Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

"The Hell with Red/Blue; People Want Out of Iraq and Solutions"

By Jim Hightower, Hightower Lowdown. Posted October 25, 2006.


Criss-crossing the country, I've learned most people are over the red-state/blue-state talk and are aching for politics that matter to them.
Jim Hightower

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Jim Hightower

Checks for $600 Won't Fix Our Economy
America can't shop its way to greatness, and this one-time, government-funded shopping spree won't lead us to a sound economy.
Mar 28, 2008

Swim Against the Current: Ordinary Americans Can Make Change Happen
The fight for our country's future is still in our hands. Grass-roots movements are breaking free from corporate control.
Mar 7, 2008

Immigrants Come Here Because Globalization Took Their Jobs Back There
Seal-the-border hysteria is everywhere. Instead of blaming immigrants for America's problems, let's look at executives on both sides of the border.
Feb 7, 2008

More stories by Jim Hightower

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

I'm out on the political trail, rambling back and forth across America in support of good grassroots groups, good issues, and a surprising number of good populist candidates. I spent practically all of September on the hustings, beginning with a two-day, five-city barnstorming tour across the Hawkeye State to support a savvy and scrappy coalition called Sensible Iowans (a redundancy if ever I heard one), and I ended the month at a spirited rally with a large crowd of feisty Democrats in (of all places) Kennebunkport, Maine -- yes, right in the home nest of the plutocratic Bush clan! No doubt Homeland Security upped the local color code to "Bright Red" for that one!

I'll be crisscrossing the country again this month through Election day, from New Hampshire to California and all sorts of places in between. Since I'm literally a rambling man these days, I offer some random political thoughts, observations, and tidbits from my travels.

The political climate

Among the political cognoscenti, it's fashionable these days to dis the body politic -- aka, you and me. We are disparaged as being a bunch of clueless and malleable rubes who care more about who wins the latest "Survivor" matchup than who wins Congress. Of course, these pundits, consultants, lobbyists, and politicos spend way too much of their time in cocktail chit-chat rooms inhaling each others' hot breath.

From my viewpoint out here in the hinterland, it's the cognoscenti who are the clueless ones. The people of America are soooooo much bigger than the politics that are being served up to us by the elites. I find that people everywhere are fed up with the red-state/blue-state hokum that passes for political discourse in our country, and they're in something of a purple rage about the system's abject failure to address the BIG matters that are on people's minds, particularly such populist issues as:

  • Falling wages and falling middle-class opportunities.
  • Lousy health care, or none at all.
  • A collapsing national infrastructure, from water systems and roads to school buildings and parks.
  • Corporate greed unleashed.
  • Money-corrupted politics and government.
  • The death of the Common Good.

Mainstream polls confirm that these are big worries for the majority of folks, and that the public is growing more and more alienated from the economic and political elites in charge. Sixty-three percent of Americans now say that our country is "off on the wrong track" (APIpsos poll), 67 percent are "dissatisfied with the way things are going in the U.S." (Gallup Poll), and 51 percent expect that the next generation will be worse off economically.

People are aching for a politics that matters to them and offers a path to an America in which they matter again. That would be Big Politics. But this year we're mostly getting another campaign of small-ball and low-ball politics, featuring such manipulative mindlessness as the Bushites trying to label all of their war critics "appeasers."

War whoops

Tony Snow, Bush's PR flak, tried to do a mini-McCarthy on the war issue by declaring in September that there are "some" in the Democratic party "who say that we shouldn't fight the [terrorists]; we shouldn't apprehend al Qaeda; we shouldn't detain al Qaeda, we shouldn't question al Qaeda; and we shouldn't listen to al Qaeda." Goodness gracious, Tony, give us the names of these traitorous Democrats so we can hunt them down like the filthy varmints they are!

Alas, poor Tony could not produce a single name.

And then Dick Cheney was unleashed. Snarling and snapping at Democrats who're calling for a withdrawal of troops from Iraq, the Veep flashed his crooked sneer and barked that these dastardly Democrats are out to "validate the al Qaeda strategy and invite more terrorist attacks" on America. Thank you, Dick. Now go back to your dungeon.

Next up was Donnie Rumsfeld. What a sputtering old goose he's become! The Pentagon chief is all honked off that we plebes have dared to criticize his handling of the war on terrorism, especially his disastrous diversion into Iraq. So, he has resorted to questioning our patriotism. Last month, he petulantly referred to us dissenters as people who always "blame America."

No, Rummy, we blame you! Indeed, we dissenters areAmerica-- 61% of the people now oppose your Iraq war, 58% say it has not been worth the lives we've lost, and 75% say Iraq has deteriorated into civil war. We the People blame you, George, "Buckshot" Cheney, and the entire Bushite menagerie of warmongers, ideological nutballs, war profiteers, and chickenhawks for squandering American lives, treasury and reputation. It's time to say the obvious -- our so-called "leaders" are losers.

Think about it: First they lost Osama. They almost won Afghanistan, but they got distracted and lost it, too. Then they lost Iraq to civil war and theocracy. Here at home, they lost New Orleans. Hell, they even lost Pluto -- one-ninth of our solar system is gone!

The poor GOP

I'm actually feeling a twinge of compassion for the Repubs. Poor babies, they're trying to run this year with a Gibraltar of weighty political negatives piled on their backs, including Iraq, Halliburton, Iran, congressional corruption, oil profits, CEO pay, corporate scandals, minimum wage, off-shored jobs, trade scams, rising poverty, Katrina, health care, prescription drugs, Social Security privatization, tax boondoggles, national debt, torture, NSA spying, secret prisons, and "signing statements."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: populism, rights, voting, fraud, election, corruption, democrats, republicans, war, election06

From "The Hightower Lowdown," , edited by Jim Hightower and Phillip Frazer, September 2006. Jim Hightower is a national radio commentator, writer, public speaker, and author of "Thieves In High Places: They've Stolen Our Country And It's Time to Take It Back."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
power
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 25, 2006 1:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a great Hightower of power. This is a great year for expanding populism and other forms of real democracy. It is a beginning of a new decency in politics and governance. It is an army of voters determined to make a progressive change. It is a new burst of power and energy to knock down greed and corruption and war and lies. It is coming soon at a polling place near you or in your mailbox. All vote for freedom, democracy, clean elections and peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: power Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: power Posted by: deaudonnee
» RE: power Posted by: deaudonnee
God Bless Jim Hightower
Posted by: Tom Degan on Oct 25, 2006 3:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've probably said this before but it needs to be said again: People like Molly Ivins and JimHightower, born and bred Texans, are national tresures. It makes me sleep a little easier at night to know that that state is not beyond hope; that there are actually thinking Texans who are as outraged as anyone by the damgae the Bush administration the republicans in general are doing to this once-great nation. I know it's a cruel generalization to think of people from that state as being just plain dumb. I have cousins from Texas who are the nicest, smartest poeppl I know. It's just that they are not represented by the people they send to Washington - that's a fact.

Remember folks, the most important election in American history is only thirteen days away. If the Bush administration is allowed another two years with a corrupt, sycophantic congress, It will mean the end of the America we knew and loved. When it's all over, you won't recognize this country. You won't even recognize yourselves.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Believe me I know! Posted by: crashgrab
Where's The Dough?
Posted by: edith on Oct 25, 2006 3:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I dont know exactly why the Democrats dont make familyincome, per capita income, and real wages the center piece of their program. Everyone can understand whether they are better off or not. Everyoneknows what kind of stress most families are under with two or more family members working, often at more than one job with few benefits.

The mega numbers like the Dow and GDP are up, but these Gross numbers aren't t the net income people (average) lilve on.

I'll be frank. Most people don't give a damn if some Islamist in Gitmo has a lightbulb shining in his cell 24 hrs a day. Most people are not bothered by the Patriot Act or wiretapping of international calls(wihether or not they should be).

But people are tired. Tired of shorter vacations, tougher tuition and medical bills, and making the same or less in real dollars as they did five years ago.

We keep hearing that productivity in the US is up. The experts and conservative politicians accused us of not working hard like the Japanese. Now we work harder!

Where's the dough?

Please feel free to use the above slogan for a campaign, if anyone's running for office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Where's The Dough? Posted by: Tom Degan
If voting changed anything...
Posted by: BJT on Oct 25, 2006 4:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...they'd make it illegal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remember John Kerry's pledge to fingt until the "last vote is counted"
Posted by: mat38 on Oct 25, 2006 4:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the Yalie, who is super wealthy, gave up before midnight when hundreds of thousand of votes in Ohio had yet been counted.
He represents the Democrat dilema, as does Billery Clinton. I will not vote for a democrat if iether of them are the candidate. They are soulless and clueless and though they may throw a bone here and there to the masses they are self serving lackeys of the wealthy american elite.
It's time for a new person, male or femal, balck, yellow, brown, red, or white, who cars more about us then corporations. Period.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Political climate?
Posted by: oneyedjack on Oct 25, 2006 4:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The political climate

"Among the political cognoscenti, it's fashionable these days to dis the body politic -- aka, you and me. We are disparaged as being a bunch of clueless and malleable rubes who care more about who wins the latest "Survivor" matchup than who wins Congress. Of course, these pundits, consultants, lobbyists, and politicos spend way too much of their time in cocktail chit-chat rooms inhaling each others' hot breath."

I respect and admire Jim Hightower as much as anyone, ever since his days as the Texas Ag Commish. And I also realize that polls (if accurate), show a supposed different set of concerns than those espoused by politicians.
But, being a reasonably intelligent person, I've often wondered how come those ubiquitous, majority poll numbers (aka persons polled), never seem to effect a change politically vis-a-vis the ballot box? (And please don't roll out the thing about stolen elections, I know elections are rigged, damn near always have been. Just that now the technology makes it much easier to produce bigger numbers).
You see, even in the pre-electronic voting robbery days, poll numbers and ballot box performance never quite seemed to coincide. I have my thoughts on that and a lot of people will not agree. I think, number one, a certain amount of respondents fudge or outright lie on polls, especially older respondents. Number two, there is a significant percentage of respondents who while answering the poll, will not make it to the voting booth. I know, I know, that old (usually last) question "how likely are you to vote," is somehow supposed to be a wrap of the poll's authenticity and therefore prognosticating tool. But that don't always happen.
And as much as Hightower wants to defend the "body politic" the truth is they are much more enamored of the 'reality television' syndrome than he wants to admit.
Opinions (including mine) are a dime a dozen, having people think and debate on opinions or events doesn't happen on a large scale because the majority in this country have been "dumbed down."
I'm sorry Hightower, the "body politic" is much more interested in who will be the next "American Idol," or NASCAR points leader than they are in their miserable destiny.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Political climate? Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Political climate? Posted by: oneyedjack
» RE: Political climate? Posted by: Burton
dems will lose because Hightower's concerns are not the concerns of dem activists
Posted by: mah_favorite_flavor_cherry_red on Oct 25, 2006 5:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]

I'm out on the political trail, rambling back and forth across America in support of good grassroots groups, good issues, and a surprising number of good populist candidates.


Alternet and the vast majority of democratic web outlets and democratic activists give Hightowers POPULIST concerns VERY LITTLE note.

with a typical fakeLeft Democratic website/media outlet like Alternet, The Nation, PBS, NPR, DU or Kos, it's VERY RARE that they run articles with a POPULIST ECONOMIC focus.
e.g., Alternet has 4 new articles at the top of its page every day each week except Sunday. That is 24 new articles each week, almost 1200 new articles each year. Out of that 1000 articles, perhaps only TWENTY articles per YEAR deal primarily with populist economic concerns. And that may be an optimistic estimate. By populist economics I mean labor supply and demand, wages, universal healthcare, mass immigration and its effects on wages, progressive taxation, vacation time, and similar topics. 20 of 1200? That is about 2%!

THAT is why the democrats are ignored by most Americans, except for when the GOP is just so very venal that the voters absolutely HAVE TO hold their noses and vote Democratic. Because the Dems political focus is on Identity Politics and catering to a few select cultural interest groups.


they're in something of a purple rage about the system's abject failure to address the BIG matters that are on people's minds, particularly such populist issues as:
Falling wages and falling middle-class opportunities.
Lousy health care, or none at all.
A collapsing national infrastructure, from water systems and roads to school buildings and parks.
Corporate greed unleashed.
Money-corrupted politics and government.
The death of the Common Good.


What?! Nothing about GAYS? Nothing about FEMINISM? Nothing about the environment? Nothing about green lifestyles? Nothing about religion? Nothing about racial politics? Nothing about the 3rd world?

Gee, from reading Alternet and watching PBS and the other all the other FakeLeft Democratic oultets, I thought the people of America were concerned about gays and race and gender and religion and the 3rd world. Out of those 1200 articles a year on Altneret, about 95% of them are about gays and feminism and the green lifestyle and race and gender and the 3rd world.

And now Hightower tells us what really matters--economic populism. Gosh, someone else here on Alternet, a lowly banned poster, used to write about all that, too.

Wonder what ever happened to him?

Florida's infamous Katherine Harris, now running for the U.S. Senate, has claimed that "God is the one who chooses our rulers." Good Lord! God chose her? And Dick Cheney? And Tom DeLay? Surely there can't be a god as mean and vindictive as that.
One of the most frequent questions I'm asked on the road is whether Bush/Rove will push us into a war with Iran as an "October Surprise" to goose up GOP election chances. Doing so would seem insane,...Stay tuned.


Say, Mr Hightower, what is it that you are talking about now? Partisan politics? Religion?
Gee, you saved that partisan politics for the last part of your article, and you actually devoted most of your article to partisan politics. What happened to the discussion of populism and the heartland need for it? You are now pandering to the democratic activists and their bloodlust for partisan politics. Yep, there you are now, sounding just like a typical fakeLeft writer, stirring up the troops with fear and bloodlust.

The fakeLeftists might talk a little bit about what the people of America really want--populist economics--but in the end, they are just fakeLeftists.....toeing the overclass line.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» One Note.... Posted by: CatDad
At least in Montana unlike Pennsylvania,
Posted by: NDnative on Oct 25, 2006 8:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
populism has sure found its place from Schweitzer to Tester. The good thing is these Democrats know what the real issues are and stick to it. Conrad Burns would be otherwise getting an easy extra term.

Contrast that to PA where Bob Casey has run a "Seinfeld" do-nothing campaign all the while pandering to the "right" on the culture front publicly and silently caving in to the "right" on the economic and foreign policy front. It's no coincidence that Casey lost to Santorum in the debate. But then again, that's what happens when fake "Democrats" with political clout/connections are given a phony lead on a silver platter and they don't capitalize on it !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

American Political Education
Posted by: StuartH on Oct 25, 2006 8:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On NPR this morning I happened to hear some interviews with voters who were unhappy with Iraq, but who didn't seem to be able to bring themselves to connect that with their vote. They were anguishing over their vote and were stuck on the fence.

What a lot of people looking at the electoral horserace forget is that undecided voters, those least able to connect the dots about what is going on around them, are about 10-15% of the electorate, typically.

Those of us who have been able to figure out what is going on like years ago, get very frustrated trying to persuade these people to get their minds around what seems to us obvious.

But, a lot of it is that these are decent people who don't believe that people like Karl Rove exist, because they themselves do not crassly calculate. That's why they are honest wage earners and steady hometown believers in Being Responsible. They can't bring themselves to think that their Faith in Jesus or America can be manipulated by unscrupulous greed mongers.

It is really tragic, when you think about it, that America has come to such a pass that one must face the fact that such low and ruthless manipulation does in fact exist. It is a measure of how close we might really come to losing America. Who really wants to see that happen?

I live in Arizona, a very red state. The reason it is a red state is that the diversity of views and ethnic cultures and alternative media that you come to take for granted in the big cities is so absent you wouldn't believe it. It takes a lot of money to establish an alternative newspaper and usually there isn't much. In the West, people believe in the Gary Cooper style of independence, an archetype that you can find in the novels of Louis L'Amour that is very resonant.

Hightower is right to characterize this as populist or at least latent populism. The problem is that Hightower's viewpoint isn't available to most of these people, since there is no media to carry these kinds of ideas across the isolating long distances that characterize the West, the Midwest and the parts of the country that get colored in as Red States. The internet has some possibility of reaching people, but there are still a lot of places where telephone service is kind of iffy and where computers seem like a fancy luxury item most useful as an educational investment for the kids.

But this year, that usual careful, Responsible and hesitant percentage represented by "undecided" has been cut into by the amount of pain echoing from so many sources.

Election polling experience over the years indicates that when there are still undecideds close to an election, they mostly break in the end for the challenger.

Those of us who have long ago become convinced that the neo-cons have conned America with a bad faith vision of a worldwide gated community run by corrupt big business will have to wait to see on election night, and hope or pray that this happens this time.

But as well, there needs to be a major think taking place about the way the internet tends to promote reaching out to like-minded people almost to the exclusion of working to form some kind of dialogue among those who care about America but who are not so quick to come to conclusions and who do not live in a diversity rich environment.

After all, careful and Responsible voting is what the Republic is founded on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who counts the votes
Posted by: ScottP on Oct 25, 2006 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like the old adage goes, it doesn't matter who votes, it matters who counts the votes.

On Nov. 8, watch for reports like this one on Fox News:
- In Ohio, the polls were again proven wrong when Secretary of State Ken Blackwell won the governor's race with a solid 55% after polling under 30%, and Mike Dewine won his senate race with over 60% of the votes after polling under 40%.
- In Georgia and Nebraska, 30% of the House seats went to candidates who trailed in the polls.

You'll be seeing plenty of reports like that from areas with electronic voting with no paper trail. Each cycle since Chuck Hagel broke the ice with his big steal it has gotten a little worse. When will the public decide enough is enough?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who counts the votes Posted by: mkeeling@jam.rr.com
Watch the Speech Here
Posted by: NoPCZone on Oct 25, 2006 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's in Google Video

Here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Common sense from slightly uncommon people
Posted by: turbocrusher on Oct 25, 2006 9:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hightower has always been a good ground for spreading true American decency within our political system. Good job Jim.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Voting Boldly
Posted by: Artkansas on Oct 25, 2006 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What will help voters be bold enough to eschew both major parties? In Arkansas, we are lucky enough to have two good candidates on the ballot for Governor. One running independently, one on the Green Party ticket. We also have two morons running for the major parties. Sadly, I fear that money and fear will speak.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Freedom of the Press - belongs to those who own one.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 25, 2006 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll never forget the New York Times leaving Dennis Kucinich's name out of a front page story on the Democratic primary during 2004 - wasn't even listed, and he had just done fairly well in one of the primaries.

Dennis Kucinich is the kind of Democrat a lot of people who vote for, if they could only hear his views. That's what the Democrats are really afraid of - the corporate press and it's pro-Republican agenda.

Recall the daily coverage of Bill Clinton's 'impeachable offenses'? Endless coverage of land deals, some other stuff, and finally Ken Starr's seizing on his affair with a 22-year old intern; which was splashed all over the front pages for weeks on end?

In contrast, the mainstream media doesn't cover the domestic spying story at all these days; they don't cover the debacle in Afghanistan, and as far as comprehensive coverage of the war in Iraq? Forget about it. If you want news out of Iraq, see http://electroniciraq.net/

We're also starting to see a replay of the Vietnam veterans story - soldiers coming back unable to fit into society are ending up living in their cars on the street - I've met a few.

The corporate media is owned by the same people who've been enjoying the world-record oil profits brought on by instability in the Middle East, courtesy of Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney and Rice - the four horseshits of the Apocalypse.

Apparently the FCC is getting ready to allow another round of media consolidation. Competetion in the media for 'getting the scoop' is being replaced by some East German Stasi-style information control system. The 'news' is turning into state/corporate propaganda - and once again, the FCC is at the heart of it.

It should come as no surprise that Former FCC Chairman William E. Kennard is now on the Board of the secretive Washington-based Carlyle Group, which is expanding from the defense industry into media and pharmaeuticals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Excelent Article
Posted by: Techubus on Oct 25, 2006 10:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am also getting sick of the polarizing media viewpoints of red vs blue. I'm a firm believer in the idea that most of Americans, whether they be liberal or conservative or somewhere inbetween, can come together and agree on the really important issues affecting us all.

The MSM is not going to change its ways anytime soon and will continue to promote these polarizing viewpoints that devide us. We have nowhere else to turn but alternative media. This is where Alternet and other sites can really stand up and make a difference. Let's see more articles like this one posted. More discussion not on what liberals and conservatives don't agree on, but what we do agree on.

The more we search for common threads of belief the more we humanize the other side. Otherwise all we do is demonize each other and the polarity and anymosity continues on unabated. I'd like to see these States united once again. I'm sick of seeing maps drawing up our Country like it's a gang turf war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xcelent Article Posted by: babs
Hightower's World = Amnesty
Posted by: eddie torres on Oct 25, 2006 12:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hightower's middle-of-the-road everyman approach is clearly calculated to set the table for a possible alliance of moderates in Congress should the Democrats overcome pre-rigged election odds.

There won't be any impeachment proceedings.
There won't be any contractor fraud refunds.
There won't be any redistricting.
There won't be any elections reforms.

Get ready for the repossession of Congress. By the Privilege Party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» MOTR?????? Posted by: mdruss42
American dicatorship-judges want to kill Constitution
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Oct 25, 2006 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read the facts at
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/10/24/opinion/
courtwatch/main2117497.shtml

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whoda thunk it?
Posted by: willymack on Oct 25, 2006 3:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who would've thought prior to the 2000 "election" that a callow, unelected ignoramus and his gang of thieves, liars thugs, and war criminals would bring our once-great nation to its knees and reduce us to a fascist dictatorship? Who would've thought that the "opposition" party would shamefully abrogate its responsibility to stand between us and the evil that is the bush regime? Who now thinks that we can turn it all around just by voting the same irresponsible party that looked away while we were bamboozled into an illegal, immoral, and unwinable "war", stood by while our national treasury was looted, and acquiesced to the destruction of Habeas Corpus? Oh, no! Much more than that MUST be done for any kind of healing or national reconcilation to be possible. It begins with the bush gang-the whole sorry lot of them, in prison. I don't hear many voices advocating that. There seems to be a lack of intestinal fortitude on the part of those elected to be the protectors of our rights and freedoms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The RICH get RICHER
Posted by: sofla100 on Oct 25, 2006 4:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What should also be mentioned is that the Iraq war has been profit city for legions of military and government contractors. They populate Langley, DC, wherever there is a "national laboratory" (aka, weapons design and manufacturing complex) and many a US enclave today. These parasites, for want of a better word, have been sucking down the dough. Especially by continuing to do government contracting and consulting, which now, in the post Halliburton scandal era, is more corrupt then ever.

Meanwhile, little or no money is left for any kind of help for failing schools, programs for the poor and those without health care, and the like. Once again, the Republican strategy at work, everything for war (and the rich), nothing for the people

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ahem. What about war?
Posted by: opeluboy on Oct 25, 2006 7:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hightower makes some great points but he ignores the sad fact that the Democratic party is simply the gay-friendly version of the War Party. Unless and until we prevent these pigs from starting another one, and somehow end the ones we're already in, there will be no money for health care, education, energy innovation, R&D or anything else this populist would love to see.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

only when such ariticles begin appearing on CNN and the mainstream USA press then I can expect somet
Posted by: petkov on Oct 26, 2006 4:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to happen. Untill thwen, the majority of USA population will remain the cocky arrogant insolent bastards who view the world as some 3rd world hole that can be explaouted and the rest of the people as eager to come to USA. I should knpow I was one of these people. I lived in USA for 23 years and I finally left and "went back to where I came from".
As things stand right now and will be for a long time, NOTHING in USA will change. Face it, USA has been in the control of the big bussiness that tells the majority what to think and how to live. Untill the dollar has the power it has and the USA can keep on borrowing money to survive it will all be the same. Maybe when the middle class shrinks and becomes so poor that they stop being the consumers of the world resources then we might see any changes. Untill them articles such as this are nice fantasy masturbations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Questions on the Religio-Political Context?
Posted by: etisoppa on Oct 26, 2006 7:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No such questions? How come?Whats happening in Middle East? foreign policy? Bush's Third Awwakening Agenda? The hi-tech deciet, chicanary, and dishmorable activites surrounding the puruit of such agends? The destruction of our Constittution? Such things are not on the Mind of Americans? I find that hard to believe. So whio's agenda are you trying to push? Or maybe Mr Hightower maybe you feel you don't have the environment within which to ask such questions

Well I have a solution:

1984 Free-Zones / State-Secret Free- Zones Declarations
If any one is for real about returning the US the world as we knew it back to its, decent, justice preserving constitutional moorings, these are what we need : State-Secret Free- Zones 1984 Free-Zones

It most be done block by block, till there are contiguous stretches, whole cities that have declared themselves to be State-Secret Free-Zones/ 1984 Free-Zones.

If you know a TI ( a person targeted with neuron assaulting technologies)that is Internationally known to be a TI, start there. That should the first item , freely and openly talked about in that State-secret Free-zone that 1984 Free Zone.

Bush 41 for his own agendas took it upon himself to victimize the poor, isolated innocent. An M.O. Jesus, the Scriptures did not present any instructions or examples of ministries based upon cruelty to other people, much less innocent people.

State-Secret Free- Zones/ 1984 Free-Zones that is the start of the fix to what we all know is going on and going wrong .

See, http://360.yahoo.com/etisoppa


http://etisoppa.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Questions on the Religio-Political Context?
Posted by: etisoppa on Oct 26, 2006 7:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No such questions? How come? What’s happening in Middle East? foreign policy? Bush's Third Awakening Agenda? The hi-tech deceit, chicanery, and dishonorable activities surrounding the pursuit of such agendas? The destruction of our Constitution? Such things are not on the minds of Americans? I find that hard to believe. So whose agenda are you trying to push? Or maybe Mr. Hightower, maybe you feel you don't have the environment within which to ask such questions

Well I have a solution:

1984 Free-Zones / State-Secret Free- Zones Declarations
If any one is for real about returning the US the world as we knew it back to its, decent, justice preserving constitutional moorings, these are what we need : State-Secret Free- Zones 1984 Free-Zones

It most be done block by block, till there are contiguous stretches, whole cities that have declared themselves to be State-Secret Free-Zones/ 1984 Free-Zones.

If you know a TI ( a person targeted with neuron assaulting technologies)that is Internationally known to be a TI, start there. That should the first item , freely and openly talked about in that State-secret Free-zone that 1984 Free Zone.

Bush 41 for his own agendas took it upon himself to victimize the poor, isolated innocent. An M.O. Jesus, the Scriptures did not present any instructions or examples of ministries based upon cruelty to other people, much less innocent people.

State-Secret Free- Zones/ 1984 Free-Zones that is the start of the fix to what we all know is going on and going wrong .

Try and give a full report next time, if it does not conflict with the agenda of your group, what ever that is ( group and agenda).

See, http://360.yahoo.com/etisoppa


http://etisoppa.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Emanuel's War Plan for Democrats
Posted by: rwa on Oct 26, 2006 8:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Book of Rahm
By JOHN WALSH

Last week I wrote that the chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), Congressman Rahm Emanuel, had worked hard to guarantee that Democratic candidates in key toss-up House races were pro-war. In this he was largely successful, because of the money he commands and the celebrity politicians who reliably respond to his call, ensuring that 20 of the 22 Democratic candidates in these districts are pro-war. So the fix is in for the coming elections.

In 2006, no matter which party controls the House, a majority will be committed to pursuing the war on Iraq--despite the fact that the Democratic rank and file and the general voting public oppose the war by large margins.

What are Emanuel's views on war and peace? Emanuel has just supplied the answer in the form of a scrawny book co-authored with Bruce Reed, modestly entitled: The Plan: Big Ideas for America. The authors obligingly boil each of the eight parts of "The Plan" down to a single paragraph. The section which embraces all of foreign policy is entitled "A New Strategy to End the War on Terror," a heading revealing in itself since "war on terror" is the way the neocons and the Israeli Lobby currently like to frame the discussion of foreign policy. Here is the book's summary paragraph with my comments in parentheses:

"A New Strategy to Win the War on Terror"
("War on Terror," as George Soros points out, is a false metaphor used by those who would drag us into military adventures not in our interest or that of humanity.)

"We need to use all the roots of American power to make our country safe. (He begins by playing on fear.) America must lead the world's fight against the spread of evil and totalitarianism, but we must stop trying to win that battle on our own. (Messianic imperialism.) We should reform and strengthen multilateral institutions for the twenty-first century, not walk away from them. We need to fortify the military's "thin green line" around the world by adding to the U.S. Special Forces and the Marines, and by expanding the U.S. army by 100,000 more troops. (An even bigger military for the world's most powerful armed forces, a very militaristic view of the way to handle the conflicts among nations. What uses does Emanuel have in mind for those troops?) We should give our troops a new GI Bill to come home to. (More material incentives to induce the financially strapped to sign up as cannon fodder.) Finally we must protect our homeland and civil liberties by creating a new domestic counterterrorism force like Britain's MI5. (A new domestic spying operation is an obvious threat to our civil liberties; MI5 holds secret files on one in 160 adults in Britain along with files on 53,000 organizations.)

There it is straight from the horse's mouth.

How does Emanuel, the man who has screened and chosen the 2006 Democratic candidates for Congress, feel specifically about the war on Iraq, the number one issue on voters' minds. Emanuel and Reed do not so much as mention Iraq in their book except in terms of the "war on terror." Nor does Emanuel mention Iraq on his web site as among the important issues facing us, quite amazing omission and one shared by Chuck Schumer who is his equivalent of the Senate side, chairing the DSCC (Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee). However a very recent profile in Fortune,"Rahm Emanuel, Pitbull Politician," by Washington Bureau chief Nina Easton notes: "On Iraq, Emanuel has steered clear of the withdraw-now crowd, preferring to criticize Bush for military failures since the 2003 invasion. 'The war never had to turn out this way,' he told me at one of his campaign stops. In January 2005, when asked by Meet the Press's Tim Russert whether he would have voted to authorize the war-'knowing that there are no weapons of mass destruction'-Emanuel answered yes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Emanuel's War Plan for Democrats-2
Posted by: rwa on Oct 26, 2006 8:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Jack Murtha made his proposal for withdrawal from Iraq, Emanuel quickly declared that "Jack Murtha went out and spoke for Jack Murtha." As for Iraq policy, Emanuel added: "At the right time, we will have a position." That was November, 2005. In June, 2006, it was obviously time, and Emanuel finally revealed his policy in a statement on the floor of the House during debate over Iraq, thus: "The debate today is about whether the American people want to stay the course with an administration and a Congress that has walked away from its obligations or pursue a real strategy for success in the war on terror. We cannot achieve the end of victory and continue to sit and watch, stand pat, stay put, status quo and that is the Republican policy. Democrats are determined to take the fight to the enemy." The refrain is familiar; more troops are the means and victory in Iraq is the goal.

The war on Iraq benefited Israel by laying waste a country seen to be one of its major adversaries. Emanuel's commitment to Israel and his Congressional service to it are not in doubt. The most recent evidence was his attack on the U.S. puppet Prime Minister of Iraq, Nouri al Maliki, because Maliki had labeled Israel's attack on Lebanon as an act of "aggression." Emanuel called on Maliki to cancel his address to Congress; and he was joined by his close friend and DSCC counterpart, Sen. Chuck Schumer, who asked; "Which side is he (Maliki) on when it comes to the war on terror?" In terms of retired Senator Fritz Holling's statement that Congress is Israeli occupied territory, Rahm Emanuel must be considered one of the occupying troops. And he certainly is a major cog in the Israel Lobby as defined by Mearsheimer and Walt. Nor is the idea that the Lobby exists and has tremendous influence on Middle East policy any longer a taboo in the minds of the general populace. According to a poll just carried out by Zogby International for CNI (5), 39% of the American public "agree" or "somewhat agree" that "the work of the Israel lobby on Congress and the Bush administration has been a key factor for going to war in Iraq and now confronting Iran." A similar number, 40%, "strongly disagreed" or "somewhat disagreed" with this position. Some 20% of the public were not sure.

But in some respects, Emanuel is a mysterious fellow, as evidenced by his biography, which is readily available on Wikipedia and in the piece in Fortune. But there are a few things missing or not fully explained. First, as is often pointed out, Emanuel's physician father was an Israeli émigré; but, according to Leon Hadar, he also worked during the 1940s with the notorious Irgun, which was labeled as a terrorist organization by the British authorities. Perhaps Rahm's current interest in terrorism was first kindled at his father's Irgun knee.

Second, during the 1991 Gulf War, Emanuel was a civilian volunteer in Israel, "rust-proofing brakes on an army base in northern Israel." (Wikipedia, New Republic). This is peculiar on two counts. Here the U.S. goes to war with Iraq, but Emanuel, a U.S. citizen, volunteers not for his country, but for Israel. Moreover, here is a well-connected Illinois political figure with a father who had been in the Irgun, but he is assigned to "rust-proof brakes" on "an army base." Maybe.

Third, immediately upon his return from his desert sojourn, Emanuel at once became a major figure in the Clinton campaign "who wowed the team from the start, opening a spigot on needed campaign funds."How did he do that after being isolated overseas, and with no experience in national politics? Fourth, after leaving the Clinton White House, he decided that he needed some accumulated wealth and "security" if he were to stay in politics. So he went to work for Bruce Wasserstein, a major Democratic donor and Wall Street financier.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ECLECTICIST SEEKER-S. JIM RODRIGUEZ
Posted by: SJR505 on Oct 28, 2006 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THE IRAQI WAR WILL NOT BE COMPLETED UNTIL THE U.S. GOVERNMENT LED BY OIL ENTHUSIASTS , GEO. “THE WEASEL” BUSH AND HIS SIDEKICK, DICK “THE SLICK” CHENEY, HAVE THE FOUR OIL PHARISEES – EXXON, BP, MOBIL, CHEVRON- ‘PRODUCTION SEVICE AGREEMENTS
(PSA) SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED FROM THE IRAQI GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS WHO HAVE SOLD THEIR COUNTRY’S OIL ASSETS TO THEM…THEN, WILL THE U.S TROOPS WILL COME HOME…

INSOFAR AS STOPPING THE FLOW OF MONIES VIA RESOLUITIONS BY MEMBERS OF THE SELECTED ELITE CLASS OF CRIMINALS CALLED THE U.S. CONGRESS, FORGET IT, IT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN…MY ARGUMENT IS WELL RESEARCHED AND BE SUBSTANTIATED BY THE ARTILCE LISTED BELOW AND SOME SELECTED EXERPTS :


Bush's Petro-Cartel Almost Has Iraq's Oil
By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted October 16, 2006.

…It's clear that the U.S.-led invasion had little to do with national security or the events of Sept. 11. Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill revealed that just 11 days after Bush's inauguration in early 2001, regime change in Iraq was "Topic A" among the administration's national security staff, and former Terrorism Tsar Richard Clarke told 60 Minutes that the day after the attacks in New York and Washington occurred, "[Secretary of Defense Donald] Rumsfeld was saying that we needed to bomb Iraq." He added: "We all said … no, no. Al-Qaeda is in Afghanistan."

…But serious planning for the war had begun in February of 2002, as Bob Woodward revealed in his book, Plan of Attack. Planning for the future of Iraq's oil wealth had been under way for longer still.
In February of 2001, just weeks after Bush was sworn in, the same energy executives that had been lobbying for Saddam's ouster gathered at the White House to participate in Dick Cheney's now infamous Energy Task Force. Although Cheney would go all the way to the Supreme Court to keep what happened at those meetings a secret, we do know a few things, thanks to documents obtained by the conservative legal group JudicialWatch. As Mark Levine wrote in The Nation($$):
… a map of Iraq and an accompanying list of "Iraq oil foreign suitors" were the center of discussion. The map erased all features of the country save the location of its main oil deposits, divided into nine exploration blocks. The accompanying list of suitors revealed that dozens of companies from 30 countries -- but not the United States -- were either in discussions over or in direct negotiations for rights to some of the best remaining oilfields on earth.
Levine wrote, "It's not hard to surmise how the participants in these meetings felt about this situation."

…But the execs from Big Oil didn't just want access to Iraq's oil; they wanted access on terms that would be inconceivable unless negotiated at the barrel of a gun. Specifically, they wanted an Iraqi government that would enter into production service agreements (PSAs) for the extraction of Iraq's oil.
PSAs, developed in the 1960s, are a tool of today's kinder, gentler neocolonialism; they allow countries to retain technical ownership over energy reserves but, in actuality, lock in multinationals' control and extremely high profit margins -- up to 13 times oil companies' minimum target, according to an analysis by the British-based oil watchdog Platform (PDF).

MOREOVER, I SAY AGAIN, THAT THE TROOPS ARE NOT COMING HOME UNTIL THE OIL/GAS PSA’S ARE SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED TO THE FOUR OIL PHARISEES- EXXON, MOBIL, BP AND CHEVRON…REMEMBER :

S+JIM+RODRIGUEZ+++ECLECTICIST SEEKER+++

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I would call it...
Posted by: bleda on Oct 28, 2006 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rather than a liberal triumph, I would say this is people finally being dragged kicking and screaming to their senses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

God chooses our candidates?
Posted by: guerillaTHOUGHTterrorist on Oct 29, 2006 1:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Florida's infamous Katherine Harris, now running for the U.S. Senate, has claimed that "God is the one who chooses our rulers." Good Lord! God chose her? And Dick Cheney? And Tom DeLay? Surely there can't be a god as mean and vindictive as that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well, god spoke to me too. Posted by: guerillaTHOUGHTterrorist