Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

U.S. Has Spies On the Ground in Iran: Former National Security Advisor

Posted by Jeremy Scahill, Rebel Reports at 3:55 PM on June 24, 2009.


Asked if the U.S. has 'intelligence operatives on the ground in Iran,' Brent Scowcroft replied, "Of course we do."

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get World in your
mailbox!

 

As violence continues on the streets of Tehran, RebelReports has learned that former U.S. National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft has confirmed that the U.S. government has spies on the ground in Iran. Scowcroft made the assertion in an interview to be broadcast on the Al Jazeera program “Fault Lines.” When asked by journalist Josh Rushing if the U.S. has "intelligence operatives on the ground in Iran," Scowcroft replied, "Of course we do."
While it is hardly surprising that the U.S. has its operatives in Iran, it is unusual to see a figure in a position to know state this on the record. New Yorker journalist Seymour Hersh and Former Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter both have claimed for years that the U.S. has regularly engaged in covert operations inside of Iran aimed at destabilizing the government. In July 2008, Hersh reported, "the scale and the scope of the operations in Iran, which involve the Central Intelligence Agency and the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), have now been significantly expanded."

In the Al Jazeera interview, Scowcroft defended President Obama's position on Iran, which has been roundly criticized by Republicans as weak and ineffective with some characterizing Obama as a “de facto ally of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.”

Scowcroft tells Al Jazeera: "We don't control Iran. We don't control the government obviously. There is little we can do to change the situation domestically in Iran right now and I think an attempt to change it is more likely to be turned against us and against the people who are demonstrating for more freedom and, therefore, I think we need to look at what we can do best, which is to try to influence Iranian behavior in the region, and with nuclear weapons."

Digg!

Tagged as: iran, cia, al jazeera, seymour hersh, barack obama, josh rushing, mahmoud ahmadinejad, scott ritter, brent scowcroft

Jeremy Scahill is the author of Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army.


Blaming Muslims For the Fort Hood Massacre Will Only Create More Victims
Whatever was in the mind of alleged shooter Major Nidal Malik Hasan is no reason to question the loyalty of Muslim Americans.
Post by Wajahat Ali. November 9, 2009.
Report: Hasan Snapped Under Weight of Bullying, Anxiety Over Deployment
That's not stopping the usual suspects from crying "jihad."
Post by Joshua Holland. November 6, 2009.
Who's Been Held Accountable for the Crimes of Bush's "War on Terror"? Four Italians ... Sort of
Certainly not those who ran our shadowy network of secret prisons, nor their superiors who created it.
Post by Joshua Holland. November 5, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
You go from A to C without proving B
Posted by: EncinoM on Jun 24, 2009 4:19 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only a new born baby would believe that we didn't have intelligence operatives in Iran. But that doesn't mean that they have anything to do with the unrest.

Hersh's article dealt with armed insurgent groups not student and middle class protesters. Your attempt to link the protestors with the US intelligence community, only aides does that wish to undermine the protesters and their goals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Spies Are Easily Bought.
Posted by: melpol on Jun 24, 2009 4:30 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would not be surprising if most of the leaders of IRAN and North Korea were on the CIA payroll. Money goes a long way in third world nations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Spies Are Easily Bought. Posted by: Aquinas
» RE: Spies Are Easily Bought. Posted by: Zeugitai
US interests want a war to liberate Iranian oil & gas
Posted by: Higher Reptile on Jun 24, 2009 4:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the purported "only credible pre-election poll" on the 2009 Iranian presidential elections had Ahmadinejad winning by a landslide
this pol was commissioned by Terror Free Tomorrow, with John McCain on it's advisory board (polling was conducted by phone, outside of Iran by an undisclosed call center)

it is unfortunate for McCain that his lobbying efforts in securing Caspian Sea oil contracts have failed miserably, Western oil companies have been shut out of the emerging Russia/China/Iran cartel

add to this the right's consensus that a victory by the relatively moderate Mir Hussein Mousavi could have created a dangerous complacency that would tempt some in the West to ease up on Iran

couple that to the GOP's push for a showdown on Iran via AIPAC's bill in Congress, the Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act

all this plus US govt agitators in Tehran makes me think that western oil companies want Ahmadinejad in power in order to justify another hostile takeover of Iran's hydrocarbon reserves

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In the know..
Posted by: progressive-life on Jun 24, 2009 6:12 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not sure what Ritter knows, it seems to change with who's paying him the most - but lets hope we have operatives on the ground.. If Iranians could overthrow their government and bring some sanity to them then we could avert a nuclear crises in the future!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Guess who...... Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: Guess who...... Posted by: Quannah
» RE: In the know.. Posted by: hilaryuk
fallawayjumper
Posted by: fallawayjumper on Jun 24, 2009 7:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember reading waaay back in '07 that BushCo sought and secured something like $400M for the intelligence services(CIA, NSA, Pentagon..?!)to conduct 'destabilization' operations within Iran which included the insertion of special ops teams to do who knows what...

That there are US intelligence operatives from one or more of our 15 Spy Agencies on the ground (collective annual budgets north of $50B)in Iran seems like a given...

And it's been said that they are extremely practiced at 'turning' disgruntled local politicians...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And those spies are doing what?
Posted by: bonapartist on Jun 25, 2009 2:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would be surprised if US didn't have any spies in Iran having in mind vested oil interests in the Gulf.

So the question is what are those spies doing? Gathering information and fermenting unrest seems as the most logical explantaion.

After all US colonial troops or realted minions are now sitting in Iraq, Turkey, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, all bordering Iran.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's no surprise there are spies on the ground. More interesting is, why admit it now?
Posted by: harryf200 on Jun 25, 2009 3:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US has spies in Iran? Shock horror, not! The US, in fact every country that has the resources, has spies in every country with who they deal and those they don't. The US even spies on the UK, and other NATO allies, as they spy on the US and each other. It has always been thus.

But yes, it is surprising that this fact about Iran has been admitted because the intel community generally never admit to such activity.

So, the most interesting issue now is not "goodness me, they've admitted it" but why have they admitted it now? The only answer to that question that occurs to me at the moment is to destabilise the situation in Iran even further, to make the government react with fear and become even more harsh than they already are, thus stirring up even more anti-government feeling as more and more people feel a sense of grievance when more and more of them are unjustly treated by the increasing government-led harshness! The irony is the US does't need to have spies on the ground to do that - just to say they have them there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Opportunist War Dogs Posted by: Purple Girl
Wow...US spies in Iran...whatta shocker!
Posted by: chariotdrvr14 on Jun 25, 2009 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course I'd rather the US didn't meddle in other countries' affairs... but this is preferable to what the neocons were clamouring for which was all out war with Iran.

What I find insulting to the people of Iran is the perception that the current uprising wouldn't be what it is without our involvement. And isn't that in a sense agreeing with with what Khameini has been saying...that this is the product of outside enemy influence?

Doesn't seem like anyone respects the fact that it's the natural aspirations and frustrations of iranian youth fueling this. They're putting themselves on the line, not us for their own reasons.
Besides, american spooks seem to have a habit of 'turning' fat corrupt self interested men in suits, guys like Achmed Chalabi (their iraqi exile poster boy) for example. But what we're talking about here is a popular discontent and a culture chafing against the claustrophic political restrictions that have been in place for decades already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of course, we have spies in Iran
Posted by: bettyn on Jun 25, 2009 9:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and so does everyone else. This goes on in every country in the world. However, I think Obama is handling this very well by simply condemning the violence and staying out of the politics. The stupid Republicans, as usual, want to go charging into this Iranian matter with no plan, no solution, and not a clue as to what they'll do when they get involved.

Remember "Mission Accomplished"? The people of Iran will sort this out. It's going to take awhile, but we are right to stay on the sidelines.

It seems the Repigs have enough of a project on their hands right now straightening out their little "Family Values" crisis and leaving world affairs to the grownups.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: They have a plan Posted by: Sister_Lauren
"A figure in a position to know"?
Posted by: cdmsr on Jun 25, 2009 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scowcroft was marginilized to the point of isolation during W's two terms and was out of government completely for eight years prior to that. How was he in a position to know anything that wasn't available to an (oxymoron alert) attentive member of the public? Unless Daddy Bush was giving his old friend unlawful access to his daily intelligence briefs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And guess what ....
Posted by: mrbailey47 on Jun 25, 2009 2:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many Iranian spies are here in the good old US of A? Methinks they've done a good job of destabilizing the Gone Old Party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bribing officials? They learned it in congress, naturally.
Posted by: luzmejor on Jun 26, 2009 3:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Pentagon is like an independent foreign nation of private businesses that we have trade agreements with.

It's the tail that wags the dog.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Religion in the military Posted by: Sister_Lauren