Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

A new book by an Emmy Award-winning journalist chronicles the exploits of the "triple-crossing" superspy who outwitted and outgunned our intelligence agencies, Ali Mohamed.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The 9/11 Conspiracy of Incompetence

By Rory O'Connor, AlterNet. Posted November 15, 2006.


A new book by an Emmy Award-winning journalist chronicles the exploits of the "triple-crossing" superspy who outwitted and outgunned our intelligence agencies, Ali Mohamed.
Advertisement

What if I told you that a member of Osama bin Laden's inner circle operated with impunity within the United States for years before Sept. 11? That despite being an ardent and avowed jihadi, he managed to become a naturalized citizen, join the U.S. Army, get posted to the Special Warfare Center where Green Berets and Delta Force train, and work with both the CIA and the FBI? And all the while, he was a top al Qaeda operative, hosting the organization's second-in-command, Ayman al-Zawahiri, when he traveled to the United States in the 1990s to raise money, and training both bin Laden's personal bodyguard and radical Muslims who would go on to assassinate Jewish militant Meir Kahane and detonate a truck bomb at the World Trade Center?

Would you take it as evidence that our so-called intelligence community was abjectly incompetent and dysfunctional in the months and years before 9/11? Or would you see it as further proof that the powers-that-be were the powers behind 9/11, either "making it happen on purpose?" Or alternately: "letting it happen on purpose?"

With time running out on the lame duck Bush administration (now well on its way to becoming a "comma," as the president might phrase it), our chances of getting to the bottom of the signal event of the Bush years -- the unsolved murder of nearly 3,000 people, the worst terror attacks ever on U.S. soil, the "day that changed everything," the iconic 9/11 -- are also rapidly fading.

Even as the misnamed "war on terror" continues to heat up, the crime that precipitated it has somehow become a cold case. The only federal prosecution directly associated with the attacks -- that of Zacarias Moussaoui -- ended in a plea bargain and with an FBI agent accusing his superiors of "criminal negligence." Meanwhile, in the absence of a truly unfettered investigation, amidst calls from victims' families for a reopened, nonpartisan inquiry, and with many major questions still unanswered more than five years after the fact, it is unsurprising that faith-based theories continue to pour into the information vacuum and assume, at least for some, an aura of truth.

Numerous polls indicate that few Americans now believe they have been told the truth about 9/11. According to one poll conducted recently for the New York Times and CBS News, more than 80 percent think the administration is either "mostly lying" or at least "hiding something." Before it becomes too late, and the case too cold, is it still possible to determine what happened on 9/11 -- and why?

Did some version of the MIHOP or LIHOP conspiracy theories actually take place? Or were our leaders and their minions in the intelligence community simply so incompetent that they missed dozens, if not hundreds, of pre-attack "threat assessments," warnings, signs and indications that, as the notorious PDB of Aug. 6, 2001, bluntly informed the president, Osama Bin Laden was "Determined to Strike in U.S.?" If so, did they then conspire to cover up their "criminally negligent" incompetence?

Count author Peter Lance, an Emmy-winning former reporter and producer for ABC News, among those who believe in the "9/11 Incompetence Conspiracy Theory." Lance's new book, "Triple Cross," tells the amazing story of an al Qaeda superspy named Ali Mohamed. As Lance writes, "In the annals of espionage, few men have moved in and out of the deep black world between the hunters and the hunted with as much audacity as Ali Mohamed."

Mohamed's fundamentalist proclivities were no secret to U.S. intelligence. As early as 1989, he turned up in FBI surveillance photos, conducting weapons training of followers of the Omar Abdel Rahman, the "blind sheikh" now imprisoned for his role in a plot to blow up the United Nations and several bridges and tunnels into Manhattan. The sheikh's followers would later be involved in the first attack on the World Trade Center in 1993, but Ali Mohamed not only avoided arrest but managed to become an FBI informant, even while smuggling bin Laden in and out of Afghanistan, writing much of the al Qaeda terrorist manual and helping to plan attacks on American troops in Somalia and U.S. embassies in Africa.

''The FBI allowed the chief spy for al Qaeda to operate right under their noses,'' Lance says in amazement. ''They let him plan the bombings of the embassies in Africa right under their noses. Two hundred twenty-four people were killed and more than 4,000 wounded because of their negligence."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: books, conspiracy, 9/11

Filmmaker and journalist Rory O'Connor writes the Media Is A Plural blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Ali Mohammed was released early in July 2005.
Posted by: Abel Ashes on Nov 15, 2006 2:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
US PROVOCATEUR FOR AL-QAEDA FREED FOR NEW TERROR MISSION?


Patrick Briley
October 7, 2005
NewsWithViews.com

The GW Bush DOJ arranged for the early release of convicted FBI and CIA provocateur Ali Mohammed in July 2005. When released Ali had not served a full sentence commensurate with his convictions for the 1993 WTC and Kenyan and Tanzanian bombing attacks during the Clinton Presidency.

AG Gonzales and John C. Richter were instrumental in the release of Ali Mohammed. John C. Richter was a former assistant attorney general for the GW Bush DOJ criminal division who had served in the DOJ criminal division with current Homeland Security Director Michael Chertoff.
John Richter was also instrumental in protecting Melvin Lattimore, another FBI provocateur involved with Ali Mohammed in the 1993 WTC and 1995 OKC bombings.

Richter was brought to OKC in October 2001 by the DOJ to prosecute Lattimore for a firearms violation. But at the time of Lattimore’s conviction the FBI and DOJ as well as Richter and AG Ashcroft knew that Lattimore had been used as an FBI provocateur together with Ali Mohammed in the 1993 WTC and the 1995 OKC bombing.

They also knew that Lattimore was the roommate of 9/11 hijackers Moussaoui, AlShehhi and AlHazmi and had been with Mohammed Atta in Norman OK just before the 9/11 attacks. Richter’s 2001 prosecution of Lattimore was done to get Lattimore out of the limelight to avoid press and public scrutiny of FBI, CIA and DOJ corruption, murder and treason involving these attacks with Ali Mohammed and Melvin Lattimore.

Thanks to the GW Bush DOJ, AG Gonzales and John Richter, Ali Mohammed and Melvin Lattimore were not fully prosecuted, did not serve the full time required for their crimes and now are free once again to work together and roam the streets of America and OKC to monitor and perhaps provoke yet another terror attack in America.

Ali Mohammed worked for the FBI, CIA and Army Special Forces and with Bin Laden and 9/11 mastermind Khalid Mohammed, all at the same time! After Ali’s conviction during Clinton’s Presidency, DOJ AG Janet Reno made a special deal with Ali Mohammed and only held him under house arrest and never with the prospect of Ali having to serve out his full sentence.

Ali Mohammed has always enjoyed a protected status with the DOJ, first with Reno and now with Ashcroft, Gonzales, Chertoff, and Richter. Because of this DOJ protection and his roles with so many different government agencies it is highly likely that Ali Mohammed was and still is a tool of the National Security Council (NSC) under Clinton and perhaps even under GW Bush and HW Bush.

The following is a summary review what is known about Ali Mohammed’s protected role as a provocateur for USG officials in the attacks mentioned above:

Ali Mohammed was an Egyptian military officer who worked for the CIA, US Special Forces and later for the FBI out of Sacramento, California all while Ali Mohammed moved Bin Laden between Sudan and Afghanistan when Cofer Black was in Sudan to monitor the operation. Cofer Black became the CIA director of the joint FBI/CIA counter terrorism center set up in 1996.

During this time Ali Mohammed wrote Bin Laden’s terror training manuals. Former CIA official L.C. Johnson has publicly stated that the USG’s use of Ali Mohammed was a tremendous mistake. Johnson also confirmed that Ali Mohammed had written terror-training manuals for Bin Laden.

READ THE REST OF THIS ARTICLE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Large index of info on Ali Mohammed
Posted by: Abel Ashes on Nov 15, 2006 2:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'Al-Qaeda' is a Manufactured Intelligence Front
Posted by: rwa on Nov 15, 2006 6:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What does the word "Al-Qaeda" mean ? In Arabic, "Al-Qaeda" has a different meanings, among them “Base", "Ground", "Norm", "Rule", "Fundament", "Grammar". The exact meaning is dependent on the context in which it is used. It depends on the word which follows “Al-Qaeda” in the sentence. "Qawa'ad Askaria" is an Army Base, "Qawa'ad Lugha" stands for Grammar Rules (the Bases of Grammar).

"Qa'ada" is the infinitive of the verb "to sit". "Ma-Qa'ad" is a chair. "Al-Qaeda" is the base or fundament of something. "Ana raicha Al Qaeda" is colloquial for "I'm going to the toilet". A very common and widespread use of the word “Al-Qaeda” in different Arab countries in the public language is for the toilet bowl. This name comes from the Arabic verb “Qa'ada” which mean “to sit”, pertinently, on the “Toilet Bowl”. In most Arabs homes there are two kinds of toilets: “Al-Qaeda” also called the "Hamam Franji" or foreign toilet, and "Hamam Arabi" or “Arab toilet” which is a hole in the ground. Lest we forget it, the potty used by small children is called "Ma Qa'adia" or "Little Qaeda".

Those who founded the glorious "International of Islamic Terror, Al-Qaeda, probably knew too little about common use of Arabic language to know that by using this name for their organization, they risked becoming the laughing stock of everybody who speaks the Arabic "public" language.

To kidnap, torture and execute people are terrorist actions which are in no way related to God or to Islam, and these actions are not rewarded by paradise as some ignorant Western media figures would like to believe.

The terrorist event of New York 11 September 20001, and the terror event of Madrid on 11 March 2004, and other terror events commonly connected to Islam, are clearly not related to Islam if we consider that the Al-Qaeda terror organization was established by the C.I.A in the 1980s. Al-Qaeda is nothing but a conveniently "Islamic" front which enables the C.I.A. to commit crimes in the name of Muslims. It is well known that the Mujahadeen terrorists of Afghanistan were organized, trained and funded by the C.I.A. using the Pakistani ISI as a "cut-out" in order to lure the Soviet Army into Afghanistan at the end of 1979. The Mujahedeen can be seen as C.I.A. terrorism with an islamic name and "islamic" perpetrators. Afghanistan has, for all purposes, been destroyed by these fanatics in furtherance of American interests.

The Al-Qaeda terror organization has caused immense damage to Islam, to Moslems worldwide and to the interests of the peoples of all Arab and Muslim countries. The actions of Al-Qaeda have only served to promote the interests of the U.S. and Israel, which are clearly interested in "reshaping" the Middle East in such a way that they can more easily rape and plunder the region at will.

prisonplanet.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New DVD Exposes Fraud Behind GWOT
Posted by: rwa on Nov 15, 2006 6:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amazing! Last week the new documentary TERRORSTORM shot up to number 12 of the top 100 DVDs on Amazon!

It's even more incredible looking at what it was up against: the standard Hollywood fare, including the latest Pirates of the Carribbean and Harry Potter movies. Your efforts show that gaining a commanding position on the
Amazon.com sales chart increases the exposure of TERRORSTORM to mainstream audiences - the folks who are still in the dark about the truth of government sponsored terror.
This week do the impossible - help get this
DVD to NUMBER ONE!

If you have not bought this DVD yet, now is the time to do so.
Unlike Google, Amazon doesn't censor its ranking system - so let's make it our own and send TERRORSTORM to number one.

"Alex Jones is a true patriot, a genuine hero."
- Actor/Director Charlie Sheen


visit infowars.com for more information

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

nice story but absurd (and also: one important question about 9/11)
Posted by: JP2 on Nov 15, 2006 10:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
yeah, it would make a nice story if the terrorists where in fact more smart and powerful and sly than the most advanced, rich, militarized and secured country in the world, with the largest intelligence agency in the world, notably guilty of countless acts of sabotage in countless country, and involved in drug trafficking, gun smuggling and terrorists training. A nice CIA story.

Unfortunately, it's the oldest story: terrorist groups are sponsored by governments because nothing like fear gives unquestionable power.
It's like using the cheats to win at videogames, only in reality.

The story of Ali Mohamed only proves that two layers are interconnected. But to put them on the same level like they were equally powerful is just ridiculous. This is no russian-american spy story.

If they are interconnected, it is clear who infiltrated who.
Secret services always infiltrate groups, of any kind, from the IRA to the Red Brigades to the Black Blok to whatever comes to your mind. They were all infiltrated. Why should Al-Quaeda be different?

The truth is, this 'incompetence' thing is only the most convenient explanation, one which actually is helping the bastards in charge who are responsible, because thanks to the supposed 'incompetence' they get more and more funding and, apparently, they never get impeached.
Cf. Katrina, Iraq, national security and etc.

The junta threw the 'incompetence' bone to the left and the left grabbed the bone enthusiastically. Foiled again.

*

And about 9/11 let it happen-made it happen.
It is an useless theoretical way to divide the people who are asking the truth, like it was another kind of political game.
The answers are all in the evidence. And a new independent investigation is mandatory. That's all.
t's all at the WTC site. Do airplanes do that? does fire do that?
In fact, I was thinking:

If 9/11 was in fact not an inside job and in reality airplanes actually demolish gigantic towers, and kerosene causes the implosion of 47-stories skyscrapers, (and pigs fly), why, may I ask, the architects who designed WTC 1,2 and 7 are not behind bars? Why nobody sued them?

What I know is that, if you design a bridge which is supposed to resist the impact of an earthquake, and the bridge fails killing many people, you go to jail. You are actually guilty of mass murder.
Professions bear responsibilities, you know.

The WTC was designed to withstand the impact of airplanes. I presume WTC 7 was also designed not to fall down into dust because of some fire. So, why nobody sent to trial the architects responsible of that mess?
Why those who supposedly are the worst designers in the world, whose task failed miserably and who are guilty of the negligent murder of thousands of innocents, are not being sentenced to anything?

Easy answer: because by doing so, evidence should be shown, things should be really proved, media should cover the event and so forth. The architects would defend themselves, asking how can anybody say it's their fault, if all the evidence (the WTC wreckage) has been destroyed and no serious public technical examination has ever been conducted on those steel beams and rubble.
The bubble would burst.

Silence is the king's best friend.
I say: let's sue the architects and see what happens!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ask the architects Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming
How much is your soul worth alternet
Posted by: OWN-the-NWO on Nov 16, 2006 12:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alternet:
$235,000 from Schumann (bill moyers pbs) foundation.

Thanks for the limited hang out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not
Posted by: Loose Nuke on Nov 16, 2006 12:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Icompetence"? Lance said

"In effect, my telling of the Ali Mohamed story holds Cloonan, Fitzgerald and a host of other key Feds responsible for not stopping the 1998 Embassy bombings or the 9/11 plot."
linked text

Considering the thousands of articles that have shown up in the MSM over the last decades:
linked text

And these 115 ommissions and distortions of the 9/11 Commission
linked text

And these Top 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official 9/11 Story
linked text

Sure there was incompetence and it's a usual element of the cover story- motive, means, opportunity and intention on the part of elites and the military-industrial complex are clear. This article is the typical coverup that gets written by people who get published by media that have funding sources like this:
linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not
Posted by: Loose Nuke on Nov 16, 2006 12:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Incompetence?

Actually, Lance said

"In effect, my telling of the Ali Mohamed story holds Cloonan, Fitzgerald and a host of other key Feds responsible for not stopping the 1998 Embassy bombings or the 9/11 plot."
linked text

Considering the thousands of articles that have shown up in the MSM over the last decades:
linked text

And these 115 ommissions and distortions of the 9/11 Commission
linked text

And these Top 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official 9/11 Story
linked text

Sure there was incompetence and it's a usual element of the cover story- motive, means, opportunity and intention on the part of elites and the military-industrial complex are clear. This article is the typical coverup that gets written by people who get published by media that have funding sources like this:
linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If this is true.. Clinton should be behind bars!
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Nov 17, 2006 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"He managed to become a naturalized citizen, join the U.S. Army, get posted to the Special Warfare Center where Green Berets and Delta Force train, and work with both the CIA and the FBI……….. he traveled to the United States in the 1990s to raise money, and training both bin Laden's personal bodyguard and radical Muslims who would go on to assassinate Jewish militant Meir Kahane and detonate a truck bomb at the World Trade Center?"".............. mmm...

Then Clinton should be put in jail for conspiracy or at the least, negligence, in the murder of thousands of American lives! He was paying too much attention to Monica...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Means Motive and Opportunity
Posted by: rwa on Nov 17, 2006 9:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The following is from the September 18, 2001 issue of the Jerusalem Post
Quote:
---------------------------------
…the Israeli officials specifically warned their counterparts in Washington that "large-scale terrorist attacks on highly visible targets on the American mainland were imminent." They offered no specific information about targets, but they did link the plot to Afghanistan-based terrorist Osama bin Laden, and they told the Americans there were "strong grounds" for suspecting Iraqi involvement.
-----------------------------------------------


This was an accusation more than it was a warning. Mossad's pointing the finger to Bin Laden in advance was an attempt to ensure that Bin Laden was blamed for the attack, to pre-empt the finger-pointing. They wanted no other possibilities to be considered. Along with Bin Laden they skillfully also pointed to Iraq, an enemy that they wanted to use the U.S. to get rid of.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Real incompetence is the fake journalsim of "Alternet" and their ilk
Posted by: johndoraemi on Nov 20, 2006 3:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Others here have damaged the incompetence theory of 9-11.

Here is a different take on Ali Mohamed:

How the FBI protected Al Qaeda’s 9/11 Hijacking Trainer
New Revelations about Ali Mohamed
by Dr. Peter Dale Scott
Article

Let's also talk about incompetence, the kind that the masses are supposed to believe, in what happened at the Booker Elementary School on 9-11.

Italy tells of threat at Genoa Summit (LA Times, 9-27-01): Bush was warned of a plot by "Al Qaeda" to use a commercial jet hijacking as a suicide missile and "ASSASSINATE BUSH AND OTHER WORLD LEADERS."

The cat is out of the bag. The secret service is warned of method and means, the target, and the culprits. Was there ever a real plot at Genoa? I don't know. I do know that the airport was ringed by anti aircraft missiles, and Bush and his entourage (SECRET SERVICE) were moved out of a high rise hotel to a safer, undisclosed location, probably a yacht.

During the 9-11 attack, Bush learns of first plane crash. Secret service, Norad, FAA learn of second hijacking, then third incident with Flight 77 deviating at 8:52am. The second tower is struck. Andrew Card informs Bush of -- something -- we can't tell what words are exchanged.

Ari Fleischer holds up a notepad with large letters saying "DON'T SAY ANYTHING YET." (Washington Times, Bill Sammon) Bush doesn't say antything, clearly uncomfortable as time ticks on in the classroom.

Por Que?

Why can't Bush be rushed out of the class to a safe location? Why is he left out in the open, despite Secret Service procedures, despite a warning that commercial jets were going to ASSASSINATE HIM two months previously in Genoa?

The only reason is to stall for time, and keep jets from intercepting the inbound plane headed to the Pentagon. The military stand down was maintained (See Norman Mineta's revelation about Cheney and "the order").

If the president was rushed somewhere, the military may have sprung into action.

Staged incompetence. Real dereliction of duty. High treason.

Crimes of the State Blog

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In addition
Posted by: johndoraemi on Nov 20, 2006 3:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Partisan knuckle dragging right wing buffoons want to make it about Clinton.

Smarmy Democratic twits defend Clinton blindly.

None of them admit that the War Of Terror is a bipartisan project, and that Clinton, Bush and the top echelons of the government are complicit.

Clinton was partnering with Al Qaeda in the Balkans, arming them.

Osamagate

Clinton also refused to extradite Bin Ladin and other Al Qaeda operatives from Sudan, refused Sudan's large intelligence files on the Al Qaeda activities there, and instead bombed their only medicine factory when pressed about the issue.

Resentful west spurned Sudan's key terror files

The western intelligence agencies continue to protect radical Islamic terrorists (like Ali Mohamed), because this war on terror is a manufactured crisis, which serves the interests of the empire.

Don't believe me? Even Fox news reveals this insanity:

London 7/7 Terror Suspect Linked to British Intelligence?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ali Baba And The 40 Theives
Posted by: hole11 on Nov 21, 2006 9:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This Ali guy. I don't know. Sounds like Forest Gump for Al'Queda.

What I find incredible is that he was an officer (a captain) in a foreign military and then becomes a lowly supply sergant at Ft. Bragg. Then he does some Shindler List type maneuvering and gets some Spetznaz belts in Afghanistan while on leave?

I am more likely to believe Donald Rumsfeld and Wolfawitz orchastrated the whole thing from withdrawing support to the Taliban (unless they provided information concerning Bin Laden) to finding a reason to go to Iraq.

What is amazing though is that Porter Goss, three of the hijackers/pilots/al queda/saudi arabians and Bush all were in Sarasota county Florida on or before 9/11.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Elementary
Posted by: R.I.P. on Nov 24, 2006 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?" - Sherlock Holmes -

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]