Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

For sheer government incompetence, this administration sets new records daily.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Making Incompetence a Reality

By Molly Ivins, AlterNet. Posted January 12, 2006.


For sheer government incompetence, this administration sets new records daily.
Advertisement

Boy, you really can't take your eyes off this bunch for a minute, can you? If they're not screwing up one thing, then they're screwing up another -- busy little beavers. And then there are the administrative nightmares they have created all by themselves: The new Medicare prescription-drug benefit is such a disaster area, four states took it over in less than a week just to make sure poor people received their drugs.

Some of the press is starting to get the drill. Give us something like the West Virginia coal mine disaster, and instead of standing around emoting like Geraldo Rivera, a few reporters have enough sense to ask the obvious question: What is this mine's safety record? And when it turns out to be abysmal, a few more reporters have enough sense to ask: Who's in charge of doing something after a mine gets 205 safety violations in one year? Where's the Mine Safety and Health Administration? Who runs it? What's their background -- are they professionals or mining industry stooges? Who's the Michael "Heckuvajob" Brown in this outfit? Why are so many jobs at MSHA just left completely unfilled? How much has MSHA's budget been cut since 2001 to pay for tax cuts for the rich?

The great irony is that this was supposed to be the CEO administration. Bush was supposed to put people in charge of government who had track records in private industry, who did in fact know how to run a railroad. For just sheer incompetence, this administration sets new records daily. All those years the right wing sat around yammering about government incompetence, and it took this administration to make it true.

But while the press is busy sort of figuring out what government needs to do -- homeland security, anyone? -- other agencies are slipping quietly out of control, with almost no attention paid. In the case of the Internal Revenue Service, the problem appears to be more malice than incompetence.

Right-wing conspiracy theorists used to enjoy frightening themselves with the possibility that the IRS would somehow become politicized and be used as a tool by some nasty socialist like Jimmy Carter to go after their ill-gotten gains stashed illegally offshore. Always seemed like a good plan to me. Unfortunately, the only people who ever tried to politicize the IRS were on the right -- first Richard Nixon and now George W. Bush.

Hundreds of thousands of poor Americans have had their tax refunds frozen and their returns labeled fraudulent, according to the IRS's taxpayer advocate, Nina Olson. Testifying before Congress this week, Olson said the average income of these taxpayers is $13,000. Olson and her staff sampled the suspected returns and found that, at most, one in five was questionable.

The poor citizens are seeking refunds under the Earned Income Tax Credit, a Reagan program to help the working poor. The total possible tax fraud amount involved in these returns is $9 billion -- compared to the $100 billion problem with fraud by small businessmen who deal in cash. That's the kind of shrewd administration we've come to expect from the Bushies. Olson points out it is not only unfair, but also a waste of time. Meanwhile, mind-boggling sums in taxes are being evaded by those at the other end of the income scale.

David Cay Johnston, The New York Times' tax expert and author of "Perfectly Legal," reports the IRS is now involved in an effort to cover up these very kinds of incompetence that Olson demonstrated. "Records showing how thoroughly the IRS audits big corporations and the rich, and how much it discounts the additional taxes assessed after audits, are being withheld from the public despite a 1976 court order requiring their disclosure," Johnston writes. In an episode reminiscent of the three stooges, the IRS simply announced there was no court order.

This is, of course, part of a far wider and grimmer shutdown of information about our government. Despite cheerful burbling from the president ("The presumption ought to be that citizens ought to know as much as possible about the government decision-making," he said last year), this administration's love of secrecy is monumental. In fact, the cost of keeping what our government does secret from the public has gone up alarmingly: The classification system that cost $4.3 billion in fiscal year 2000 was up to $7.2 billion in fiscal year 2004. That's a lot of Wite-Out.

Meanwhile, the IRS has also tracked the political affiliations of taxpayers in 20 states. Its explanation is that the information was "routinely collected by a vendor" and, of course, it made no use of it. And now the IRS is planning to "outsource" collecting overdue taxes to private firms around the country. Now, let's see, do we think any of those private firms will have Republican Party affiliations?

Digg!

Molly Ivins writes about politics, Texas and other bizarre happenings.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
unconchas
Posted by: unconchas on Jan 12, 2006 6:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
not to mention the raping pf Lady Birds hiways with all the billboards the assholkes

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Unconchas at the keyboard Posted by: Bic Pentameter
incompetence and corruption, because we can....
Posted by: Casey Burns on Jan 12, 2006 6:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hi Molly,
As always, you have hit the nail on the proverbial head. Your previous articles on Abramoff and corruption, and this one on the Administration's gross incompetence.

It appears at this point that fewer of these Republi-perps are trying to hide their corruption and incompetence, and are instead flaunting it. Because they can! It appears that to them, they own the government that they paid for (forgetting it was all borrowed), and that they can do what they please with it, and tell the 99.9% of the rest of us to consume what "meadow muffins" they leave behind and that is all we can expect and much more of the same.

Its the assymetry between the mid 90s when these assholes arrogantly went after Clinton - and now when they look the other way at BushCo's indescretions, that I find hardest to digest. If these so-called do gooders who tried to bring Clinton down used the same chip on their shoulder logic against Bush, he wouldn't have made it to re-election.

Keep up the great writing! You are a national treasure!
Casey

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hyperbole...get the hook
Posted by: vespasian01 on Jan 12, 2006 7:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
M writes here, "unfortunately, the only people who ever tried to politicize the IRS were on the right.."

Molly! arrrgh..this runs dangerously close to Pee-Wee Herman's "I know you are, but what am I."

There are probably as many scum-sucking weasels in Demo Party as in Republican. Your writing is way too good to pollute with hyperbole.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Elephant in the Living Room
Posted by: DonKiyote on Jan 12, 2006 10:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think Molly is missing the point here. The Bush administration is not incompetent; they are actually very competent at accomplishing what they want. How else could you explain their ability to be elected to the highest office in the land (twice!)? Even if you believe, as I do, there was some hanky-panky involved in the elections, they were competent enough to pull it off and get away with it.

Their aim is to make irrelevant any agency that fetters their cronies’ ability to maximize profits. They're doing this by appointing people to run these regulatory agencies who could care less about performing the responsibilities involved in doing the job. If some poor people in New Orleans, or a few miners in Appalachia, die, it's no skin off their ahhh.... noses, as long as it doesn't interfere with their dinner plans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

was rebuked today
Posted by: memememem on Jan 13, 2006 4:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for being inappropiate.
yes I used th F word.
But I object being branded,
My mail, while insutintg, was targetted and thought out
Francois

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Didn't Clinton compromise which led to the increase of EITC returns audited
Posted by: chaoslegs on Jan 13, 2006 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My memory may be fuzzy (been 1.5 years since I reaad Perfectly Legal), but I think Clinton made the compromise with the Republicans, to keep EITC, but to increase the auditing of those returns. Clearly it was something Clinton didn't want to do but was forced into rich whining class.

It is too bad accountability is only for schools and other public institutions they are trying to tear down. Or for poor people (see Bankruptcy bill), but never for the corporations or the Pentagon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On Purpose
Posted by: JSquercia on Jan 13, 2006 7:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that the Republicans are making Government Agencies Inefficient and Ineffective on purpose .
That way they can calim that it is obvious that
government doesn't work . That will make it easier to eliminate those agencies that impede their constituents . Those constituents were described , rather accurately, by the President, as the haves and the have mores.

Little did we know that the CEO government advocated by Bush was based on his record of failed business and had as its role model his good friend Kenny Boy Lay .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Trust Me. I'm from the --
Posted by: MikMouse on Jan 13, 2006 10:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The foundation of Conservative Republican belief is that the government cannot be trusted. It has been so since the first days of the John Birch Society in the 1950's.

Government is incompetent, evil, corrupt and filled with waste, fraud and abuse.

Now that they have taken over the government they have proven that their belief is in fact true.

No one should be surprised that the Republican government is incompetent, corrupt and filled with waste fraud and abuse.

Now the choice left to the rest of us is: Do we get rid of government or do we get rid of Republicans?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The States Step In As Medicare Falters
Posted by: rabblerowzer on Jan 14, 2006 2:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The States Step In As Medicare Falters
Seniors Being Turned Away, Overcharged Under New Prescription Drug Program

On Friday, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, one of the few Democrats to vote for the prescription drug plan pushed by President Bush in 2003, described the program's faulty debut in dire terms.

"The result is a major health emergency in California, particularly for people with chronic and debilitating diseases who rely on multiple medications daily to keep them alive," she wrote.

My family has a saying that's been handed down from generation to generation, "Beware of Republicans baring gifts."

Always expect Incompetence & Corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I keep thinking it cannot possibly get any worse, but it does.
Posted by: Sojourner on Jan 14, 2006 10:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The people I know who voted for Bush are fat cat Republicans. Their assets will drop a bit, and they will have to cut back on their round-the-world trips. But the working class idiots who voted for Bush ought to be up in arms.

The IRS freezing of returns fits the way business is done in America today. Anyone who has tried to get a rebate on a purchase knows that routine: make them force you to pay what you owe them; hold on to someone else's money as long as you can; make them pay a lawyer to contact you; tell them you will have "the manager" talk with them. The U.S. has become just like the used car business.

The Repiglicans in Washington worked their way up peddling to suckers, and that's the way they run our government. It's what we said we want by the way that we voted.

The Repigs are milking us dry for every last cent

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No great irony ... it was obvious from the beginning ...
Posted by: thewileyone on Jan 16, 2006 12:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"... this was supposed to be the CEO administration. "

It was obvious before the voting started in Nov of 1998 that George W. Bush had an appalling record as the man-in-charge. None of the companies, or baseball team, he was in charge of did well. Those who thought he could manage this country well is as stupid as he is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]