Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Stunned, Scared and Silent

By Molly Ivins, AlterNet. Posted August 15, 2006.


The Bush administration's reliance on scare tactics -- to beat Americans into stunned submission -- is becoming outright laughable.
Ivins

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Molly Ivins

Molly Ivins AlterNet Archive
An archive of the great progressive columnist's writings.
Jun 21, 2007

Stand Up Against the "Surge"
We are the people who run this country. We are the deciders and we need to raise hell.
Jan 12, 2007

Now They're All For Bipartisanship
Apparently, the people of this country did not elect liberals to Congress last week. Nope, they elected populists!
Nov 15, 2006

More stories by Molly Ivins

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 

We have nothing to fear but fear itself, especially since fear is now being fomented and manipulated for political purposes by a bunch of shameless hacks. Who is trying to make you afraid and why? This Karl Rove tactic is getting quite threadbare, in fact, and so much so that it is getting dangerously close to comedy.

My favorite episode, of course, was the Miami terrorists, a fearsome horde of seven described by the FBI's deputy director as, "More inspirational that operational." That means wanna-bes. An FBI informant posing as a member of al-Qaida offered to supply the plotters with material for the jihad, so they asked for boots and uniforms. Every terrorist needs a uniform.

Of course, even a nincompoop can succeed occasionally -- but the list of wanna-bes keeps growing. Seventeen people were arrested in Canada for intending to behead the prime minister. Has anyone in all of history ever cared that much about a Canadian prime minister? Their national motto is, "Now, let's not get excited."

Of the hundreds of prisoners, alleged terrorists all, who have been held at Guantanamo on the grounds that they were the worst of the worst, only 10 have ever been charged with anything. In the latest episode, shortly after announcement of a British-based plot to blow up airliners, Britain and the United States were already airing their differences over when the perpetrators should have been arrested. The administration has put itself in the position of the Boy Who Cried Wolf. If, God forbid, a serious terrorist conspiracy is uncovered, there will be a tendency to dismiss it as a backlash to these over-hyped "plots."

I personally have been sleeping more soundly at night knowing that Michael Chertoff is secretary of homeland security. Ever since Chertoff's agency brought us the stunning news that there are more terrorist targets in Indiana than in New York or Washington, I've realized this guy could find a terrorist plot anywhere. Watch out for the Amish -- they'll run right over you with those buggies, and they all have pitchforks, too. I hear they're connected to al-Qaida through Saddam Hussein.

Should you be suffering a fear shortage despite the administration's best efforts, consider the paralyzing news of the defeat of Joe Lieberman. According to none other than our very own Veep Dick Cheney, Lieberman's defeat helps the terrorists. Yes! How can this be, you ask? Well, you know Joe Lieberman has been supporting Bush's war in Iraq, and we are at war with Iraq because Saddam Hussein was allied to al-Qaida and had weapons of mass destruction, see? He wasn't? He didn't? Gee, maybe that's why the Democrats were upset with Lieberman!

Lieberman's unhappy fall in electoral battle touched off a volcano of drivel in the media. Some of it should be written off as the incurable Establishment tendency to defend its own. People who have known Joe Lieberman for 18 years are naturally predisposed in his favor -- always happens. On the other had, what a bunch of codswallop from people who should know better. They're behaving as though no one had a right to challenge Lieberman, whereas given his record, I can't think of anyone who deserved challenge more.

The pusillanimous punditry announce that these fools in the Democratic Party may make the war in Iraq a major issue! Horrors! I hate to pull the old advantages-of-provincialism trick, but I do think the D.C. press corps and political establishment are painfully out of touch and need to get out into the country more. Indiana, anyone?

Digg!

Molly Ivins writes about politics, Texas and other bizarre happenings.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Grammar correction
Posted by: thecamster on Aug 15, 2006 11:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"According to none other than our very own Veep Dick Cheney,..."

Souldn't that read "According to none other than our very own Veep Dick, Cheney,..."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sumpin's been bothering me
Posted by: disorderly on Aug 15, 2006 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regarding the most recent terror threat, there's something I don't get. If the British authorities have been watching the would be bombers for months, and if they were planning to watch them a while longer and only jumped in and arrested everyone after being pressured by our own leaders in the White House, why all the panic overreaction at the airports? Did they believe the terrorists were ready to attack at any moment after all? Or was the "bring your bodies and only essential (and preferably transparent) clothing" order in the UK and the "no fluids but the bodily kind" one in the US more about looking on top of things than about prudence? Or am I just getting cynical about the whole thing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sumpin's been bothering me Posted by: notrab68
» RE: Sumpin's been bothering me Posted by: markusmark
» RE: Sumpin's been bothering me Posted by: guleblanc
Molly's Right,
Posted by: Sparks56 on Aug 15, 2006 1:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the fear thing is getting thin, thin, thin. How about those cell-phone wholesalers that were gonna blow up the Mackinaw Bridge? Isolate all those yewpers and bring this country to its knees!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Molly's Right, Posted by: notrab68
» Who's trying to kill us? Posted by: paulaH
» RE: Who's trying to kill us? Posted by: notrab68
» I'M Right Posted by: sirossisofliver
» RE: I'M Right Posted by: elmertwittle
» RE: Molly's Right as Rain Posted by: sheena2u
» RE: Molly's Right as Rain Posted by: guleblanc
» It's YOOPER Posted by: mrsmagoo
Laughable? Yes.
Posted by: notrab68 on Aug 15, 2006 2:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only thing laughable here is this article. We're in a fight for our lives against Islamic fascists, and good-ole-boy Molly here thinks it's some Republican conspiracy.

Man, oh, man! You people really are going to be the death of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Laughable? Yes. Posted by: owlbear1
» RE: Laughable? Yes. No sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
» RE: Laughable? Yes. Posted by: psyopswatcher
» RE: Not laughable. Posted by: sheena2u
» RE: Laughable? Yes. Posted by: Plenum
» RE: Laughable? Yes. Posted by: notrab68
» RE: Laughable? Yes. Posted by: Solar Wind
» RE: Laughable? Yes. Posted by: aebartle
» RE: Laughable? Yes. Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Laughable? Yes. Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Laughable? Yes. Posted by: indy675
Liquid Explosives?
Posted by: magistre on Aug 15, 2006 2:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And just what were these mysterious "liquid explosives"? No one seems to know. One scientist/expert put on ( at the last minute, it seems) says mixing the components of nitroglycerin on board the plane ( while possible) is very,very laughable. Another "instant report" claims "hydrogen peroxide" was the culprit. However, to be explosive, hydrogen peroxide must be close to 99.99% pure and as such is highly corrosive (enclose in stainless steel, easy to hide?) So where is G.W.B. et.al. getting their "dog-tails"? James Bond movies? Maxwell Smart? Looney-Toons?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Liquid Explosives? Posted by: psyopswatcher
» RE: Liquid Explosives? Posted by: Swatopluk
skepticism
Posted by: rwa on Aug 15, 2006 5:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
None of the alleged terrorists had made a bomb. None had bought a plane ticket. Many did not even have passports, which given the efficiency of the UK Passport Agency would mean they couldn't be a plane bomber for quite some time.

In the absence of bombs and airline tickets, and in many cases passports, it could be pretty difficult to convince a jury beyond reasonable doubt that individuals intended to go through with suicide bombings, whatever rash stuff they may have bragged in internet chat rooms.

What is more, many of those arrested had been under surveillance for over a year - like thousands of other British Muslims. And not just Muslims. Like me. Nothing from that surveillance had indicated the need for early arrests.

Then an interrogation in Pakistan revealed the details of this amazing plot to blow up multiple planes - which, rather extraordinarily, had not turned up in a year of surveillance. Of course, the interrogators of the Pakistani dictator have their ways of making people sing like canaries. As I witnessed in Uzbekistan, you can get the most extraordinary information this way. Trouble is it always tends to give the interrogators all they might want, and more, in a desperate effort to stop or avert torture. What it doesn't give is the truth. Be sceptical. Be very, very sceptical.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: skepticism sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
» RE: skepticism Posted by: slider
» RE: skepticism Posted by: sheena2u
Those bad terrorists
Posted by: sapatatanka on Aug 15, 2006 11:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, I have never yet met a person alleged to be a terrorist who was trying to kill me one way or another - but then I am what is considered a 'liberal'. Or may that be a reason why nobody is trying to kill me? Or is the fact that I live in Europe the reason why nobody is trying to kill me?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Those bad terrorists Posted by: psyopswatcher
» RE: Those bad terrorists Posted by: sapatatanka
codswallop
Posted by: rsaxto on Aug 16, 2006 12:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have never been hit by the other hand of codswallop - that must really sting! I prefer watching the Bushies be hit by the other hand of Molly's wrath which can really be funny.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

codswallop
Posted by: rsaxto on Aug 16, 2006 12:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have never been hit by the other hand of codswallop - that must really sting! I prefer watching the Bushies be hit by the other hand of Molly's wrath which can really be funny.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's politics stupid sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Aug 16, 2006 4:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's simple, Bush and Blair are both on the s**t list in their respective countries and the war news looks badder and badder so lets throw in a little terror threat to get our constituents minds off how we have messed up the whole world

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fear is how totalitarian regimes control the massess
Posted by: wawa on Aug 16, 2006 4:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When governments succeed in keeping the people fear-filled, the people
do NOT think,
do NOT question,
do NOT dissent.

Dissent is what keeps democracies healthy, but with 64 lobbyists PER congressperson,
the voices of We the People, are seldom heard.

WAWA/wearewideawake is a Pro-Bono Public Service discourse confronting media and governments that shield the whole truth.

We who are wide awake are compelled by the "fierce urgency of Now"[Rev MLK] to raise awareness and promote the human dialogue about many of the crucial issues of our day: the state of our Union and in protection of democracy, what life is like for Christians in Israel Palestine in the 21st Century, nuclear weapons, the environment, science, medicine, theology and spirituality.

The USA Military is always in the top 20 of WAWA readers.
Big Brother doesn't write in, Big Brother doesn't dialogue, but Big Brother reads and that gives those of us who are wide awake hope that The Truth will be learned.

"If enough Christians followed the gospel, they could bring any state to its knees." - Father Philip Francis Berrigan

In paraphrase of Tom Petty our motto has become:

You can stand us up at the gates of hell, but we won't back down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bait
Posted by: aislinnluv on Aug 16, 2006 4:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
maybe what we ought to do is stake out both blair and bush in baghdad as bait for the terrorists. then they would get some of what they want and we could get some of what we want... even if all they did was spray the two morons with silly string, wouldn't it be rewarding to see them take some sort of punishment for the hell they have put so many through?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: bait Posted by: dangerouslysane
Michael Townes Watson
Posted by: michaeltwatson on Aug 16, 2006 5:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheney and Lieberman, now two peas in a pod, are criticizing real Democrats for wanting to “wave the white flag" rather than "staying the course" in Iraq. That claim is like claiming Muhammed Ali should have stayed the course in front of Joe Frazier and taken a pounding, rather than “float like a butterfly and sting like a bee.” Since Rumsfield likes to use sports analogies in characterizing the war effort, maybe he should use this most famous of Ali's sports analogies.
We claim to have the greatest intelligence capabilities in the world. Intelligence is what stopped the London airplane terrorists, not brute force in Irag and torture techniques around the globe. Congressional Democrats have always been willing to give the President, with only the need for a search warrant retroactively issued by a court, any intelligence necessary to go after the terrorists. All the Republican war on terror has done in Iraq is to make more terrorists and make the job more difficult. Let’s start to float and sting, like the British and Ali (ironically a Muslim). How many troops is it that the British now have in Iraq?
Michael Townes Watson, author of America's Tunnel Vision--How Insurance Companies' Propaganda Is Corrupting Medicine and Law. www.America'sTunnelVision.com.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kinda shrill up there.
Posted by: DaigleD on Aug 16, 2006 6:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw a pretty shrill comment up yonder about defending ourselves from Islamist extremists and that liberals would be death of us all. Haven't we always been vigilant against all kinds of folks who wish us harm inside and out? Is there any reason other than politics to pick out one particular group to make us accept things we would normally reject on principal?

Putting it all into a personal perspective,
attempts on my life since GWB took office:

Extremist Islamists - 0
Liberals working through Islamist extremist by proxy - 0
Lady talking on cell phone in Suburban full of kids - 2

In fact, I'd say more rich white men have done me personal harm than anyone else in the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An offer you can't refuse, Democrats?
Posted by: monkeywrench on Aug 16, 2006 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Speaking of scare tactics, has anyone noticed how quiet certain Democrats, like Tom Daschle (before he was defeated), have become since they got those anthrax-laced letters after 9/11? Seems the Bushies have borrowed a trick or two from that perennial favorite of the criminal class, the Mafia. I wonder how many other silent Democrats woke up to find horse's heads next to them or received one of "those phone calls" since 9/11? Maybe this is why the Dems are so ineffectual. . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But "what if it's TRUE" -- Protect the Children!!!!
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Aug 16, 2006 9:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope the tide IS turning ... the Security Moms of both sexes are beginning to see the error of their cowardly ways ...

But I don't think so ...

Look how tamely, how GRATEFULLY, the American traveling public takes off their shoes and thows away their cosmetics because the same British Security system who provided the 'pretty good intelligence" which justified the Iraq adventure, now tells them 'bad British Arabs had precursors of liquid explosives."

If a Terrorist Cell can persuade MI5 that its members are now willing to pack Daddy Bear sized C-4 dildoes where the sun don't shine ... we'll all be grabbing our ankles for the Security of the Homeland -- because 'you never know.'

And, oh yes ... the American public WILL vote for the Party That Will Keep Them Safe -- either the Republicans ... or Democrats who can out-Republican the Republicans.

Either way ... BIG Defense contracts ... big Budget Deficits -- and lives of 'anxious obedience' for everyone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unbelievable
Posted by: kk33deg on Aug 16, 2006 10:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was a very good point made in a letter published in, of all things, the Houston Chronicle. If there is so much potential for terrorists to try to smuggle explosive or otherwise hazardous liquids through the TSA security lines at the airport, why are all these confiscated gels and liquids being thrown in trash cans and left there all day? Surely if the threat was real, HAZMAT teams would be there to take the confiscated presumably hazardous substances away immediately and dispose of them safely.

I can hear Cheney saying this to Rove right now - "I love the smell of burning Reichstag in the morning - smells like victory in 2006."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Unbelievable Posted by: monkeywrench
me bad
Posted by: Edward George on Aug 16, 2006 2:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This Administration isn't the first seemingly founded and flourishing on bluff and bluster. Teddy Roosevelt with his "Bully Pulpit" and Great White Fleet is ranked by many as a greater President than Franklin with his "All we have to fear is fear itself" and Fireside Chats. (And The Great Communicator actor is worshipped for being there when the leader of the Soviet Union decided to admit they were bankrupt, and had been since well before the actor came along.) However the people were not really fooled, they did elect Franklin four times. Franklin avoided sending young Americans into battle as long as he could while trying to help those deserving help. And when war was forced on us he asked for and got the active participation of those of all political views. They participated because they knew he was a straight shooter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tickets? Passports?
Posted by: Somedaysoon on Aug 16, 2006 2:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The London thing will be another nothing. These guys didn't have airline tickets and most did not have a passport. So how were they going to fly? Stow-aways? Bush and his fellow chickenshit creeps are grasping at anything to keep from a dem overthrow. My mouth waters when I think of all the hearings that will result from a democratic overthrow of congress. The torture congress will inflict on the prez and vice will be delightful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Change of plans/not
Posted by: larry278 on Aug 16, 2006 6:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When W, R B 'sure shot' Cheney & Mike Pissoff alerted us to the dangers of terrorist infiltration I got rid of my bed so that the terrorists hiding under my bed couldn't creep out & sabatoge the USA as I slept. OK, I got tired of looking under my bed every time Pissoff, et al warned us. I sleep on the floor with the blessed assurance that I'm not providing a hiding place for terrorists. It is hell to get up but, on the other hand, it doesn't hurt near as much when the spasms from my DT's make me fall out of bed or when I laugh my ass off listening to W & co doing their riff on the old Chicken Little/Henny Penny rap of 'the sky is falling'. Those duds [no I don't mean dudes] can be damn near as funny as Molly Ivans, funny-not witty. I hit the mute button on my TV when W or his crew are on TV so I won't spit out my false teeth laughing at their fool talk.
BBC news on TV give an adequate warning when they broadcast a clip of W or his ilk but American TV doesn't. I don't watch any American TV news any more because of that. OK, I'm an eastern liberal, talk with an English/Puerto Rican/Yiddish/Arabic accent & I can't understand anybody who speaks with whatever passes for an American accent in fly-over country.
I can dig it that W & co live in a bubble but has their bubble ever been within earth's stratosphere since Jan 20, 2001?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fear OF Sanity
Posted by: ccluelessfl60 on Aug 16, 2006 11:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was told I was a paranoid schizophrinic, but now I am alright. I used to think someone was out to get me, now even the president and vice-president tell me I am right on the money.
Fear is good ,keeps you heart pounding. I have a hell of a time around the 4th of July.But since my heart attack I am on beta blockers and my heart rate seldoms gets above 60 beats a minute.The meds make me pee a lot, but then when the other shoe drops, I will have an empty bladder. I am too broke to fly anywhere because the meds cost so much ,so for now I am safe. I will have to stop bleaching my hair because my hydrogen perioxde might explode. But in light of all the goofy news in the past 6 years I am the most intelligent and level headed person I know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you, thank you, THANK you,
Posted by: unbound on Aug 21, 2006 5:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ms. Molly Ivins!
That'll preach!

--WSH

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]