Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Scottie Goes Ballistic on Newsweek

By Jim Hightower, AlterNet. Posted May 25, 2005.


Surely Scott McClellan has now learned that people who live in a glass White House shouldn't throw rocks.
Jim Hightower

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Jim Hightower

Checks for $600 Won't Fix Our Economy
America can't shop its way to greatness, and this one-time, government-funded shopping spree won't lead us to a sound economy.
Mar 28, 2008

Swim Against the Current: Ordinary Americans Can Make Change Happen
The fight for our country's future is still in our hands. Grass-roots movements are breaking free from corporate control.
Mar 7, 2008

Immigrants Come Here Because Globalization Took Their Jobs Back There
Seal-the-border hysteria is everywhere. Instead of blaming immigrants for America's problems, let's look at executives on both sides of the border.
Feb 7, 2008

More stories by Jim Hightower

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 

McClellan, George W's mouthpiece to the media, piled up a mountain of ironies when he lashed out at Newsweek recently for its piece about the desecration of the Quran by US guards at Guantanamo Bay prison. Scottie was outraged, he said, because Newsweek editors initially refused to retract the story after finding a factual flaw in it. Filled with righteous indignation, McClellan lectured reporters about standards of truth, about relying on only one source, and about credibility.

Hoo-boy...where to start? How about with the entire pack of lies that the Bushites used to plunge American troops into the war and ongoing occupation of Iraq? Even though the White House has now been forced to admit that it couldn't find any Weapons of Mass Destruction or a link between Al Qaeda and Saddam--we still have received no retraction of their story or apology for damaging US credibility all around the world.

Also, you might recall that the Bushites' untrue story about a "mobile biological weapons lab" in Iraq was not only based on a single source, but the source was a guy that US intelligence never interviewed! And when Scott wails in outrage about Newsweek relying on only one source, he didn't add that the source is a top-ranking official in Bush's own Pentagon, or that Pentagon officials were shown the story before publication and raised no objection to its truthfulness.

Then there's the general tone of White House glee over getting to beat up on Newsweek, part of the despised "liberal media." But wait--the author of Newsweek's piece is a hero to the right wing, the guy who broke the Monica Lewinsky story that led to Bill Clinton's impeachment trial!

Oh, one more irony: While Scottie is piously browbeating Newsweek for a glitch in it's story, note that he does not and cannot say that the desecration charge itself is untrue.

Digg!

Jim Hightower is the best-selling author of "Let's Stop Beating Around the Bush," from Viking Press. For more information, visit jimhightower.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Pentagon officials were shown the story before publication and raised no objection to its truthfulne
Posted by: dennyduke@earthlink.net on May 26, 2005 4:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sure sounds like a setup to me. Maybe by the same crowd that setup Dan Rather?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Losing the Battle
Posted by: dlf on May 26, 2005 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this administration has got to hold the line on the amount of information coming out of Iraq for a number of reasons. In order to maintain the support of the American people for our troops, little can be known about how or if we are violating Iraqi citizens or combantants. When you have a military that relies on the descendants of subjugated peoples it hardly works in your favor to show the troops as subjugators. To have Muslim and Christian soldiers fighting a "common" enemy requires our military be viewed as pristine in their actions. The backlash has already begun as minority enlistment is rapidly shrinking. The more we see our troops engaging in the "ugly American" activities we know so well the less likely it is there will be a surge in the number of minority enlistments. It is encumbent upon this administration to keep a lid on stories coming out of Iraq, that will be viewed in a negative way, by those with few options for employment here at home. It is particularly important that blacks and poor people do not view their service as aiding in oppressing a population we are supposedly setting free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Losing the Battle Posted by: Thinks4Herself59
» RE: Losing the Battle Posted by: kermit_the_bear