What we've now learned from the 9/11 Commission and recent books by White House insiders is that George launched a war for the worst possible reason: Because he could.
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Presidential Morality
Also in Top Stories
Financial Meltdown 101
Arun Gupta, Indypendent
GOP Attacks on ACORN Are Based on the Fear of 1.3 Million New Voters
AlterNet
Not My Financial Crisis -- I've Got Literally Nothing to Lose
Alexander Zaitchik, AlterNet
Stop Being a Narcissist -- It's Time to Quit Facebook
Carmen Joy King, Adbusters
Our Next President Will Transform the Supreme Court
Ellen Goodman, Washington Post Writers Group
Religulous: Atheists Will Love Bill Maher's New Flick
DJK, Brave New Films
How World Leaders Can Reverse the Economic Meltdown
Dean Baker, Mark Weisbrot, Campaign for America's Future
Obama vs. McCain: How the Underinsured Would Fare Under the Candidates' Health Plans
Trudy Lieberman, Columbia Journalism Review
"I did something for the worst possible reason," admitted the President. "Just because I could."
That was Bill Clinton speaking, doing his recent mea culpa about his oval office tryst with Monica Lewinski. To his belated credit, Clinton admits shame about this abuse of power: "I think that's just about the most morally indefensible reason anybody could have for doing anything."
Now let us fast forward to George W. To his credit, W would not think of having sex with a White House intern. But this does not make him an innocent in the abuse of presidential power. What we've now learned from the 9/11 Commission and recent books by White House insiders is that George launched a war for the worst possible reason: Because he could.
It's clear that there was no geo-political necessity for his attack on Iraq, no threat to our national security, no weapons of mass destruction or ties to al Qaeda, no reason to send American men and women to die – except for the worst reason: Because he could. He and his gang of neo-con chickenhawks had an ideological score to settle with Saddam Hussein, and they were out to do it regardless of rationality, right or consequences.
Here's a Bush quote from a talk he gave to the National Security Council: " I do not need to explain why I say things. That's the interesting thing about being the president. Maybe somebody needs to explain to me why they say something, but I don't feel like I owe anybody an explanation."
He has the power. Might makes right. He can cause death, gruesome injuries, vast destruction, horror, and increased danger to America – just because he can...which is the most morally indefensible reason anybody could have for doing anything.
Clinton abused his presidential power to work out his sexual fantasies with an intern. That's pathetic. Bush, however, has abused his power to work out his Saddam fantasies with other people's lives. That's beyond contempt.
Jim Hightower is the best-selling author of "Let's Stop Beating Around the Bush," from Viking Press. For more information, visit jimhightower.com.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »
| More Columns: | ||
|
Gay Americans Have a Friend in Obama Sex and Relationships: With the exception of marriage, the Democrat supports all major gay rights. By Deb Price, AlterNet. October 13, 2008. |
Why the Bailout Won't Help Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace: The bailout's supporters said Congress had to do something to unfreeze the credit markets. It didn't work. By Mark Weisbrot, AlterNet. October 10, 2008. |
Henry Paulson: Good Businessman or Very Bad Communist? Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace: Is Paulson looking to socialize risk and privatize gain? The answer could be the difference between economic disaster and recovery. By David Sirota, AlterNet. October 10, 2008. |