Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Steelworkers President Slams Palin: 'Stop Using Your Husband's Membership in the USW as a Prop'

Posted by Ali, Think Progress at 11:33 AM on September 4, 2008.


The head of the United Steelworkers union (USW) isn't pleased.
palinwhubby2

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

When Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) introduced Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate, he trumpeted her husband’s union membership: “The person I’m about to introduce to you was a union member and is married to a union member, and understands the problems, the hopes and the values of working people,” he said. That day, and again last night, Palin also emphasized that her husband is “a proud member of the United Steelworkers Union.”

Conservatives are hoping the reference will play well in Michigan and Ohio. But the United Steelworkers union (USW) isn’t so pleased. USW President Leo Gerard noted that just because Todd Palin is a union member doesn’t mean that Palin is automatically qualified to represent labor interests:

It is important to realize that while the governor’s husband is a member of a union, this does not automatically qualify her for an on-the-job training program to become a heartbeat away from the presidency. And while her husband is one of 850,000 dues-paying members of the steelworkers union, it does nothing to absolve Sen. McCain of his long history of anti-union sentiment and anti-worker actions.

In fact, McCain’s hostility to unions and union priorities runs deep:

– McCain voted to block the Employee Free Choice Act, making it easier for workers to unionize. [6/26/07]

– McCain condemned unions as “serious excesses” and said government workers are “crippled” by union contracts. [10/9/07; 5/21/07]

– McCain voted to filibuster minimum wage hike in 2007 [1/24/07]

– McCain voted against a bill protecting discrimination against workers who go on strike, effectively allowing companies to hire permanent replacements for striking workers. [S. 55, 7/13/94]

– McCain voted against an amendment providing more effective remedies to victims of gender discrimination in the payment of wages. [7/17/07]

Last night, Gerard demanded that Palin “stop using USW as a prop.” Noting McCain’s opposition to the top priorities on USW’s agenda, Gerard asked Palin:

Are you with McCain – and against workers – on these issues? If so, you need to stop using your husband’s membership in the USW as a prop, because then his union card cannot possibly cover up your or John McCain’s worker-savaging positions.

Digg!

Tagged as: palin, usw, todd palin


Bush Takes a Last-Minute Swipe at Workers' Rights
The proposal is "one of about 20 highly contentious rules the Bush administration is planning to issue in its final weeks."
Post by Satyam Khanna. December 1, 2008.
Republicans Just Can't Stop Picking Partisan Fights
Just in case anyone thinks the spirit of bipartisanship has overtaken Congress in light of the severe financial crisis, think again.
Post by Digby. December 1, 2008.
Conservatives Say Low Wages Will Solve the Economic Crisis, But the Opposite Is True
FDR knew that high wages are good… and we should too.
Post by Stirling Newberry. November 28, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Unions - part of the problem
Posted by: LionHeart on Sep 4, 2008 6:27 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unions have become a farce and are all about the power of the union leaders, not the workers. Ask anyone who has been screwed by their union and has had to sue them for disability benefits etc.

What gives the union the right to endorse a candidate on behalf of it's members? They endorse and feel THEY have the right to represent them in non union matters... what gives them the right to say someone else can't declare they are a union member as a way of showing they understand workers issues.

They have outlived their usefulness and overstep their boundaries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Hello Moderators!!
Posted by: walldodger1969 on Sep 5, 2008 4:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the hell is viagra ads doing here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hello Moderators!! Posted by: gathaiga
Unions
Posted by: Shey on Sep 6, 2008 2:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some - not all - unions, have been guilty of terrible crimes and abuses of power.
Does that mean that we should go back to the conditions suffered by workers in this country, before there were unions?

Early union leaders literally died for the right of American workers to organize, so that they might have a voice to raise against the barbaric worker abuses of the Robber Barons, the fore-bearers of today's mega-corporations.

Many unions need to do a whole lot of internal house cleaning. In the meantime, concentrate on the crucial election at hand and help spread the word that a union card doesn't make Palin's husband any less a Republican. Or make her less of a hypocrite, for running ad's about him being a "fisherman", while hiding his long involvement with British Petroleum.

Stay mentally on topic people, they're trying to scatter and divert our attention.
And remember that she, not he, is running for office. And that she is a card carrying religious-right wing-nut, Cheney style Fascist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Unions Posted by: foreverhope
Unfair and growing desparity
Posted by: nvannes on Sep 6, 2008 4:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's outrageous that the disparity between the working class and the wealthy is presently more than it was 40 years ago, that a CEO will make more in 10 minutes than one of his working employees makes in a full year. Much of this comes in the form of a bonus for his company having done so well under his leadership. Well, if the company has done so well, why not spread the wealth amongst everyone who works for the company, who helped get it to where it is? Often bonus agreements with CEOs have nothing to do with increased production or profit. They are just simply written into the CEO's contract, regardless of performance, up and even down, based purely on reputation and relationships and who you know. This is particularly egregious and insulting. The American way? Sadly it has become that. Give the hardworking, dedicated employees all the credit but the inside boys take all the money and benefits, assurances and support. Screw that. I say tax the living shit out of these super wealthy republicans and democrats, we gotta get the money to support their wars from somewhere, not just pass it down to the children of the working poor and the vulnerable. Close all loopholes. No more offshore ownership if you want to live and work in this country. Hopefully unions will come back with a vengeance. They should. And less and less money will go to military industrial lobbyists and war profiteering. It should begin with free education so people learn the wrongness of war, why wars are always fought with "other people's children", not the politician's children or those of the lobbyists who control them. We must learn the down side of "my country right or wrong". Who the hell wants to live in a country that's "wrong"? We were wrong in Vietnam. We were wrong in Iraq, to invade to control it's oil. We need to start pushing for peace. We need a Department of Peace to shut down our war hungry, aggressive, imperialistic government which is trying to spread itself all over the world without being wanted or invited. We've got enough nuclear bombs to annihilate everyone, all of civilization, so no nation in its right mind would attack us. But still it's not enough for our self-perpetuating military which wants and needs more. More capital, more missiles, more and smaller nuclear weapons, more aircraft carriers and nuclear subs (even though they just stood by and watched the trade towers fall), more soldiers, poor and uneducated, so they will not ask why should I kill this other person in his own land? Because they hate you, stupid. Don't ask. Just shoot to kill. Instead of my country right or wrong, union membership must reflect a new, more sensitive awareness, a little less brawn and a lot more intelligence. Where is the money coming from and where does it go? Is it helping to make this world a better place for my children and theirs to come? If owners and corporations are unwilling to open their books and share their knowledge, be transparent as we expect of our government, then I say the hell with them. Go find another job or borrow some money from the government and go start one yourself for others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the Real Irony...
Posted by: djnoll on Sep 7, 2008 4:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
one of the first community organizing efforts by Obama was to help steelworkers in South Chicago where the plant had closed. Sarah Palin just put down someone who helped her husband's fellow union workers when they were jobless to survive! No wonder the President of the United Steelworkers is so mad! I would be too, and I would be seriously asking this man to shut up his hypocritical wife or get out of the union, forget using him as a prop for her campaign. She has shown she is ungrateful at best, cold and heartless at worst, where her husband's union members are concerned. Hope the union comes out and endorses Obama - that should really help the Republican ticket! NOT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

no, they won't stop
Posted by: foreverhope on Sep 10, 2008 4:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The band 'Heart', writers of the song Baracuda used at the convention and rallies since, told them to stop using their song. Shameless in any way, lacking any honor whatsoever, they continue to do as they please. But I do think the media and the real world are catching up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]