Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Cindy McCain Bankrolled Conference That Called for Ban on Mercenaries

Posted by Jeremy Scahill, Rebel Reports at 8:30 PM on October 16, 2009.


The "McCain Conference on Ethics and Military Leadership" appears to be ahead of the senator when it comes to the U.S. use of mercenaries.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get World in your
mailbox!

 

A little-publicized U.S. Naval Academy conference named after Senator John McCain and bankrolled by his wealthy wife, Cindy, issued a call earlier this year for the U.S. government to ban the use of armed private security contractors like Blackwater in U.S. war zones, stating bluntly, "contractors should not be deployed as security guards, sentries, or even prison guards within combat areas."

"[T]he use of deadly force must be entrusted only to those whose training, character and accountability are most worthy of the nation's trust: the military," reads the executive summary of the U.S. Naval Academy’s 9th Annual McCain Conference on Ethics and Military Leadership, which was held in April at the Annapolis Naval Station. "The military profession carefully cultivates an ethic of 'selfless service,' and develops the virtues that can best withstand combat pressures and thus achieve the nation's objectives in an honorable way. By contrast, most corporate ethical standards and available regulatory schemes are ill-suited for this environment."

In 2001, Cindy McCain, who may be worth as much as $100 million, first endowed the McCain conference "in honor of her husband" with a $210,000 gift that was specifically intended to fund conferences that would "bring together key military officers and civilian academics responsible for ethics education and character developments."

According to the Fall 2009 newsletter, "Taking Stock," published by the U.S. Naval Academy's Stockdale Center for Ethical Leadership -- the host of the McCain Conference -- among the speakers at the 2009 event was none other than Erik Prince, the owner of Blackwater. Prince’s company is the most infamous of those engaged in the type of armed activity explicitly condemned by the conference's leadership.

The executive summary released by the McCain conference was recently highlighted in a report completed on September 29 by the Congressional Research Service on the use of private contractors. That report said that the U.S. is "relying heavily" on armed contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan and suggests their use could continue to rise. The report also states that misconduct and the killing of civilians by armed security contractors "may have undermined U.S. counterinsurgency efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan."

Despite the fact that the McCain conference, which publicly advocated against the use of armed contractors in combat areas bears Sen. McCain's name and was bankrolled by his wife, when it has come to making this a major issue on Capitol Hill, the Arizona Senator has been largely silent. In 2007, Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Jan Schakowsky introduced the Stop Outsourcing Security Act, which sought to do precisely what the McCain conference called for two years later: to ban the use of mercenaries in U.S. war zones. McCain did not endorse or co-sponsor that legislation, which would certainly have benefited from his support (neither did then-Senator Barack Obama). Responding to a reporter's question on the campaign trail in July 2008 about whether he believed that U.S. troops and not private guards should protect U.S. diplomats in Iraq, McCain said, "I'd like it, but we don't have enough. Yes, and I'd love to see pigs fly, but it ain’t gonna happen.”

The McCain campaign hired people with deep ties to the mercenary industry to work on his presidential bid. Among these was senior strategist, Charlie Black, whose firm BKSH & Associates worked for Blackwater’s owner Erik Prince, helping to guide Prince through his appearance on Capitol Hill in the aftermath of the September 2007 Nisour Square massacre in Baghdad. McCain also brought on as a senior foreign policy advisor Richard Armitage, the former deputy Secretary of State. After leaving the government, Armitage served as a senior adviser for Veritas Capital from 2005 to 2007. Veritas owns the mercenary giant DynCorp, which holds billions of dollars in Iraq and Afghanistan security and training contracts.

Moreover, the International Republican Institute, which has deep ties to McCain, hired Blackwater as its private security force in Iraq, paying Blackwater an average of more than $17 million a year since 2005 for security services, according to records.

As the Obama administration weighs a substantial troops increase in Afghanistan, leading Democrats and Republicans are calling for an expanded role for US trainers for the Afghan military, which will mean more business for private contractors. Blackwater continues to play a central role in the CIA’s drone bombing program in Pakistan and Afghanistan, which vice president Joe Biden and others are suggesting should intensify. At present, there are 74,000 contractors on the DoD payroll in Afghanistan -- roughly 10,000 more than the number of U.S. troops. Thousands of other contractors work for the US State Department and other agencies.

The McCain conference raised questions about "the privatization of combat support functions," including intelligence collection and analysis, as well as "advising/training for combat." It concluded, "In irregular warfare environments, where civilian cooperation is crucial," barring the use of armed contractors "is both ethically and strategically necessary."

Digg!

Tagged as: john mccain, blackwater, erik prince, cidy mccain, stockdale center for ethi

Jeremy Scahill is the author of Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army.


Americans Lack Economic Literacy; Some Hold "Insane" Views on Stimulus Spending
According to pollsters.
Post by Steve Benen. November 20, 2009.
Yes Men Strike Again, Launch New Coke Brand Bottled Water Called 'Deception' [with Video]
The best part is when they run into an actual Coke employee.
Post by Tara Lohan. November 18, 2009.
Why There Are More Than 1 Million Hungry Kids in the U.S.
Those shouldering the burden of this economic crisis are barely surviving.
Post by Sarah Newman. November 18, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Jeremy Scahill is the unsung hero of our troubled times.
Posted by: Doubtom43 on Oct 16, 2009 10:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keep up the good work Jeremy, we've just scored another win in Southern California against the company known as XE, aka Blackwater.

Not enough is known about these gun-happy goons who want to carry over their military experience into a for profit role in the civilian world, instead of securing an honest job like everyone else who leaves the military. They are guns for hire, regardless of how much effort they expend to portray themselves differently. There should be no room for "private armies" anywhere in these United States!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blackwater - CIA’s drone bombing program in Pakistan and Afghanistan, nuclear mass murder anyone?
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Oct 17, 2009 1:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is Joe Biden's end game?

"In irregular warfare environments, where civilian cooperation is crucial," barring the use of armed contractors "is both ethically and strategically necessary."

This sounds like a global argument to me. Where is the 'regular' warfare environment?

Since our fully armed CIA/private killers are a global problem and we are paying for them, without controlling them in the slightest I might add; and since they are totally and criminally out of control, it looks like we have created and loosed a monster of biblical proportions.

Now, are we going to sit back and let them do what they do, or are we going to DO something about it?

It is time to defund these murderers. End the use of private mercenaries.

Or is it too late, they already have nukes, all the coolest bombs, and are not afraid to use them on American soil? Are they actually holding us hostage? Is that why our 'leaders' kept shoveling money and pardons at them?

Hmmm... isn't that terrorism?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

'Canary' John McCain
Posted by: Lese Majeste on Oct 17, 2009 2:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain said, "I'd like it, but we don't have enough. Yes, and I'd love to see pigs fly, but it ain’t gonna happen.”

You flew during the Vietnam War and dropped napalm on civilians, for which you stated you probably should of been tried for war crimes, didn't you Johnnie boy?

And didn't your goof off on the USS Forestal flight deck by revving up your A-6 and cause a massive fire that killed US personnel and destroyed millions of dollars of tax-payer equipment?

In the 1980's, you were taking bribes from the S & L banks, so you and some other Senators also getting bribed would look the other way, eventually resulting in the S & L bailout that cost us hundreds of billions?

And all that cheerleading for the Iraq War and all that cheerleading to get the USA to bomb Iran, how many American families lost a loved one, no small thanks to your war mongering?

Yes, Senator McCain is a fine, fine American who's never met a war he didn't like.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 'Canary' John McCain Posted by: Ellie1
Alliegence lies with the Highest Bidder
Posted by: Purple Girl on Oct 17, 2009 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can we trust our national Security and international reputation to corps who only pledge their alliegence to the Bottom Line?
If China Out Bids US in some attempt to reclaim their finacial loses- Who would be surprised that Blackwater et al turns their Guns (and US paid training) on US?
Unemployement is at an all time high- why not offer those unemployed the same opportunity overseas as these private profitteers. We don't need more Soldiers in Afghanistan - we need an Army of civilians to help rebuild a society which has been used as slave labor by the Taliban and AQ for the last 2 decades!We need to not only free them physically but psychologically and economically.
In fact we should be forcing the Wall Streets into 'an offer they can't refuse'. Avoid prison (or worse) time for Economic Treason by volunteering their 'expertise' and 'talents' in building a sustainable economy for the Afghani's. they claim their their Talent is such they deserve their huge salaries and bonuses- Prove it. Take a scratch of dirt like Afghanistan and make it a viable economy. These 'titans' of industires predecessors took our nation from Ag to Industrial- Let's see if as beneficiaries of their efforts, these SOB's can do the same.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Perhaps John
Posted by: JSquercia on Oct 17, 2009 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps John should listen to his better half .It seems She has more sense than He does between her position on this issue and a woman's right to choose

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Numbers game = you lose, taxpayer
Posted by: eddie torres on Oct 17, 2009 10:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The DoD says there are 5,165 armed private security contractors in Afghanistan, and 4,895 (95%) are Afghans. While regular Afghan soldiers cost $12,000 per year, there are no cost analyses or dollar amounts in the CRS report linked to by Scahill.

I'll assume Afghan armed private security contractors probably cost 3x more each ($36,000) than Afghan soldiers, because that's how much more ex-military US armed private security contractors are paid in Iraq.

Worse, there are 68,000 other private contractors in Afghanistan, and they charge $400 to move just one gallon of gas into the country by helicopter.

Time magazine correspondent Mark Thompson says up to 70% of the Taliban might be willing to stop fighting for $7300 per year.

Does anyone in the Pentagon own a calculator? Here's a tip: Start --> Run --> "calc" --> Enter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And, a little more bad math
Posted by: eddie torres on Oct 17, 2009 11:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are currently 28 million Afghans, and half are under the age of 30.

The DoD could pay $12,000 each to every Afghan under the age of 30 to: (1) not fight or support fighters; and (2) sell opium to the DEA. That's 15 times the GDP (PPP) of $760 per year.

It would cost US taxpayers $169 billion. And no more US soldiers would die.

Diane Feinstein is weeping tears for the plight of Afghan women, saying the US needs to continue a pointless war in the name of femininity?

Fine. To appease Feinstein and her war-profiteer husband, give $12,000 each to every adult female Afghan to end the conflict. Cut the men out of the deal.

It would cost US taxpayers $169 billion. And no more US soldiers would die.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mass murderers palling around Posted by: Sister_Lauren
modern day pirates and privateers...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Oct 17, 2009 11:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and we wonder why people distrust their government?

if you want to have a resposible government take responsiblity for government projects and activities... thats why we have a civil service thats fully accountable to the political establishment ...BUT... an unfortunate practice [i think was started back in the early 60's by Bush41] was realized that in order to promote your agenda and alienate the opposition was easily attained by hiring privateers to stack their playbook and when they got into power they rewarded their private GOP-CIA-PNAC army with lucrative posts in high paying federal agencies, so even in times when they were not in power they had THEIR people in key posts they could rely on for information to undermine the opposition at a time and place of THEIR choosing.

If there wasnt any postions open in the federal civil service... they would just start a new agency like the DEA, ATF, or our newest gestapo agency ...homeland security... when the opportunities presented itself.

what webs we weave ...we need to ban outright... all pirates from any kind of association with politics... period... a complete lobby meltdown is in progress and its all related to "MY TAX DOLLARS" being misallocated by criminal organizations masquerading as politicals in DC!

sorry for the rant, but we have enough corruption in DC without adding mercenary/pirates to the mix!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Must be just another political stunt.
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 17, 2009 2:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cindy Mccain against mercenaries? Something's off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Once again we need to act unethically because, well, that's just the way it is...
Posted by: Paul_C on Oct 17, 2009 11:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What kind of leadership is that?? Good grief, a two-year-old can do better than that!

This report is important because it is validation at the highest levels of the military that these mercenary armies are a danger to others as well as to ourselves.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Screw yourself, SPAMMER!! n/m
Posted by: Paul_C on Oct 18, 2009 7:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes, 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB
Posted by: Lese Majeste on Oct 18, 2009 8:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That I know and so does anyone who can read above a 5th grade level.

I was trying to stay on topic and not get that mad dog 'Guitar Bill' snapping and snarling and biting everyone in sight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHile we are dissolving mercenary armies, shouldn't we do the same with the IRI?
Posted by: leafsong1 on Oct 18, 2009 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The IRI uses taxpayer funds to hire mercenary/thug armies to overthrow friendly democratically elected governments for patently commercial interests. There is no criminal allegation that can be leveled at Blackwater/Xe that could not have been leveled at the IRI decades before Blackwater came into existence. Blackwater is merely doing in the open what the IRI does in secret.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No more mercenary cops, either
Posted by: westomoon on Oct 19, 2009 2:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blackwater provides adjunct police all over the US too, as part of a growing trend. It's just as bad an idea on US streets as it is in war zones, for precisely the same reasons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]