Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Stuck in Your Job Because You Need the Health Benefits? You’re Not Alone.

Posted by Monica Sanchez, Blog for Our Future at 9:01 AM on May 31, 2009.


There are the millions of people for whom losing their employer-based coverage would have dire financial and health consequences.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace in your
mailbox!

 

In the United States, the majority of people get their health insurance through their job. Many have an immediate need for that coverage, either because they or someone in their families has a health condition that requires ongoing medical care. These are the millions of people for whom losing their employer-based coverage would have dire financial and health consequences. And for many of them, it means staying in a job they would rather leave to keep those health benefits. This phenomenon is referred to as 'job lock.'

Economist Scott Adams has found evidence of pretty wide-spread job lock. His research has found that:

  • among men aged 25 to 55 with spouses, there is an approximate 22 percent to 32 percent reduction in job mobility stemming from health insurance coverage;
  • there is slightly more job lock among married women; and
  • job lock has increased since 1988.

Overall, Adams' results are consistent with earlier studies that found job mobility was reduced by 26 percent to 31 percent due to the lack of portability of employer-provided health coverage.

That means millions of people are not switching to more satisfying, perhaps even more lucrative jobs, because they need the health benefits being offered by their current employer. And they are right to be afraid. This is what can happen when they take the chance:

"Michael Courtney was 41 years old when he was diagnosed with a rare form of lymphoma. It started on his tongue, but spread quickly. He has had radiation and chemotherapy. Treatment will continue indefinitely. So will his bills.

"An auto mechanic, Courtney was hesitant about changing jobs because he didn't want to lose his health insurance. But a new employer promised immediate benefits so he took the job. He was even able to stay with the same insurance company that he had at his old job. But a month into the new job, he found that the new policy wouldn't cover his cancer for three months. His disease was a pre-existing condition. Already strapped with medical bills, he postponed treatment."

Some would-be entrepreneurs are also being stifled by the need to keep their employer-based coverage, which can only hurt the economy. As economist Jonathan Gruber notes:

 

"Universal health insurance, far from suppressing entrepreneurship, could be a boon to it.
The main reason for this is a phenomenon known as "job lock," a term coined during the last round of debate over universal health coverage in the early 1990s. Job lock refers to the fact that workers are often unwilling to leave a current job that provides health insurance for another position that might not, even if they would be more productive in that other position...

"Some of tomorrow's potential entrepreneurs are today's employees at firms that provide health insurance. They may have powerful new ideas that will build the firms of tomorrow. But if they leave their current job to work on those ideas they may find themselves without access to reliable health insurance...

"There are fewer direct studies of the impact of job lock on entrepreneurship. But the most convincing research, by Alison Wellington, mirrors the findings of other job mobility studies: Americans who have an alternative source of health insurance, such as a spouse's coverage, are much more likely to be self-employed than those who don't. Wellington estimates that universal health care would therefore likely increase the share of workers who are self-employed (currently about 10 percent of the workforce) by another 2 percent or more. A system that provides universal access to health insurance coverage, then, is far more likely to promote entrepreneurship than one in which would-be innovators remain tied to corporate cubicles for fear of losing their family's access to affordable health care."

In his blog post "Health Care 'Job Lock' Stifles Entrepreneurship," Dr. Michael McCarthy highlights the problem:

"When I'm pitching my Web site, I'm often asked what my 'cash-burn rate' is.

"That's startup speak for: 'How long can you keep going until you run out of money?'

"But cash burn isn't my problem. My costs are low: You can run a Web site with laptop, an Internet connection and $6.95 web-hosting account.

"The wall I'm facing is my COBRA.

"COBRA, the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986, is the law that lets you stay in your employer's health-insurance plan for 18 months after you leave your job, provided you pay the premiums yourself.

"It's not cheap. But it does give you some breathing room between jobs.

"But once my 18 months are up, the chances of me finding affordable health insurance for my family on my own are slim, and I may have to punt on my startup and go hunting for a job with benefits.

"According to economists, up to 25 percent of workers would move on to other jobs, or strike out on their own, if they didn't fear losing their health coverage.

"Time and time again, we hear that innovation, led by entrepreneurs and small businesses, is going to recreate the U.S. economy so it can thrive in the 21st century. And as behemoths, like General Motors, Chrysler and Ford, totter toward possible extinction, our only hope is that someone is coming along with ideas for new businesses.

"But many of those potential entrepreneurs are not going to be given a chance to experiment and innovate if they can't strike out on their own. They are locked into their current job because of health insurance. Shackling workers to jobs they don't want hobbles the U.S. economy at a time when it needs to be nimble and quick."

Dr. McCarthy's situation illustrates the crux of the problem. In Washington state, where he lives, insurers cannot refuse coverage to someone who just had COBRA coverage, but they can charge whatever they want for that coverage.

It is not enough to simply guarantee people they can get health insurance coverage outside the job. They must know they will be able to afford that coverage and that it will cover the care they need. (See my post "What Should Be the Goal of Health Care Reform?")

A public health insurance plan option must be created to compete on a level playing field with private insurers. A public health insurance plan can break the near monopoly power of a few insurance plans to help drive value and lower prices in the health care market place. A public health insurance plan will provide everyone the choice of a comprehensive benefit package at a price they can afford.

So don't let Congress rip the heart out of Obama's health care plan! Learn more about a public health insurance option.

And then stand with President Obama and Dr. Howard Dean to demand the choice of public health insurance by signing the petition today

 

Digg!

Tagged as: health insurance, job loss, job lock


Americans Lack Economic Literacy; Some Hold "Insane" Views on Stimulus Spending
According to pollsters.
Post by Steve Benen. November 20, 2009.
Yes Men Strike Again, Launch New Coke Brand Bottled Water Called 'Deception' [with Video]
The best part is when they run into an actual Coke employee.
Post by Tara Lohan. November 18, 2009.
Why There Are More Than 1 Million Hungry Kids in the U.S.
Those shouldering the burden of this economic crisis are barely surviving.
Post by Sarah Newman. November 18, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Health Slavery
Posted by: QQOblivion on May 31, 2009 9:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Job-lock is real. I woman friend of mine years ago had two kids at the time, and was pregnant with a third. She worked as a daycare-worker. And even with a discount for her kids because she worked there, her two kids cost as much to send to the daycare center as she was making working there.

She only worked for the health-care benefits, and received no take-home salary!
But she needed the health-care from her employer because she was pregnant.

(Good to say, she has a better job today, although she is still not rich by any means.)

I have a feeling that it is quite common for people to work in jobs that pay near nothing (or precisely nothing, as in my friend's case) just for the health-care. Of course, it is even worse for other people, whose employer doesn't cover them at all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Big Business
Posted by: SalB on May 31, 2009 10:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Big Business sees a stat like 30% of people are tied to a job because of health insurance and salivate. Those are all employees they can depend on, even if they cut wages and force unpaid overtime.

And here is a sex segregation watch on the Scott Adams quote: If the rate for women staying with a job for the health insurance is only "slightly higher" than that of men, what is the point of separating the groups? A more effective statistic would tell us what percentage of all people are staying with ill-suited jobs only for the health insurance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Big Business Posted by: VZEQICVA
SINGLE PAYER AND INDIVIDUAL COVERAGE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 31, 2009 10:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No more 'group plans'. People should have portable benefits, length of service applied to a lifetime and transferable with job changes. Americans have had their feet nailed to the floor for decades now. The ability to change jobs without consequences should be avaivlable to all. It's part of the reason why wages have been stagnant and workers are treated badly. We've been required to sell our souls to the "company" for too long now. People are more productive doing what they like and are good at, not what they're forced to do. The minimum wage society that many thought would work, doesn't. What works is allowing people the right to sell their talents to the highest bidder. It's called competition. Please don't scare me with the 'inflation speech'. For those in professions that are organized, they should have their labor unions. While we're spreading democracy all over the world, we ought to leave a little for ourselves at home. Going to a job day after day because it's your only port in the storm if you get sick is morally wrong. Especially since the very people providing benefits, can fire you in a heartbeat. More flexibility puts more people to work, they pay taxes and circulate money in the form of spending, don't have to rob the local 7-ll to eat, and not to push the envelope, but they're happier which is known to help people stay healthy. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» democracy begins at home Posted by: DrXyzzy
Big Business and age discrimination/
Posted by: Rod on May 31, 2009 3:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have said all along big business does not want national single payer health insurance, they need drones, that they can use and abuse.

They know their manages often suck, but do not have to address the problem. They know their employees have the skills to put them out of business, but rather than run a tight business, that might take some work and thought, they prefer it like it is.

Second issue, this is why they do not like to hire over 50. They make up other excuses, but it will raise their health insurance. So they avoid a whole class of excellent workers so they can use and abuse the other class.

One thing for sure, IF we all get out and write letters to our elected officials, and tell them in no uncertain terms, they bow to business and muck this up, we WILL kick them to the curb. IF we do that, and then make it stick, pay attention, this is our only chance.

Our big business masters would like nothing better than to implement a fatally flawed plan and prove to us it can not work.

We have one real shot at this people, lets make it work.

Rod
Rod

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And they're killing small businesses
Posted by: bthespoon on Jun 1, 2009 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...often literally. If it weren't for people losing their jobs and health insurance, we'd have hardly any entrepreneurs left, because you cannot find or keep reliable affordable sustainable health insurance and own or work for a small business in America today (with the exceptions of New York and New Jersey where there are some but still not enough consumer protections against health unsurers).

Do you think Big Bidness likes this set-up?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Our health unsurance non-system is anti-social
Posted by: bthespoon on Jun 1, 2009 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It pits doctors against patients (and vice verse), big businesses against small businesses (and vice verse_, Americans against Americans, and forces everyone to have to sue everyone all of the time over who has to pay medical bills.

It is also anti-entrepreneurial. It makes individuals unable to compete in the job market, small businesses unable to compete with larger ones, and big businesses unable to compete globally.

And it limits choice. Health unsurers force us to waste billions of hours choosing what we will not be covered for (a devil's dilemna) and which providers we will not be allowed to see.

Finally it makes absolutely no sense to continue an overly expensive, useless (harmful even), wasteful, immoral money train for the few at the expense of the many. Health unsurers make money by price gouging healthy Americans and denying often desperately needed medical care to sick ones, a business model that is as bad for Americans and America as any business model could possibly be.

NO business that expects to remain viable would allow an unnecessary middleman to divert 31% off the top before any goods or services could begin to be delivered, and "We the People's" business cannot afford to allow it to continue either...if we expect to remain viable.

Please, help us wake up Obama and the Democrats to "evidence based" health coverage policy. I've been paying extremely close attention, and they're sitting at the table with the corporate interests committed to dishonest reform and denying a seat or a voice to honest evidence (AKA "The Truth"), while in the process of selling "We the People" out on this issue.

Every other civilized nation on Earth (but ours) knows the truth, and the evidence is everywhere. Obama knows the truth but feels he must refuse to acknowledge it because he thinks he needs their dishonest dollars to stay in power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Health care reform includes affordable insurance
Posted by: eksommer on Jun 1, 2009 6:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have job lock and I'm about to go crazy. I certainly have not changed jobs often in my life, but I have been able to move around, and to freelance when I chose because I could always get some kind of health care coverage. Now I am stuck. And I really want to get back to freelance writing and editing, but the benefits at my current place of employment are worth more than my salary; so I stick around, unhappy, doing monotonous editing on a mono subject that is about to put me in a coma.

I totally agree that this "health care slavery" as another commenter mentioned is stifling free enterprise in this country. We are all going to end up being automaton drones working for megacorps--just like in all those sci-fi novels.

Kudos to Sanchez for writing this piece, and to people such as Adams and McCarthy for critically and honestly approaching the issue.

President Obama must not let the insurance companies dictate the rules for the rest of us. Affordable health care means affordable insurance as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enforced Serfdom
Posted by: lynned2002 on Jun 1, 2009 6:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is right on. The current system of health care is a form of enforced serfdom. I too tried to start my own business three years only to find I could not get health insurance due to a pre-existing condition. I tried to make a go of it anyway and during that time my son in college had emergency surgery and my teenage son broke his arm. My older son was able to get on the college health care program retroactively but by the time it was straightened out the bill collectors were dogging me relentlessly and my credit report is a mess.

I did find a health care policy for my teenage son, Tonik from Anthem (then Blue Cross) that is quite cheap, a little over $100 per month. It turned out to be very helpful even though the deductibles and copays were high.

I eventually had to go back to work for yet another company whose values I didn't share, whose ethics I found morally reprehensible, doing something I had no interest in.

I recently got laid off and I decided to see this as a blessing in disguise. I am going to make a go of my business again and pray that I can hang on health wise until this whole mess is straightened out. I will not go back to corporate America.

Please call your senators and members of Congress and insist that public health care is on the table.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmmm... Health Care for ALL Americans is Simple!
Posted by: jpinsatx on Jun 1, 2009 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1) MERGE Medicare, Medicaid and CHIPS into one single "Income Based" system for children, poor and elderly citizens.

2) REQUIRE insurance companies to provide the same basic coverage for EVERY Uninsured citizen, regardless of health status, at affordable rates.

3) ALLOW insurance companies to "Profit" by offering additional benefits and options to those who qualify and are willing to pay the difference.

As for Funding…

1) Changing from an "Emergency Treatment" to a "Preventive Care" system will save local communities billions, maybe even trillions of taxpayer dollars!

2) Consolidating and utilizing existing systems will expedite the process and make administration more efficient and cost effective!

3) Small business will be able to compete globally and hire additional taxpaying employees!

4) Wealthy seniors will pay their fair share!

The Tremendous Burden on Future Generations will be Greatly Reduced!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hopkins in Peoria
Posted by: EHopkins on Jun 1, 2009 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Wealthy seniors will pay their fair share" No. That's the kiss of death for any government program, as it becomes stigmatized as something mainly for the poor and thus unfair. It will lose the support of the well off. Everyone pays the same in basic Medicare. That keeps public support.

All people are equal in human worth. Health care is a human right. All should pay equally.

Reform the tax system and make it more progressive if the govt. needs more money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Health Insurance Reform©: The Illusion of Insurance
Posted by: Dancr on Jun 1, 2009 1:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Health Insurance Reform©:
The Illusion of Insurance


On the linked website are four articles that I wrote about a decade ago, that are still quite relevant, today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's a good reason
Posted by: willymack on Jun 1, 2009 7:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The prime working years of a person's life are called the heroic years. The above article names but one of them. Single-payer universal health care, WITHOUT the participation of the greedy, money-grubbing merchant class, today, NOW.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE IMPOSSIBLE DREAM: HEALTH INSURANCE & EMPLOYMENT SECURITY IN TEXAS
Posted by: joeocho88 on Jun 1, 2009 11:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The LUXURIES that you all describe here are usually WAY OUT OF TOUCH for everybody I know and most of my family.

I HAVE NEVER HAD A JOB THAT HAD HEALTH INSURANCE AND THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A SUCH THING AS EMPLOYER LOYALTY HERE. I have only known two people in my entire family who were able to retire from a job!


AND I AM A VERY OLD PERSON!

BUT I AM TOO YOUNG FOR SOCIAL SECURITY AND TOO OLD FOR A JOB, IT SEEMS...

THIS IS A RIGHT TO WORK/RIGHT TO STARVE STATE.

IF I HAD ANY MONEY COMING IN STEADY, I COULD LIVE ON IT.
IF I HAD HEALTH INSURANCE, I WOULDN'T KNOW WHAT TO DO.
I have NEVER had enough money to see a dentist IN MY LIFE!
SO YOU PEOPLE NEED TO BE THANKFUL THAT YOU HAVE STEADY EMPLOYMENT AND HEALTH INSURANCE AT ALL AND STOP YOUR ******* GRIPING!
BECAUSE SO MANY OF US DO NOT HAVE --AND HAVE NEVER HAD-- WHAT YOU HAVE!
I often wonder what it would be like to be able NOT to worry whether my car payments would OUTLAST MY JOB!

What would it be like?

And the damn four-year diploma won't help you either. It is all WHO you know here NOT WHAT you know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is abhorrent that the USA does not have healthcare for all
Posted by: anneliese-nyc on Jun 2, 2009 7:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't it time that we put the "endless wars " budget to an end ? And then we ALL could have health care as most all highly civilized countries do .We are just fodder for the uber rich .We pay the highest rates for medical services in the world and the highest for medicine .We are NOT #1 for health care...we are # 16th on the same level as Costa Rica(where they are more compassionate re: medical treatment AND a third cheaper )Why is it that illegals get it free (ah...gotta love "FREE America) and we can go bankrupt ??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]