Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The information age could have happened 2,000 years ago but didn't. What we need to learn from the past -- and correct -- to keep from plunging into another Dark Ages.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Techsploitation: This Is Not Progress

By Annalee Newitz, AlterNet. Posted December 5, 2006.


The information age could have happened 2,000 years ago but didn't. What we need to learn from the past -- and correct -- to keep from plunging into another Dark Ages.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Annalee Newitz

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

I can't stop thinking about the Antikythera Mechanism, a 2,000-year-old computer-like device made by some Greeks who wanted to predict the motion of the sun, moon, and stars. Fashioned out of highly sophisticated interlocking gears, the mechanism was discovered a little over a century ago in a shipwreck off the coast of the Greek island Antikythera. About the size of a shoebox and operated with a hand crank, the machine can also plot the dates of eclipses.

I know all these details because a group of international researchers used cool new X-ray imaging technologies to look at the mechanism, which to the naked eye appears rather like a pile of crusty, corroded plates that have stuck together. Using X-rays, however, scientists could see how the gears fit together. Pictures are available on Nature.com and reveal a machine whose complexity rivals the internals on a Rolex. Researchers say it was probably state-of-the-art technology around 30 BC. It's likely that Greek astronomers on Rhodes had been perfecting such gear-driven temporal charts of the heavens for decades or even centuries before inventing the Antikythera Mechanism.

As Nature editor Jo Marchant points out, what's intriguing is not so much that the device existed 2,000 years ago but that the technology behind it ceased to exist for the next 1,000 years until the first mechanical astrolabes and clocks worked their way out of the Arab world and into the West. It's very possible that gear-driven mechanisms were made throughout the first millennium in the Middle East, but Western scholars have yet to gain access to the ancient texts that describe them.

For people interested in the evolution of technology and so-called scientific progress, the Antikythera Mechanism doesn't just provoke questions about history. Instead, it asks us to rethink the future. If the ancient Greeks and Romans managed to invent the precursor to information technology 2,000 years ago and then essentially forget about it, what does that say about the kinds of amazing advances we might be throwing away right now?

Tech historians have two theories about why the Greeks and Romans didn't get into gear mechanisms full bore and invent some kind of clock or computer before the Holy Roman Empire smooshed Europe. First of all, there was no power source for their gear devices other than the hand crank. Weight-powered clocks weren't invented until the late Middle Ages in Europe. So devices like the Antikythera Mechanism weren't particularly practical unless you were an astronomer or a rich collector. Plus, who needed to know time down to the minute? As long as you knew the hours and seasons, you could get by just fine in classical antiquity.

More interesting to me is the theory that the widespread practice of slavery in Greece and Rome would have prevented people from trying to create machines that could perform human labor. It's not that having slaves kept people from inventing gear mechanisms -- it just kept them from imagining possible outcomes and applications. If you already have people performing all the manual and intellectual labor you don't want to do, there's no need to figure out what kinds of machines would be capable of doing it.

Obviously, it's impossible to know what stopped our ancestors from connecting the dots and ushering in the information age 2,000 years ago. And it may be equally impossible to figure out what our sociological blind spots are today that prevent us from hurtling into a better world more quickly. Still, there are some missteps in progress we can see and correct before plunging into another Dark Ages. It's clear that our dependence on oil has halted progress toward finding cleaner, more efficient energy sources. Similarly, the widespread use of cars has halted progress in public transportation.

Who knows what kinds of great discoveries are cast aside when labs lose their funding or graduate students lose hope and slink away from experiments in defeat? Tomorrow's Antikythera Mechanism is probably sitting in some disgruntled engineer's garage right now, rusting. Let's hope we discover it in two years rather than 2,000.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: technology, information age

Annalee Newitz (annalee@techsploitation.com) is a surly media nerd who was actually invented 2,000 years ago but only discovered recently.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What good would it have done them anyway?
Posted by: medstudgeek on Dec 5, 2006 7:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They didn't have a complex society that had to be administered the way we do. It's like inventing a machine that makes people want to have sex--what's the use?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» VIAGRA Posted by: Just Curious
I Predict The Moon And The Earth Spins Into The Sun
Posted by: hole11 on Dec 5, 2006 8:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Haha, I beat the Aztecs again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hurtling?
Posted by: oregoncharles on Dec 5, 2006 10:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"hurtling into a better world more quickly."

You're quite sure that's such a good idea? What makes you think it would be "better?"

Here I am, using the Internet to question the wisdom of extremely rapid innovation: but the Internet, too, has had unforeseen consequences; for instance, a tendency to eat your life.

I am actually more concerned that we use judgement and caution in introducing new technologies, than that we catch every new gadget that comes down the pike. There are quite a few of those we could have done without - atom bombs spring to mind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hurtling? Posted by: nickptar
The next great invention...
Posted by: mr. joshua on Dec 6, 2006 1:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...I predict will be the re-discovery of the bicycle as an extremely energy-efficient, non-polluting mode of transportation. Of course, as an avid bicycle commuter, I could be blind to my own bias on the subject.

Naah. ;)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hard to believe...
Posted by: adp3d on Dec 8, 2006 3:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that its been 40 years since we landed on the moon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hard to believe... Posted by: DaBear
The secret to biking in Boston.
Posted by: guleblanc on Dec 8, 2006 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I discovered this when I worked in Chinatown a few years ago. You have to ride in the middle of the lane. Then you (1) won't get hit by opening doors from parked cars, and (2) the cars think you are a slow car. If you ride close to the right edge of the lane they don't know what to make of you, so they ignore you. Then they pass you, but they push you rightward into the parked cars.

The cars will honk and yell things at you, but they would be doing that anyway, even if you were driving. You just wouldn't be able to hear them in your car. They won't kill you.

Also, obey all the traffic regulations, including stop signs and stop lights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maya's Prophecy:
Posted by: makeadifference on Dec 8, 2006 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The History Channel recently ran a program on the Maya Doomsday Prophecies. On December 21, 2012 a world wide tidal surge due to a magnetic shift on earth will causes ice sheets to break loose producing tsunamies around the world. 2/3rds of the world population will die. Hmmmm, just something more to think about. More information on this by searching the Dresden Codex.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Maya's Prophecy: Posted by: Roverton
» RE: Maya's Prophecy: Posted by: nickptar
» RE: Maya's Prophecy: Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
THE CHINESE
Posted by: Just Curious on Dec 8, 2006 8:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't forget the Chinese, folks. Whatever old whitey in Greece and Rome has invented the Chinese are sure to have invented a couple of centuries before.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: THE CHINESE Posted by: mejsmith
Nice article but the author as always leaves the reader powerless and/or depressed.
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 8, 2006 9:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps she wouldn't mind spending some time out offering some solutions to go along with it so that readers don't feel that all is lost, would she?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scientific discoveries
Posted by: willymack on Dec 8, 2006 12:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are so many discoveries made on a daily basis, they can't be absorbed let alone acted upon, so they languish somewhere until such time as someone peruses the material out of sheer boredom. Soild state electronics are a good case in point. Thirty years after the discovery ot the transistor, someone finally put together a radio using these devices. The rest is history; when's the last time you listened to a tube-type radio? It's a bit depressing to think that a cure for cancer, or a device that would make fossil fuels obsolete may be gathering dust in a university basement or some genius's attic, for lack of time, money, or interest due to greed (oil companies), resistance by religious loonies, or just the usual fatheads.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Scientific discoveries Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: Scientific discoveries Posted by: Edward George
The Romans invented a steam engine
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Dec 8, 2006 5:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or so I read many years ago. (Anybody with a link, please provide same - would be greatly appreciated) I understand that it was a toy and the implications were not explored. Imagine if the implications if both devices had been appreciated then and been exploited. Of course we might all be speaking latin and arguing about the depredations of the latest emperor. Hmmm, no latin, but...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Waitaholdit there...
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Dec 9, 2006 5:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, the Greeks may not have invented WATERCLOCKS back then, but they did use hidden weights to open temple doors and such - made an impressive effect. Then there was that 5,000 year old dry cell battery found in the Sahara... There are records of successful eye operations having been done including some types of cataracts having been corrected, appendectomies, and a host of other things. The Greeks lnong before they met Rome had a secret "healer's powder" that supposedly cured infections and lots of diseases - when it didn't kill - that "tasted of moulde" it was said, and THAT was lost. So was the knowledge that cleanliness help prevent infections. The knowledge was THERE once.

The bit about not wanting to replace slave labor with machines is a reach, too. Slaves weren't as reliable as machines. Consider instead the ban on books that weren't sanctioned Holy Scripture by Constantine; consider the burning of the Library at Alexandria because it was "profane" and not Scripture - five MILLION manuscripts or more - some centuries old! Anything the priests didn't understand went into the flames. In the Middle Ages, prestidigitators did too if they couldn't prove what they did wasn't magic, if they got the chance to try.

No, even into the times of Galileo and daVinci, the Church was busily destroying knowledge they didn't like. Here's a little-known fact: in Oaxaca, there are stelae that USED to have carvings of cobras and African elephants. After centuries of remaining intact, twenty years after their discovery by whites, they had all been defaced - every one. The original documentation shows them, but there's no proof now. Another: a cave discovered in, I think, Spain, that had been continuously occupied for almost 130,000 years was found. Some bodies were taken for examination (this is in modern times). Within two weeks after test results were announced, the lab burned down, with the lab tech and all the evidence; there was also a fire - IN THE CAVE ITSELF! All evidence gone. When was the last time you heard of a CAVE burning down?

Like America's news, no big fuss was ever made in any of these instances save in scientific circles, and that dies down quickly.


Consider again: anything that contradicts the interpretation that Earth is about 5-6,000 years old tends to disappear or die along with the people who found it. Please pardon the lack of links to substantiate this; I'm half asleep as usual, and it's hard-to-find stuff anyhow. The thing is, I've been into archaeology since third grade - half a century now - and I retain about 80 percent of most of what I read, for what that's worth. It IS in the interests of the Catholic church that this stuff not come out, though, seeing as how they HATE to back down on anything. Even when the Pope isn't speaking ex cathedra and is allowed to err, it's better if he doesn't.

God forbid the faithful should ask questions, and the Church has fought tooth and nail against ANY technology from the beginning. As with what Bush and the Dominionists/Fascists he's with have been doing, the ignorant are simply easier to control. I can't help but wonder: is there a special unit within the Church that does for physical evidence what the Society of Jesus does with new philosophies and ways of reasoning? The agenda of the Jesuits was kept secret for ages; why not another unit? And I realize that these things are all over the place regarding timelines, but that, it seems to me, is part of the point.

Coincidence, all this? I dunno...

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Green Glass
Posted by: magistre on Dec 9, 2006 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Consider also in the south-western Sahara there are deposits of green glass -this is silicon (sand) fused together by the heat of a nuclear explosion. and this is not the only place it occurs. In India they began excavating an area (later deremined to be in excess of 8,000 years old) for a new housing developement and had to stop because the area was lethally contaminated with radiation.
And the beat goes on...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Green Glass Posted by: nickptar
» RE: Green Glass Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» RE: Green Glass? Posted by: oregoncharles
Ancient discoveries before the world was ready for them
Posted by: liveoilfree on Dec 9, 2006 8:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of western philosophy, says Whitehead, is nothing but footnotes on Plato. Meaning they thought of it first.

Many of the inventions of the greeks were lost simply because the world was not technologically ready for them. Lack of communications, secrecy, failure of infrastructure.

Consider Hero of Alexandria's "steam engine" prior to C.E.

Newitz is correct in that there was no great incentive to convert this toy or novelty into an industry of steam turbines, possibly because the concept of "factory" was hunched banks of cheap slaves.

But this steam engine was lost for 1700 years also because the infrastructure would not support it: there was no cheap supply of iron plate, fuel, etc. There was arguably a patronized community of scholars in Alexandria, but the mindset of exploitation of nature developed by Roger Bacon et al in the 13th Century had not set the stage for a techno-adventure as it did in England.

Interestingly, the Greeks also not only knew that the earth was spherical (later suppressed for centuries) but also calculated its circumference within 4% of its actual size. This was done using angles of the sun measured at two distant points (Greece and Egypt) at the same time on the same day, allowing triangulation Greeks measured circumference of Earth in 3rd Century B.C.E.

All these smarts failed, arguably, because of a lack of supporting technological infrastucture. And no Internet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ice isn't magnetic
Posted by: oregoncharles on Dec 10, 2006 7:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good point,that.

The Earth's magnetic field does indeed quit and then reverse occasionally, and appears to be getting ready to do so again (that is, its strength is declining.) This would be very inconvenient if you're using a compass, and will doubtles have other unpleasant effects, but they don't show up in the geological record. I.E., no noticeable extinctions, although the flip is recorded in the rocks.

A sudden shift in the ice sheets, either North or South, is certainly possible and might be sudden enough to produce tsunamis; a sudden overall rise in sealevel would be more likely, minus the wave.

Overall, as we discover occasionally, this prophecy is a fairly safe one: the Earth has lots of ways to get us. But the magnetic reversal wouldn't cause the ice sheets to shift, just play hob with radio reception, that sort of thing.

Isn't this whole string badly off-topic?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ice isn't magnetic Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Ice isn't magnetic Posted by: Ian MacLeod
Just think...
Posted by: Burton on Dec 10, 2006 3:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...we'd have 2000 years of Tomb Raider games to play!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]