Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Community-built websites -- 'wikis' -- are growing in ways unimaginable to their inventor.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

'Wikis' Taking Over the World

By Rory O'Connor, AlterNet. Posted August 2, 2006.


Community-built websites -- 'wikis' -- are growing in ways unimaginable to their inventor.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Rory O'Connor

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

"I've seen things like this happen once or twice before," says Mitch Kapor, software pioneer and head of the Open Source Foundation. "We're at the Big Bang of the next information revolution."

WikiMania is breaking out all over Harvard Yard this week, as hundreds of self-styled 'wikipedians' -- well on their way to the stated goal of providing free online encyclopedias in every language on earth -- invade the august law school's usually sedate environs for their second annual global gathering.

Part scientific conference, part community festival and part uprising, WikiMania 2.0 brings together members of various projects sponsored by the parent Wikimedia Foundation -- Wikipedia.org, of course, but also Wikiquote, Wikisource, the Wiktionary, Wikinews, etc. The purpose is to exchange ideas, build relationships, and report on projects and research, as well as provide opportunities for those wacky wiki-workers to meet the rest of us and share their ideas about free and open source software, free knowledge initiatives, and the relentless spread of wikis worldwide.

In little more than a decade, ever since programmer Ward Cunningham developed the first "writeable web page" and dubbed it a "wiki" after riding one of Hawaii's quick Wiki Wiki buses ("I was going to call it Quickweb," he recalls, "and then I remembered these buses I took during a trip to Hawaii, and I thought, 'That's cooler!'") the wiki phenomenon has exploded into public consciousness, growing at an exponential pace rivaled only by well, that of Wikipedia itself, which adopted and adapted Cunningham's software to become one of the world's most visited websites.

Created at virtually no cost by volunteers who work collectively, using the innovative software that enables anyone to write and edit on a web page, Wikipedia.org has experienced such explosive growth that, were it a commercial venture, the not-for-profit site's valuation would be well in excess of $1 billion.

Cunningham had worked in virtual obscurity for years, creating and running his own private wiki (known as the WikiWikiWeb) and using it to communicate with a group of other programmers called the Portland Pattern Repository software developers community. The software he developed uses a simple formatting language that lets anyone with a browser edit a page. Together the community came up with a uniquely collaborative way of working -- encouraged not just to review, comment on and criticize each other's online contributions, but also to change them. In time, Cunningham saw that when people worked together cooperatively, they could create a product greater than the sum of its parts. Without intending to, he had constructed one of the greatest social networking tools ever invented.

From Answers.com to Ask.com to Apple to Sun to the almighty Google, hundreds of commercial websites and technology companies now use Wikipedia in a variety of profitable ways. Meanwhile, more and more people are inventing different, often highly original wiki applications every day. From enterprise wikis to memory wikis to WikiHow from Congresspedia to wikitorials to ShopWiki.com from Avianfluwiki to Brandwiki to wikimentaries (Read Lisa Voyticki's companion article on the wikimentary HERE) and from productwikis to ComedyWiki, WikiTravel, Wikocracy -- even "Steal This Wiki," an online attempt to wiki-ize Abbie Hoffman's "Steal This Book" -- the list is growing daily as the wikiverse expands relentlessly from its initial Big Bang into intergalactic information realms none can yet imagine


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Community
Posted by: AlienSlave on Aug 3, 2006 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Creative Freedom and finding my small part and place of acceptance and belonging in the unlimited expanse of community is a fulfillment sought out and realized by growing numbers of the human race. Being set free from the narrow minded, intellectually stunted politicians and bureaucrats is a taste they will never know, a freedom they will never control. Its evolution and growth doesn’t fit into sordid lives and culture.
AlienSlave

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wikis are natural
Posted by: firsty on Aug 3, 2006 7:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i see wikis as the natural social evolution of communication and information as the internet has contributed to it. just as blogs and cheap domain prices have given so many people the opportunity to share the information and insight they have with others, wikis provide the opportunity to collaborate and discuss that information and, as a result, enhance and extend that information. wikis connect people who were previously blogger-types, contributing an article that, even tho it's shared with the world, is static. wikis, on the other hand, allow for the development of the statements and ideas that we have. they connect writers to readers in a way that writers cherish and that readers appreciate.

this form or that form, the details of editing and defining wikis, these are simply details. the collaboration that takes place on wikis is the key idea, the key point of evolution in an increasingly connected society. by the time the critics catch up with what the problems with wikis really may be (instead of exaggerating perceived problems), the society will be onto something else, or will have solved whatever wiki problems there actually are, or simply redefined collaboration thru newer and newer technologies. it's not about the tool, it's about the idea. the people will lead the ideas, and wikis hold the collaborative idea of the internet right now, and they are (in my opinion) doing a fantastic job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]