Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

GOP Messaging: Mission Fail

Posted by Jane Hamsher, Firedoglake at 9:02 AM on April 2, 2009.


Republicans twisted themselves into pretzels opposing compensation limits to bank executives, despite the fact that 81% of Americans support it.
dylanfail.thumbnail

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace in your
mailbox!

 

Peter Brown of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute writes about their new poll, which indicates that there is no appetite for the Republican message these days:

Consider this: Four out of five voters think politicians in Washington, D.C., should limit the pay of executives at companies that get federal bailout money. Three in 10 voters embrace the historically un-American notion that government should control the pay for executives of firms that don’t get any cash from Uncle Sam — the kind of trust in government over the private sector that only a few years ago would have seemed laughable. The sentiment may be unprecedented, but so too is the federal assistance to private industries to keep them in business.

Republicans twisted themselves into pretzels yesterday opposing compensation limits to bank executives, despite the fact that 81% of Americans support it. You could see their relief when Melissa Bean and the New Democrat Coalition offered up an amendment to gut the bill -- 165 of them flocked to the floor to join with 63 corporatist Democrats to pass it.

Says Brown:

 

The poll numbers suggest that Republican leaders might want to reassess their strategy of arguing that President Barack Obama is trying to do many things at the same time, and that his plans are just too expensive for a country already carrying historically high debt levels.

Unfortunately for the GOP, the data do not provide any leads for how they might want to make inroads with the American people, who aren’t buying the Republican line. By a two-to-one margin, Americans trust Mr. Obama more than congressional Republicans to get the nation out of its financial fix, and that’s even though they oppose his bailouts of banks and auto companies.

I listened to the incoherent rantings of the GOP honchos yesterday when they presented their joke budget, and it's clear they haven't got a message except "spending: bad." They have spent so long trying to pretend that what they're doing has nothing to do with what they say they're doing they don't know how to recover.

As far as I can tell, they're just trying to push their standard themes and hoping the economy fails so they can say "see, we told you" -- as if the ideas they can't seem to sew into a cohesive plan will somehow be validated because things get worse. It isn't much, but all they have to cling to is the hope that Obama gets blamed for anything bad that happens in the world so they can get a chance to play offense again. And that is the totality of their game plan.

(h/t Digby)

Digg!

Tagged as: democrats, republicans, gop, economic crisis, econopocalypse, mission fail

Jane Hamsher is the founder of FireDogLake. Her work has also appeared on the Huffington Post, Alternet and The American Prospect.


After 5 Weeks, 3 GOP Filibusters and 200,000 Americans Running Out of Bennies, Obama to Sign Unemployment Extension
This is how things work in DC these days.
Post by Steve Benen. November 6, 2009.
Unemployment Hits 10.2 Percent, Economy Sheds 190,000 Jobs
A run-down of the employment picture.
Post by Dean Baker. November 6, 2009.
Meet Some of the People Who Have Jobs Thanks to Obama's Recovery Act
640,329 jobs were created or saved. But the true significance of this number lies in the people behind it.
Post by Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins. November 4, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Let's see the Republican's bailout failed because you...
Posted by: GerryAttric on Apr 3, 2009 2:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
needed a second one. The Republican stimulus package failed or there would not have been a second. Their "War on Terror" failed for numerous reasons. Prior to 9/11 their Intelligence agencies failed to protect America. Their minimalist government philosophy went out the window with the creation of DHS which increased the size of government. Their argument against universal health care goes out the window and down in flames when you analyze the fact that they have given trillions to private corporations to save them while telling poor Americans "Fuck You, Die if you can't afford to live." And should I continue etc. etc. etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about,"NO price negotiations on drugs"
Posted by: hardwroc on Apr 3, 2009 10:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That certainly was looking out for people. That is good for Americans, HOW?
If we SOCIALIZE med care, we remove the cost of PROFIT, and that would be how many billions?And then maybe our auto makers could compete with the automakers that have Socialized med care evenly. Would that be bad?
Remember Labels are just that, and should only carry so much baggage, like, REPUBLICAN. I associate that with only protecting the nation AFTER the worst attack in history. Then attacking an uninvolved country in reprisal. And cutting taxes for the very wealthy, while cutting services for the very UNwealthy. Isn't that a REDISTRIBUTION of wealth?
If we had to hand carry a heavy load of products or belongings, how would we do that? Have the stronger carry more, or divide it exactly even, and whip the weak to match the strength of the strong? OR, let the stronger carry more so the weak can carry as much as they are able and get the load where we want it, somehow?
Just sayin,,,,

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Republican" party
Posted by: frank69 on Apr 3, 2009 1:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Party of Abraham Lincoln has mutated into the Party of Crazy Idiots!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]