Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Gospel of Green

By Bill McKibben, OnEarth Magazine. Posted October 4, 2006.


Evangelical Christians are increasingly part of the movement to protect God's green Earth.
Bill McKibben

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Bill McKibben

It Isn't Morning in America Anymore -- It's Dusk on Planet Earth
If we want to preserve a planet similar to that on which civilization developed, we've got to cut CO2 emissions.
May 12, 2008

If We Want to Survive the Climate Crisis We Must Change
Either we build real community -- with mass transit and local food -- or we will go down clinging to the wreckage of our privatized society.
Mar 15, 2008

The Problem with Christmas
It has long since become too busy, too expensive, too centered around acquiring that which we do not need.
Dec 4, 2007

More stories by Bill McKibben

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

First came the mighty winds, blowing across the Gulf with unprecedented fury, leveling cities and towns, washing away the houses built on sand. Toss in record flooding across the Northeast, and one of the warmest winters humans have known on this continent, and a prolonged and deepening drought in the desert West. For Americans, this has been the year the earth turned biblical. Pharaoh may have faced plagues and frogs and darkness; we got Katrina and Rita and Wilma.

But this was also the year the environmental movement turned biblical -- the year when people of faith began in large numbers to join the first rank of those trying to protect creation. The key symbolic moment came in February, when 86 of the country's leading evangelical scholars and pastors signed on to the Evangelical Climate Initiative, a document that may turn out to be as important in the fight against global warming as any stack of studies and computer models. It made clear, among other things, that even in the evangelical community, "right wing" and "Christian" are not synonyms, and in so doing it may have opened the door to a deeper and more interesting politics than we've experienced in the last decade of fierce ideological divide.

That document seemed, to many newspaper readers, to come out of nowhere. But, of course, it was the result of long and patient groundwork from a small corps of people. Understanding that history helps illuminate what the future might hold for this effort. And given that 85 percent of Americans identify themselves as Christian, and that we manage to emit 25 percent of the world's carbon dioxide -- well, the future of Christian environmentalism may have something significant to do with the future of the planet.

In the beginning (say, The Reagan Era), all was darkness. To liberal American Christians, the environment was largely a luxury item, well down on the list below war and poverty. "I remember one Catholic bishop asking me, 'How come there aren't any people on those Sierra Club calendars?'" says one of the few religious conservationists of that era. To conservative Christians, environmentalism was a dirty word -- it stank of paganism, of interference with the free market, of the sixties. Meanwhile, many environmentalists were more secular than the American norm, and often infected with the notion spread by the historian Lynn White in his famous 1967 essay, "The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis," that Christianity lay at the root of ecological devastation. Everyone, in short, was scared of everyone else.

But there were a few lights starting to shine in that gloom. Calvin DeWitt carried one lantern. A mild-mannered midwesterner with a Ph.D. in zoology, he helped in 1979 to found the Au Sable Institute in northern Michigan. The institute devotes itself to organizing field courses and conferences that teach ecology, always stressing the Christian notion of stewardship, the idea that, as it says in Genesis, we are to "dress and keep" the fertile earth. To understand what a religious environmental worldview might look like, consider this from one of DeWitt's early statements: "Creation itself is a complex functioning whole of people, plants, animals, natural systems, physical processes, social structures, and more, all of which are sustained by God's love and ordered by God's wisdom. Thus, Au Sable brings together the full range of disciplines -- from chemistry to economics to marine biology to theology -- that we need if we are to be good stewards of God's household." That doesn't sound too frightening, right?

In DeWitt's Reformed Church tradition, God has left us two books to read. First, the book of creation, "in which each creature is as a letter of text leading us to know God's divinity and everlasting power." And second, the Bible. It's easy to see how environmentalism connects with the first of these, but it's taken longer to understand its relevance to the second.

"When we started, for the first two or three or four years almost everything we were dealing with was an Old Testament text, from the Hebrew Bible," says DeWitt. That makes sense. Since the Old Testament starts at the beginning, it almost has to deal with questions about the relationship between people and land. There's Noah, the first radical green, saving a breeding pair of everything; there are the Jewish laws mandating a Sabbath for the land every seventh year; there's the soliloquy at the end of the book of Job, which is both God's longest speech in the whole Bible and the first and best piece of nature writing in the Western tradition.


Digg!

Bill McKibben is the author of "The End of Nature" and "Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
rotten
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 4, 2006 1:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bushies are Christianity and Judaism at their most rotten manifestations and Christians/Jews who are real environmentalists and real pacifists are Christianity/Judaism at its finest. A similar statement works for Muslims, other religions and atheism as well. All of us are capable of doing the right thing for the Earth but also capable of destroying the viability of the Earth with war, global warming, etc. Stay tuned to reality and see what the future holds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

idiots
Posted by: WhatNow? on Oct 4, 2006 4:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, and James Dobson, demanded that it be retracted. Climate science was unsettled, they said."

What's wrong with erring on the side of caution? It seems like with idiots like these, christianity is the antithesis of wisdom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Welcome Christian Evangelicals to the Environmental Movement
Posted by: Douglas on Oct 4, 2006 4:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our environment is in very big trouble and we only have a few years to save it (if that is still even possible). This issue is so important and the stakes are so high that we need the help of anyone and everyone. We need alliances between diverse groups of people, ideological friends and foes alike wherever that is possible. I welcome Evangelicals to the Green Movement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In the beginning
Posted by: wawa on Oct 4, 2006 4:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The myth/story of Creation is that God created everything and said it was GOOD-except when dividing the dark/night from the light/day

And He/She gave human's "dominion" over the earth

Dominion NEVER meant to rape and plunder,
but to nurture, care and love.

It is that 'dividing' that we do from God:
it is our blindness/apathy to God in all of Creation/Nature
that must be awoken in order to:
Tikkun: heal/mend/transform the world.

eileen fleming, eco-feminist, activist, author, satirist, reporter, editor WAWA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why hasn't the Bush House built on sand been washed away?
Posted by: mat38 on Oct 4, 2006 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The opening sentence of this story is a startling line of with a solid impact on my palate for good writing. It made me think about what the hell is wrong with our nation. The rest of the article told me it's that Evangelical Christians, right and left. They are fucking (pardon my frankness) nuts - every single one of them - who are in a doomsday cult and trying to bring the rest of us down to the depths of ignorence and intolerance where they live. It's big business, as is war, and our President is a crazy religious whacko. God save America from them. Please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh, brother!
Posted by: Moonray on Oct 4, 2006 6:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Talk about rationalizing . . .

Sure, it's great that some of the weird, Bible-thumping, Republican-voting legions of the Christian Right now are embracing environmental causes. But hailing that development is like welcoming the Third Reich to the war on heart disease.

Religion -- especially fundamentalist religion -- is inherently destructive to humankind. It values superstition over logic, which is how we got into this mess in the first place. The only reason the Christian fundies like the green movement is that the apocalyptical predictions fit in nicely with their ideas of looming Judgment Day. Wake up and smell the lunacy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Does not compute Posted by: Capybara
» We Need to Build Alliances Posted by: YogiBear
» You're welcome! Posted by: Moonray
» Must... not... take... bait... Posted by: MatthewSavage
» But you have to admit... Posted by: doctorsquared
And now, to get more EVANGELIES to fight to legalize HEMP !
Posted by: NDnative on Oct 4, 2006 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And don't even think it's impossible. Yeah Alternet, your favorite governor Arnold vetoed it but here in North Dakota, even a lot of hard core conservatives and liberals joined forces to fight to give farmers the right to grow hemp.

P.S.: I hear Tom McClintock fought to legalize hemp in CA but Ahh-nold chose BIG OIL, BIG AGRI, and the DEA over farmers !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good points about McClintock Posted by: jdylarid
Sheeple & The Steeple
Posted by: NoPCZone on Oct 4, 2006 7:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For as long as there has been organized religion there have been people without and within who have hijacked it for their own selfish purposes and today is no different. One of the main reasons that 'leaders' have been able to get away with it is due to the outright ignorance many of the faithful have of their own 'holy' texts.

People today have no excuse, unlike those in pre-reformation Europe, where the Catholic Church used the Latin language, widespread illiteracy and repression of translated Bible texts to keep adherents in the dark. Early Bible translators were hunted across Europe like dogs, tortured and killed by the authority of the Catholic Church for wanting to put native tongue translations of the scriptures in the hands of anyone who wanted them. Today's equivalent are the 'King James Only' crowd who wish to use the cloak of archaic language to fog the common understanding of the basis of their faith.

Most of what is bad that has been done in the name of Christianity has been caused by or enabled by the Biblical illiteracy of a significant percentage of the faithful. Any pastor/preacher/preist that teaches or supports the NeoCon agenda is misleading his/her followers.

It's not just the environment. It's social justice, tolerance, peace and many other things. They are clearly taught, but de-emphasized or ignored by many in the evangelical churches. Millions of the sheeple within blindly follow the teachings of their leaders who have an agenda beyond the charge and purpose of the church.

Questioning and dissent is discouraged-- quite the opposite of what the Christian Bible teaches. The Bereans were specifically commended in the New Testament for putting the teachings before them to the test-- quite the opposite of most evangelicals of today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pantheism
Posted by: edith on Oct 4, 2006 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
religions that elevate humans to divine status produce members who are careless with the earth heritage. Christianity, Muslims and Judaism claim without proof that man is made in God's image(though Jews and Muslims also claim to be offended if you draw or depict God's "image".)

Until people are seen as what they are: just another organism along with bacteria, people will have a superiority complex over the rest of Nature, cheered on by rabbis and priests eager not to offend the big "givers" to their congregations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: pantheism Posted by: MartianBachelor
I've only read the headline but
Posted by: pzzp on Oct 4, 2006 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it contradicts some previous articles about the push by Christian zealots to hurry End Times along. For those who look to Armageddon as salvation, why bother saving the Earth?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who would not be mad as hell ?
Posted by: Burtonger on Oct 4, 2006 1:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We shall see if these christians are real christians,cuz BUSHCO surely are not.Here is an interesting quote that is relative to our times.
Napoleon said" Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich".
I say ignorance is the real reason these Neo Nazis with nukes {BUSHCO}aren't all in jail or executed,and it's all because of disinformation and propaganda which should be a punishable offense.
Absolutely obscene crimes and major sins are the actions of this immoral,unethical,illegal NAZI FASCIST regime,so when the hell are people going to wake up and stone these monsterous bastards from HELL.
Well KARMA will get them eventually even if everyone is too weak or afraid to uphold real world laws for dealing with SUPER criminals against humanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So what? Another death bed conversion?
Posted by: Sojourner on Oct 4, 2006 4:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought Pat Robertson would at least wait for the rising oceans to wipe out the Bush family complex in New Hampshire before he'd concede that what science has been telling us all along (The first Earth Day was in 1970. Club of Rome predictions in the 1970s. That's 35--count 'em--35 years ago!) was a FACT.

Yes, right wingnut Christians are entitled to their own beliefs. But they are not entitled to their own facts.

We don't need verbal concessions. We need political action. Santorum stunk up the Congress long before his right wingnut Christian cohorts got religious about the environment.

I shall believe this death bed conversion is sincere when we hear them point the finger of guilt at the top man: GW Bush. Until then, it's mealy-mouthed backing and filling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It just doesn't change anything.
Posted by: grokked on Oct 5, 2006 12:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with all this is that it misses the point.

While the boy emperor and his court may make effective use of evangelicals, and other brands of stupids, among the republican rank and file, their only true alliegence is to the corporations and the ownership class.

To think that this administration is going to suddenly discover "green" just because a select few of their brighter evangelical minions have taken the first halting steps to recognizing the real world is wishful thinking.

In Bushworld, the neocons and robber-barons are still the only voices that count.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As an atheist/secular humanist/environmentalist, I'd just like to say to these 'green' evangelicals
Posted by: Lord Ichmael on Oct 5, 2006 1:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...Welcome to the environmentalist cause and THANK YOU for joining. It's nice to see people whom Cheney, Bush, and their corporate crook friends are, among other things, demagoguerizing for in hopes they'll overlook everything else for gay marriage, insisting global warming is a myth, saying Iraq's just fine and dandy, and spreading support for the zero-evidence-backing-it bigotted intelligent design, have seen through the rather thin bubble of deception. Between this and the Foley Scandal, the Republicans' fate may certainly be sealed (hopefully; if theirs isn't, OURS is!).
Then we'll see if either or both houses of the newly-Democrat-seized congress have the balls to challenge Cheney and Co.'s policies of destroying the environment, merging of church and state, secret newly-legal torture chambers housing almost completely innocent civillians, the policy of pouring gasoline on the fire of Terrorism, nonsensical denial of embryonic stem cell research (We must protect the sanctity of life, by leaving the embryos in the trash instead of being used to develop potential cures for disastrous diseases!), elimination of business safety laws and tax cuts for the rich/tax increases for everyone else, war profiteering, elimination of government programs that help the lower and middle class, and rampant shameless propaganda, hypocrisy, and downright complete dishonesty/no concern whatsoever for the PEOPLE of the country. If the Republicans win or the Democrats are still selfish cowards, I might just want to move to Canada or the UK.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You aren't seeing anything new - just noticing a different strain
Posted by: Jasonix on Oct 5, 2006 6:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The term "evangelical" is useless. It just leads to confusion - like these articles about how "evangelicals" are going green. The truth is that hardly a single person in the religious community has changed their opinion about the environment. The writers of these articles are simply paying attention to different religious people.

"Evangelicalism" refers to Protestant churches that say people need a personal conversion experience. An "evangelical" can be anyone from a Pentecostal or Southern Baptist to a Mennonite or Quaker. These groups don't agree on much besides how to "get saved." Even traditions within the same denominational family can be at odds on political questions. For example, the unquestionably "evangelical" Baptist General Conference supports the progressive anti-theocracy group Baptist Joint Committee on Public Affairs, while the "evangelical" Southern Baptists are much more willing to meld church and state.

A better nomenclature is to call religious rightists "dominionists" or "theocrats." Even calling them "fundamentalists" isn't accurate, because there are people who believe in a young earth, literal interpretation of scripture, and hell-fire that don't want anything to do with politics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The End is Near
Posted by: armybrat8 on Oct 6, 2006 12:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, not every last one of us evangelicals believes it. The LEFT BEHIND series is entertaining. But I'm not sure you can interpret prophecy with any degree of certainty. It will all come true in the end, and that is my firm belief. But will it look anything like we expect it??? Not likely.

The Zealots of Jesus' time looked forward to a great Once and Future King, who would overthrow the Roman occupation and set up a strong and powerful Israel once and for all. Instead they got the most a-political Messiah imaginable, and not 70 years after his death the Temple was destroyed and the Children of Israel scattered to the four corners of the globe. So I don't buy into Lehaye's schemes about the timing of the millenium based on current events in the Middle East. The situation scares me, but I don't know the hour or the day, because Jesus told us we wouldn't know.

My point is this: we have an ethical responsibility to take care of our planet, whether we base this on religious or simply ethical reasoning. I've been an environmentalist since my 4th grade teacher told us about global warming, and this was quite some time before I became evangelical. I'm glad I'm not standing out in this green field alone anymore:)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]