Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

A new book explores the 'stupidity, hubris and dereliction of duty' behind the pre-9/11 intelligence failure.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

How 9/11 Could Have Been Prevented

By Rory O'Connor, AlterNet. Posted August 7, 2006.


A new book explores the 'stupidity, hubris and dereliction of duty' behind the pre-9/11 intelligence failure.
Wright Interview
Advertisement

"Wherever you are, death will find you/even in the looming tower."
--The Holy Q'ran

Was 9/11 preventable? Add New Yorker writer Lawrence Wright, author of "The Looming Tower: Al Qaeda and the Road to 9/11," to the growing ranks of those answering a resounding "Yes!" to that simple but highly-charged question.

The failures of the CIA, FBI, the National Security Agency and many other branches of government to share information -- and the concomitant failure to stop the 9/11 hijackers -- have already been well-documented by others, but few have offered Wright's coherent focus on what the New York Times accurately describes as "the stupidity, hubris and dereliction of duty that occurred within the United States government." In particular, Wright's relentlessly detailed account of the flawed investigation of the October 2000 bombing of the American destroyer USS Cole -- a seminal and largely misunderstood event in the run-up to the 9/11 attacks -- amply demonstrates how "jealousy and turf wars" were used by U.S. intelligence operatives as "an excuse to hide information that should have been shared."

"9/11 could have been stopped with a functional intelligence community," Wright states forthrightly. "But instead, things were hidden for no reason from people with a vital need to know them."

When the Cole pulled into the port of Aden, Yemen, for refueling on Oct. 12, 2000, "The Al Qaeda presence there was very well-known," says Wright. His claim is buttressed by on-the-record testimony from, among others, military intelligence analysts associated with the secret Able Danger program. The Able Danger team had already identified five different Al Qaeda cells by then, including one active in Aden.

They had also brought this information to Gen. Peter Schoomaker, then-head of the Special Operations Command (SOCOM), now chief of staff, U.S. Army, as well as to high intelligence officials at the Central Command (CENTCOM), which oversees the Fifth Fleet to which the Cole had been tasked. It remains unknown what -- if anything -- the high Pentagon officials did with this information, but clearly none of it was ever conveyed to the Cole's commander, Kirk Lippold.

As a result, a fiberglass boat filled with plastic explosives pulled alongside the destroyer and blew a forty-by-forty-foot hole in its side, killing 17 crew members and injuring 39 others.

"You had 17 dead sailors," says Wright. "And they had pertinent information that might have stopped 9/11." Such actions "look like obstruction of justice," he adds, "It's an outrage that no one has been held to account."

In his book, as well as a recent New Yorker article, Wright explains how the CIA withheld vital information from FBI agents who were in Yemen investigating after the attack on the Cole. In particular, the spy agency lied about its knowledge of a terrorist planning meeting in Malaysia that took place before the Cole bombing, which had been attended by two Al Qaeda operatives named Khaled Al-Midhar and Nawaf al-Hamzi. It also failed to reveal that the men -- both of whom ended up on planes involved in the 9/11 attacks -- were living in Los Angeles, information that the CIA was legally bound to share with the bureau.

"Given all the alarm bells, I just can't understand why they would tolerate the presence of two known Al Qaeda members in California," says Wright. "Everyone in the CIA knew they were Al Qaeda, but they did nothing! Had this information been given to the FBI, they could have uncovered the 9/11 plot at that time."

How to explain this astonishing failure? One theory has it that the CIA may have been trying to turn the two Al Qaeda members into double agents as a means of infiltrating the terror group. "Half the guys in the bureau think CIA was trying to turn them to get inside Al Qaeda," Wright told me. "It's never been proven, but it's extremely suggestive that this was a failed CIA operation to recruit them." If so, that would at least explain why, when FBI Cole investigator Ali Soufran repeatedly queried the CIA about the meeting in Malaysia -- attended not only by the Cole bombers but also by the two 9/11 hijackers -- the information about al-Mihdhar and al-Hamzi was withheld.


Digg!

Filmmaker and journalist Rory O'Connor writes the Media Is A Plural blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
No intelligence failure: It was an inside job. INTENTIONAL of, by and for the Bush gang
Posted by: ScottGregory on Aug 7, 2006 4:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
911 Truth
and
911 revisited
Nobody "overlooked" anything. And it wasn't Al Qaida...nor was it any other Islamic conspiracy.. It WAS some sad Islamic fall guys playing into the hands of Bush, et.al.
There was no problem with the "intelligence" It was deliberate. Get your head out of you know where. Stop being a shill for the Bush gang/MSM/ruling class.
And why wasn't Marvin Bush, (Dubya's brother) or his company officers or even the truck drivers who were ready and waiting to hall off the 30 ft. steel girder uprights that were the core of WTC N&S builidngs not prosecuted for tampering with a crime scene. They had those intact girders, which could have provided evidence of the deliberate sub-ground level demolition, on boats to China(? somewhere in Asia) before the FBI could even get the yellow crime scene tapes up. Explain that!! Why wasn't a Grand jury empaneled immediately just to prosecute that extraordinary criminal act. Screw you apologists for the murderous cabal that now rules the United States.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wait a minute you idiot Posted by: popsicle67
» RE: Wait a minute you idiot Posted by: squiddly
» Right-o Posted by: fifthworld
What Really Happened
Posted by: rwa on Aug 7, 2006 5:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More indepth analysis is available at:linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey - Nice Dog and Pony Show Guys!
Posted by: colek on Aug 7, 2006 5:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really. I used to read alternet thinking it was "alternative" but dang, this song and dance around 9/11 truth really debunks any notion that there is any alternative to the obvious controlled dissemination of the truth.

The extensive holes in the official 9/11 Commission report are so glaring that even Thomas Kean calls it a farce. The fact that the main stream (and alternative) media continually glosses serious unresolved issues surrounding the defining event of our time stinks like 3000 bodies in a mass grave only superficially covered up.

Congratulations though, at least you're getting warmer. When you really want to restore your credibility with the 90% of your target market which surely constitutes a significant percent of the 55% of Americans who smell the rat at ground zero, let us know when the dog and pony shows are over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is an Establishment piece
Posted by: autonomie on Aug 8, 2006 12:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Intelligence failure? Perhaps.

But what's the root issue?

People angry about US foreign policy.

Overthrowing elected leaders, propping up dictators, sanctions that killed a million Iraqis, support for Israeli terrorism, troops in Saudi Arabia, and so on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is an Establishment piece Posted by: Iconoclast421
Just a thought...
Posted by: Colin on Aug 8, 2006 2:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There’s something about this piece I don’t like, something which autonomie alluded to in a previous post.

There are two ways of looking at 9/11 – firstly as one specific attack, which is the context in which this article was written. And, from that point of view, I think there’s no question that the 9/11 attacks could have been prevented. Of course they could have been prevented! They were attacks carried out by men who could have been stopped. Any single man can be stopped from doing anything if the force against them is great enough. That doesn’t strike me as that revelatory.

The problem is when you take this idea that it’s possible to stop one man (or in this case, small group of men) and then extrapolate up and think to yourself, ‘well, if I can stop one man if I have to, then I could stop all men if needed’ – a notion which currently seems to sum up America’s foreign policy. It is this idea I see coming out of the article and it’s a dangerous one, mainly because it’s complete rubbish.

There are too many people in the world to limit the actions of all of them. The plain and rather uncomfortable truth is that there comes a point where you are just going to have to rely on trust and trust in the fact that reciprocation is one of the key fundamentals in human interaction. If you treat someone else with respect, you will probably get respect back. This is the way it has always been and probably always will be. The article avoids this question completely which is a shame, because it’s a more important point that concentrating on the idea you can stop those few bad people (of which there will, again, always be).

I’ll make a wager with anyone that fancies it. For as long as America (and my (esp. currently) rather pathetic homeland of Britain) and the like, believe that they can make their own existence secure by working on the premise you can stop everyone if needs be, this world will remain a crappy place to live. The only real possibility for change starts with each last individual and their decision that they will conduct only their own affairs in a way reduces the possibility of pissing someone else off. Of course, no systems perfect – but this one will work better by far.

Don’t believe me? Then listen to Jesus… ‘do unto others’. (Or Buddhism and the role of Karma, or Confucius and his golden rule – in fact, any theology which all have variants of this premise at its core. I wonder why?)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I agree: Britain a total crap hole Posted by: sirossisofliver
» RE: Just a thought... Posted by: willymack
count the ways
Posted by: rsaxto on Aug 8, 2006 5:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let us count the ways 911 could have happened:

1. Bushie individuals along with the Saudis planned and supervised and executed the entire operation.

2. Bushie individuals along with the Saudis and the Israelis planned and supervised and executed the entire operation.

3. Bushie individuals deliberately kept all the pieces of the operation separated so that the operation could not be prevented from happening.

4. All of the Bushies are such nincompoops that none of the people at the top could learn it was happening.

5. Top Bushies ordered it to happen but left the details to subordinates.

Any one of the above is ample grounds for impeachment proceedings to begin when added to all the other illegal things the Bushies have done. Impeachment isn't happening because most of the people at the top of USA government are criminals of one sort or another and each is protecting their backsides. DC has become really pitiful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

re Count the ways
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Aug 8, 2006 5:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All are valid but I prefer #4

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another backdoor article to legitimize 9-11 as a arab attack.
Posted by: Prophit on Aug 8, 2006 5:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, where do these people come from??? First of all, these arab terrorist groups are consistantly the most incompetent groups around. The timing, the coordination, the precision and the overall perfection of this attack lacks any resemblance to historical performances by these so called terrorist groups.

Given the LYING by the Pentagon to the 9-11 commission, the lack of response by the military to these hijackings and the videos I have seen through Loose change parts 2 & 3 along with the video by the guy on the NJ side of the river proves to me no arab terrorist did this since they don't fly black helicopters in American air space without being shot down. At least they have no way to do that here.

Its just another article to use to justify this was what it wasn't. We all know that now. So don't bother with that stuff here, we don't believe you anymore. Put this one on CNN where it will wash with the beer drinking couch potato crowd. LOL

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: member Zarqawi? Posted by: FauxPorteno
What a sorry attempt to lead the public away from the truth of 911
Posted by: concerned Canadian on Aug 8, 2006 6:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Indeed, as so many postings have already made very clear, please please please do not attempt such utter crap as attempting to post this article as some kind of truth of 911. The article's points have already been covered in numerous other articles so nothing is new here.
If this is bread for the entertainment of the masses then take this article and put it on the desk of the ones who run the circus, not on this site. What is a shame is that many innocent and good people are being charged in this article with negligence - good intelligenece people, good Norad people, good US people everywhere who were prevented from either seeing the whole picture or even telling what they knew because their leadership was playing them like puppets to orchestrate 911. And now this crap article trying to play us as puppets????

Take this article, put it somewhere and then put it back on the desk where the directive to write this article came from. We do not need the odour here.
OK! Now this is actually good news. This piece shows clearly that the perps have to resort to this kind of cheap trick because they have nothing else left. Empircal facts stand in the way of their deceit. This article does a disservice to all good people and is a Rove or Cheney Bush dog and pony show as someone put it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US trying to kill Whistleblowers from informing public of danger
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Aug 8, 2006 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I highly recommend everyone to go to the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition website at www.nswbc.org
The coalition is made up of outstanding professionals in all areas of protecting the people. A list of members can be found at www.nswbc.org/about%20us.htm and consist of many of this country's finest from the DEA, CIA, FBI, DIA ...

The site has much information that is extraordinary and informative. There is a lot of information that is available, but the site is well organized.

The senate is trying to kill the available information from people who consider our Constitution, Freedoms and Liberties above becoming a police or military state. Both parties are at odds with the concept of a free country and the Coalition has their Dirty Dozen of the House and Senate that are the worst of the worst offenders to try to help in keeping this country free.

Ignorance is not bliss when the core government is rotting from within.

"When even one American -- who has done nothing wrong -- is forced by fear to shut his mind and close his mouth, then all Americans are in peril." Harry S. Truman

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This article just proves that alternet.org is part of the problem and NOT part of the solution!
Posted by: HeadsUp on Aug 8, 2006 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can you watch WTC 7 implode and think for one minute that this was an outside job? This type of BS just perpetuates the fear machine and is going to get the A-HOLES re-elected. SHAME ON ALTERNET.ORG FOR PUBLISHING MORE REDERICK!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "REDERICK"??? Posted by: sirossisofliver
» RE: "REDERICK"??? Posted by: Roverton
» WTC 7 - No plane, No fires! Posted by: HeadsUp
9/11 was not the result of intelligence failure
Posted by: kellysgarden on Aug 8, 2006 8:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If all intelligence had totally failed, the attacks of 9/11 would have still been prevented. Had CIA, FBI, NSA etc. done and known absolutely nothing on that September day, normal protocol would have had all those hijacked planes intercepted long before they reached NY and DC. This is even corraberated by the Mineta testimony which the Keane/Zelikow Commision completely disregarded. This means that there had to have been some kind of stand-down orders NOT to intercept those planes, MEANING THAT OUR GOVERNMENT WAS COMPLICIT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AlterNet= CIA Gate Keepers
Posted by: mite on Aug 8, 2006 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I keep telling you all, Alternet.org is part of the problem. CIA are the Presidents private jeckals-army and CIA has controlled the press since the 1960's.
They trace your e-mails back to you every day. May the eyes of Cheney be upon you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: AlterNet= left-wing Gate Keepers Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE:troll comment by mite Posted by: marklar
What a sorry site
Posted by: cattins3 on Aug 8, 2006 9:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I signed up to comment just to say I'll be ending my Alternet subscription online. What a bunch of whooie! For anyone who's spent even the slightest bit of time doing the REAL research on 911, listening and observing and thinking for oneself, this article takes the cake. My compatriots and I are not STOOPID. Thanks for the disinformation, as if there's not enough of it already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What a sorry site Posted by: babs
» RE: What a sorry site Posted by: marklar
MSM going into overdrive . . .
Posted by: FauxPorteno on Aug 8, 2006 9:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Funny thing - a recent poll in the Rocky Mountain News in CO demonstrated that nearly 1 in 3 Americans believe that the government either permitted or was directly responsible for the September 11th attacks.

It has been truly instructive watching the largely government controlled MSM go into overdrive labeling anyone who dissents as a kook or anti-American. Not one interview or op-ed piece has been in any way fair or objective. They immediately stoop to portraying Ph.D's as imbeciles and everyday Americans as worse. How often do we see this kind of shit coming out when the government has indeed F'd up and are trying to cover? This is all the evidence I would need to be convinced of two things:

1. Our MSM is completely under Uncle Sam's thumb.

2. They were complicit otherwise why such spin control 5 years after the fact.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cowardly media
Posted by: 911 truther on Aug 8, 2006 9:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
40 million spent on investigating Clinton's sex life...$600,000 spent on 9/11

http://video.google.ca/
videoplay?docid=13630
85081657572837&q=pentagon+9-11

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What if Gore had been president?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Aug 8, 2006 10:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that if Al Gore had recieved a briefing from the CIA on Aug 6 of 2001 he would have immediately rounded up representatives from every single government intelligence agency, from the NSA to DIA to FBI to CIA, stuck them in a room, and said "I want everything you know about Al Queda - members in the US, members abroad - everything - to be discussed right now." This is the president's job, and claims that 'intelligence agences didn't share information' simply mean that Bush either a) was woefully incompetent or b) was hoping for some kind of terrorist attack to take place. Remember, this is an administration that forced John O'Neill out - the one person who seems to have been the most knowledgeable abut Al Queda.

Why would the Bush cabal want to see terrorists succeed in America? Well - the stolen election was coming to light, for one. The Enron debacle was known to the White House - that's Bush's #1 donor over his poitical career, remember - for two. Rumsfeld and Cheney were desperate to start a war in the Mideast to remove Saddam from power and more importantly, to keep him from dumping Iraq oil on the world market and messing with the price. Condi even said, post 9/11, that "we knew there were going to be hijackings". Maybe they didn't know they'd be suicide hjackings.

Those who claim there is "No Al Queda" are simply trying to hide a rather disturbing fact from the US public - our short-sighted foreign policies have created whole legions of people who apparently live out there whole lives with just one thought in mind: "Get them!". Great. Well done - way to make friends and influence people. Furthermore, US actions since 9/11 have spawned a whole host of Al Queda clones around the world; have strengthened the ultra-conservative wing in Iran, etc. etc. The only beneficiary has been the oil price, which has gone through the roof.

Much thanks are due to the author of the piece. Of course we all know the 'official story' is BS, but so is the government PR, exemplified by the "Loose Change" video series, which is obviously a government-sponsored PR piece. Let me guess: DCI Group?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What if Gore had been president? Posted by: concerned Canadian
» RE: What if Gore had been president? Posted by: concerned Canadian
» RE: What if Gore had been president? Posted by: concerned Canadian
» RE: What if Gore had been president? Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» KA-Boom Posted by: coldeye
Well, it's official
Posted by: Boomerang on Aug 8, 2006 2:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alternet is full of crazy people. Anyone who bothers with any of this conspiracy nonsense is totally off their rocker.

"TEH CIA IS EVERYWHERE!"

Grow up...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well, it's official Posted by: kellysgarden
» RE: Well, it's official Posted by: mountainmama
How 9/11 could've been prevented
Posted by: willymack on Aug 8, 2006 2:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're almost certain to get a lot of response on this one, both good and bad. If the purpose of this article is to get people to THINK, I think you'll succed handsomely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Busy day for trolls
Posted by: marklar on Aug 8, 2006 3:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
too bad they have no true beliefs and make really bad americans. Let's send them to Iraq to defend the coountry they claim to love - or would asking them to actually sacrafice something be too much?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about the media distracting the public in the months before 9/11
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 8, 2006 4:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All that media mess of pulling another "Monica" out of Gary Condit was enough to get even the FBI off their concentration. Of course 9/11 was allowed to happen or the neocon NAZIs and their neolib "free" traders wouldn't have been able to pursue their fucking agendas !!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Every time
Posted by: Soco on Aug 8, 2006 5:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alternet posts the "Official Story" line the majority of readers reject it. It's rejected because the whole story can only be explained if the reader suspends logic, accepts the governement is benevolent, and the laws of physics were suspended on 9/11. Good American people in these agencies were thwarted from performing their job and are being purged. We are bathing in the evidence, yet the media won't touch it, why?

If the government failed, it was either through negligence or complicity. There are no other options. Either way, it failed.

The primary responsibility of government has been to provide for the security of it's citizens, not promote wars by instilling fear.

The primary responsibilty of the press is to provide the facts. We form an objective opinion from balanced reporting. Promoting the official version shows a lack of journalism. Stories like this fail the public interest. Report what the 911 scholars are covering and the "official story" let the readers decide.

You won't because you are cowards. Time for the "War time profits roadshow" is coming to an end. I suspect a very real but silent majority knows this story is bullshit. People are waking up and it's going to be painful for the ones who sustain the lie.

People the world over are tiring of the concerted effort to capitalize on their fears via this slanted view. To accept killing each other over mindless rhetoric to line the coffers of the wealthy with gold is bullshit.

It's easier to accept the goverment failing it's people than the press propagating this farce on their behalf.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: very time Posted by: concerned Canadian
Building 7 committed suicide
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Aug 8, 2006 7:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the first time in all history, a building took it's own life. After towers 1 and 2 fell, tower 7 dropped itself for no apparent reason. There are no explainations to how this happened. Theories on 1 & 2 are only probable less than 20% based on NIST information. Tower 7 has no possible explaination that has any merit whatsoever. Even the people at NIST are left guessing. It must have been remorse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Building 7 committed suicide Posted by: concerned Canadian
» RE: Building 7 committed suicide Posted by: VannaLaRoche
9/11 BS
Posted by: mountainmama on Aug 8, 2006 7:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This gentleman must live in lala land...nothing was in error...it was all planned and executed as planned...by Bushco!! This guy needs to wake up and smell the coffee here. I am wondering if he has read any of the other information showing the real truth about 9/11! He's helping to disseminate mis-information and continue the farce that the administration is trying to make us believe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ugly Truth
Posted by: BAKslider on Aug 9, 2006 6:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yep. And the "Chaney Infant Human Sacrifice Party" story won't be coming out either. I would tell you more but you don't have the clearance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How 9/11 could've been prevented
Posted by: willymack on Aug 9, 2006 8:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Easy. No bush, no 9/11.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Now I wouldn't go that far Posted by: johndoraemi
How come no one ever brings up John O'Neill?
Posted by: kelly.nickell on Aug 10, 2006 7:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I haven't read Looming Tower, so I can only assume why no one really says much about the extreme irony, if nothing else, in the death of John O’Neill.

John O'Neill was the FBI agent that investigated the Cole bombing. He got himself a new job after a tiff with his higher-ups at the bureau, while brandishing a hard-on for Al-Quesa-Dilla. He knew much about little bastard radicals.

His new job was Chief of Security at the towers.

CNN had a blurb on his death on 9/11 in an article on 9/12 here: Trade Center security chief thought dead

PBS did a special on what is probably the worst timing and Karma in history for a guy changing jobs - The Man Who Knew.

Shitty outcome for your first day at work I would say. No matter what any one says, Bush Nine-One-One (hum the theme from Hawaii Five-O in your head) went down because of a tall stack of hubris, arrogance, ineptitude, and stupidity.

And these people still run our country today. This is why FEMA is a hated thing in Waveland, Mississippi. This is why many people believe today that the Federal Government is a waste of our time. This is why I will drive for twenty hours rather than fly for two. And I get to keep my cigarette lighter and fingernail clippers.

Intelligence? We no need no stinkin' intelligence; we have The Pet Goat.

Four planes hijacked on the same morning in the USA. Three buildings dropping squarely in their own foot prints. Anti-aircraft battery on top on the presidents hotel on 9/10. A country that knew for ten minutes that something bad was going on before the President of the United States.

And we gave him the power to invade whomever he wants at his discretion.

I guess we’re the ones that need intelligence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And the PAKISTANI ISI CONNECTION
Posted by: johndoraemi on Aug 11, 2006 1:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
9-11 was allowed to occur by the Bush white house for obvious political gain and a "war that won't end in our lifetimes." -Dickhead Cheney

Interesting how all these limited hangouts never mention the head of Pakistani Intelligence Lt. General Mahmoud Ahmad, and him being caught red handed FUNDING THE 9-11 ATTACKS BY HAVING $100,000 WIRED TO MOHAMED ATTA BEFORE THE ATTACKS!

Do you official storytellers not get this?

Do you have trouble understanding the most obvious money trail, thrown into your lap?

Do you just buy the 9-11 coverup commission nonsense that the funding was not important enough to bother with?

The head of Pakistani intelligence was working closely with BushCo henchmen before, during and after the 9-11 attacks. This is the guy who financed the same attacks.

He was caught.

He resigned.

Nothing happened after that. It is not discussed. It is not investigated. It is not acknowledged.

HE IS NOT SOUGHT FOR MASTERMINDING THE GREATEST ATTACKS ON US SOIL, YADA YADA.

LT. GENERAL MAHMOUD AHMAD'S FACE IS NOT ON THE FBI MOST WANTED LIST.

AN FBI SPOKESMAN CALLED HIM THE "MONEY MAN" BEHIND 9-11.

THEY DON'T WANT HIM.

DO THE MATH.

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

decent
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 5, 2006 2:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we had a decent FBI the Bushies would be on their most-wanted list and if we had a decent CIA 9/11 would never have happened.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yoora
Posted by: kladyc on Feb 13, 2007 1:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]