Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

If the 'Seinfeld' comedian got called out for using the n-word, so should black people who use it in jest or endearment.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Richards' N-Word Diatribe

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, AlterNet. Posted November 21, 2006.


If the 'Seinfeld' comedian got called out for using the n-word, so should black people who use it in jest or endearment.
Advertisement

Former “Seinfeld” star Michael Richards quickly bowed to public pressure and apologized for his boneheaded N-word-laced diatribe against black customers who allegedly heckled him during his appearance at the Laugh Factory.

But Richards was a soft target. He's a white man that sprinted way over the line of racial etiquette. It was a no-brainer that blacks would rage against him. They have done the same against the legion of other white celebrities, politicians and public figures that have gotten caught with their racial pants hanging down. When the predictable firestorm hits, they back peddle fast, do their mea culpas and declare they're not racist.

The same can't be said for the legion of black comedians and rappers that have virtually canonized the word. They sprinkle the word throughout their rap lyrics and comedy lines, and black writers and filmmakers go through lengthy gyrations to justify using the word. During a panel discussion at the Summer Television Critics Association tour in 2005, Aaron McGruder, creator of the popular comic strip “Boondocks,” defiantly told the audience that he'd use the N-word as much as he pleased in his comic strip and in his series on the Cartoon Network's “Adult Swim.” If folks didn't like it, well, tough.

McGruder and N-word users and apologists serve up the lame rationale that the more a black person uses the word, the less offensive it becomes. They claim that they are cleansing the word of its negative connotations so that racists can no longer use it to hurt blacks. Comedian turned activist Dick Gregory had the same idea some years ago when he titled his autobiography Nigger. Black writer Robert DeCoy also tried to apply the same racial shock therapy to whites when he titled his novel, The Nigger Bible.

The black N-word apologists tick off an endless storehouse of defenses to justify use of the word. They claim that that it is a term of endearment. They say to each other, "You're my nigger if you don't get no bigger." Or, "that nigger sure is something." Others use it in anger or disdain, "Nigger, you sure got an attitude." Or, "A nigger ain't s...."

Still, others are defiant. They say they don't care what a white person calls them since words can't harm them. They forget, ignore or distort one thing. Words are not value neutral. They express concepts and ideas. Often, words reflect society's standards. If color-phobia is a deep-rooted standard in American life, then a word, as emotionally charged as nigger, will always reinforce and perpetuate stereotypes. It can't be sanitized, cleansed, inverted, or redeemed as a culturally liberating word. Nigger can't and shouldn't be made acceptable, no matter whose mouth it comes out of or what excuse is tossed out for using it.

There are still dozens of daily examples where whites (and other non-blacks) taunt, and harass blacks by calling them nigger, spray paint the word on their homes, businesses, churches, physically assault and even murder blacks. In the FBI's annual count of hate crimes in America, blacks still make up the overwhelming majority of victims.

The N-word reigns supreme at the top of the stack as the favorite racial epithet hurled at blacks during these crimes. Even when the word isn't used, the sentiment is that blacks are still fair game too be abused and dehumanized, and the N-word reinforces that belief. The word nigger is and will always have, grotesque, and deadly meaning to them. And, even if some blacks do occasionally go off the deep end and wrongly harangue whites for using the word, maybe that's because nigger, pricks agonizing historical and social sores.

In all fairness, a handful of black activists have waged war against the N-word. There's a website that hawks T shirts, DVDs and exhorts blacks, especially young blacks, to solemnly pledge not to use the word or patronize anyone who puts out products that use the word. Presumably that's aimed at those rappers and writers that have turned the N-word into a lucrative growth industry. But they have been the exception. Blacks have been more than willing to give other blacks that use the word a pass. The indulgence sends the subtle signal that the word is hardly the earth-shattering, illegitimate word that black and white N-word opponents brand it.

Richards gave no public hint before his profane outburst that he was a closet bigot who routinely used the word in reference to blacks. But he didn't have to. The obsessive use of and the tortured defense of the word by so many blacks gave Richards the license to use the word without any thought that there'd be any blow back for doing it. He was terribly wrong and got publicly called out for it.

The blacks that use and defend that word should be called out too. Who's willing to do that?

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: race, racism, comedy, richards, n-word, african americans, blacks

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is a political analyst and social issues commentator, and the author of the forthcoming book The Emerging Black GOP Majority (Middle Passage Press, September 2006), a hard-hitting look at Bush and The GOP's court of black voters.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Merely the decline of a once great method comedian
Posted by: may261989 on Nov 21, 2006 5:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Richards - Kramer - has been the one actor from Seinfeld I always thought would struggle the most. He was a one trick pony on Seinfeld ( admittedly a brilliant one ) so I wasnt surprised to see him getting a bit of stick when attempting a stand up routine. An actor of his stature will naturally get a bit of stick from certain members of the audience if they are off key with the jokes.
To turn it into a racist diatribe is unforgiveable, yet I believe he is not in the league of M Gibson. Gibson comes from a family of racists ( his father being a holocaust denier) and his right wing views and lack of empathy have been prevalent for many a year. Richards just lost it I believe, in a big way for sure, and it probably brought up a few old deep seated biggoted ideas. But hell, everyone has their breaking point and Richards was pushed to his by a couple of loud mouthed hecklers( this is what they are by the way, their race is irrelevant in this case, they are merely the type of people who often spoil a good comedy show, they are certainly not heroes).
As a writer in the Guardian said, its a bit like a Larry David script (Curb Your Enthusiasm) gone horribly wrong .
Richards will now have to face the ire of not only the public but his friends in the business as well - who must be shocked. It will be a tough time for him and he deserves it for uttering words which are at best highly insensitve and at worst perpetuating deep seated stereotypes in a world where we are trying to leave it all behind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» repost from above Posted by: hole11
I have only ever heard the N word used by a white in the presence of a black person TWICE
Posted by: not_the_preferred_nomenclature on Nov 21, 2006 6:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and this Kramer incident was the 2nd time. The other time was in downtown Houston about 4 years ago when a white guy driving a car nearly hit a black guy who was jaywalking. The white guy yelled out "Get outta the way, you damn N*****!"

Now, how many times have I heard BLACKS use words like "cracker" or "white b*tch" in th presence of whites? DOZENS of times, including when I was assaulted by a black man on a bus in Houston for reading a book. Blacks are FAR more racist than whites. I hear such things from blacks on almost a regular basis while riding the buses in Houston.

Just last week a white law student at a historically black law school in Houston (located in a black neighborhood) was attacked and beaten while the black attackers yelled things like "white bitch!"

And white liberals are far more racist towards the white underclass than the white underclass are themselves.

I blame the overclass and their fakeLeft drones for blacks being so racist. The overclass has has used their position to evolve a fakeLeft dogma that allows blacks to be racist because this serves their purposes. It has a lot to do with the false overclass fakeLeft dogma that whites enslaved blacks, when all along it was the overclass that enslaved blacks AND whites. But the overclass has evolved the white-hating fakeLeft dogma because it helps to serve to divide the largest voting block--the white lower middle class.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tone
Posted by: Kaliko on Nov 21, 2006 8:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think you guys are missing the point. The big deal really isn't that he said nigger, it's the hatred behind the loaded words that was most offensive. He went too far, to say "...fifty years ago we'd have you hanging upside down with a f***ing fork up your ass!" is pretty damn racist, if you don't see that then, I'm worried.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tone Posted by: perri6
» RE: Tone Posted by: jmooney
Oh, give me a BREAK.
Posted by: loomis_simmons on Nov 21, 2006 8:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The blacks that use and defend that word should be called out too. Who's willing to do that?

Uh...plenty of people? Who do just that? All the time? And have been for longer than I've been alive, maybe? Geez.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh, give me a BREAK. Posted by: yellow
» RE: Oh, give me a BREAK. Posted by: hole11
Wait A Second Dammit
Posted by: hole11 on Nov 21, 2006 8:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I realize this author of this article is stating that the n-word is offensive and blacks use this word in the mainstream and that the author is black (right?).

But Richards's racist remark was not the n-word (my opinion). Richards said that, "50 years ago we had your ass upside down with a fork in it." Now to me that is a racist statement. Just like porch monkey or a welfare queen might offend whomever.

Describing someone as black, white or anything with colorful language is not racist. It's descriptive. To me a nigger is someone who is poor, dumb or ignorant and possibly a slave or servant to everyone else.

From what I know of Richards is he comes from a very rich family and done many things before he ever became an actor/commedian. I wouldn't call him white if he doesn't eat pig.

The guy Richards was talking to with his disparaging remarks (Doss) was fairly disruptive too. He offended Richards by saying he wasn't funny. Doss paid to have Richards perform just as everyone else and probably should have saved his comment for after the show.

But the wrong Richards did was not calling him the n-word but saying he had his family upside down etc. then calling him the n-word.

Try as we might we are not going to rid words from the dictionary or legislate them out of existence as long as we have the first Amendment. (yes, I saw Dave Chappel's take on it)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wait A Second Dammit Posted by: Deep
» I Hear Ya Posted by: hole11
» Fuhrman vs. OJ Posted by: yellow
» RE: Fuhrman vs. OJ Posted by: hole11
» RE: Fuhrman vs. OJ Posted by: yellow
» RE: Fuhrman vs. OJ Posted by: hole11
» RE: Fuhrman vs. OJ Posted by: yellow
» RE: Fuhrman vs. OJ Posted by: hole11
» RE: Fuhrman vs. OJ Posted by: yellow
» RE: Fuhrman vs. OJ Posted by: hole11
» RE: Fuhrman vs. OJ Posted by: yellow
» RE: Fuhrman vs. OJ Posted by: hole11
» RE: Fuhrman vs. OJ Posted by: yellow
» RE: Fuhrman vs. OJ Posted by: hole11
» RE: Fuhrman vs. OJ Posted by: yellow
» RE: Fuhrman vs. OJ Posted by: hole11
» RE: Fuhrman vs. OJ Posted by: yellow
» RE: Fuhrman vs. OJ Posted by: hole11
Holocaust denial = racism
Posted by: loomis_simmons on Nov 21, 2006 8:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you deny the holocaust in WWII you are a racist. Am I getting this correct?

Yuuuuup.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Should read ASSHOLE 11!! Posted by: yellow
» Funding The Communists Posted by: hole11
» RE: Funding The Communists Posted by: yellow
» RE: Funding The Communists Posted by: hole11
» RE: Funding The Communists Posted by: yellow
» RE: Funding The Nazis Posted by: hole11
» RE: Funding The Nazis Posted by: yellow
» RE: Funding The Nazis Posted by: hole11
» RE: Funding The Nazis Posted by: yellow
» RE: Funding The Nazis Posted by: hole11
» RE: Funding The Nazis Posted by: yellow
» RE: Funding The Nazis Posted by: hole11
» RE: Funding The Nazis Posted by: hole11
» RE: Funding The Nazis Posted by: hole11
» RE: Funding The Nazis Posted by: hole11
» RE: Funding The Nazis Posted by: yellow
Hutchinson Misses by a Mile
Posted by: sincere on Nov 22, 2006 10:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
oh for crying out loud. i know this was the typical white apologist slant (though not all whites were apologists by any means) to Richard's racist tirade--"well blacks use it too, so why get mad at someone else?"--but i expected better from Hutchinson. sometimes i read his editorials, and they're spot on. other times, it often seems like he rushed out a commentary without actually gathering all the facts. i notice not once does he mention that Richards did not simply use the n-word, but distinctly engaged in dredging up acts of racist violence (lynchings) and sodomy (ritualized desecration of the body often followed lynchings, or for a modern case, see Abner Louima). ["Fifty years ago, we’d have you upside down with a (expletive deleted) fork up your ass."] Richards here is certain to allude to a by-gone era with perverse nostalgia, as if recounting a better time when blacks knew their place and challenges to white supremacy were met with swift and brutal retribution. Richards is even certain to say "we" when he threatens the black hecklers with being lynched, in order to assert his group identity as a white male, on the top of the social hierarchy, with blacks occupying the distinct role of the inferior "other." whatever issue one has with the use of the n-word among blacks (i am one who has consistently criticized it) what occurred at the Laugh Factory was not Richards channeling Richard Pryor or Dave Chapelle. it was Richards channeling David Duke, the hyper-normalized reality of American white supremacy, and the historical physical brutilization of black bodies--turned into playthings that could be broken, dissected and displayed as trophies--that is part of this country's history. whether Richards is a card-carrying racist of the highest order, i don't know. what his tirade did show was that racism is ingrained in the very fabric of American society. and given time and the right factors, it can be summoned up, perhaps even without thought.

Hutchinson knows this. or at least, if he claims the ability to speak on each and every topic relating to race and racism in America (the themes of his editorials), he *should* know this. too often of late his commentaries seem to be written as if in attempt to appease some particular reader-base, that i shall not name, by superficially approaching a topic or leaving out vital information that would better round out his analysis. if he keeps this up, he'll pretty soon be regarded as the Joe Lieberman of his discipline--quick to jump out ahead of an issue, and often gunning at the wrong side.

Sin

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hutchinson Misses by a Mile Posted by: solotraveler
Double standards
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Nov 23, 2006 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's just like many other double standards we've come to accept.

Black professional clubs, black on-campus groups, black networking groups, black magazines...We take all of this for granted, because we think it's racially exclusive in a "good" way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you cared to take a look at the way things really stand...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Nov 25, 2006 6:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.. you'd see we're all just niggers to the rulers of this land."

Crass

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hole 11 Look here my Friend.
Posted by: yellow on Nov 25, 2006 8:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Sephardic Jews, or Jews of Spain and the Islamic lands of the Mediteranian like North African countries were always the global minority. Over 90% of the Jews killed by Hitler were Ashkenazic Jews (the Exceptions being Jews from Yugoslavia, Greece, Italy, Bulgaria, and Albania-in other words the Balkans) The State of Israel was started by Ashkenazic Jews. In 1948, the Arab countries expelled about 750,000 Jews who went to Israel. By the early 1950s, Sephardim became and remained the majority. They are overwhelmingly represented in the working class and lower echelons of the Military like the infantry. They Universities are overwhelmingly Ashkenazic. There is a lot of racism in Israeli Jewish society. The Sephardim are discriminated against. They're all in the military and the Northern Europeans are all at college. All the Prime Ministers are Ashkees and so are all the Generals. The top CEOs of the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange's main publicly traded companies (there are nearly a total of 700 of them) are all Ashkees. There is a true racial divide among Israeli Jews themselves. Even the Israeli Sociologist who quite sympathetically points this out in mainly interview based research (which was published in a book called Israel's Oriental Majority) is an Ashkee called Shlomo Swirski. There was an organization called The Black Panthers of Israel led by Charlie Beton (whose last name, ironically, means concrete. Most Sephardim were low wage construction workers and built the country in the 1950s and 60s until the free availability of Palestinian labor). There were riots in Haifa and Tel Aviv as well as Jerusalem. One of Swirski's key contentions is that the Ashkees became adept at retaining Sephardic loyalty to Israel on two grounds. One is that the Arab homelands of many Jews did formally expell them. The other is that they settled the new Sephardic immigrants on the lands and in the houses of the departed Palestinian Arabs so that they were often near the frontier where the artillary attacks, incursions, and fighting was. They also tended to compete with Israeli Arabs in the job market in the early days of their immigration experience. There, now you can REALLY hate Israel.

If you want to know about the Warburg Family there is a fascinating book by Ron Chernow. Apparently, this German Jewish family dates back to 1559 and takes their name from a town where they came from at the time. The only thing Jews were allowed to do then is deal in money and so the growth of the financial industry was an early achievement of theirs. By WWI they became a loyal German community having been emancipated in 1871 by the Kaiser. Over 100,000 German-Jews served in the Kaiser's Army or nearly 20% of the total German-Jewish population. The Jewish community's proportion of its members dedicated to military service exceeded the national average. This is rarely pointed out in any but Jewish histories. German-Jews intermarried at a rate of 60%, similar to US intermarriage rates, and their contribution to German Culture was highly regarded. Yet the Warburg family opposed Zionism and viewed themselves as Germans first and Jews second. Even after the War, they refused to give much help to Israel arguing that Zionism was also a form of National Chauvanism. By the 1980s, the Warburg contributions to world finance quickly melded into broader, more mainstream financial cultures and their particularity is no longer felt. There is longer any reason to obsess about them much less about the majority of Jews who don't even know who they were. By the Way, the German-Jews were less than 5% of the 12 million European Jews in 1939. The vast majority were from Russia, Poland, and the Baltics, former areas of the old Czarist Empire. The majority of these were dirt power, supporters of Socialism, and knew nothing of the Warburgs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Misinformed again Posted by: hole11
» RE: Misinformed again Posted by: yellow
» RE: Misinformed again Posted by: hole11
» RE: Misinformed again Posted by: yellow
» RE: Misinformed again Posted by: hole11
» RE: Misinformed again Posted by: yellow
» RE: Misinformed again Posted by: hole11
» RE: Misinformed again Posted by: yellow
» RE: Misinformed again Posted by: hole11
» RE: Misinformed again Posted by: yellow
» RE: Misinformed again Posted by: hole11
» RE: Misinformed again Posted by: yellow
» RE: Misinformed again Posted by: hole11
also hole 11...
Posted by: yellow on Nov 25, 2006 9:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the Romans didn't use the Jews as tax collectors but they did privatize tax collection. Grover Norquist and his K Street boys would have been delighted. However, the Romans did use the Jewish tax which maintained the temple in Jerusalem and helped maintain their middle eastern empire in the days before and after Caeser.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: also hole 11... Posted by: hole11
» RE: also hole 11... Posted by: yellow
» RE: also hole 11... Posted by: hole11
» RE: also hole 11... Posted by: yellow
» RE: also hole 11... Posted by: hole11
» RE: also hole 11... Posted by: yellow
» RE: also hole 11... Posted by: hole11
» RE: also hole 11... Posted by: yellow
» RE: also hole 11... Posted by: hole11
» RE: also hole 11... Posted by: yellow
» RE: also hole 11... Posted by: hole11
» RE: also hole 11... Posted by: yellow
» RE: also hole 11... Posted by: hole11
» RE: also hole 11... Posted by: hole11
» RE: also hole 11... Posted by: yellow
» RE: also hole 11... Posted by: hole11
DeBeers and the Jews.
Posted by: yellow on Nov 25, 2006 11:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The connection between DeBeers and the Jews is nil. The DeBeer diamond firm was founded on the Debeer grain farmer by an Afrikaaner farmer named DeBeers in 1888. He sold the farm to Cecil Rhodes for the diamonds discovered under the soil and afterwards it was taken over by Rhodes and other partners none of them Jews. The DeBeer Corporation has been associated with many horrible practices like use of slave labor, price fixing and monopolization, and use of prison labor. The DeBeer Company controlled the production of diamonds. But it is cut diamonds that sell on the world market. This is where Israel comes in along with many Jewish diamond dealers. Israeli stonecutters cut the diamonds while dealers market them wholesale to Jewlery retailers in the West. The cutters and dealers take control of the rough diamonds only after they are shipped out of South Africa. This provides a living to many people Jewish and non-Jewish alike. I still don't think that the diamond trade is a reason to hate all Jews. Most Jews have nothing to do with this trade and are thus not responsible. By the way, I've noticed how much Jewellery many Black folks wear. Are they in some way culpable because of this practice? The Israelis, by the way, attempted unsuccessfully to break DeBeers monopoly hold on the diamond supply by underselling the DeBeer's Central Selling Organization outlet. This move backfired and almost created a financial crisis in Israel. Today the significance of South Africa as a source of rough diamonds has been diminished by Russian and Canadian sources. South Africa is still the source of about 60% of all mined diamonds. In 1981, DeBeers and the CSO suffered major profit and sales declines due to the world recession and a growing market in fake diamonds. DeBeers rebounded in the late 1980s with Zaire pressured to rejoin the CSO contributing countries and with the skewing of the distribution of the world's wealth toward the rich. I am no fan of diamonds whether or not they are a "girls best friend." Still, I don't believe this is a Jewish issue.

Hitler and Gold. The Nazis stole a ton of gold everywhere they went. Gold doesn't support economies. Work does. High productivity and German theft other countries resources along with price controls and wage controls and a huge military machine that displaced consumer goods production and led to forced savings reduced inflation. Why isn't this easy enough to grasp. People didn't regain their confidence in the German economy because of gold or anything else like that but because of the measures I mentioned here.

Also the US economy never made gold illegal. That means legally prohibiting the metal. This never occured. The government has from time to time "closed the gold window" in order not to cause a depression or panic. I really am not a gold watcher and I have already explained the real power of the US dollar and how US military might, productivity, and sheer domestic market size, has encouraged so many countries like China, Japan, Korea, and Saudi Arabia to purchase our national debt in US Dollars just to keep the Dollar strong enough to keep buying crap from China so that Walmart gets rich. If you can show me where the Jews are a big part of this key US strategy I'll listen,

You seem to want to hate a great deal, hole 11. My respectful suggestion is to stop listening to people who offer no proof of what they say and whose explainations fly in the face of common sense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DeBeers and the Jews. Posted by: hole11
» RE: DeBeers and the Jews. Posted by: yellow
» Sir Sassoon Posted by: hole11
» RE: Sir Sassoon Posted by: yellow
» RE: Sir Sassoon Posted by: hole11
» RE: Sir Sassoon Posted by: yellow
» RE: Sir Sassoon Posted by: hole11
» RE: Sir Sassoon Posted by: yellow
» RE: Sir Sassoon Posted by: hole11
STUPID
Posted by: give_peace_a_chance on Nov 26, 2006 1:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
black on black crime is pervasive.

inner city african Americans are denied even a basic level of education from our socialist education system

skyrocketing teenage pregnancies among africanAmericans.

skyrocketing alcohol and drug abuse among africanAmericans

ridiculous cultural fascination on basketball and hiphop at the expense of education and entreprenuership by africanAmerican culture

rampant corruption and waste in africanAmerican run cities at the expense of the poor

accelerating number of one parent africanAmerican homes due to abandonment by immature and punkish africanAmerican males.

AND WE ARE UP IN ARMS BECAUSE OF THE RANTINGS OF AN IDIOT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: STUPID Posted by: yellow
» Corporate School Posted by: hole11
» RE: STUPID Posted by: CraigMc
» RE: STUPID Posted by: hole11
Craig
Posted by: CraigMc on Nov 27, 2006 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jeez, wake up a smell the coffee ! This is a word that has been bantered about in the black community for ever. Yes, I agree it has a double standard in it's use. It should not be this way but it is. If the black population really wants to curb the use of this word, then they need to address it amongst their own people first. You can't have it both ways. It can't be OK for blacks to use it and very wrong for whites.

Craig

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wish you'd given us the link
Posted by: palepink on Nov 27, 2006 4:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Hutchinson, you said There's a website that hawks T shirts, DVDs and exhorts blacks, especially young blacks, to solemnly pledge not to use the word or patronize anyone who puts out products that use the word.

I'm working for a newspaper in Washington state that will excerpt your column for tomorrow's editions and know some of our readers will wish we had given them the link, but all I can find is www.abolishthenword.com, which doesn't match your description.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Boondocks, Chappelle and others
Posted by: Techubus on Nov 28, 2006 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This probably doesn't mean much to you coming from a gringo but I fail to see issues with the use of the word from such outlets as Boondocks or Chappelle.

There's a difference between using a word in hatred or using it to promote laughter,understanding or to lighten an otherwise serious issue. You grant extra weight to the word solely because of its historical context and cannot accept that it's use and meaning can be altered in a positive way. Is it really any less insulting if I replace that word with another explective to express hatred towards an individual or a whole ethnic group? It is my feelings and my intent that spread racism, or curb it, not the words I choose to used.

Just about everybody loves the Chappelle show. Its racial humor is one of its funniest aspects. People find it hilarious regardless of their race, and it brings humor to what was once a very humorless issue. That is how many people cope with bad things. A soldier on a battlefield will try to find ways to make light of their situation that is otherwise very serious and deadly, it is simply human nature. We make humor out of tragedy as a coping mechanism.

I'm a big fan of the Boondocks as well, and I have to wonder if the author has ever sat down and really watched the show. I especially recommend the MLK episode, which I feel reveals the whole point the guy's trying to get across about his use of the word in the show.

Stop focusing on the surface, that is all a word is, the intent behind the words are what matters most. If a word is used in hatred, it really doesn't matter what that word is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

nigger no more
Posted by: Ministry_of_Mutation on Nov 30, 2006 12:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
nigger no more

 

that old nigger burned inside of my head

an industrial brand hidden under milky skin

 

history’s nigger a scar that never heals but weeps

aching behind the eyes and burning in the gut

 

America’s nigger a country club key I refuse to use

an offer from the grand masters of a lost race

 

my nigger the barrier in the brain holding hate

the boundary beyond which all humanity bleeds out

 

whispered nigger a retarded idiot uncle who’s dying

holding our world hostage with dehumanized slurs

 

our nigger the untold American history lesson

a Huckleberry tale of subversion and slavery

 

slavery’s nigger the broken branches of an evil tree

bearing bloody fruit in the darkest of dreams

 

realize nigger can’t exist except to reveal you

so read this poem in silence and never aloud

 

B.Z.B. Evans

Ministry of Mutation
http://MUTANEX.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HOLE 11- You don't get the Great Depression!!
Posted by: yellow on Nov 30, 2006 6:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The grain price collapse was a consequence not a cause of the great depression. This fact is essential to grasp its nature. Between 1925 and 1928 there were great surplus harvests in the US and parts of Europe. There was world grain overproduction due to surplus US grain exports to Europe all of which had nothing to do with Soviet production. Between 1929 and 1934, agricultural prices dropped on average by more than a third while industrial prices dropped by less than a fifth. This created the scissors crisis which led to the collapse of world trade. Europe also was heavily invested in the US stock and bond market drawn by high interest rates and the first ever stock market bubble or overvaluation. The collapse of the US market sent shocks all over and resulted in a quick slowing of the world economy and drop off of investment and employment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Correction Posted by: hole11
» RE: Correction Posted by: yellow
» RE: Correction Posted by: yellow
» RE: Correction Posted by: hole11
» RE: Correction Posted by: yellow
» RE: Correction Posted by: yellow
» RE: Correction Posted by: hole11
» RE: Correction Posted by: yellow
» RE: Correction Posted by: hole11
» RE: Correction Posted by: yellow
» The Yellow Way Back Machine Posted by: hole11