Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Salaries of all Public School Teachers in New York City, Paid to One Man.

Posted by Paul Buchheit, AlterNet at 11:50 PM on April 25, 2008.


Hedge fund manager John Paulson, who made a clever bet against subprime mortgages, made close to $4 billion.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

The United States has the highest inequality rate in the developed world. 28 million Americans -- almost 1 in 10 -- are using food stamps. The average worker has seen virtually no real increase in wages since 1970.

Some hedge fund managers made over a billion dollars last year. Hedge fund manager John Paulson, who made a clever bet against subprime mortgages, made close to $4 billion.

How much is 4 billion dollars? If you work as a sales clerk in a retail store, you'd have to work 200,000 YEARS to make 4 billion dollars. If you have a steady $50,000 a year job as a laborer and work for 50 years, in all that time you'd make as much as the hedge fund manager gets in one hour at the office.

4 billion dollars would pay a year's salary for ALL the public school teachers in New York City.

Yet this money goes to one individual.

Is any one person worth all those teachers? Some people defend ultra-high salaries, claiming the money is earned because of the risks involved, and that any American can get rich with hard work and a little luck. But only a tiny percentage of Americans take most of the money. They have the savvy and connections and good fortune to benefit from financial dealings that transfer the gains from America's productivity to their own pockets. Then, in most cases, they pay only a 15 percent capital gains tax on their huge fortunes, while regular workers pay up to 40 percent of their earnings for payroll tax, income tax, sales tax, transportation, and utilities.

Even if the unfairness of this all is accepted, it seems that nothing can be done about it. Plato said, "Any city, however small, is in fact divided into two, one the city of the poor, the other of the rich; these are at war with one another."

But something CAN be done. The Working Group on Extreme Inequality, part of the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, DC, proposes (1) an increase in the top marginal federal income tax rate on ultra-high incomes; (2) a cap on the tax deductibility of executive pay at no more than 25 times worker pay; and (3) a reforming of the estate tax to include a progressive rate structure. Other measures might include a revision of the capital gains tax to a level approaching the tax on regular income, and the overhauling of a system that allows corporations to avoid income taxes in the very country responsible for their success.

Any of these will give us the opportunity to redirect some of America's productivity to the people who do most of the work.

Digg!

Tagged as: john paulson, inequality, subprime crisis

Paul Buchheit is on the faculty of DePaul University and the Chicago City Colleges. He is the founder of Global Initiative Chicago (GIChicago.org), and the founder of fightingpoverty.org. He is the editor and main contributor to American Wars: Illusions and Realities (Clarity Press).


Corruption Bubbles Up Amidst the Immigration Crackdown
Workers bear the brunt of government enforcement while business owners get off scott-free.
Post by David Neiwert. May 16, 2008.
Why is Burger King Spying on Student Labor Organizers?
The fast-food company tries to hide its anti-labor practices.
Post by Katrina Vanden Heuvel. May 15, 2008.
Intelligence Contractor Wasn't Pleased When We Showed up at its Shareholder's Meet
We were shareholders, but apparently not the right kind.
Post by Tonya Hennessey. May 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Excellent strategies
Posted by: puddytat on Apr 26, 2008 1:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author has presented some great strategies to begin to turn around the deplorable wealth inequalities we currently have in this country. How do we get started?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xcellent strategies Posted by: wolfgangmo75
Sickening.
Posted by: Luther Blissett on Apr 26, 2008 6:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This kind of thing makes me absolutely sick. But we will not eliminate this gross inequality, this system in which people who do nothing of value make $4 billion while people who work their asses off are lucky to take home $20,000, until we--the workers--take control of the means of production. It truly has come down to a choice between socialism and barbarism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sickening. Posted by: the man with a dog
Why?
Posted by: Longdream on Apr 26, 2008 6:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(1) an increase in the top marginal federal income tax rate on ultra-high incomes; (2) a cap on the tax deductibility of executive pay at no more than 25 times worker pay; and (3) a reforming of the estate tax to include a progressive rate structure. Other measures might include a revision of the capital gains tax to a level approaching the tax on regular income, and the overhauling of a system that allows corporations to avoid income taxes in the very country responsible for their success.


These are complicated issues, and I doubt this foundation is going to meet with much success overhauling the tax law.

They're going about this the wrong way. There isn't any need to cap incentives on earnings--high earners pay the taxes on which the country runs, and none of this has anything to do with the fact that lower wage earners find it difficult to live well.

Martin Luther King fought, not for a minimum wage, but for a Living Wage. The time and money this foundation spends trying to tilt at windmills would be better spent on intense work lobbying for corporations to pay decent wages which are tied to better living standards to all of their workers, here and abroad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And that 4 billion
Posted by: JSquercia on Apr 27, 2008 8:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And that 4 Billion was taxed at 15% as Capital Gains rather than the 28% that I paid on my Social Security . Thanks again St Ronnie and the Republicans who refused to even consider eliminating the Tax on Social Security but fillibustered to prevent that 4 Billion from being taxed as ordinary Income . Actually the didn't have to really fillisbuter merely show that they enough votes to prevent Cloture . I don't know if it is possible to force them to actually have to TRULY filllibuster (ala Jimmy Stewart ) but it would have been wonderful to have made them give speeches on the floor defending the loophole

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]