Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush's Economy 'Doing Remarkably Well'

By Molly Ivins, AlterNet. Posted October 24, 2006.


For those of us who aren't rich, however, incomes are stagnant while healthcare and education costs skyrocket.
Ivins

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Molly Ivins

Molly Ivins AlterNet Archive
An archive of the great progressive columnist's writings.
Jun 21, 2007

Stand Up Against the "Surge"
We are the people who run this country. We are the deciders and we need to raise hell.
Jan 12, 2007

Now They're All For Bipartisanship
Apparently, the people of this country did not elect liberals to Congress last week. Nope, they elected populists!
Nov 15, 2006

More stories by Molly Ivins

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Oh, goody. According to the White House press office, President Bush will spend much of the next two weeks discussing what a swell economy we have. Did you know that the Dow Jones Industrial Average is at its highest point EVER? And the NASDAQ, ditto. Wow, breathtaking, huh? But the Dow is not a good indicator of how thing are really going for the majority of Americans.

I just love listening to the Bushies play with numbers. When Bush took over in 2001, he had predicted a surplus of $516 billion for fiscal year 2006. Last week, the administration announced a 2006 deficit of $248 billion, missing its projection for this year by $764 billion. Bush said the numbers are "proof that pro-growth economic policies work" and are "an example of sound fiscal policies here in Washington."

This is highly reminiscent of Dick Cheney's recent observation about the Iraqi government, "If you look at the general, overall situation, they're doing remarkably well."

Bush's main talking point on the budget is that he "cut the deficit in half" -- that would be from 2004, the year the White House inflated the projected deficit for political reasons. Even conservatives disagree. Brian Riedl of the Heritage Foundation said, "The White House has a track record of projecting budget numbers to be a lot worse than they end up, which therefore helps them defeat the gloomy expectations and declare victory." If Bush does manage to make the tax cuts permanent, it will add more than $3 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years. The federal budget would be virtually in balance if there had been no tax cuts.

Bush's version of "doing remarkably well" includes a trade gap -- now a record $69.9 billion -- up 2.7 percent since July. "Short of a big correction in consumer spending, the best we can hope for is that the trade deficit stabilizes," Stephen Stanley, chief economist at RBS Greenwich Capital, told Bloomberg.com.

Meanwhile, what we see in the economy as a whole is an immense shift of wealth from the poor and middle class to the very rich. It seems a little painful to have to point this out yet again after six solid years of it, but these are lies, damn lies and statistics.

Just to give you an idea of how dependable the Bush numbers are, the Department of Health and Human Services put out a press release a few weeks ago telling senior citizens they will have "new options with low costs" and that monthly premiums in '07 will be the same as in '06.

"The Medicare prescription drug benefit... just keeps getting better," burbled HHS. They seem to have been taking too much in the way of prescription drugs. Rep. Henry Waxman, one of the most singularly useful members of Congress, found that average premiums will actually increase by over 10 percent next year. And for the lowest-priced plans, average premiums will be up over 44 percent. "It is not merely confusing arithmetic, it is deceptive advertising," said Waxman.

While lightening the tax burden for the rich, other parts of the Bush economic program continue to undermine the middle class in this country. As you may recall, in 2005 the credit industry successfully rammed a disgraceful bankruptcy reform bill through Congress. It's working out just the way we expected it to: Middle class families are borrowing more than ever to make ends meet. Most families go under if: (a) they lose a job or (b) they have a health emergency crisis.

One attorney sums up the legislation's impact: "It's designed to make life miserable for anybody who owes money. It's a help-the-banks, squish-the-little-guy law."

Bush's remarkably good economy is only good for the richest -- for the rest of us, incomes are stagnant and education and health care costs are skyrocketing. The Republican Congress blindly rubber-stamps policies designed to help only a few. Are you better off than you were six years ago?

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: ivins, molly, bush, elections, economy, financial

Molly Ivins writes about politics, Texas and other bizarre happenings.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Democrats
Posted by: Ahimsa on Oct 24, 2006 1:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I assume that some proportion of the Democratic Party must read Mrs. Iwins. If they do, can they get a clue and use this kind of rhetoric in their campaign?
Use something that has resonance among the people, a resonance based on their daily reality. Dispell the lies of the Reps, point out at the smoke screen of lies, insist on it!
Can someone in that glorious party get a clue? Are they servants of the Republican Party? I'm afraid I'm gonna wake up tomorrow to see Sen. Palpateen ruling us...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Democrats Posted by: cacky
» RE: Democrats Posted by: david_peace2002
» RE: Democrats Posted by: JSquercia
BUSH'S BANKBOOK
Posted by: Vox-Clamantis on Oct 24, 2006 2:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suspect when Bush says the economy is great he's looking at his own bank book and nothing more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great economy
Posted by: lamar on Oct 24, 2006 2:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ford Motor Company only lost $5.8 billion this quarter. Isn't that good news?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Smoke And Mirrors
Posted by: gradioc on Oct 24, 2006 3:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hell, if I was running an organization I could make the books look great too if I never paid the bills. The ecomomy is humming along because we are borrowing hand over fist to pay for the government. Of course the markets love it. We're borrowing money from the Chinese that we then turn around and send right back to China to buy their consumer goods. What a racket. The biggest problem is that no one running this country looks ahead past the next election cycle. The GOPs only want power for its own sake, to reward their friends and punish their enemies. Their vision goes to tax cuts and no further.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wonderful economy?
Posted by: Maryanne on Oct 24, 2006 4:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My husband has an IRA account in which nothing has been added or subtracted for the past decade. In December 2000, just after Bush was elected, the stock market fell dramatically. He lost more than one-third of what had been invested. Six years later, he is still not up to what he had had in December 2000.

The stock market may be doing well, but when one has lost so much, the gains are on the reduced amount, which take a great deal of improvement in the stock market to reach the same level. Net gain in 6 years: nothing, still a loss.

In addition, many stores in our neighborhood are closed, empty buildings all around us. Services that had once been free are now dependent upon user fees. Libraries have closed, and costs for use have been put into place. Prices at the supermarket have gone up. Health care has gone up (for us) from $94 per month (in 1994) to the current $800. per month. Gasoline may have fallen in price, but it is still higher than it had been just a couple years ago.

We are able still to keep our heads above water, but what of those who can't?

Wonderful economy, isn't it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wonderful economy? Posted by: MTguy
» RE: Wonderful economy? Posted by: thecamster
poorer and poorer
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 25, 2006 12:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not to mention that poor people in most of the rest of the world are getting poorer and poorer. As this continues starvation and disease will hit new global highs. Adding those deaths to those shot and bombed to death by the Bushies and we get a huge measure of our rapacious corruption and our total immorality under the Bushies. Impeach the burning Bushies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Congress Creates Money from Air
Posted by: mite on Oct 25, 2006 1:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think we need to know the real debt. As of 2003 our Real Debt to the Bank Cartel's was $7.4 Trillion- forget the Billions we lost that in the 1980's.
The truth is our Congress gave our country away to the International Banker's in 1913 with the Federal Reserve Act.
You see we believe fairy tales. i.e. Congress needs $1 Billion for some new law that helps a Corporation or Banker investment; they print the paper with some ink and tricky markings and call them T-Bills (U.S. Treasury Bills) and give them to the Banking Cartels down the street at the Federal Reserve- a Private Corprate Entity. This action is called Debt of the U.S. Citizen which we pay through our labor and taxes. We have no coin or gold, silver, as outlined in the Constitution.
Baron Nathan Mayer Rothschild boasted: "... give me control over a nations currency, and I care not who makes its laws"
It is recorded in the Congressional Record that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933. Congress June 5, 1933 Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate the Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States.
So before you believe all this smoke before you by this corprate media do the research citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» If We Let Them DO It Posted by: edith
IRS Gestpo
Posted by: mite on Oct 25, 2006 1:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh! I forgot to give you some references to check.

www.originalintent.org and www.1040checkmate.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush's economy
Posted by: rob242 on Oct 26, 2006 3:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please get your facts straight. The NASDAQ is not at an all time high.The all time high was over 5000, yesterday it closed at 2356. The best way to make a point that a person will trust is to use correct facts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush's economy Posted by: thecamster
Adrian Salbuchi: Death & Resurrection Of The $US
Posted by: rwa on Oct 26, 2006 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the United States to maintain global superpower status, there must always be somebody somewhere as far away as possible, on whom to dump vast quantities of unbacked US Dollars, continually and uncontrollably printed by the Fed so that once the US War machine has consumed that money, it can be silently and discretely removed from further circulation (i.e., “soaked up” and hoarded in foreign central banks, private savings, etc.). They need to make sure that these Dollars “disappear” after they have been consumed; at least for a while. And it really doesn’t matter whether they “disappear” into central bank vaults abroad or into individual investors’ safes and mattresses in Mexico, Indonesia, Argentina, Nigeria or Brazil. That’s not really the issue.

In short, every time one of us “foreigners” (or “Aliens” as the US government sweetly calls us), buys Dollars as savings, or our national central bank “soaks them up” from domestic markets in order to maintain whatever rate of exchange the IMF requires in order to maintain a “sustainable economy” (Anne Kruger, dixit) - i.e., so as to ensure that we can pay back foreign debt loans - what we are really doing is helping finance the US Budget Deficit. In the worst case scenario, we are helping to pay for the cost of killing iraquis and afghanis, preparing invasions against Iran, Syria, North Korea or Venezuela, or torturing POW’s in Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib...
May we once again stress that the real backing which the US Dollar has nowadays is US economic strength, US prestige and, above all, the immensely powerful and apparently invincible armada of US military might which, since 11th September 2001 is permanently perched ready to attack, bomb and invade anybody anywhere for any reason. Not bad as a “convertibility” scheme: today, the US Dollar is convertible into bullets, bombs and tanks, not to mention covert CIA actions which could even include highly complex and costly domestic terrorist attacks like 911 which served as a casus belli for pro-israeli neocons in the Bush Administration to declare war on the entire world. Maybe someday we may know what really happened on that clear morning of September 11th, though that wont happen anytime soon…

In short and as a crude example of what we are saying, every time the Argentine people need to buy a barrel of oil, we must, as a community, work and toil to earn u$s 57 to buy it. However, every time the US government needs to buy a barrel of oil, it just has to ask the Fed to print u$s 57. Clearly, there is a great difference…

Again: like that, it’s easy be a global superpower.

Mafia + Usury = “Market Economy”

But, as the old adagio goes, “all good things must come to an end”. And it would seem that with George W. Bush the era of printing all the money you want is fast coming to an end. In Argentina, we know only too well what happens when you print “all the money in the world” to pay for uncontrolled government spending. Former president Raúl Alfonsín did just that and collapsed the economy into 5000% hyperinflation in 1989 with the ensuing hunger, street riots, violence, unemployment and suffering among the population.

Long before George W. made it to the White House, the perverse process had begun whereby Finance and Money which should always be subordinated to the Real Economy of Work and Production went out of control and – like a virtual tsunami – grew and grew into the monster which is today. Swamping and drowning out the Real Economy, destroying the forces of Labour, deconstructing Production and generating mass poverty and unemployment on a worldwide scale...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]