Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

A new community of expert and amateur readers grades the news as it happens...

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Don't Trust the News?

By Rory O'Connor, AlterNet. Posted November 27, 2006.


A new community of expert and amateur readers grades the news as it happens...
Advertisement

How can you be sure that the news you see and hear is true? Are there any journals and journalists that you can really trust and rely on? If so, how can you find them amidst the clangor and the clutter?

After all, we live in an age of media scams and scandals -- from blowing it up on "Dateline" NBC to making it up in the New York Times (and the Daily News and USA Today and the Boston Globe and the New Republic and so on, ad nauseum and seemingly ad infinitum…) and from Jon Stewart's "Daily Show" to O.J. Simpson's "If I Did It" show… from Fox News to faux news all the way to even phonier video 'news' releases… and from government-and-corporate-sponsored "opinion" commentary to paid Pentagon propaganda posing as authentic journalism to Disney's undocumented 911 "docudrama" -- wherever and whenever you look, examples of media make-believe abound.

So what's a citizen to do? In recent years, a combination of factors -- including but not limited to the consolidation of mainstream media by huge multinational entertainment conglomerates, the concomitant spread of cable television's highly partisan and factually challenged opinions-as-news formats, the digital information revolution and its explosion of online media outlets, and the Defense Department's Rumsfeldian reliance on "Information Dominance" -- have combined to create a serious long-term problem for our democracy. To put it bluntly, many of us no longer feel we can trust the news media to deliver the information we need to function as fully informed democrats.

Enter NewsTrust, an online social news network aimed at helping people identify quality journalism -- or "news you can trust." This free, not-for-profit service offers the most trusted news of the day, as selected by community members using state-of-the-art media literacy tools. By filtering content available from online sources, establishing common metrics for evaluation, and accessing the "wisdom of the crowds" through social networking, the free, not-for-profit NewsTrust service offers one possible solution to the "News You Can Trust" conundrum. The website, where members rate the news online based on commonly accepted standards of journalistic quality, features news and analysis from hundreds of mainstream and independent news sources. This non-partisan community effort tracks news media worldwide and helps citizens make informed decisions about democracy across party lines.

At NewsTrust, anyone can submit stories and news sources for community consideration. Each is then researched and rated by panels of reviewers for balance, fairness and other basic journalistic principles. Some reviewers are paid practicing journalists, others students -- but most are simply "ordinary citizens" seeking trustworthy information. NewsTrust's voluminous research shows that "amateur'" citizen reviewers using the site's unique review tools are able to evaluate news as reliably as experienced professionals.

NewsTrust is the brainchild of former journalist and brilliant digital media pioneer Fabrice Florin. After cashing out of a company that delivered content to mobile devices, Florin had time and money on his hands. While seeking something "socially useful" to occupy his time, he soon determined that media and its discontents would be a good place to put his energy. In early 2005, Florin began his effort to jumpstart NewsTrust. One of his first calls was to this reporter.

A mutual friend had referred Florin, whom I did not know. He told me of his plan to create an online space devoted "simply to helping each other find good journalism online." He said that he has some early interest and a modicum of backing from MoveOn, the self-identified "progressive family of organizations" that claims 3.3 million members across America working together "to realize the progressive vision of our country's founders."

I told Florin that I liked his concept, but thought it would never work if it accepted funding and support solely from the likes of MoveOn. The key to NewsTrust's success, to my mind, was to ensure that the service was completely non-ideological and non-partisan -- both in fact and in perception. Aligning closely with any partisan group -- especially the controversial Moveon -- would doom the effort at its inception. Finally, I told Florin he would also have to reach out to conservatives and independents and make strenuous efforts to include them in the NewsTrust community.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: news, web

Filmmaker and journalist Rory O'Connor writes the Media Is A Plural blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
One simple question
Posted by: sapatatanka on Nov 27, 2006 10:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just how does one report on genocide, say in Dharfour, in a "balanced, fair" manner and how does one test news for "other basic journalistic principles" in a piece about, say the slaughter of North American Indians by the US?

I fear this site will turn out to be another whitewash of mainstream media news.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One simple answer Posted by: roc
» RE: One simple answer Posted by: sapatatanka
» RE: One simple answer Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
Would love to see this work.
Posted by: stockpix on Nov 28, 2006 9:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This looks like a potentially great idea, the only thing that worrries me is the potential for a "Fox" effect where ill informed partisans overwhelm reality. I presume there is some provision for fighting this partisan whacko effect in either direction. Hopefully, the informed will be more motivated. Perhaps like Wikipedia, it will be essentially self correcting, rather than simply being an extended poll of our collective ignorances. I'll have to take a look.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Basic Journalistic Principles
Posted by: MattSimon on Nov 28, 2006 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I think that this NewsTrust.net site is a potentially brilliant idea, if executed well and were cleaned up a bit design-wise, I disagree with the principles on which you say it is founded.

You assert that each story gets "researched and rated by panels of reviewers for balance, fairness and other basic journalistic principles." I ask, to which principles are you referring?

In my opinion and experience, the best authority on journalistic principles is a book co-written by Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel, the director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism called, "The Elements of Journalism."

In the book, they outline what the journalistic principles should be. They are:

- Journalism's first obligation is to the truth.
- Its first loyalty is to citizens.
- Its essence is a discipline of verification.
- Its practitioners must maintain an independence from those they cover.
- It must serve as an independent monitor of power.
- It must provide a forum for public criticism and compromise.
- It must strive to make the significant interesting and relevant.
- It must keep the news comprehensive and proportional.
- Its practitioners must be allowed to excercise their personal conscience.

The closest that they come to endorsing fairness and balance is with the second to last point, making the news "comprehensive and proportional." In the text of the book, they clearly explain why fairness and balance should not be the objects of good journalism.

Fairness, they argue, is a problem. Because, to whom does a journalist strive to be fair? Is it to those in power? Is it to the citizens? Is it to one's own family? There is no clear answer. The only thing that a journalist should be "fair" to is the truth.

Balance, they argue, is a problem because that necessarily includes spin from both sides which, in many cases, becomes more important than the actual news. Balance creates television shows like CNN's now-cancelled show, "Crossfire." Balance creates a false sense of debate.

Objective, good journalism is drastically different than journalism striving toward "fairness and balance."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

looks promising
Posted by: off-the-radar 2 on Nov 28, 2006 6:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
thanks for the article. The site looks very promising.

Be great to link to more European and UK articles (guess that would be up to the readership, including me!). I also really like the non-idealogical nature of the site with views from all over the spectrum, albeit ones striving for balance, accuracy and truth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It Is All Propaganda
Posted by: pixiequix on Nov 29, 2006 8:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The newspaper you park in front of in the morning, the daily news you flip on at night- it's all valuable advertising space, bought and sold with one goal in mind; the control of your mind. Think I'm being dramatic, or even just a bit excessive? Think again. It is all propaganda. Carefully designed to mold and shape your opinions, beliefs, and ideas, along with all of your wants, needs, and desires. I have a suggestion- don't let them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Trustworthy Alternet
Posted by: YogiBear on Nov 30, 2006 2:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NewsTrust lists the Alternet on its top 10 best online sites. Seems like that should have been mentioned at the beginning or end of this piece by the editors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]