Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

In Praise of Kevin Benderman

By Norman Solomon, AlterNet. Posted July 29, 2005.


Conscience is not part of the military's chain of command.
Normon Solomon

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Norman Solomon

Obama's Triumph Over Media Frivolity
Obama's Tuesday win represents a victory over a press corps fixated on fluff over substance.
May 7, 2008

Let's Party Like It’s 1932
Obama has the potential to become as great a president as FDR, while activists have the potential to prompt change comparable to the New Deal.
Apr 21, 2008

NPR: National Pentagon Radio?
When even public radio parrots the military's official line on the war in Iraq, what hope is there for unbiased, quality reporting?
Mar 27, 2008

More stories by Norman Solomon

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

"Before being sentenced to 15 months for refusing to return to Iraq with his Army unit, Sgt. Kevin Benderman told a military judge that he acted with his conscience, not out of a disregard for duty," the Associated Press reports. Benderman, a 40-year-old Army mechanic, "refused to go on a second combat tour in January, saying the destruction and misery he witnessed during the 2003 Iraq invasion had turned him against war."

Three weeks ago, his wife Monica Benderman wrote: "He returned knowing that war is wrong, the most dehumanizing creation of humanity that exists. He saw war destroy civilians, innocent men, women and children. He saw war destroy homes, relationships and a country. He saw this not only in the country that was invaded, but he saw this happening to the invading country as well -- and he knew that the only way to save those soldiers was for people to no longer participate in war. Sgt. Kevin Benderman is a Conscientious Objector to war, and the Army is mad."

On Thursday, at his court-martial, Kevin Benderman spoke. "Though some might take my actions as being against soldiers, I want everyone to be home and safe and raising their families," he said. "I don't want anyone to be hurt in a combat zone."

But the Pentagon is imposing its power to enforce the unconscionable. And words that were written by Monica Benderman in early July are now even more true: "The Army has removed itself so completely from its moral responsibility, that its representatives are willing to openly demand, in a court of law, that they be allowed to regain 'positive control over this soldier' by finding him guilty of crimes he did not commit, and put him in jail -- a prisoner of conscience, for daring to obey a moral law."

And, she added: "It is 'hard work' to face the truth, and it is scary when people who are not afraid to face it begin to speak out. Someone once said that my husband's case is a question of morality over legality. I pray that this country has not gone so far over the edge that the two are so distinctly different that we can tell them apart."

Monica Benderman is correct. Facing truths about the priorities of our country's government can be very difficult. During the Vietnam War -- also based on lies, also methodically murderous -- an extraordinary U.S. senator made the same basic point. "We're going to become guilty, in my judgment, of being the greatest threat to the peace of the world," Wayne Morse said at a hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. "It's an ugly reality, and we Americans don't like to face up to it."

Moments before the Senate hearing adjourned, on February 27, 1968, Morse said that he did not "intend to put the blood of this war on my hands." In the summer of 2005, while the horrors of the Iraq war continue, not a single United States senator is willing to speak with such moral clarity.

As an astute cliché says, truth is the first casualty of war. But another early casualty is conscience, routinely smothered in the national media echo chamber.

On the TV networks, the voices are usually smooth, and people often seem to be speaking loudly. In contrast, the human conscience is close to a whisper. Easily unheard.

Though rarely explored in news media, the capacity for conscience makes us human. Out of all the differences between people and other animals, Darwin wrote, "the moral sense of conscience is by far the most important."

And that's why Kevin Benderman, now in prison, is providing greater moral leadership than any member of the United States Senate.

Digg!

Norman Solomon’s latest book, “War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death,” was just published.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
He is a hero to me.
Posted by: WhatNow? on Jul 29, 2005 7:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He went to fulfil his obligation and as time went by he did what I would think any rational person would do. He questioned the morality and motives of his mission.

If we were under a direct and dire threat I'd bet my left nut, he would be there and I might be with him. I would have found it a honor to have served with Mr. Benderman.

http://www.bendermandefense.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Benderman's" are the only thing that will save us
Posted by: crz53 on Jul 29, 2005 8:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it's pretty clear that the current administration has shown little, if any, concern for public opinion here at home. Because of this, I think any successful anti-war movement is going to have to be led, at least in part, from within the military. Until more brave soldiers begin to act according to their conscience, rather than simply "following orders", Washington's warmongers will continue to do as they please. My hat's off to Mr.Benderman and every other soldier who's willing to take a stand against a government and military run amok. They're the real heroes we should be cheering.
- Mike Lorenz

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Duty to one's country and duty to one's conscience...
Posted by: Sojourner on Jul 29, 2005 9:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...pose a most familiar and clearly 'religious' conflict. What sacrifice to make and when links us to our most ancient ancestors who struggled with their own version of the conflict. Armed conflict and the death penalty are the last unresolved blood sacrifices. (I am not an animal rights advocate, so I cannot speak for them.)

As Plato tells the story, when Socrates thought it better to accept the hemlock as the rule of law in the city he loved than to escape, it was because he held Athens higher than his own life. He had as a young man distinguished himself in battle. To die well was to live well.

Our law allows for conscientious objector status, and for all its quirks (timing is everything), it represents evidence of the inescapable religious bulwark of our American way of life.

The calls of public religion in duty to one's country and of private religion in duty to one's conscience can be irreconcilable. We can do no more than pray that everyone of us might find some way to live with that burden. A sacrifice of one kind or another cannot be avoided.

May God have mercy on us as we try to do our best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Actually
Posted by: Actually... on Jul 30, 2005 1:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He was in the Army HOW LONG? And he thought he could just disobey orders while he was "working on his application?"

Military law defines a deserter as a soldier who flees the military with no intent to return OR to "avoid hazardous duty or to shirk important service." So, he's lucky that he didn't get convicted of desertion because that's exactly what he did, according to military law.

If he were so "morally and ethically against the war" since he was there in 2003, why did he wait FIFTEEN months after his return (and TEN days before he was to be deployed) to file his little objection? Simple, that was booshwah! He just didn't want to deploy with his unit. He shirked his duty, and now, he will pay the price.

Hero? Hardly!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Actually Posted by: garyweimberg
» May justice be done Posted by: Sojourner