Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

GOP Ineptitude and Advice for Dems

By Molly Ivins, AlterNet. Posted October 31, 2006.


Victory looks likely; prepare for not gloating.
Ivins

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Molly Ivins

Molly Ivins AlterNet Archive
An archive of the great progressive columnist's writings.
Jun 21, 2007

Stand Up Against the "Surge"
We are the people who run this country. We are the deciders and we need to raise hell.
Jan 12, 2007

Now They're All For Bipartisanship
Apparently, the people of this country did not elect liberals to Congress last week. Nope, they elected populists!
Nov 15, 2006

More stories by Molly Ivins

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 

"There's no doubt in my mind, with your help, Dave Lamberti will be the next United States congressman." -- President George Bush last week, endorsing Jeff Lamberti.

Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., has announced his candidacy for the president of the United States. Until now, he's barely been noticed as a guy who took money from Brent Wilkes and Mitchell Wade, whose bribes to Randy "Duke" Cunningham led to his resignation from Congress and a plea of guilty to bribery charges. Hunter is widely expected to be the next congressman indicted in this scandal.

As for the chair of the House Armed Services Committee's presidential candidacy, we have been thinking of scarcely little else around here. It's about time we had some good news.

There's so much evidence stacking up in the "Can't These People Do Anything Right?" File, you'd suspect their secret strategy is to reward incompetence. It's like the hiring of Michael "Brownie" Brown at FEMA or John Bolton at the United Nations -- it's just hard to imagine why.

So now the latest report from the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction says we have lost track of hundreds of thousands of guns we shipped to Iraq, many of which are likely now being used to kill our soldiers. For this administration, "Who's in charge of getting the plastic forks for the potato salad at the company picnic?" has deadly consequences.

A depressing story like this, and the week has barely even begun. I hate to imagine what will be on our plates by Friday.

So with the Bushies continuing their tailspin, it might be time to review the rules in case WE WIN in the upcoming midterm elections:

I realize for many Democrats it has been so long since we won, we have completely forgotten the etiquette. And I realize I'm taking a chance here -- there's nothing more dangerous than overconfidence -- but you have to practice for victory as well as defeat.

First rule: No gloating. Actually, there is gloating allowed, but only in the exclusive presence of other Democrats. Gloating in the face of Republicans is rude and unsportsmanlike, and just gives them one more thing to complain about. Also, remember there is a possibility there may be some Republicans on the civil service staff -- I have seen this when the R's win -- and it is really not good manners to watch them wailing around with their eyes brimming with tears.

Second, I'm sure we will all be full of grand theories if Republicans lose and we win. Dems will be ready to be helpful, offer advice and sort of try to perk the R's up. I do not recommend this. It somehow never feels to me when R's are dumping truckloads of good advice on the D's that they are, actually, sincere about it.

Third, celebratory jigs, reels and renditions of "Danny Boy" are best limited to Irish bars.

Fourth, try to refrain from insulting Republicans en masse. A good start would be, "You know, it was mostly the ones under indictment that hurt you."

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bush, election06, ivins

Molly Ivins writes about politics, Texas and other bizarre happenings.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Wait till Nov 8
Posted by: lonpine on Oct 31, 2006 12:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm really afraid that we'll get Diebolded this time around again. All the polls sound too good to be true, and I can't imagine this Administration just sitting back and taking that radical stance of, ah, letting the people really decide. I'll believe it when I see it on Nov 8.

Till then, I assume nothing, and feel advice like yours is a bit premature.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Way to go Kerry.. Posted by: Conservasaurus
» getting desperate.... Posted by: may261989
» RE: getting desperate.... Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: getting desperate.... Posted by: jmooney
» RE: getting desperate.... Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Wait till Nov 8 Posted by: Suburban Dad
» RE: Wait till Nov 8 Posted by: Suburban Dad
Rove and cheating
Posted by: antoniomo on Oct 31, 2006 1:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rove's recent comment on NPR that he has the numbers, supposedly referring to polls the media doesn't have access to and he does, makes me nervous. That could be his way of justifying another round of "official" voting results that somehow just don't come close to matching the exit polls.

Still, I appreciate Ms. Ivins advice. Hey, winning is possible. Republicans, quite clearly, aren't infallible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And the One Who Lied
Posted by: Sparks56 on Oct 31, 2006 2:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"....try to refrain from insulting Republicans en masse. A good start would be, 'You know, it was mostly the ones under indictment that hurt you."'
And the ones who lied..
And the ones who stole....
And the ones who lied....
And the incompetent cronies...
And the one who lied....
And all the soldiers who died.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And the One Who Lied Posted by: wacoguy
But first, a football analogy...
Posted by: MTguy on Oct 31, 2006 2:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hang on tight to the ball until you're over the goal line. Holding the ball aloft in preparation for the post touchdown spiking could result in "premature celebration" and no points scored.

Here in MT, we have a nifty ol' senator by the name of Conrad Burns, No. 1 on top of Jack Abramhoff's "Goodies" list. The GOP saw fit to elect this guy again out of the Primary to run in the General Election. The litany of complaints against Mr. Burns is long, and yet these people think it's O.K. to send this kind of man back to DC as an example of what Montanan's are like.

I'm sorry, but nothing the voters do surprises me anymore. It wouldn't surprise me if Rove knew something we don't know and the GOP held on to both houses of Congress.

Even on Halloween, that's a damn scary thought.

Joe Jacobs
East Helena, MT

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not over . . .
Posted by: Jeanne on Oct 31, 2006 3:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Til it's over. I won't believe it until the votes are "counted" and the Dems are the winners regardless. Only a massive landslide in Dems favor will preclude the point shaving possible with electronic voting. If it's close, it will be a Republican victory. The talking heads will puzzle over it, proclaim some "intangible" factor causing last-minute voter anxiety resulting in a "stay the course" outcome in the tally. And we, dutiful Americans, with the "best system in the world" will accept the result no matter how implausible. We will, without complaint, go back to our routines on 11/8 and pretend that the majority has spoken.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

over
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 1, 2006 12:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's all over except for the propaganda and the election stealing both of which have a history of causing the wrong people to be "elected". If the wrong people are elected we need to quickly find out why/how it happened and let the lawyers have at it. Truth and proof can reverse election stealing so it's not over until some of the crooks are forced to sing. Maybe we can have an orgy of breaking up a whole lot bad election machinery made by bad Repubicans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Danny Boy"
Posted by: R.I.P. on Nov 1, 2006 5:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well I always though this was J.F.K's grandfather's favorite.... but over on a history site they claim it was "Sweet Adeline".
The reason the past concerns me is I don't want to know what happens by Friday.... I'm on coruption overload. How many weapons have "gone missing"? Unbelievable. (but I bet it's true)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I just hope
Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming on Nov 1, 2006 10:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that we don't snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is worse than inept?
Posted by: South42 on Nov 3, 2006 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I sure hope that we win Nov 8th. I wonder about the wisdom of labeling the other side inept, stupid, etc.., because if we don't win what does that make us!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are you kidding?
Posted by: bleda on Nov 4, 2006 1:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember those sore winners two years ago? LET'S GET IN THEIR FACE!!! Turnabout's fair play. We are right - and as time goes on, more and more flat-earth fundamentalists/fascists/whatever will have to admit it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is about the dumbest piece of tripe that Ivins has ever written
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob on Nov 4, 2006 5:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, but it is... don't gloat if the organized Bush Crime Family loses the elections?... what tripe.

We'll gloat as much as we like, if we get the chance past all the vote fraud. Why should we care one bit what they or the MSM thinks? And when we're done gloating, we're going after these crooks for every one of their crimes. This is not a silly game.

Ivins is getting out of touch more and more with every column. Time to retire. All those years coping with tyrants in Texas by laughing it off with a distant shrug is not good enough for the rest of us. Her columns have become increasingly irrelevent to me. Just like most of the fossillized liberal columnists in the MSM like Elizabeth Goldman, and the fake liberals who are too comfy in their 401 K's like Kristoff, Cohen, and Friedman. They should all be replaced by new blood-- blogger heros like Markos, the Young Turks, and alternets' best ones. Enough is enough, these MSMers are becoming obsolete and irrelevent.

Yes, I'll gloat... but only after the election. Today, who knows what these crooks will do to stay in office.

Most of all, I'll be less inclined to gloat than to be absolutely relieved that some modicum of reason, rationality, and accountability will return to our country's government.

Gloat-- what a ludicrous concept to even invoke given the actual serious crisis of losing our freedoms and rights that this democracy is in. Time to retire and take your pension, Molly, with all due respect, you've been great but it's time to go (emphasis on been).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: heckuva rude thing to say Posted by: carcinoid112
» RE: Honest, not rude. Honestly. Posted by: doinaheckuvajob
Yes we are going to f---ing GLOAT if we feel like it (if we win) and there is nothing you can do
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob on Nov 4, 2006 6:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
about it, Molly or anyone else. Here we are gloating with pride in ourselves, our efforts, our democracy, and our disgust with Rethug criminals. Win or lose, gloat on!!! Because win or lose, we're proud of who we are and we're not going around with our heads held low, like battered victims (and wussy columnists) anymore. So there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vote Peace
Posted by: rwa on Nov 5, 2006 1:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It makes little sense that well-qualified anti-war Green Party Senate candidates in states like Wisconsin, New York and California – where pro-war incumbent Democrats are projected to win by a huge majority – have failed to get much popular support. A strong showing by the Green nominees would send a powerful and badly-needed message to Washington without jeopardizing a Democratic victory.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]