Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Could Mother Nature do what the Democrats couldn't?

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Will Katrina Dampen Bush's Black Voter Court?

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, AlterNet. Posted September 24, 2005.


Could Mother Nature do what the Democrats couldn't?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Earl Ofari Hutchinson

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Could Mother Nature do what the Democrats couldn't? And that's put a damper on President Bush and Republican strategist Karl Rove's relentless drive to break the Democrat's stranglehold on the black vote. Before Katrina hit, there was a strong sign that Bush and Rove had some success. Their pro-business, and homeownership, Social Security privatization, and traditional family values pitch touched a faint nerve with some black evangelicals, independents, and younger, upwardly mobile blacks. The pitch worked so well that Bush bagged double-digit support from blacks in the presidential race in the crucial battleground states of Florida and Ohio. That helped tip the White House to him.

If the presidential election were held today, it would be a far different story. Project 21, the ultra conservative black political action group, that's been Bush's most fervent cheerleader, issued one skimpy press release mostly attacking the Congressional Black Caucus for racially politicizing the disaster. It made perfunctory mention of the federal response. Bush was not mentioned at all. Bush's top black evangelical backers are either mute, or have made wary utterances that they'll wait and see how much of a fight Bush puts up to get Congress to pony up the billions for Katrina reconstruction and to combat poverty that he promised in his national televised speech in New Orleans.

Even if he keeps his reconstruction promise, it won't totally rinse away the bitter taste his initial catatonic response to Katrina left in the mouths of most blacks. In polls, the majority of them blame Bush's bungled response not on incompetence but racism. Even more ominous for the GOP, the polls show that they also blame Republicans for the suffering. That's more worrisome than condemning an incompetent president. The GOP banked heavily on boosting black support in key races in 2006. The months before Katrina they worked hard to put the pieces in place.

In 2006, a bevy of high profile blacks will bid for Senate and governor seats in Pennsylvania and Ohio. These are two perennial crucial battleground states. Republicans would tout a win, or even a credible showing in the races, by their black candidates, to prove that the GOP is a cozy place for blacks.

The black evangelicals are also a vital key to their plan. By playing hard on the wedge issues of gay marriage, and abortion, the GOP counts on them to mobilize thousands of their church going flock to rally behind the GOP banner. But in the days after Katrina, the few black ministers that ventured any opinion about Bush spoke only of their concern about Bush's mishandling of the disaster, and what he'd have do to make amends for it.

The Katrina bungle doesn't mean that Bush, or the GOP, are politically spent with blacks. Much can and will happen between now and Election Day in 2006, and Republicans have gone into maximum damage control spin to make sure that good things happen right away. Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum kicked off the GOP counter-offensive when he unveiled a GOP poverty reduction program. Bush quickly took the cue. In his New Orleans speech he solemnly pledged to make tackling poverty a priority. He even squeezed in a big plug for school vouchers, enterprise zones, and greater reliance on faith based initiative.

These are all standard Republican pet programs that have gotten at best light traction. Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman stood Bush's bumble on its head and assured anxious Republicans that Katrina was not a setback but a golden opportunity to show that Republicans can wage an effective war against poverty. In a rare interview, Laura Bush got in her licks and publicly demanded that the nation look at poverty a different way. The GOP thrust was brazen, opportunistic, and a much belated effort to seize the political high ground.

But it was far better than anything the Democrats said or did post Katrina. Massachusetts Senator John Kerry, Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean, and John Edwards flailed away at Bush for his Katrina ineptitude, spoke in vague terms about Two Americas, or made a plea for a Marshall type plan to fight poverty, a plan doomed from the moment the call was made.

By not putting forth a big, bold anti-poverty plan, and showing a willingness to raise their voices loudly and persistently for it, in other words to be active lobbyists for the poor, the Democrats again let the Republicans off the hook for their bumbles. That's been the sorry pattern with them through two failed presidential elections. They've allowed the Republicans to snatch victory from defeat every time.

Bush will have to do much more than toss out big dollar figures for Katrina reconstruction, and talk about fighting a truncated war on poverty. He'll have to deliver the goods. That will determine whether the GOP can bob above the Katrina tide with black voters, or not.

Digg!

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. He is the author of 'The Crisis in Black and Black' (Middle Passage Press).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The midterms will be a good measuring stick...
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Sep 24, 2005 12:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...to see how much the anger transfers to poll results.

I overestimated the impact of the highly publicized "Vote or Die" campaign. This may be the thing that really creates a wave. There are a lot of senate races where the African American vote could be very significant, and complicate matters for the GOP on both offense and defense.

At least one can hope...

today on the Muse This House of Card’s was not built for a perfect storm.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

War on Poverty?
Posted by: Cayenne on Sep 24, 2005 2:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is your plan for ending poverty?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: War on Poverty? Posted by: NewHere
Once there was a city on a hill.
Posted by: Sojourner on Sep 24, 2005 11:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
JFK had not been President for long before I heard a university economist on a government stipend explain how "a rising tide lifts all boats." Instead of worrying about how to divide the pie, it could be made bigger, so there was plenty for everyone.

At the same time, the civil rights struggle and the anti-Vietnam War movement had organized bigger public demonstrations against existing policies than anything since the labor union battles that had led to the New Deal.

When LBJ signed the federal Anti-Poverty Program, politicians were persuaded we had wealth enough for both guns and butter. But LBJ was driven from office by the riots in the cities. And after Nixon was elected in '68, he appointed Dick Cheney to demolish the Anti-Poverty Program.

Cheney found plenty of excuses to trash it. In my community at the time (and the program depended on local participation) the goal was to provide visibility and a vocal presence of the poor at the decision-making table. Cheney's excuse that federal and local money was being wasted relied on a few egregious examples of mistakes by beginners. Compared to the money wasted every year by the Pentagon, the Anti-Poverty Program was less than a drop in the bucket.

The real reason for shutting down the Program was that the Republican administration saw no good reason for allowing federal money to be spent promoting liberal (read: Democratic) programs. As if participatory politics is dangerous to America.

Well, the final blow came with the Lewis F. Powell memo (Google: Lewis F Powell memo; the hyperlink is too long to fit here). Read it, and you will see how we got today's closest advisor to the Republican president leaking the identity of a CIA agent, the majority leader of the Republican senate liable to indictment on stock fraud, and the Republican House whip's closest associates indicted for political malfeasance. But at least we don't have to talk to poor people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about the gang bangers, thugs, crooks, and drunks?
Posted by: La Femme Nikita on Sep 26, 2005 5:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Earl,
There is a whole segment of the population that is not voting. Some are educated. Others are not.
What about them?
Their anger keeps them out of the poll booths.
Their bitterness simmers and stews and makes everyone around them miserable. What about these folks? The folks in the Tenderloin. The folks in the manual labor jobs. The folks in the prisons.
Wait a minute, can people in prison vote?
The folks on the street corners.
What about them?

I know all about the Buppies. I am sick of them. I disassociate myself from them.

What about the hip-hop artists, the djs, the dancers?

I am telling you there is a whole segment of the population you are not addressing here.

Now Middle Passage Press is a creative thing, so I know you feel me.

Wassup?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Five Percent Nation
Posted by: La Femme Nikita on Sep 26, 2005 5:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok went backed and checked a comment to a post I made in Wiretap.
What about these folks:Black Apologetics: Five Percent

This is just one example of a culture I ran with while coming up.
Are you aware of these folks?
There are many other black subcultures I can bring to your attention: Rastas, The Nation of Islam, Yoruba, etc.

What about all those folks Earl? How Come you never write about them? I know you can.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]