Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Unemployment Hits 10.2 Percent, Economy Sheds 190,000 Jobs

Posted by Dean Baker, Center for Economic and Policy Research at 9:17 AM on November 6, 2009.


A run-down of the employment picture.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace in your
mailbox!

 

The unemployment rate crossed 10.0 percent for the first time since early 1983, hitting 10.2 percent in October. The establishment survey showed the economy losing another 190,000 jobs, with most of the job loss in construction and manufacturing.

The October unemployment rate is still below the 10.8 percent peak reached in December of 1982, but the workforce is considerably older now and in age cohorts where workers are less likely to be unemployed. If the workforce had the same age distribution as in 1982 but current unemployment rates for each age cohort, then the unemployment rate would be more than a percentage point higher. The 10.7 percent unemployment rate for men is 0.6 percentage points higher than the 10.1 percent peak in 1982. This is consistent with the massive job loss in construction and manufacturing.

 

The unemployment rate for women is 8.1 percent. In an unusual turnaround, the employment to population ratio (EPOP) for white women, at 55.7 percent, is now 0.9 percentage points higher than the EPOP for black women. Before July of this year, black women had always had higher EPOPs.

By education, those with some college have taken the biggest hit in recent months, with their unemployment rate rising by 0.5 percentage points to 9.0 percent in October. It had been 7.9 percent in July.

The number of people involuntarily employed part-time rose by 190,000. This helped to push the U-6 measure of labor market slack up 0.5 percentage points to 17.5 percent, another record. The average period of unemployment rose by 0.7 weeks to 26.9 weeks, with the median rising by 1.4 weeks to 18.7 weeks, both new records.

The 190,000 job loss reported in the establishment survey is somewhat offset by an upward revision of 171,000 to the job loss data for the prior two months. The new data put job loss for August and September at 154,000 and 219,000, respectively, so it is not clear that the rate of job loss is on a downward path.

The 61,000 jobs lost in manufacturing is actually above the 47,000 average for the prior three months. Similarly, the 62,000 jobs lost in construction is far above the 34,000 average for the prior three months. Within construction, job loss has overwhelmingly switched to the non-residential side, which shed 33,400 jobs in October. The stimulus related jobs are being overwhelmed by cutbacks in construction of retail and office space. The job loss within manufacturing was broadly based. The auto sector actually showed a small "cash-for-clunkers"-induced gain of 4,000 jobs. However, its current employment of 663,700 workers is almost exactly half of its level from 10 years ago.

Retail lost 39,800 jobs, with sporting goods and hobby stores being especially hard hit with a loss of 15,800 jobs, 2.6 percent of employment in the sector. State and local governments shed 16,000 jobs in October, which was offset by an increase in federal government employment of the same amount. One ominous sign was a drop of employment in trucking of 7,500 jobs, approximately 0.6 percent. This could suggest a big falloff in the amount of goods being shipped.

On the positive side, there was a modest uptick in manufacturing hours of 0.1 per week, with overtime rising by 0.2 hours. Also, jobs in employment services increased by 33,700, which, coupled with prior months' revisions, gives three consecutive months of increase.

Another piece of good news was a 0.5 percent rise in the average hourly wage. This brought the annual rate of increase over the last three months to 2.8 percent. This would be very good news if it is maintained since it would imply that wages are at least keeping pace with inflation. However, this figure is most likely an aberration and will probably be reversed either by revisions to the data or offset by weak reported wage growth in November.

In all likelihood, the economy will continue to shed jobs, at least through the rest of the 2009 and probably into the first months of 2010. The unemployment rate will probably not peak until the spring of next year, at close to 11.0 percent.

Digg!

Tagged as: economy, jobs, unemployment


Americans Lack Economic Literacy; Some Hold "Insane" Views on Stimulus Spending
According to pollsters.
Post by Steve Benen. November 20, 2009.
Yes Men Strike Again, Launch New Coke Brand Bottled Water Called 'Deception' [with Video]
The best part is when they run into an actual Coke employee.
Post by Tara Lohan. November 18, 2009.
Why There Are More Than 1 Million Hungry Kids in the U.S.
Those shouldering the burden of this economic crisis are barely surviving.
Post by Sarah Newman. November 18, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
A Federal Jobs Council
Posted by: jebpgh on Nov 6, 2009 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama needs to start moving to the jobs issue now that the health care strategy has form and direction. You never want to lose focus but not to address the jobs issue head on is political suicide. He should appoint a "jobs czar" and order the establishment of a joint task force of the key departments to focus on a comprehensive jobs recovery plan. That plan would create a sort of NRA/WPA focus. Coordination at the federl, state and local level is called for and the re-vitalization of local private industry councils and a program like CETA. Coordination of benefits, tax incentives, training dollars and job creation efforts. It needs to get on a fast track and it needs to happen ASAP.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Federal Jobs Council Posted by: VZEQICVA
DOW 10,000 +
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 6, 2009 10:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not due entirely to companies generating profits because of improved products and/or services. It's because payrolls have been slashed and that generates immediate cash, and lots of it. I'll be accused of being a socialist but it seems to me that when companies realize such profits it might be time for them to have an obligation to hire people. Corporatons can't go on being monments to money and nothing more. They do have obligations to the public. It's a two way street. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's going on here?
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 7, 2009 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Overwork for those who are employed.

At the same time 61,000 manufacturing jobs were lost last month, the number of manufacturing hours INCREASED. In other words, employers are dumping workers, then piling even more work on those left – many of whom previously hourly with overtime pay, but having recently been switched to salaried with no overtime.

Such a deal for companies. Dump people, whole families in fact, into the economic wilderness with the threat of destitution while hammering those left on the job with more stress, less time to be with their families, less time to actually have a LIFE.

This trend has been going on for quite awhile, resulting in more illness and, I wouldn't doubt, more early deaths from the increased stress – making affordable healthcare all the more important. But, when those overstressed individuals do get sick, the medical insurance industry does that all it can to make sure those individuals (and their families) become destitute, even if still employed.

Workers, the productive backbone that has generated by their sweat and their brains all the wealth the lazy Wall Street Aristocracy has stolen, are being reduced to chattel, to wage-slaves.

What a system. Is this a fitting example to the world of how the (self-styled) "Greatest Nation On Earth" should conduct itself? Is this anything less than an international embarrassment, and an affront to our common humanity?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama Doesn't Care About American Citizens
Posted by: Paul1939 on Nov 14, 2009 2:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now let's see, over 15 million unemployed American citizens and the Obama Administration allows corporations to import 1.5 million foreign workers each year. It is ludicrous to believe that there are no qualified American citizens available to do these jobs. Why does Obama care more about foreign workers than he does about American citizens?

Again, over 15 million unemployed American citizens and the Obama Administration protects millions of illegal aliens holding jobs instead of American citizens. How Mr. President, do you ask American families to give up the American Dream so that an illegal alien families can have that dream? What Mr. President is so special about illegal aliens that you prefer them to the citizens you are sworn to protect?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]