Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Upchuck Rebellion

By Jim Hightower, Hightower Lowdown. Posted April 6, 2006.


The Good Food movement is leading the charge against expensive, nutrient-free, artificial, unhealthy, corporate crap-food.
Jim Hightower

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Jim Hightower

Checks for $600 Won't Fix Our Economy
America can't shop its way to greatness, and this one-time, government-funded shopping spree won't lead us to a sound economy.
Mar 28, 2008

Swim Against the Current: Ordinary Americans Can Make Change Happen
The fight for our country's future is still in our hands. Grass-roots movements are breaking free from corporate control.
Mar 7, 2008

Immigrants Come Here Because Globalization Took Their Jobs Back There
Seal-the-border hysteria is everywhere. Instead of blaming immigrants for America's problems, let's look at executives on both sides of the border.
Feb 7, 2008

More stories by Jim Hightower

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Even though winter is just beginning to release its frigid grip on most of the land, I'm already thinking out of season, looking ahead to one special thing: fresh, ripe, right-out-of-the-soil, good-and-good-for-you summer tomatoes. Oh, I can taste them now! And eggplant, too. And peppers. And all kinds of other edible wonders.

I'm a food guy. I've got a small but richly composted garden plot in my backyard, I'm a regular at several farmers' markets, and I frequent a number of great restaurants here in Austin, Texas. I love poking around food stores of any variety, I like to browse through seed catalogs and cooking magazines, and I always try to sample the local specialties as I travel around the country. I enjoy friendships with quite a few chefs and restaurateurs, and I love visiting with farmers and food artisans who are doing creative things. Though it still pisses off the corporate establishment, I was once the agricultural commissioner of Texas.

I know firsthand about the phenomenal cornucopia of good, fresh, nutritious and delicious food that our country is capable of producing. That's why it knocks me whopperjawed to see the stuff that dominates too many American diets -- an array of industrialized, conglomeratized, globalized products that have lost any connection to our good earth. This stuff is saturated with fats, sugars, artificial flavorings, chemical additives, pesticide residues, bacterial contaminants, genetically altered organisms and who knows what else? Plus, the major factor driving prices is not the cost of any actual food that might still be in these products, but the cost of packaging, advertising and long-distance shipping.

What has caused us to stray so far from the farm, so far from the essential and wonderful sustenance provided by nature itself? The answer, of course, is that the brute force of corporate power has been applied both in politics and the marketplace to pervert our food economy. During the past half century, control over our nation's food policies has shifted from farmers and consumers to corporate lawyers, lobbyists and economists. These are people who could not run a watermelon stand if we gave them the melons and had the highway patrol flag down customers for them! Yet they're in charge, saddling us with a food system that enriches corporate middlemen while driving good farmers off the land, poisoning our productive soil and water supplies, and literally sickening those who consume these adulterated foodstuffs.

Revolt!

Do we have to swallow this? Of course not -- we're Americans, rebellious mavericks -- and the revolt is on! For the past few years, a grassroots movement has quietly but rapidly been spreading throughout the country. I call it The Upchuck Rebellion: a growing number of people fed up with the destructive power of industrialized food are declaring that they're not going to take it anymore.

More than declaring … they're taking action. Part of this effort is political, trying to get the industrializers and globalizers to clean up their act. At another level, however, America's food rebels are taking on the idea of industrialization itself by creating their own alternative food economies. These are based on local farmers, seasonal consumption, organic and sustainable production, local food processors and artisans, and local markets. The goals are (1) to build a system that delivers tastier, healthier food; (2) to keep a community's food dollars in the local economy; and (3) to treat food not as a corporate commodity, but as a centerpiece of our culture.

Naturally, the Powers That Be have howled in derision at these efforts, sneering that local farmers, consumers, entrepreneurs, chefs, marketers, gardeners, environmentalists, workers, churches, co-ops, community organizers and just plain citizens simply don't have the savvy to create and run any kind of significant food system. However, my friend John Dromgoole, who runs a successful natural gardening and composting center in Austin, has a snappy retort to these elites: "Those who say it can't be done should not interrupt those who are doing it."

This is a movement that has antecedents going back generations -- both J.H. Kellogg and C.W. Post, for example, were health-food visionaries more than a century ago (and both would be appalled by the products now bearing their names) -- but the modern-day movement is barely 20 years old. In this short time, however, these innovative doers have made astonishing gains. Just in terms of raw numbers, today's "Good Food" movement is impressive:

  • Organic food topped $15 billion in sales in 2004 -- triple what they were only seven years earlier. Sales are increasing by roughly 20 percent a year (compared to only about 2 percent for all other foods) and are expected to reach $30 billion four years from now.
  • Nearly two thirds of American shoppers bought some organic foods last year -- up from about half the year before. About 40 percent of consumers now say that they regularly buy some organic foods.
  • There are now more than 8,000 organic farmers, with thousands more trying to make the transition from industrialized production to organic (a rigorous and costly process that should be assisted and funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which instead remains either indifferent or hostile).
  • From white tablecloth restaurants to barbecue joints, chefs have been in the lead in introducing organic food to the public and in creating the fast-growing market for locally produced seasonal foods.
  • The growth and popularity of farmers' markets has mushroomed in recent years, popping up in practically every city and most towns. Some 4,000 of these bustling, vibrant markets now exist, bringing local farmers and artisans together with customers at all economic levels. Likewise, the community-supported agriculture movement is fast spreading. These CSAs allow consumers to buy "shares" in the production of a local farm or group of farms, giving the farmers a defined and reliable cash market and the consumers a weekly share of the crops. In addition, the food co-op movement (once the rather funky domain of hippies) is thriving. About 300 of them are in cities across the country, doing some $750 million a year in business and providing local producers another way around the corporate distribution system.
  • The demand for organic and locally produced food has become so mainstream that major supermarket chains and such national food wholesalers as SYSCO have had to alter their once-rigid procurement practices to make some of their purchases from organic and local producers.

Digg!

Jim Hightower is the author of "Let's Stop Beating Around the Bush" (Viking Press). He publishes the monthly Hightower Lowdown; for more information about Jim, visit jimhightower.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
= )
Posted by: flyingfish on Apr 6, 2006 3:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah nice article!
I have a vision of schoolyards and all public spaces for that matter, filled with apple trees and edible landscapes of all sorts.

Now on to the real work of reforming "education" to a system that produces fully developed humans (like a nice ripe organic tomato) and not herds of corporate shepherded sheep. Having to relearn how to learn upon "graduating."
-but that was only part of the article

Certainly this movement of Good Food is growing. Isn't it strange to even be having the discussion at all? And is not it strange that I could use a term like 'health food' without the raising of the brow? Should not all food be 'health food'?

I was thinking just the other day what a strange phenomena it is when a large portion of a species consumes nutrient deficient food wrapped in various petroleum derived films and packagings.

Plant Trees.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: = )Health Food Posted by: Seedkeeper
» RE: = )Health Food Posted by: flyingfish
thanks
Posted by: rsaxto on Apr 6, 2006 3:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks to Hightower I have figured out why so many CEOs are assholes - it's because of the junk food that they eat which soon comes right out of their assholes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you can't pronounce it....
Posted by: churchofone on Apr 6, 2006 3:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.....you should probably think twice about eating it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Slow Food
Posted by: Roverton on Apr 6, 2006 4:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's keep Jack-Out-Of-The-Box for as long as possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Upchuck-ins?
Posted by: Lulu Gee on Apr 6, 2006 5:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jim your title has given me an idea for a bit of agitprop--Upchucking on the steps of agribiz/industrial food headquarters and also at state and federal legislatures. Cheetos or some other luridly colored food will do quite nicely. You're probably going to need to devour a whole bag and if that in itself doesn't cause upchucking there is always syrup of ipecac. Thanks Jim. LuLu Gee

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

expand the scope of revolution
Posted by: cold2touch on Apr 6, 2006 5:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is the essential point in Jim's article:
corporatized world is out of control -- empty, vapid, phony, valueless, yet this world maintains an iron grip on the rest of the world and its future. We need regime change here, overthrow the evil empire of cortorations. In fact, the corporate charter, which protects wrongdoers with limited liability while extending unlimited ability to plunder and cause harm should be revoked. Corporations don't make decisions, the people who run them make decisions, so when they strive to profit at the expense of devastation to environment, health and culture, they should pay the full price.
Lest one be turned off by visions of lantern jawed, tow headed workers parading with red flags, remember that those movements failed because they were fostered by ignorant, semi-literate psychotics, resentful of being left out of corporate and feudal power. The goal of socialist revolutions was an even greater industrialization and shame at agricultural roots which they tried to violently pull out.
Let's give it another try and replace rethoric by logic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Inspiring!
Posted by: wheresarah on Apr 6, 2006 6:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for this great article. As a parent of a kindergartener who eats school lunches most of the time, I can relate. I'm not happy with the menu, but didn't think I could do anything about it. I am very inspired by the story in this article and would like to initiate change at her school, and as many others as possible.

I am stubborn enough that I'm pretty sure I could do it! :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Food Empire Strikes Back
Posted by: antiapathy on Apr 6, 2006 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wally world has caught wind of the organic trend, and they are on the bandwagon. Theya are going to do everything they can to drive down prices, shipping in produce from Chile to China... Plus the corpos have lobbied congress to change the definition of organic to allow some synthetic materials.
So this article stresses the most important part of the good food movement: buy local. Pretty much anything you get at walmart or even whole foods is going to be shipped in from 1000+ miles away. CSAs and FMs and Co-ops are definitely the way to go. I'm just a little p.o.'d that our taxes are still subsidizing all the big ag corpos with their unsustainable practices... Where is True Cost economics when you need it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The rise in awareness of good food and happy eating is right on!
Posted by: Bobsays on Apr 6, 2006 7:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been waiting a long time for this: the return of good eating. The 1990s will stand as a monstrous decade where everything - people, food, sex - was sacrificed for the short-term goals of the business class. We now see the consequences: burnt out, fat people who claim to have no time to make nutritious meals. It is a foul philosophy of life and I do not buy into it. Both I and my wife are busy and successful people (if you count success as doing what you want when you want and still get paid for it). We always have nice, homecooked meals at home. We talk about all the time and enjoy exploring new recipes. Food is a daily, discussed passion. We are also both fit.

My cousin went into the food trade. She is a millionare. She made her fortune designing and marketing the crappy high fat, high sodium/sugar foods that are part of the problem. And what does she look like? She is fat. She is the worst sort of stress bunny you can imagine.

Now this trend needs to be more than just looking at food porn in cook books. If it is to have staying power it must auger in a new philosophy for life, where family, food, friends are central. Bring it on!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not only good, simple food but
Posted by: fifthworld on Apr 6, 2006 8:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Conscious Eating" - a la Norman Cousins' book. How many of us take 5 or 10 minutes to do nothing other than enjoy and be aware of, gratefully, what we are eating? There are plenty of studies showing the importance, metabolically and otherwise, of attention and stress-free eating. It's rare by golly. I myself will bring my nicely thrown together healthy dinner into the room again, and read the Web, stressing on Alternet or wherever. So let's dump the corpo-cardboard crap AND eat with consciousness. I call it cous-cous consciousness. Frankly, it might even be the more important thing, considering some I know eat, er, not so well, and are ripely healthy into many decades. Okay, that's another topic, but wanted to throw in a little cog!! : )

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nice but why did you leave out USDA's latest ...
Posted by: Ricki on Apr 6, 2006 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... way to put small farmers out of business? NAIS, National Animal Identification System, written and to be administered by corporate agribusiness. ALL owners of ANY livestock must register their premises. Every single animal must have a radio frequency id tag. Every chicken, every bovine, every horse, etc. No exceptions for 4-H'ers or Amish/Plain People. If your animals are not registered and they leave your farm they will be taken away and disposed of. The farmer has to pay for every tag. Factory farms, which have the most disease and the unhealthiest animals, just have to register their premises. Any movement of any animal off your farm has to be reported in 24 hours or there is a penalty of $1000. Even for a trail ride. Vets will be forced to refuse care for any animal without an id. The farm premises will be monitored. Your animals will no longer be under your control.
This will affect Mr. Hightower's veggie growers too, as the USDA has long maintained that organic methods, using manure in particular, is a health hazard, and many of us small farmers will have to get out of business because of costs involved which will make less chemical free manure available for veggie growers.
EVEN IF YOU DON'T EAT MEAT THIS WILL AFFECT YOU. DO YOU WANT THE GOVERNMENT/CORPORATE AGRIBUSINESS TO HAVE TOTAL CONTROL OVER YOUR FOOD SUPPLY? DO YOU WANT THE GROWING SMALL FARM/LOCAL FOOD SUPPLY MOVEMENT TO BE SHUT DOWN? If they get away with this imagine what is next. NAIS violates our Constitutional rights.


The excuse for implementing this is to track mad cow, and stop bioterrorism.. Well, all they have to do is stop feeding animal parts to cows to stop mad cow, and a bioterrorist is not going to my small farm, if they strike it will be on a big factory farm for the most impact. There are other ways to track animals without violating people's rights - testing and tagging at the slaughterhouse for one. But guess who owns most of the slaughterhouses and processing plants? That's right, agribusiness!

Go to NoNAIS.org or stopanimalid.org for more information and help to stop this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

P. S. Mr. Hightower...
Posted by: Ricki on Apr 6, 2006 8:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... why have you not spoken out against this outrageous violation of our rights???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: P. S. Mr. Hightower... Posted by: Jim Shaw
Home economics, anyone?
Posted by: badkitty on Apr 6, 2006 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I went to the junior high where Alice Waters started her program, and they had a home economics program--every girl had to take a semester of cooking and a semester of sewing. I still use some of those recipes (they were all from scratch). My son went to the same junior high a decade ago, and the progressive Berkeley school district had gotten rid of all the home ec and shop classes by the time he got there. I did send him to a cooking summer camp with which I believe she had some involvement, but it wasn't as basic as my cooking class. I think that, with all the garbage for sale in stores (I buy almost everything at farmer's markets or through my CSA), if you really want to make a change, making all students take a cooking class for a semester might really help. It's a life skills thing, and I notice a lot of young people don't seem to have them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Appleton, WI Public Schools
Posted by: progressiveview on Apr 6, 2006 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Check out what the Appleton, WI Public School system has achieved with their inovative school lunch program and the impact on behavior in school and performance.

http://nutrition.about.com/
od/schoollunches/fr/naturalovens.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This Article is making me Hungry
Posted by: saywhat? on Apr 6, 2006 9:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in small ways this food movement is indeed happening....i have a friend who is in the restaurant business, and is developiing a model kitchen for a few public schools...they have found from the first kitchen that the kids are less tired and do much better in school by having a healthy lunch.....

so i think it will be homemade humus along with homemade bread for my lunch today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

.
Posted by: bettsoff on Apr 6, 2006 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rock on.

Now if only I could figure out how to get a job supporting this kind of stuff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

good food,alright!!!
Posted by: morningstar777 on Apr 6, 2006 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a local trip to "sprouts" and I was totally amazed. fresh asparagus on ice, leafy lettuce without chemicals, and rolled oats in bins, I was in heaven! the taste is so....delicious.
and, as for cost?
cheaper than some of the processed foods found in my local grocery store.
yeah, I wish I had learned about this stuff in High School.
to bite into a whole tomato straight from the garden is pure heaven...
one at the grocery store? bleh! ain't the same...you can stil taste poisonous residue on the tomatoe after it has been washed, this isn't food, this is pure cancer!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: good food,alright!!! Posted by: ttmrichter
Thanks, Jim
Posted by: oregoncharles on Apr 6, 2006 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article, about one of the more hopeful elements of the present scene.

Note the comments, pointing out the USDA attacks on the very movement you extoll.

Isn't it time you went back into politics? And aren't you sick of the fully-corporate Democratic Party, which, at best, rolls over & pees on its belly when these things happen?

There IS a party that supports your positions, and it's looking for good candidates for office. You would be a great one. I bet there's a chapter in Austin. If not, you of all people could start one in a wink.

Yeah, the Greens. We Need You! And, more to the point, you need us. Because the Dems are, well, blatantly useless when they aren't on the wrong side altogether. And food is a winning issue, all by itself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Genetically Modified Food
Posted by: kiwibill44 on Apr 6, 2006 3:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just wondered how organic producers are going to protect their crops from being `contaminated` by GM crops growing in the same general area. It is quite possible (if not probable) that pollen from GM crops could cross-pollinate organic crops. Seed collected from the latter would then have the `foreign` genes present.
One would expect, considering a reverse scenario, that if anyone caused the same equivalent damage to GM crops they would probably be sued by the coeporates. Are there any contingencies to attempt to make corporates responsible for the contamination of organic crops?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The best thing we can do
Posted by: sphoenix on Apr 6, 2006 3:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know...I read an article recently that quoted a 90 year old woman who stated that 50 years ago over 50% of the population were family farmers...today that figure is less than 2%.

Do you want to break the corporates? It's simple really...learn to grow your own food! It doesn't take much space and what else are you doing with your time? Watching TV? We have power, if we have the guts to do something about it other than complain. Ask yourself this...with oil prices continuing to rise and more food coming from outside this country to feed us...how long do you think this situation will last? What about terrorists, bad weather, or any other natural or man made disaster that might interrupt the food supply to your region? What are you going to eat when the semi's stop bringing in food from the outside? Look at New Orleans and you will see a possible future...a very grim and hungry future. Screw this lack of control over my own life...I am growing more and more of my own food and learning to store, can, dry, and preserve as much of it as I can. We don't have to be held hostage by food anymore...take back your power and stop feeding ravenous agribusiness...learn to feed yourself and you will never fear what THEY are doing to your food.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Live Better Longer
Posted by: ansona on Apr 6, 2006 3:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article..thank-you!


How healthy is your immune system?
How strong is your antioxidant/carotenoid count?

Nobel Prize Winning Science- Antioxidant BioPhotonic Scanner-

(audio/video)
http://www.mysuperscanner.com/distributors/bio/tour

"The amount of key antioxidants that many different species maintain in their body is directly proportional to their lifespan."
Richard Cutler, M.D., Director of Anti-aging Research at the National Institutes of Health

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

url
Posted by: flyingfish on Apr 6, 2006 4:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thought I'd add this url

"LocalHarvest.org"
- it's a nice resource
also if you are interested in learning organic and sustainable farming methods, check out

organicvolunteers.com
-or
wwoof.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Organic food is cheaper to grow and healthier to eat
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 6, 2006 9:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Luckily I live in the Monterey Bay region of California where organic farms are abundant. One interesting thing I notice is that the 'mainstream' stores boost organic prices to ridiculously high levels, thus perpetuating the myth about the high costs of organic food. The other fact is that if you want an 'organic' frozen TV dinner, you are missing the point. You have to learn how to cook with basic unprocessed ingredients (a challenge I suppose), and then it is actually much cheaper. You also have to get used to seasonal availability - can't get what you want all the time, sorry. It is also a lot healthier - no preservatives, no herbicides, no pesticides, no hydrogenated fats, no heaping tablespoons of sugar with every meal. The body load of chemicals that we acquire in our society is immense, and the more one can do to decrease it the better off you will be.

Take a look at Bill Moyers Trade Secrets - why isn't a total body scan of your chemical load (blood and fat biopsy) a standard part of your health regime? Well - that could provide a comprehensive database that could be used to relate environmental cancers and hormone/endocrine disrupter-related diseases to chemical exposures... and the chemical industry wouldn't like that very much, now would it? ExxonMobile's think tank, the Competive Enterprise Institute, certainly doesn't think you should be worried:CEI

Oh, those pesky and burdensome regulations.

It's your health, remember.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Slow Food
Posted by: YogiBear on Apr 6, 2006 9:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This reminds me of the existing "slow food" movement.

http://www.slowfoodusa.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Desserts???
Posted by: zorrobird on Apr 11, 2006 1:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The plan at the Olympia school sounds great except for the elemination of the desserts. You can have nutricious desserts.Would it cost a fortune to have rice pudding for example??? I bet the kids weren't happy with that choice...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Aslan 365
Posted by: Aslan on Apr 11, 2006 1:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice to observe that food nuts view the world through the one narrow prism-beam of their own relevancy; and can develop phenomenal conspiracy theories that are just as vacuous as those found in every other prismatic view.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]