Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Human Cost of War: The Images the Corporate Media Doesn't Want You to See

Posted by Liliana Segura, AlterNet at 2:30 PM on October 5, 2009.


Robert Greenwald's Rethink Afghanistan brings you jarring images of civilian suffering. Not surprisingly, the NY Times isn't on board.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get World in your
mailbox!

 

This past weekend, AlterNet had the privilege of hosting a screening of Robert Greenwald's important new documentary, Rethink Afghanistan, in New York City. It was just one of several screenings to kick off an impressive nationwide campaign by Brave New Films to spread a crucial message about the war in Afghanistan: This is not the "good war" as we have been told by so many for so long. This is a losing battle, and it is costing us dearly: in billions of dollars, in thousands of lives, and in the eyes of the rest of the world.

And of course, it is costing the people of Afghanistan more than anyone. Perhaps one of the most jolting things about watching the film is seeing image after terrible image of civilian suffering: desperate families mired in refugee camps, pain-stricken schoolgirls attacked with acid by the resurgent Taliban, countless injured men, women and children who are the "collateral damage" from errant U.S. bomb strikes. It is a punch-to-the-gut reminder of just how sanitized this war -- which Obama has always called the "right front" of the so-called war on terror -- has been.

Of course, if you're the New York Times, these very images, which have the power to awaken people to the human cost of war, are actually proof of a slanted agenda on the part of the filmmaker. "At an almost breathless pace that leaves little room for reflection, Mr. Greenwald presents a flurry of sights, voices and figures, many of them compelling but all reflecting his point of view," writes NYT film reviewer Andy Webster in a dismissive 250-word review today.

"Mr. Greenwald's documentary has no time to approach an opposing view with sympathy or understanding for its concerns," he concludes.

Webster misunderstands -- or else purposely distorts -- Greenwald's purpose in making his film. This is not a Times-style war report that feigns "objectivity" by peddling administration spin. This is a critical educational and organizing tool for Americans and their Congressional representatives, who must confront hard questions -- and horrible images -- about this deadly war that has no end in sight. This is what is being done in our names, with our tax dollars. It is time people saw what it looks like.

For Jeremy Scahill's take on Rethink Afghanistan -- and the New York Times review -- go here.

Digg!

Tagged as: new york times, afghanistan, brave new films, robert greenwald, rethink afghanistan

Liliana Segura is a staff writer and editor of AlterNet's Rights and Liberties and World Special Coverage.


Word "Canadian" So "Reviled in Some Places" that Visiting Canucks Say They're Americans
An odd turn.
Post by Joshua Holland. November 23, 2009.
Tiny Michigan Town Tells Liz Cheney to Take her Fearmongering Elsewhere
Someplace where they're all wusses.
Post by BarbinMD. November 21, 2009.
Krauthammer Commits Terrorist Act on the Opinion Pages of the Washington Post
Terrorists terrorize -- it's what they do.
Post by Joshua Holland. November 20, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Americans are pure Evil
Posted by: PakiBoy on Oct 5, 2009 9:54 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is merely a tiny tip of the iceberg of the horrors of war--your news is censored!!!
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Oct 6, 2009 2:45 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Okay, sheeple, you've just seen about 0.00000000001% of the horrors of our illegal, pointless, ongoing invasion of Afghanistan, let alone Iraq!!!

Now you can go back to shopping, watching football on tv, & stuffing your faces with cupcakes & potato chips!!!

Don't worry, Obama is bringing change & will take care of everything!!! Just go back to sleep!!! We will attack Iran next!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US needs a smaller military footprint in Afghanistan
Posted by: Garvagh on Oct 6, 2009 4:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bravo! I recommend "How the west can exit the Afghan quagmire" by Anatol Lieven and Maleeha Lodhi in the Oct. 6th Financial Times.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So sad
Posted by: azbeener on Oct 6, 2009 8:31 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow thats just downright messed up dude!


Russ
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

survivors as losers
Posted by: richholland on Oct 7, 2009 3:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
after 1945 in Germany former soldiers got benefits;
-wounded and disabled were prefered for office jobs-
help with education
if you had been an officer with medals it was an extra for managementpositions.

I get the impression that many honored veteran heroes walking proudley never fought, where the real fighters are standing hungry in the street.
This is not new for USA.
After world war I the police and home guard were shooting peacefull veterans asking the promise pensions.(also some kids and wives were hit)

Knowing the SM genetic material in the bone of USA males I do not wonder about what happens now.

Anyway God will give billions to Those who deserve it and illness is good because if you hell on earth You will be rewarded in Heaven??????????
A real american patriot never is ill...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't worry, FOX will cover the opposing views
Posted by: Lese Majeste on Oct 7, 2009 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Mr. Greenwald's documentary has no time to approach an opposing view with sympathy or understanding for its concerns,"

Why should he? There's plenty of that non-stop on CNN and FOX and the NYT.

The vast majority of the American MSM is in bed with the war criminals and liars who want us to keep killing in Afghanistan and start another "War for Wall Street and Israel' in Iran.

So keep sending your money and your kids off to be slaughtered for Israel and Wall Street and go back to sleep.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"no time to approach an opposing view with sympathy or understanding"
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Oct 7, 2009 8:57 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, he’s no Michael Moore in the public consciousness. And that’s probably a good thing: political discourse in this country could use fewer cults of personality among its commentators.

But it could also use balance, something in short supply here. At an almost breathless pace that leaves little room for reflection, Mr. Greenwald presents a flurry of sights, voices and figures, many of them compelling but all reflecting his point of view. A historical summary is fleeting. What appears, again and again, are terrifying images of children: dead, hideously maimed or, in one instance, almost put up for sale by a frantic civilian in a refugee camp. Military engagements, it seems, are messy and claim innocent lives.

Mr. Greenwald’s documentary has no time to approach an opposing view with sympathy or understanding for its concerns. It may inspire those already behind its cause, but it is unlikely to win over new supporters.


So if I have this right, this reviewer thinks "balance" would have been including the views of the very people who want to keep the war going on as long as possible, kill and maim as many of these children as we can afford, or politically get away with.

You know, I think he has a point.

We should ask the corrupt officials if they want to keep getting money for free. We should also ask the rapists and torturers in uniform to explain why their needs should be considered paramount. I'd really like to see that documentary.

But wait, haven't we already seen an awful lot of the pro-war position in the papers and on TV?

Yes we have. In fact his complaining about this reminds me of a sort of media attitude I hear a lot: any complaints about jews gets you automatically labeled as 'anti-semitic', just as any criticism of war gets you marginalized as un-serious. Is it the same people making this argument? Maybe they are racists.

So let's take this suggestion seriously. Let's ask the "opposing view" what they think of this carnage and destruction. They seem to think it is desirable or necessary, let them explain that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NYT says we are in Afghanistan to steal the vast natural resources
Posted by: MeyravLevine on Oct 7, 2009 11:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of that country.

In today's editorial page, NYT opines that NATO nations aren't doing enough to secure Afghanistan. However, China is willing to invest in copper mining in Afghanistan.

Conclusion - It is a great day when China can join hands with us and rape and pillage Afghans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop the largest military budget in US history
Posted by: greenferret on Oct 7, 2009 12:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yesterday, the U.S. Senate approved the largest military budget bill in the history of our nation: $626 billion.

Next, the bill will be sent to a conference committee and then back to the House and Senate for final passage.

There still remains a short window of opportunity to stop this wasteful military madness.

Tell your members of Congress to vote "NO" on the 2010 defense appropriations bill.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keeping the human cost of war and the horror of the Torture Crimes from you is what they do.
Posted by: JohnHKennedy Denver CO on Oct 7, 2009 3:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of these day we the voters must push hard to cause prosecution for those officials who violate Federal Laws. Our officials no longer fear our laws or the voters. We are something to be used every four years. Fight back by making our Congress call for enforcement of our Federal Anti-Torture Laws.

The 9-11 victims died for what? Torture in their name?

Help Prosecute the Violators of our Federal Torture Law,
NOW, before the Statute Of Limitations expires.
Google Our Url to see Our Work and

SIGN the PETITION
Calling for Prosecution Now!
ANGRYVOTERS.Org

So the 9-11 victims did not die for Torture!
Start a weekly "prosecution" protest at your Congressman's office Now!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what, my lai?
Posted by: tazdelaney on Oct 7, 2009 3:43 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the first act of president george washington as president was to hire a bunch of mercenary thugs to go kill native peoples in the southeast, in gold, with full-pay for a man's scalp, half-pay for a woman's scalp and quater-pay for a child's scalp. from a population in 1500 of some 18-22 million 'indians' in the territories now called america; there were barely 1 million survivors by 1900.

meanwhile, some 8 million africans were killed in the process of bringing some 10 million slaves over from africa to build this country for the empowerment of the good white christians. speaking of that, both many indians in concentration camps called reservations and black slaves were often herded into churches to worship the very christ whose minions comitted these genocides.

2 years ago, obama was cornered by fox news' bill oreiley (no, i don't watch tv news but saw the video clip online), about the obama family minister and friend who had said that america was and is based upon racist genocide. obama replied that "no good american believes those things that he says." well, sorry uncle tome but those facts are documented history and your statement shows that you are a holocaust denier. in fact, the native and slave-trade genocides were much larger than the nazi atrocities but where are the holocaust memorials for these victims on the DC mall. i wouldn't hold your breath waiting for admissions of these, much less amends and compensation.
2.5 million iraqis and afghanis killed by american forces or policies since 1980? and for what? did the iraqi people or afghani people ever do a damn thing to the american people? onward christian soldiers...

generally speaking, since hersh showed the world the photos of 800 mrdered, defenseless civilians, including 100+ children, in my lai, (as hersh said at the time and was declassified in 2004, my lai was one of over 200 such villages razed in 'operation hamlet.' and what had the vietnamese people ever done to the american people to deserve the 2.1 million deaths we inflicted on them in that 10-year long imperial-colonial war?

this time around, the military used only 'embedded' 'journalists' so they could censor and suppress such grisly images. but again, seymour hersh got us the photos of the tortures...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]