Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Americans Want NAFTA Renegotiated

Posted by Brandon Wu, Eyes on Trade at 8:54 AM on June 24, 2008.


New polling shows a majority across party lines favors scrapping the current deal.

A new Rasmussen Reports telephone poll indicates that over half - 56 percent - of Americans think NAFTA should be renegotiated. The juicy bits include:

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey taken Monday night finds that 56% of voters support renegotiation while 39% say U.S. free trade agreements in general have directly impacted their families. Of that latter group, 73% say the impact has been a bad one, as opposed to 14% who say it was beneficial.

Only 16% of respondents favor NAFTA - a pact which came into being in 1994 and lowers nearly all trade barriers between the U.S., Canada and Mexico -- as is, with 28% undecided... Perhaps most importantly, 71% say negotiation of trade agreements is important to them in terms of how they will vote. Only 20% say it is not important.

(We've been talking about that last point for a while now...)

This comes a few weeks after a Pew Research Center poll showing that 48 percent of Americans, including 42 percent of Republicans and 52 percent of Independents, believe "free trade agreements—like NAFTA, and the policies of the World Trade Organization" have been "a bad thing" for the United States, while only 35 percent said they have been a good thing. This is a dramatic reversal from a 2004 poll in which Americans believed that these trade agreements have been a good thing, by a 47-34 margin.

The same Pew poll also shows that 61 percent of Americans believe free trade costs U.S. jobs, and 56 percent believe it lowers wages. Only 9 percent believe free trade creates U.S. jobs, and only 8 percent believe it raises wages -- results which are consistent across party affiliation lines.

And, just for fun, if you care to take at face value the ABC News/Facebook poll (to be clear... I wouldn't), 79 percent of Americans think the U.S. should renegotiate NAFTA or withdraw from it entirely.

A few more polling tidbits after the jump ...

  • The Rasmussen Reports poll linked to above shows that nearly three-quarters (73 percent) of Americans believe that a free trade agreement has had a negative effect on their families. Only 14 percent say their families have benefited from a free trade agreement.
  • A January Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll indicated that 58 percent of Americans think "globalization has been bad … because it has subjected American companies and employees to unfair competition and cheap labor."
  • As a sampling of local polling, Pennsylvania voters polled in the lead-up to the 2008 Democratic primary election by LA Times/Bloomberg said they consider the economy a top priority, with 55 percent of Democratic primary voters and 66 percent of Independents who will be voting in the Democratic primary naming it as the number one issue.
  • Similarly, in Ohio, a University of Cincinnati poll just before the Democratic primary showed that a plurality (41 percent) of voters said jobs and the economy would weigh most heavily on their vote, ahead of health care and insurance (25 percent) and the Iraq war (25 percent).
  • A SurveyUSA election poll of likely Democratic primary voters in Missouri found 44 percent of voters chose the economy as the top issue compared to 22 percent who chose health care and 13 percent who chose Iraq.

Digg!

Tagged as: public opinion, nafta, trade

Brandon Wu is a development and program associate with Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch.


Steelworkers President Slams Palin: 'Stop Using Your Husband's Membership in the USW as a Prop'
The head of the United Steelworkers union (USW) isn't pleased.
Post by Ali. September 4, 2008.
Baghdad Getting Only Half of Needed Water Supplies; Iraq Approves Oil Deal with China
First Saddam-era deal approved; UNICEF blasts Iraqi government for not investing in drinking water.
Post by AlterNet Staff. September 3, 2008.
The Employee Free Choice Act: Busting the Union Busters
American Rights at Work launches an ad campaign to educate the public on the critical issues facing the struggling middle class.
Post by Staff. September 2, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What a load------
Posted by: Doubtom on Jun 25, 2008 11:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans don't want NAFTA PERIOD!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

why?
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jun 25, 2008 3:17 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...because Amerikan Korporatists didn't f*ck Canadians hard enough for the first go 'round?

damn. have you *any* idea what NAFTA did to Canada? any???

its not like the FIRST NAFTA agreements were negotiated in Good Faith by the US or their corporate minions...

& Canadians are supposed to embrace this sudden desire to re-tweek these agreements in favour of the US now that their fortunes have changed?

CAN YOU SAY, WTF?

man, you're lucky we're Canadians... because if we've LEARNED TO ACT LIKE AMERICANS, you'd be screwed.


PERHAPS Americans should take a LONG HARD LOOK at what NAFTA did to the PEOPLES of the Americas...

...then mosey on over to Council of Canadians information page about the Security & Prosperity Partnership to find out how much WORSE its gonna get if you don't take action & realize that

humanism is greater than nationalism

if you don't realize that NAFTA or the NAU or the SPP isn't in OUR best interest, then we're really... really...

REALLY

gonna find out how bad this can get.
2007:
BIS warns of Great Depression dangers from credit spree

June 2008:
Royal Bank Of Scotland Issues Crash Alert & BIS Warns of Great Depression

Global stockmarkets are braced for one of the worst crashes in 100 years, according to the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) credit strategy team. RBS credit strategy team, in a special report for clients, said it expects inflation to paralyse economies and spark the crash. The report advised investors to be prepared for a severe downturn in global stock and credit markets, saying the S&P 500 index is likely to fall by more than 300 points to around 1,050 points by September.

Mr Bob Janjuah, the report's author is highly respected in the City after his foresighted warnings last year about the credit crisis proved accurate.

Meanwhile, the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) has continued to warn of a possible second Great Depression. The Bank for International Settlements, the organisation that fosters cooperation between central banks, has warned that the credit crisis could lead world economies into a crash on a scale not seen since the 1930s. In its latest quarterly report, the body points out that the Great Depression of the 1930s was not foreseen and that commentators on the financial turmoil, instigated by the U.S. sub-prime mortgage crisis, may not have grasped the level of exposure that lies at its heart.

According to the BIS, complex credit instruments, a strong appetite for risk, rising levels of household debt and long-term imbalances in the world currency system, all form part of the loose monetarist policy that could result in another Great Depression.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NAFTA = NAU = EU = SCREWU
Posted by: hilly7 on Jun 26, 2008 9:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just American jobs? 35% think it's good for America? Where on earth would you find 35% of that many ignorant Sheeple to say that? Let me guess, perhaps some of the millionaires.

There were plans drawn up after 1942 for a reorganizing of North American. It does now hurt USA and will soon do to Canada, and Mexico what it is doing here.

Ford has spent millions of dollars uprooting Mexicans from their land to build assembly plants in Mexico. Parts are to be made in China, shipped to Mexican borders and assembled, then distributed to former USA & Canada, no tarriffs.

Already signed into law is the ability for either USA or Canada to call upon the troops of the other country to restrain that country's citizens. I'm not sure if Mexico is prevey to this action. This will make slave laborers out of Mexican citizens, and 3rd world countries out of the USA and Canada.

Clinton carried out the plans for a start, Bush jumps into Super Nafta. At some point, I'm sure the NAU and EU will merge. Currently, I assume that most of us have already seen the designed and minted NAU currency.

Corporations and Media are owned in part by Central Bankers, and there you have it. After the last few articles I've read from this site, it's beginning to look like Faux News. Id this reporting or preparing for the new government. It never struck me what NWO was until I saw it spelled backwards.

There is coming a slow but steady crash, a crash so intense, so purposeful, so planned that when it arrives, it will make the 30s look like a dance. You merely have to look at people then (financial, emotional, and mental), to see what is before us. How can 1% defeat the 99%? Ignorance and division.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PJ
Posted by: PJ on Jun 27, 2008 3:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did we forget to factor in the incredible stupidity of the American public again? Did this report happen to ask any of the responders what NAFTA even stood for let alone what it does? Because of our fantastic propaganda system and our profound ignorance most of us have come to believe that a treaty with Canada and Mexico is why our jobs are being sent to India and China. Our system of keeping it murky and unclear is working perfectly and we are truly the stupidest people on earth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

most of us have come to believe that a treaty with Canada and Mexico...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jun 27, 2008 5:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is why our jobs are being sent to India and China.
Posted by: PJ on Jun 27, 2008 3:45 PM


How do people not see the obvious? Canada/Mexico = China/India?

Now tell me... how does that equate again?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good Idea! Let's Discuss...
Posted by: ranchero42 on Jul 5, 2008 8:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whom shall we trust to reopen trade negotiations? Reid? Pelosi? Perhaps SCOTUS is ready to be persuaded by a reasoned legal argument to declare it null and void. Oh, damn, if a treaty up for review under contract law that is exactly what would have happened when we realized we were getting the shitty end of the stick. Maybe we should take a vote. What we need is a President who will say: "Our Country has asked enough from you for a while. We're going back to being a country that's okay with it's people asking what their government is doing for THEM for a while".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]