to be capable of writing about is a response to fundamentlist diatribe.

If this poor bloke's books are a direct address to xtian fundamentalism, then why bother to even crack them open? Better to read Jean Genet to your children that such bland pablum. He was the one, after all, who claimed that a negative reaction to something is the same as a positive one: it gives power to whatever you are reacting to.

While you might be getting more cohesive, your numbrs are dwindling. Your enemies are gloating over their victories at this very moment. They defined the battlefield and you, like poor, duped pawns, moved right into the fray. I'll pray for you: perhaps the survivors will be stronger and smarter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Surely, comrade commisar, you jest!!!
Posted by: left-leaning-libertarian on Jan 24, 2007 11:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read the Pullman trilogy a few years ago and found them thorougly entertaining, thought-provoking, and brilliantly conceived. It is simply amazing to see these kinds of issues addressed in (supposedly) juvenile literature; the conflict of faith and science; the evil that humans do through their institutions. . .

The only other ("childrens") author who comes close to this sort of cerebral brilliance is Madilyne (A Wrinkle In Time) L'Engle.

Anything like this that gets kids to think about the world around them, and, more importantly, to QUESTION the world around them is good in my book (I am 48). I've felt for a long time that there's a need for something like a new edition of "The Little Red School Book;" just something to challenge kids intellectually and give them some material with which they can critically challenge the pabulum and dogma of repressive church and state. Books like these, getting kids to think through an entertaining story, are a good start.

So, why the hell is the author of this review so bent on demanding "ideological purity" from Pullman? Consider the story on its own merits, consider that much of Pullman's inspiration was drawn from Milton's "Paradise Lost," and
consider the audience for which it was intended; consider all these things then LIGHTEN UP!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Flaws & All
Posted by: hbw on Jan 24, 2007 2:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Despite its many flaws, I loved reading and re-reading Pullman's trilogy. I was even moved to write an admittedly flawed song about Lyra Belacqua and her accomplishments. Some of the passages do not describe the action very clearly, especially in The Amber Spyglass; you have to read very closely to follow what's happening, and even then it may not come across.

There are many ways to interpret and appreciate the Big Ideas with which Pullman plays. But don't slag him for anti-feminism or heterocentrism. He has plenty of strong, capable female characters (true, one is a toxic bitch), especially the witches. And the love between a pair of angels is homosexual by default, since all angels are male in "appearance" but technically without sex or even gender--and it is just as valid as that between any pair of humans.

Do Will and Lyra have sex? It is left intentionally unclear, but you can infer as much. Does that actually cause the Dust to come back? Unclear: One follows the other, but doesn't necessarily result from it. And yes, the Dust (the Dark Materials themselves) is a "scientific" explanation for the spiritual consciousness that defines humans and the mulefa--cheesy, new-agey, but it works as a metaphor on multiple levels.

Just a shame they couldn't get Kinky Friedman to play Lee Scoresby, the Texan aeronaut, in the film. He was busy with something else the last couple of years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

thanks for the spoilers
Posted by: tineleyspice on Jan 24, 2007 2:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and yes as someone said above, read the books again, I'm pretty sure you misunderstood key plot points.

...and for the rest of you, if haven't read the books yet, give them a try. The audio-book is great too--read by Phillip Pullman with a full cast.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Have you even vaguely understood these books?
Posted by: esteph on Jan 24, 2007 2:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh how you missed the point.

The trilogy is an ALLEGORY, not a New Age liberal polemic. It's about "The Republic of Heaven" - freedom in our minds, freedom in our society. It's about a girl's (not yet complete) transition towards womanhood.It's about the pain of adolescence - the pain of having to make hard choices. It's about a child learning that things have to be surrendered as well as gained and her making a principled choice to do just that. It's about growing up, transition. It's about loyalty, courage, love.

And, yes, it IS an attack on loveless, dictatorial, mean spirited religion. On the religion of terror. On religious fundamentalism. The religious right should be far more afraid of it than they are of Harry Potter. I dread what bland degutted version of it Hollywood will come up with.

And daemons are NOT "familiars". They are the unspoken side of the personality - the Jungian Shadow. They are absolutely part of the individual - that is why the forced separation of a child from his//her daemon is so obscene to Lyra. it is a lobotomy, a destruction of the personality.

Lyra does not surrender to male values, but she has to return from her journey to a world where men still dominate. But throughout her journey she challenges the gender norms of HER world. She can't challenge those of 1990s USA (remember, her "home" world is an alternate England that looks a bit 19th Century) because she doesn't Live in 1990s USA.

To anyone tempted to read "His Dark Materials" I would urge you to do so. It is a beautiful trilogy, full of rich allegory and layers of meaning. Oh - and by the way, the correct title of the first book is "Northern Lights". "The Golden Compass" was an invention of the American publishers to give it a title that "fits" the other two titles. It's a far more relevant title and an alethiometer isn't a compass anyway!

When you've read it - go out and buy his Sally Lockart trilogy. Not as deep, but still challenging gender norms and great fun.

And if you want to listen to Pullman talking - hear him on Education or Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This book is attacked as anti-religious
Posted by: Ghoulman on Jan 24, 2007 3:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... and that's not surpriseing. All those christian groups have to look like they're doing something and get into the papers.

The book is little different in plot and imagery than scads of comic books over the last three decades at least (did anyone see Constantine? keanu reeves?). If this book is being marketed as "anti-religious" I gotta wonder what Ad Exec is laughing his arse off over this.

Naturally, the woman will have the same role they always do in teen stories. As do the men. It's thier age that's the thing as much as the roles they are lead into. It might seem like it all happened "naturally" but it's just that kids aren't ever seen as anything but proto-citizens.

You know, if they, the characters in this book, were really young adults they'd react like them. This book reinforces the same traditional roles the comics do simply because the creators aren't making anything more than a safe, easy to sell, mild, commercial product.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hermionie
Posted by: hermionie on Jan 24, 2007 4:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ah but my children and I have read these books many times- and one must not forget in the last book the death of God is anti-climactic (Lyra should have at least said "oops") and the angels fail to notice..Also In the last book a homosexual angel becomes the hero of the scene when he drowns a wicked preist. Lyra and Wil bcome a sort of new adam and eve...Ok I thought the end was kind of wanting... none the less... In my obviously non-traditionalist household the kids and I have had hours of great conversations about the relevance of "dust" and the problem of "the Church".
Why can't the dust just be consciousness? Authenticity? The children are covered but not the adults, because they live in a (to use religious terms here) state of "grace" i.e. they haven't sold out and become anything other than what they are authentically. I love the idea that separating someone from their true selves is as act of violence and violation. That's what my kiddos and I thought of it all.
As far as "his dark materials" (yes a quote from Milton-I think Pullman is an Oxford prof) perhaps "dark matter" (which is the most prevelant thing in the universe) represents all that is mtsterious and unknowable. Love these books.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

any spoiler alert possible?
Posted by: juhuacha on Jan 24, 2007 7:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
article was fine, but I was reading through the comments and... had to shut my eyes (I'm only on the first book, they're not the easiest thing to find in China, so its taken me a while to get the second one sent over). for future reference, could people please put "spoiler alert" in their comment header?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Think of C.P. Snow and the two cultures
Posted by: Consumatopia on Jan 24, 2007 7:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His Dark Materials reflects the intuitions and prejudices of someone on the Liberal Arts side of academia rather than the Science side--he's hostile to mainstream Christianity, and he's hostile to dogmatic, unquestioning science. His ideals seem to be questioning, self-reflection, worldly experience, and subjective intuition. The last of these being offensive to dogmatic science.

Subjective intuition, which I also believe in, is unfortunately linked to borderline crackpot theories of quantum mechanics. Pullman's version of QM seems to combine most ridiculous aspects of Many Worlds, Copenhagen, and probably a few others. I actually find it more amusing than offensive.

The difficulties with feminism and gender are a bit harder to explain away, but I'd be more inclined to see them as either just mainstream middle class Westernism or perhaps even an overreaction to dogmatic political correctness than Christianity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DOES WALMART CARRY THIS TITLE?
Posted by: charlieparisek on Jan 24, 2007 10:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ya think?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You missed the whole point
Posted by: jacqui2 on Jan 25, 2007 8:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the worst, and most pretentious, review of His Dark Materials that I have ever read. You completely missed the point of the trilogy. Ugh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You're wrong, I'm correct
Posted by: lamar on Jan 25, 2007 11:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love how all these hosers think they have the only true interpretation of the books. Nice. It's illustrative of the far left mind. Instead of saying, "gee, I took this message from the book and here's why," you people say, "you are wrong, I know better than you." Jeez.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think you missed an important dimension...
Posted by: Shakti on Jan 26, 2007 2:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... namely, Pullman's pro-pagan, pro-sexuality, pro-witch, and pro-nature theme. I agree with some of the other posters here who recommend that you carefully re-read the books and reflect more deeply on the archetypes he is working with.

On a very fundamental level, these books are valorizing the feminine. "His" Dark Materials are all about Shakti energy, the Creatrix.

RE: the movie - I think Nicole Kidman is miscast as Mrs. Coulter. I was hoping for a brunette Uma Thurman. Oh well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» one more thing ... Posted by: Shakti
Just a Damned Good Story
Posted by: lulugeez on Jan 27, 2007 8:52 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh for godssakes Annalee, can't you just have a good read? Pullman's books are certainly good on that level. Pullman's books also are largely anti-god as a transcendent being--as a being from beyond who despises the flesh and blood constraints and pleasures of life on planet earth. Take note of the daemons, without whom none of the characters could survive. Perhaps they represent the bonds that we have, but choose to ignore or sever, to biology? His books show a humanity struggling to survive the anti-materialistic pull of the virtual. Dark materials and dust are matter--"stuff" that you can't take with you as you plug in for your trandscendental upload. The mysterious or spiritual aspect of these stories, that seem to unsettle you, are an aknowledgement that many mysteries remain about our existance and the world we live in and this will ever be so--unless we succeed in rationalizing the human spirit down to a size acceptable to engineers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Isn't The Same Shit We Went Through With Harry Potter???
Posted by: Kym525 on Jan 27, 2007 10:35 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Overanalyzation?

For fuck's sake people, can't you just READ and ENJOY a book without trying to make it fit into some oddball worldview? I love this series and think it's kind of wasted on the YA audience, most of whom are still stuck in 'Gossip Girl' mode.

We accused the far right wack jobs of going over the rails in the case of Harry Potter - they went as far as burning copies of the books. Here you guys are doing the same thing (except the burning aspect, but I really put it past some of you).

What next - The Dragonriders of Pern as eco-fable? Get a life!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]