Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The revelation of Deep Throat is a reminder of the moribund state of investigative journalism; ironically, it's the career path of Watergate hero Bob Woodward that provides the parallel.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Watergate's Lost Legacy

By David Sirota, The American Prospect. Posted June 2, 2005.


The revelation of Deep Throat is a reminder of the moribund state of investigative journalism; ironically, it's the career path of Watergate hero Bob Woodward that provides the parallel.
Advertisement

This article is reprinted from The American Prospect.

Upon the news this week that Watergate source "Deep Throat" had come forward, CNN's Judy Woodruff waxed nostalgic about the golden era of muckraking journalism. "It is so hard, I think, for young people we know who work here at CNN and other news organizations to even imagine what Watergate was like," she said. "To have a White House come undone, an administration come undone, because of some news reporting." Coming from a lead reporter at one of America's largest cable networks, it was truly a sad commentary.

First and foremost, it was sad because she was right -- American journalism today has lost its confrontational, hold-their-feet-to-the-fire attitude that gave it a reputation as our government's fourth check and balance. Young reporters can't imagine what that kind of reporting really is because they've never experienced it.

Certainly there was Whitewater and the Monica Lewinsky scandal, but those were cheap attempts by journalists to recreate Watergate without actually doing the real investigative work. They were pathetic journalists' attempt to grab the sizzle of scandal without doing the hard work that uncovers serious crimes like Watergate. Though there are certainly some very fine investigative reporters left, they have become a rare breed, usually replaced by blow-dried blowhards who spend more time sucking up to power than challenging it.

It was also sad because Woodruff, one of CNN's senior reporters, had the nerve to complain about the decline of journalism, even though she and her television news colleagues have had a big hand in that decline. Though Beltway insiders lament the termination of Inside Politics, that show -- like most others -- has cheapened journalism and made politics into a melodramatic soap opera. For every occasional story that delves into real issues like health care, jobs, and stagnating wages, we get hundreds of stories that are nothing more than "he said, she said" fights between dueling suits, the reporter never once taking the time to delve into the issues that are actually being discussed.

Interestingly, one of the much-lauded reporters who broke Watergate, Bob Woodward, actually epitomizes these problems. More than any other, his career charts the decline of the national press corps to the laughingstock it is today. Here was a tough-nosed reporter who made his name doing the gritty, unglamorous work that eventually exposed one of the most egregious abuses of power in American history. But instead of using the credibility he had earned from Watergate to build a career exposing corruption, he quickly dove into the Beltway culture, where that kind of thing is looked down upon. He used his fame to suck up to those in power, and then write books like Bush at War that simply told power's story, ultimately becoming just another bloviating cardboard cutout on the pundit circuit.


Digg!

David Sirota was the top spokesman for Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee. He is currently writing a book on the middle class economic squeeze for Crown Publishers. You can contact him at Davidsirota.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
maybe... just maybe
Posted by: rubymydear on Jun 2, 2005 2:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If any good is to come out of the emergence of deep throat, it's that all this waxing nostalgic about when reporters were reporters may slap some moxie into the current generation. The elephant sitting in the corner is the obvious parralels between watergate and the current regime's skullduggery. this juxtoposition may provide some hungry cub reporter the inspiration to do some digging. rest assured, it won't be judy woodruff or bob woodward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On the contrary
Posted by: dlf on Jun 3, 2005 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First I would like to say that Bob Woodward may be a part of the new cozziness between the fourth estate and the other 3, but his work is not without merit. His book "Plan of Attack pretty" much tells us what the books by Richard Clark, The 9/11 Report, and Paul O'Neill told us. The difference is he had access to the key players, who pretty much let it all hang out. The media chose not to dissect that book and make it a must read. Secondly, his book "The Bretheren" is the most compelling read for anyone interested in our court system. This opinion, by Justice Black alone is worth reading the book. It is his opinion for the press for printing the Pentagon Papers:

...paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell. In my view, far from condemnation for their courageous reporting, the New York Times, the Washington Post, and other newspapers should be commended for serving the purpose that the Founding Fathers saw so clearly. In revealing the workings of goverment that led to the Vietnam War, the newspapers nobly did precisely that which the Founding Fathers hoped and trusted they would do.

My point is, Woodward has continued to write about and reveal the abuse of power. It is the rest of the media, that has given short shrift to the importance of these works that we should be condemning.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]