Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Keeping an Iron Grip

By Jim Hightower, AlterNet. Posted May 21, 2005.


Why put this iron clamp on a supposed Iraqi democracy? Because the Bushites don't trust the new leaders or the idea of real democracy.
Jim Hightower

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Jim Hightower

Checks for $600 Won't Fix Our Economy
America can't shop its way to greatness, and this one-time, government-funded shopping spree won't lead us to a sound economy.
Mar 28, 2008

Swim Against the Current: Ordinary Americans Can Make Change Happen
The fight for our country's future is still in our hands. Grass-roots movements are breaking free from corporate control.
Mar 7, 2008

Immigrants Come Here Because Globalization Took Their Jobs Back There
Seal-the-border hysteria is everywhere. Instead of blaming immigrants for America's problems, let's look at executives on both sides of the border.
Feb 7, 2008

More stories by Jim Hightower

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 

KEEPING AN IRON GRIP ON IRAQ'S DEMOCRACY

by Jim Hightower

George "The Liberator" Bush brought democracy to Iraq, right? He certainly takes every opportunity to tell us so, pointing to that country's newly-elected government that, he says, now is the sovereign authority in charge of Iraq's destiny.

But... how sovereign are they, really? For example, can you imagine considering our own USofA to be a sovereign democracy if--get this--a foreign power had total control of our CIA? If a nation does not control its own secret intelligence agency, it is not sovereign. So, guess who controls the Iraqi Intelligence Service? The CIA!

The director of this secret police force, Mohammed Abudullah Shahwani, was not chosen by the new government, but was handpicked by the Bushites. He reports not to the new Iraqi officials, but to the CIA, which provides all of IIS's financing. In fact, immediately after January's elections, U.S. forces moved Iraq's national intelligence archives into U.S. headquarters in Baghdad, putting them off-limits to the very elected officials that George W so loudly touts as that country's sovereign leaders.

As one leading lawmaker in the new government bluntly puts it, the Iraqi Intelligence Service "is not working for the Iraqi government; it's working for the CIA. I prefer to call it the American Intelligence Service of Iraq."

Why put this iron clamp on a supposed democracy? Because the Bushites don't trust the new leaders or the idea of real democracy. They say that Iraq's elected government is too friendly with neighboring Iran, so the leaders cannot be allowed the freedom of being... well, sovereign, democratic leaders. Also, the CIA has spent a lot of time spying on the politicians whom the Iraqis have now voted into office--and the Bushites want to keep this information secret from the people and their chosen leaders.

A government that's under the thumb of the CIA is neither sovereign nor a democracy, no matter how George tries to spin it.

Digg!

Jim Hightower is the best-selling author of "Let's Stop Beating Around the Bush," from Viking Press. For more information, visit jimhightower.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It was never about Democracy
Posted by: RoguebotV on May 23, 2005 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Hightower,
The gist of the plan was never to institute a viable independent govenment within Iraq.
The entire operation centered on putting people like US in place of those who were not like us.
Iraq is situated for various protocols and none of them are truly democratic. Here's the short list.....
A second quality base of operations in the theater. (#1 Israel)
Freedom to move in U.S. oil interest as a hedge against the Saudi's.
The final purging of Islam from the area with American-esque secularism. ( Funny, because we are racing away to the opposite of secularism ourselves)
Finally, how much activity to the business of America has this represented?
We lost the ability to control our politicians in any significant manner for they spend billions to take advantage of the generally lowered I.Q. of Americans.
Please spend some more of your time exploring how we can not produce quality minds anymore and you will solve several issues.
The increased Godiless of middle America is an I.Q. problem.
The inability to discern political malfeasence is also an I.Q. problem.
That is the answer........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well at least gays won't be able to marry
Posted by: ghoster on May 23, 2005 1:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yep, with the US designed government there those gays won't be able to marry there, and no woman will get an abortion, though they are still up in the air about gun rights, the neo cons have another toy to play with the Iraq government, and just think now they want one in Tehran and Damascus. Let them have their way and no US citzen will be safe outside the US. Just what they want. and the whole world hates them so how do they keep on going? QUestions I have answers I want. Freedom nice concept but much to messy to implement. Better a dictatorship and hell we have a man with experience right there and for three hundred billion I am sure he can be convinced to come out of retirement. It would be cheaper in the long run.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Intelligence service is just the start
Posted by: stevewilkesuk on May 24, 2005 5:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many sovereign states:
1. Had their electoral law designed by someone from another country?
2. Have their entire economy open to 100% foreign ownership?
3. Have billions of dollars missing from their accounts, with the prospect of asking for it back (let alone getting it back) non-existent?
4. Contain hundreds of thousands of foreign troops with no timetable for their departure?
5. Have another country's military bases being built there without asking for them?

All along the US was going to prefer to have Saddam replaced by "another iron-fisted military man" (in the words of a former British Ambassador), but seeing as that hasn't been possible (as Iraqi non-violent resitance has forced the coalition to accept elections they didn't want) the next simplest way to keep the country moving in the right direction is not to give them any real control over their own affairs. It was always going to be like this and anyone surprised by it really hasn't been paying attention.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]