Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Hacking the Subway

By Annalee Newitz, AlterNet. Posted November 9, 2005.


The law says you're allowed to look at the map online, but you're not allowed to create a digital version for your iPod.
Annalee Newitz

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Annalee Newitz

My Last Column
After 9 long years, it's time to move on. One final thought: don't ever stop ruthlessly criticizing everything that exists.
Jul 2, 2008

Three Myths About the Internet That Refuse to Die
The Internet will not magically bring the world together; nor is it likely to destroy us.
Jun 20, 2008

Using Sci-Fi to Change the World
Science fiction isn't escapist; it can help us envision how to make the world a better place.
Jun 5, 2008

More stories by Annalee Newitz

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The first few times I came to New York, I refused to ride the subway. Those were in the pre-cleanup days, before Mayor Rudy Giuliani started painting over the graffiti and busting kids for fare-skipping, but I didn't avoid clattering down those scum-caked stairs because I was afraid of hooligans. Frankly, I was just afraid of getting lost.

The New York City subway system is a bewildering maze of numbers and letters. Navigation is via borough name or region rather than direction -- you don't take a train east, you take it to Brooklyn. If you want to go north, hop on a number or letter heading to the Bronx, or possibly uptown, or possibly to Harlem. The signs in the subway stations are also alienatingly detailed, listing express routes and late-night routes alongside regular routes in a perverse, run-together way that makes catching the right train seem unlikely at best.

However, after deciding to stay in New York for a month -- that's a whole different story, involving a borough called Staten Island that can only be reached via ferry -- I realized that my allergy to the subway was getting stupid. I had to figure out a way to hack the system if I was going to get from Staten Island to what people in Manhattan and Brooklyn would call real places.

Part of the problem is that the underground railways I'm used to, in San Francisco, are just ridiculously simple -- some might say infuriatingly so. There are four lines, each with its own color. There are big, simple, bright maps in every station. Trains don't turn into other trains or replace each other randomly, the way they do in New York. Recently in New York I attempted to catch the correct A line train to JFK Airport (there are two or three A lines, and only Far Rockaway goes to JFK). An A train pulled up, and I asked a police officer standing inside if it was going to the airport. "Yup," he said, just as the door closed on my arm. He didn't even move -- just left me yanking my arm out of the door and yowling as the train pulled away. Fucking New York.

I persevered, however, with the help of a somewhat outdated subway map my friend Wendy gave me when I first arrived in the city. By the time I'd used it to navigate a trip to Coney Island, as well as to various places on the Lower East Side, in SoHo, and uptown, the map was soggy and torn. Plus, the longer I was in the city, the more self-conscious I got when I had to unfold the damn thing on the subway platform. I wasn't exactly a tourist anymore -- what tourist would live on Staten Island, anyway? And yet I was stuck looking like one with my big old subway map. Couldn't I just get some kind of electronic map on my PDA or something? Turns out I could -- if New York's Metropolitan Transportation Authority weren't obsessed with hoarding its digital maps.

A couple of months ago, a guy named William Bright was making maps of subway systems available for iPods on his Web site, Ipodsubwaymaps.com. They were great maps, and a great resource for dorks like me who would rather ogle their iPods than unfold dirty old paper things. But Bright got a cease and desist order from the MTA saying he was violating copyright by making these maps available. (He got a similar notice from San Francisco's BART.) That's right -- you're allowed to look at the map online, print it out, and carry a copy around, but you're not allowed to create a digital version of the map for your iPod. So Bright had to take down all his great MTA iPod maps.

To avoid further harassment, he started designing his maps from scratch instead of taking the most accurate maps directly from the sites of the MTA and BART. (It's worth noting that some cities, like Chicago, allowed him to use their maps without sending him a nastygram.) So Bright's MTA subway maps for iPod are now available; they just aren't necessarily very accurate, since he designed them himself. People keep e-mailing him with fixes. Since I don't want to get lost in some obscure part of Brooklyn, I'm sticking with my annoying paper map for now.

The whole rotten deal got me thinking about all the strange ways in which free speech is being curtailed in the United States. I need maps to get around in cities the same way I need free information to navigate through social space. When municipal governments are using copyright law, of all things, to censor the public distribution of public maps, where the hell are we headed when it comes to political speech?

Digg!

Annalee Newitz is a surly media nerd who is still trying to figure out the subtle differences between the 4 and 5 lines.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Copyright law
Posted by: memerot on Nov 9, 2005 11:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Copyright law was written to protect commercial publishers from unfair competition by their competitors - by making it illegal for the competitors to just re-typeset and print the same book. It was intended to encourage private individuals and companies to create artistic works.

It was never intended to apply to a government agency which should be in the business of disseminating information. I wish he'd fought the law. Unless a company can show they suffered financial loss as a result of an action, they have no recourse under copyright law. Since it would be impossible for the subway station to show they suffered financial loss, they couldn't have done anything. The only financial loss they could have suffered was the cost of hiring a lawyer to sue a private individual, on the taxpayer's dime, who was doing their job better than them. Our government just does such a great job with priorities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terrorism is a threat that will kill us dead...
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Nov 9, 2005 9:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or kill us live.

Once we're completely in the grips of paranoia and ceasing to live our lives the way we wish, we've lost our liberties and the terrorist bastards have won.

I for one am sick of it. I live and work in DC and know full well I walk through targets every day. But by God I shall do so with my head held high.

You can’t call it terror if you’re not afraid of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what about the others?
Posted by: evermind on Nov 10, 2005 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So what about all those maps in tourist guides and non-tourist guides in all the bookstores that have copies of the mta map? They're even making a profit off of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That's the MTA for you...
Posted by: socgrrrl on Nov 10, 2005 10:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, what a great idea to have subway maps available for one's iPod. It's great that William drew his own maps and didn't let the MTA and BART bully him. I'm going to have to check this out.
You'd think that the MTA would have better things to do...like say, make sure the trains run on time and are clean. (I live in nyc. socgrrrl.squarespace.com).

Oh, and the subtle difference between the 4 and 5 lines is that the 4 train is a kelly green and the 5 is more of a forest green.
heh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Copyright protects free speech, it does not violate it!
Posted by: TinCans&Twine on Nov 10, 2005 5:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I understand how frustrating the problem may seem to Ms. Newitz and other iPod geeks. However, it really is not a “free speech” issue as she concludes at the end of her article, it is a copyright issue. Just because something can be made more readily available by technology, that does not give people the right to distribute that thing as they see fit. You have to consider the rights of the original creator to protect their intellectual property. Whereas it may not seem like cities should be able to profit off of subway-map sales, they most certainly have the right to create them and attempt to generate revenue from the sales of those maps. William Bright may have had a wonderful idea that provided a great service, but his sevice still violated copyright law. William Bright was not exorcising his right to free speech, he was publishing other people’s maps.

I use the same argument for peer-to-peer music downloading online. Just because one band doesn’t mind people downloading their music, that doesn’t give people the right to steal every other bands' music. Technology may make it easier for files to be shared online, but that does not legitimize the theft. Technology has made it quicker, easier, and safer to rob banks protected by the FDIC. But that doesn’t make bank robbery legal. Even if you want to compare file-sharing to making cassette dubs of CDs, the difference is you’re not copying one for yourself or a friend, you’re putting a copy out for an unlimited multitude of random strangers to take as they please. File-sharers may think they are putting one over on greedy record companies, but really they are taking away money from the artists that created the product they are stealing. Copyright law was created and refined to protect the theft of intellectual property and file-sharing violates copyright law.

Creative Commons, endorsed by music genius David Byrne, is one solution to the copyright paradox. Maybe that needs to be expanded to include printed material such as books and subway maps. Regradless of the paradox, the issue of William Bright distributing subway maps for your iPod remains an issue of copyright law, not free speech.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can Bright publicize his effort and make it open source?
Posted by: bettsoff on Nov 11, 2005 4:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of taking emails about errors and trying to fix them all himself, why not make his project open-source and get results that much faster? He could do a daily accuracy-check based on the MTA map and announce when this new, original version was complete and ready for use.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Resonse TinCans&Twine?
Posted by: alarew on Nov 11, 2005 9:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So please - a mea culpa would be in order here tincans...don't you think?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: resonse TinCans&Twine? Posted by: TinCans&Twine
Regulation
Posted by: aether8m on Nov 11, 2005 5:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The irony is that New York's "pasta primavera" subway map is a product of the free market. So many of the lines intertangle and intertwine because they were originally laid by three different companies, all founded with the intention of out-innovating eachother. When the three drove eachother bankrupt, the city of New York was left with a series of tunnels that were designed to compete and circumvent, rather than work as a whole.

If the system had been regulated from the start, the layout would be simple and intuitive (see Washington DC's Metro as an example) and this article would never have happened.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]