Civil Liberties  
comments_image Comments

John Cusack: Will Eric Holder Guarantee NSA Reporters' First Amendment Rights?

The U.S. Attorney promises not to prosecute journalists, but his war on whistleblowers undercuts that.
 
 
Share

Photo Credit: s_bukley/Shutterstocl.com

 
 
 
 

 

Another week and  another wave of stories on the NSA and the unconstitutional  out-of-control surveillance state hit the digital newsstands, showing once again why the tide is turning. Some revelations are  so surreal, it's hard not to assume  they're satireNSAchief Keith Alexander seems to be modeling his ambitions and visions for domestic and international spying after  General Curtis LeMay's viewson nuclear war.

Meanwhile, despite the  massive smear campaign against Edward Snowdenopinion polls stand clearly with the truth-tellers. People know they have a right to know what the government is doing in their names. State secrecy is on the run, while American privacy, long rumored dead, is alive and kicking and wants the fight out in the open – in the sunlight and in the public square.

Last month, though, Glenn Greenwald's partner,  David Miranda, was detained at Heathrow airport for almost nine hours, while on a journalistic mission paid for by the Guardian. His electronics were seized, and he was forced to hand over his social media passwords under the threat of imprisonment. He was detained under the UK Terrorism Act – for an act of journalism. This was an assault on  press freedom that should make every reporter shudder no matter their opinion on the NSA.

The message was sent. It gave a whole new meaning to  "Miranda rights". A Miranda warning, in effect.

Perhaps worse, we learned a few days later that the  United States had been given a "heads up" by their British counterparts that they were planning on detaining Miranda. The US government did not lift a finger to stop this blatant attack on journalism and press freedom – even as it has been moving heaven and earth to bring Edward Snowden back to the US. That should be a scandal in its own right.

Now, the US owes its citizens and the international community another "heads up": on whether the  United States will do the same to journalists working on NSA stories who are entering the United States. Put simply, will Attorney General  Eric Holder, the US State Department, and the FBI promise safe passage to journalists, their spouses and loved ones, and vow not to interfere with their reporting on these NSA stories?

So far, the answer has been far from clear.

Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras, the two American journalists at the center of these stories, have been doing their reporting from Brazil and Germany respectively. The US government has not, so far, stated publicly whether they can enter the country without receiving the same outrageous treatment that Miranda received. Or worse.

Can they practice journalism in the United States, without their hard drives being confiscated, without an unconstitutional search-and-seizure taking place at the border? Are they free to enter the United States without being served a subpoena, or even jailed? Unlike the UK, the United States is supposed to be bound by the first amendment of the constitution, which exists to bar such treatment of journalists.

Poitras, a filmmaker and journalist universally respected in her field, has already been a victim of the ever-expanding  surveillance state: since  her widely praised film My Country, My Country debuted in 2006,  she has been detained while crossing the US border over 40 times. She is editing her upcoming film on whistleblowers in Berlin, because of fears her footage will be seized in the United States

She's not alone.  Jacob Appelbaum, a security researcher, a  Tordeveloper and journalist in his own right, has been harassed while going over the border for years, simply by virtue of his association with WikiLeaks, whose "crime", apparently, is publishing government secrets in the public interest – something we know established newspapers do all the time.

 
See more stories tagged with: