Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The abysmal cases of slave labor in the U.S. are both shocking and terribly mundane.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

A Welcome Return to Enforcing Labor Laws

By Robert Scheer, AlterNet. Posted August 2, 2005.


The abysmal cases of slave labor in the U.S. are both shocking and terribly mundane.
Advertisement

Ten years ago this week, I was awakened by a phone tip that California labor department inspectors were about to free scores of Thai slave workers from a garment factory in El Monte.

"Did you say slaves?" I asked my informant in disbelief, as I hurriedly dressed to go to the site. The Smithsonian Institution in 1998 made this case a part of its exhibit on U.S. sweatshops, calling it a low point in the sad history of U.S. exploitation of undocumented laborers.

Some of the workers had been held prisoner for years in a housing complex crudely remade into a prison sweatshop. The more than 70 slaves were paid less than $2 per hour and never allowed to leave the compound, which was guarded around the clock and encircled by razor wire. They could only shop at a "company store" that sold them basic goods at grossly inflated prices. Montgomery Ward and Federated were among the chains that sold merchandise suspected of originating in the sweatshop.

But for all the horror of the El Monte bust, there also was something terribly mundane about it. After all, the look of the sweatshop, in which cowed workers produced brand-name clothing under abysmal conditions for less than the minimum wage, was not all that much of a departure from the appalling conditions I had witnessed on dozens of other federal and state agency raids of California garment factories. These sweatshops invariably employed Asian and Latin American immigrants whose status as fugitive workers meant that, de facto, they did not enjoy the standard protections provided by labor, occupational safety and health laws.

Although not slaves like the El Monte workers, these workers were desperate enough to be at the mercy of their employers, laboring for little pay in cramped, unhealthy workplaces. And as in El Monte, these workers usually arrived here in global human smuggling operations charging exorbitant fees that took years to pay off.

Indeed, this week, the two California officials who led the El Monte raid a decade ago, Victoria Bradshaw and Jose Millan, will be marking the occasion by conducting raids throughout the state to enforce labor laws all too often ignored to increase profits. Depressingly, these raids are almost certain to unearth abysmal cases of degrading work sites, owed back wages, child labor and sub-minimum wages.

A decade ago, before the El Monte raid, the state had launched a groundbreaking effort to hold employers accountable for working conditions in industries reliant on undocumented labor.

At the time, Bradshaw, a former department store executive, held the appointed position of state labor commissioner under Republican Gov. Pete Wilson, and her top aide was a civil service lawyer, Millan, who had been raised in the barrios of East Los Angeles.

Together, they fashioned a win-win program that stressed that workers, no matter their immigration status, were entitled to the protection of laws governing the workplace. Needing the workers as witnesses against lawbreaking bosses, they deliberately excluded Immigration and Naturalization Service agents from their raids, encouraging the workers to file complaints and serve as witnesses in hearings.

This wildly successful approach, dubbed the Targeted Industries Partnership Program, sent a shockwave throughout California's garment and agricultural industries. One positive result was to help level the playing field for those employers who obeyed the law but saw their profit margins slashed by those competitors that did not.

Despite the obvious benefits of this approach, it was not welcomed by other officials dealing with immigration at the federal level; the Department of Labor under President Clinton offered tepid support, at best. Worst of all, when Democrat Gray Davis replaced Wilson as governor, he basically whacked the program in a misguided attempt to please the business community. Workplace inspections fell to less than 100 a year for the entire state.

Luckily, in one of his few sensible acts since being elected, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has resuscitated efforts to enforce California labor laws by bringing back Bradshaw and Millan -- as secretary and deputy secretary, respectively, of the state Labor and Workforce Development Agency.

This week, they will conduct about 100 workplace raids throughout the state, again treating oppressed employees, whether documented or not, as the victims of a crime rather than as perpetrators.

That mainstream Democrats and top labor union officials have been at best indifferent and often hostile to this sensible approach, while at least some Republicans have been supportive, indicates that this is hardly a partisan issue.

And why should it be? It makes sense for everybody involved, except those who break the law and exploit the vulnerable.

Digg!

Robert Scheer is the co-author of The Five Biggest Lies Bush Told Us About Iraq.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Surprising but not too surprising
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 2, 2005 3:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's amazing how employees who get all the luxury show their ingratitude whereas the real hardworkers are forced into hell. In my state (VA), I've encountered endless number of small businesses where the conflict between the employee and employer surprised me. A lot of employers who I would tell these kinds of stories about would sympathize but their pathetic employees would show ingratitude thinking they were the king of the world. Of course, there's always some case or other of arresting disgruntled employees who attempted to or succeeded in killing the employer showing up in the local news. Put these same people in places Scheer described and they would have learned the real lessons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scheer has earned my trust
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 2, 2005 8:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So I accept his generalizations that a state program to protect workers on the job was starting to show success under a conservative Republican governor, was weakened under a Democrat, and now is being strengthened again under a Republican.

That is a classic "man bites dog" story. Had I heard it from any other source, I would not have believed it.

I understand just a little bit better why Gray Davis was removed from office. I am stunned that money, alone, can influence an elected official to repudiate his political party's heritage so completely. It may not technically be 'corrupt' to do what Davis did. And since he paid the supreme price for an elected official -- removal -- I am hopeful that democracy possesses quiet corrective undercurrents seldom seen. I now regret my support for Davis during the recall. So, while feeling just a bit more ignorant than before, I also feel just a little bit wiser.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Higher Standards=Double Standards
Posted by: berrygoldwater2004 on Aug 3, 2005 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The same corporations that benefit from sweat shops in the states benefit from sweat shops in other countries. Why is it justifiable that other peoples outside our borders can be exploited and not people in the U.S.? It's not, in my opinion, as some people claim that we get super cheap goods. The cost of a pair of Nike shoes ($120.00+) is not nearly equal to the $.50 it takes to manufacture and ship these shoes. The same can be said for most products, even the mounds of "made in China" junk at Wal-Mart. The real reason, I believe, is that Americans don't truly care about other people. What we do care about is our image and self preservation. It looks bad having borderline slave labor in your county or city. You start coming off as an uber bigot. How can we claim to champion equality if a bunch of people down the street are making Hilfiger at gunpoint? We can't, so we make a good show and bust a few factories. Really, it's the "few bad apples" approach to crime and punishment. And just like the "few bad apples" approach it doesn't get to the root of the problem. That root? Corporate dominanace and greed. But for most Americans that's okay. Racism, for example, only counts if it injures you. If you're wearing clothes that were made by the exploitation of another race or ethnic group what do you care? That's their problem, not yours. The destruction of their lives and families isn't personal it's just business right? Or what about sexism? Most sweat shops employ women. Does that really bother anyone here as they wear their ow so cool baby doll gear? No. Most of the products Americans buy these days are soaked in the blood, sweat, and misery of others. Busting a few sweat shops and writing an article now and again is simply a band-aid over the truth. A way to sooth the guilt and subconcious awareness that we are the biggest hypocrites on the face of the earth. All of us, white, black, latino, asian, male, female, gay, conservative, liberal, whatever.

Let's face it. America is a plutocracy. Americans worship wealth over all else. Our claims of morality, justice, equality, anti-discriminaton etc... are just a smoke screen for our greed and exploitation of others.

Final tangent. There is still wide spread open market slavery in North Africa. Thousands bought and sold every day. Care to see if Americans give a flip? I'll bet they don't.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Higher Standards=Double Standards Posted by: kermit_the_bear
» RE: Higher Standards=Double Standards Posted by: berrygoldwater2004
Wal-Mart and slave-labor
Posted by: magistre on Aug 3, 2005 7:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Illinois

A good friend of my 17 year old son works at Wal-Mart and tells me that "everyone" is "expected" to come in or stay an hour to an hour-and-a-half ON THEIR OWN TIME to work. This is not the first time I've heard this but it is the first time I've heard it in person. Wal-Mart seems to have no problem doing what is obviously: (1) theft of service (2) forced servitude (3) violation of minimum wage and overtime laws. What further bothers me is that the state of Illinois evidentally has a hard time becoming motivated to do something about this practice!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wal-Mart and slave-labor Posted by: timg98376
Not surprising it's happening in California
Posted by: iamsenstiveyellow on Aug 5, 2005 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it is happening it's not too surprising it's happening in California, one of the most liberal states.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» liberal Posted by: magistre
» RE: Not surprising it's happening in America Posted by: berrygoldwater2004
» I nominate you for... Posted by: Sojourner
Top GOPer in IDAHO joins battle over Wal-Mart & health care
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 5, 2005 3:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Speaker of Idaho House considers legislation to require insurance

Hey, maybe there are a few good Republicans who are willing to show some respect for the working class for once. Idaho may not be California but at least even in Idaho, most residents are truly sick and tired of low wages and overworking people to death without any compensation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]