Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

A new alliance between MySpace and Dotster pulls the covers over the most basic web task: getting a domain name and setting up e-mail.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Dotster's Computer Illiteracy Campaign

By Annalee Newitz, AlterNet. Posted September 26, 2006.


A new alliance between MySpace and Dotster pulls the covers over the most basic web task: getting a domain name and setting up e-mail.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Annalee Newitz

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Usually I don't let the PR e-mails get to me. My standard procedure is to review and delete these missives from alternate marketplace universes where people care about incremental changes to the graphic user interface in a piece of useless software. But last week when the bizarrely clueless announcement from domain-name megaregistrar Dotster arrived in my inbox, I just couldn't stand aside and let it pass.

Maybe I was feeling particularly grumpy because the ongoing Hewlett-Packard scandal is constantly reminding me that all my nightmares about the corporate surveillance of media types are, in fact, true. Whatever the reason, I just got plain pissed off by Dotster's craven bid to appeal to youth with its new PimpedEmail product for MySpace users. For $7.95 per month, Dotster will sell you access to a "pimped" domain name via your MySpace account. Apparently, according to the press release, these domains "tend to favor hip buzz phrases ... for example, if a visitor types 'Stephanie' into the DDS search box and clicks 'Name Search,' the results might include stephanieisthebomb.com, stephanyshizzle.com, or worldofstephanie.com."

OK, it's true that what leaps out immediately here is the slap-your-head stupidity of these "hip buzz phrases" -- my personal favorite is worldofstephanie, which has to be one of the buzzingest, hippest phrases I've ever encountered. But what pushed me over the line from merely bemused to actually offended is Dotster's crass attempt to suck money out of one of the most cash-strapped communities on MySpace: unknown musicians trying to get people interested in their music.

Most of the suggestions for how to use PimpedEmail involve using it to promote unknown bands. "A new group calling itself Nikki Blast could use band search to register nikkiblastrocks.com," suggests Dotster. Then "they can set up as many e-mail addresses as they like using that domain extension. For example, the drummer could be madbeatz@nikkiblastrocks.com, and the band could award loyal fans with their own addresses such as timmy@nikkiblastrocks.com." Hmmm, could "madbeatz" be another one of those hip buzz phrases? What about "rocks"?

Of course these suggestions won't necessarily control youth behavior, partly because they're just lame. And I'll admit that MySpace teaming up with Dotster isn't nearly as problematic as MySpace collaborating with state governments to police what kids are doing on one of the world's largest social networks. But PimpedEmail is more insidious than you might think. It pushes conformity under the guise of cool; it turns the ideal of freely sharing band information into something that requires payment by the month.

No, it's not surprising that the News Corp.-owned MySpace is figuring out ways to accessorize its free service with little nuggets at teen prices. I still reserve the right to be grossed out when it happens.

More depressing still is the way PimpedEmail pulls the covers over the true process involved in doing one of the most basic tasks of any Web user: getting a domain name and setting up e-mail. The Dotster press release describes its service as a "unique Domain Discovery System (DDS)," adding helpfully that "visitors to the service's Web site can generate unique domains."

Huh? There's nothing "unique" here -- this is the usual way one searches for domains and buys them online. Every time I've ever bought a domain, apparently, I've had a "unique" experience when I searched to see if annaleenewitz.com (for example) was available, and then purchased it. The only thing that's different here is that instead of getting boring suggestions for domains (like annaleecompany.com), you'll get allegedly cool ones (like annaleeshizzle.com).

The misrepresentations here go beyond the usual "we're unique" marketing ploys. Dotster makes it seem that getting a domain and getting e-mail are the same thing -- and that the easiest way to do both is through MySpace. Let's leave aside the privacy issues involved in tying your MySpace page together with your e-mail and domain services. I'm more worried that services like PimpedEmail will actually lower technical literacy in Web users by hiding what's really going on when you create the address madleetz@worldofannalee.com. Not only does PimpedEmail take money away from its users, it takes away their knowledge of how domain names work -- and by extension, it takes away just a bit more of their power.

Digg!

Annalee Newitz is a surly media nerd who's got all the hip buzz phrases, like "get funky" and "far out" and "make the scene."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
An Alternet universe...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Sep 26, 2006 8:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...where one lacks control over one's spending choices?

But what pushed me over the line from merely bemused to actually offended is Dotster's crass attempt to suck money out of one of the most cash-strapped communities on MySpace: unknown musicians trying to get people interested in their music.

A fool and his money are soon parted, or......don't inhale?

And unless the author has evidence to the contrary here statement "that all my nightmares about the corporate surveillance of media types are, in fact, true" is silly. That's why heads are rolling, the chairwoman was fired, and te feds are investigating. What kind of universe does a person inhabit when an instance of corporate crime becomes accepted as "normal"?

I wouldn't buy a myspace domain. Godaddy sells web space (actual .com sites) for $1.99 for the first year (year long promo, around $7.00 after that), with email and free webhosting, if you're willing to tolerate advertisements. If you want "your very own" website, they offer hosting plans for ~$3.00/month with NO ads, 5.0gb bandwidth, and a buttload of email addy's.

Buyer beware and buyer be informed. Nothing has changed. It's YOUR money they're after all. Do something intelligent with it, or at least something you won't wax boring in lamenting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

thanks once again
Posted by: talkville on Sep 27, 2006 1:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Again a great article regarding the enclosure of the internet! In the 'Knowledged-based" society, who owns and controls knowledge becomes significant.

Thanks once more for an excellent critique of those who would appropriate knowledge in order to extract a monthly recurring income from us who are 'ignorant'!

You do highly important work; I for one appreciate your efforts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

F the kids
Posted by: lamar on Sep 27, 2006 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aww, screw the kids. I can't stand the kids. They probably need some of their power taken away. Perhaps being scammed while they're young will make them properly skeptical as adults. Hopefully they'll learn that the internet is a social networking tool, and not social networking itself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: F the kids Posted by: lamar
"shizzle"
Posted by: Allison on Sep 27, 2006 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow... I can think of no better way to make your personal domain name sound absolutely dated and ridiculous... two years ago. Because that's when "shizzle" went from being new and mildly amusing, to being stale and mainly used by white people in suits trying to sell something.

Anyway I don't think most people DO know "how domain names work". Especially not the MySpace kids who see the internet as only the front-end, and have never had to deal with the ugly, somewhat user-unfriendly back-end that even a non-hacker like me has had to face at some point. MySpace is the new Geocities - if you actually know what you are doing, you don't use it (at least not any more than you have to).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I've seen this before
Posted by: phaedrus on Sep 28, 2006 2:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Usually your articles are really something new, and I'm not saying this is in any way a bad one, but I've read this same story a dozen times before, I feel.

I'm a youth, of roughly the age bracket you seem to be talking about. maybe a little older. I just get the impression you're referring to youth who would fall into this kinda trap, anyway.

The modern world is full of really stupid ads like this, sure. And there are plenty of people who will fall for it, and think they sound "gangsta" or "pimpin" with their new domain names. But I think there have always been trend-followers, and I don't think these are people who would ever really care to learn about domain name registration and the ways to set up your own email server once you've got a domain name.

Geeks, and I am temporarily classifying all people who know even this technical distinction as geeks, are a minority, but they are a growing portion of the population. And the people who don't are becoming more familiar with the internet as a whole, and may try this sort of thing in a graceless attempt to get closer.

I think I know the feeling you're describing in this article. There's a lot of stupidity in the world, and idiots do scream louder than smart people. But relax, the youth aren't doomed. A lot of us are working our brains off anyway, and I dare say more of us than could afford to do so than in any generation before in history.

p.s. I know you're not "the last generation", at your age, but you're still talking about that doomed new breed of suckers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

did you have a bad day?
Posted by: joeblo on Sep 30, 2006 11:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seriously. Other than letting off some steam, did that article have a point?

Im sure you can appreciate the irony of the fact that you used a HTML editor to write that article, and not hard-coded it yourself...

Thats whats great about computers, they do what you tell them to do. Why you feel the need to point out that people will pay for something that someone else programmed to be done 'easier' i.e. if you dont know what you are doing, is beyond me.

Did you pay for the PC you are using, or did you assemble it yourself, chip by chip? Because taking your logic to its natural conclusion, that is the only way to REALLY be 'cool' like you are. Most adults by this time in their life are aware of the fact that you pay for the things you dont want to take the time to learn, or you learn them on your own.

Ive noticed more of these sanctimonious articles lately on alternet... sorry, your shit still stinks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

not only is there nothing new in this article...
Posted by: frankym on Oct 9, 2006 11:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i too think i understand where the author was coming from when she wrote this article, but dude... have you turned on MTV lately? if you want to talk about forces that are potentially exploitive to youth, this is the last place i'd start. this pimpedemail thing seems pretty benign to me, and i think it's actually kind of a neat idea. kids don't know how the internet works, and if they can register a domain through this service for $7.95 a year and have an easy way to manage it, i don't see the harm. i mean, kids pay $3 bucks for a ring tone that they use for a couple weeks before buying a new one, what's wrong with giving them a relatively inexpensive domain to play with for a whole year? compare the damage done by a kid buying this product to the same kid spending a school night watching 4 back-to-back episodes of the show "Next," and i think most will agree that the time spent writing this article could have been better spent elsewhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]