Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Noam Chomsky: Workers Will Build the Recovery, Not Wall Street

Posted by Zach Carter, Media Consortium at 9:29 AM on March 31, 2009.


Workers' rights are a core issue for our democracy.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace in your
mailbox!

 

With new bailout plans for Wall Street being unveiled almost every week, it’s easy to forget that nearly all of the work that fuels our economy takes place outside of Manhattan. While reviving the financial sector is an important part of recovery, any lasting economic solution must also empower American workers and protect them from corporate abuses.

Workers’ rights are a core issue for our democracy, as progressive icon Noam Chomsky argues in an interview with Paul Jay of The Real News. The discussion covers the current economic crisis and its implications for the democratization of the U.S. economy. It’s a fascinating exchange. In the video below, Chomsky advocates for a much broader palette of reform than a simple clean-up the financial sector.

Chomsky notes that while the recent bank bailouts have brought a great deal of attention to the disconnect between public investment and private profit, it has become routine for the taxpaying public to foot the bill for important research that eventually creates big corporate profits. To ensure that we all reap the benefits of our investments, it is essential to make institutions accountable to their communities, rather than exclusively dedicated to maximizing shareholder returns.

The first step in democratizing the U.S. economy, according to Chomsky, is promoting unionization by enacting the Employee Free Choice Act, which makes it easier for workers to organize.

“The Employee Free Choice Act is always misrepresented,” Chomsky says. “It’s described as an effort to avoid secret elections. It’s not that. It’s an effort to allow workers to decide whether there should be secret elections, instead of leaving the decisions entirely in the hands of employers.”

EFCA would give workers more control over their circumstances, leading to improved wages and living standards for laborers. In a column for The American Prospect, Terence Samuel points out that even if Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s plan to bailout Wall Street succeeds in stabilizing the banking sector, banks can do little to bring about recovery if U.S. citizens are all broke. If we want to get out of the bubble-and-bust cycle, we must establish a middle class that has money to spend. Fundamentally, that means raising wages.

Robert Eshelman puts the plight of today’s workers into focus in a devastating piece for Salon. Even where clear, straightforward laws to protect laborers from predatory employers exist, major corporations have been able to use the fear of being fired to push employees into “voluntarily” working under illegal conditions (Wal-Mart just agreed to pay out $640 million to settle charges that it intimidated its own employees into skipping mandatory breaks and accepting pay rates below the minimum wage).

“If corporations were able to exert such coercive power when the unemployment rate was around 5 percent, what can they do in a job market in which 14.8 percent of the population can’t find adequate work?” Eshelman asks.

Under the Bush administration, the U.S. Department of Labor systematically ignored its duty to enforce labor laws. Writing for Colorlines, Michelle Chen highlights a report from the Government Accountability Office that takes the Department to task for failing to even return phone calls from workers who complained about employer abuses.

Millions of jobs are hanging in the balance as President Barack Obama formulates his rescue plan for the U.S. auto industry. But while the administration has insisted that factory workers at GM and Chrysler have to accept wage cuts, they’ve almost bent over backwards to funnel bonus money to executives at failed insurance giant AIG. General Motors’ CEO Rick Wagoner has stepped down at the Obama administration’s request, and while it’s hard to feel sorry for an executive who lobbied aggressively against the environment and ran his company into the ground, his ousting reflects Wall Street’s privileged status in Washington. As Josh Marshall highlights in Talking Points Memo, it is astonishing that executives at Bank of America and Citigroup, who have put taxpayers on the hook for far greater sums of bailout money than GM and Chrysler, have not been subjected to the same treatment as Wagoner.

We’ve all seen the grim statistics indicating how severe the current economic crisis really is, but the proliferation of roving tent, shack and lean-to communities along U.S. railways underscores the true costs of the recession more grimly than any consumer spending metric or gross domestic product projection. All over the United States, people who cannot afford even rental housing are living in makeshift structures without access to basic amenities. It’s much like the rise of Hoovervilles in the late 1920s and 1930s, where out-of-work laborers took up residence anywhere they could.

While these squatter communities are growing as the crisis deepens, the worst part of the whole phenomenon is that they were common before the current downturn, as Scott Bransford notes for High Country News.

Whatever happens on Wall Street, fixing the economy will mean making sure ordinary people have access to basic amenities, and guaranteeing that workers have the power to prevent abuses from corporate America’s executive class.

This post features links to the best independent, progressive reporting about the economy. Visit StimulusPlan.NewsLadder.net and Economy.NewsLadder.net for complete lists of articles on the economy, or follow us on Twitter. And for the best progressive reporting on critical health and immigration issues, check out Healthcare.NewsLadder.net and Immigration.NewsLadder.net. This is a project of The Media Consortium, a network of 50 leading independent media outlets, and was created by NewsLadder.

Digg!

Tagged as: immigration, economy, healthcare, workers, barack obama, wall street, live from main street, mediawire


After 5 Weeks, 3 GOP Filibusters and 200,000 Americans Running Out of Bennies, Obama to Sign Unemployment Extension
This is how things work in DC these days.
Post by Steve Benen. November 6, 2009.
Unemployment Hits 10.2 Percent, Economy Sheds 190,000 Jobs
A run-down of the employment picture.
Post by Dean Baker. November 6, 2009.
Meet Some of the People Who Have Jobs Thanks to Obama's Recovery Act
640,329 jobs were created or saved. But the true significance of this number lies in the people behind it.
Post by Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins. November 4, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Correction Mr. Chomsky
Posted by: sthrnfrydpinko on Mar 31, 2009 10:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The workers *would* build the recovery, but they won't be given a chance. With every day that passes we are being marginalized and excluded from participation in any facet of American life that doesn't involve us spending our money on disposable crap. America is more than happy to take our money, and mroe than happy to take our labor when we give it up for next to nothing, but aside from that, America wants nothing to do with us. I'm just waiting for the rest of you to catch on to this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have to disagree
Posted by: EncinoM on Mar 31, 2009 11:54 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I respect Chomsky and his intellect, the ideas on the economy follow the failed path of collectivism. Stackholders say is important but, they have not risked much if anything. It is the corporation and the shareholders who have their fortunes on the line. Chomsky also speaks as if teh goals of the all the various stackholders are the same. Workers are seeking continued employment, while the community may seek to limit operations. The Teamsters and other Unions, along with some Eskimo groups backed ANWAR, as they saw profits and employment from its exploitation. While other community groups, who would see little money opposed it.

Seeking a perfect socialist world, Chomsky dismisses the value of the private sector, out of hand. He fails to see the need to reward the risk taking share holders. His example of Bill Gates artifically props up teh contribution of the public, sector while surpressing the investment and the energy of the private sector contributed to the computer age. It was the private sector that re-designed the computer from a large warehouse sized goliath to something that could fit in a house. The internet was brought to the masses not by Universities, but by corporations willing to invest in a new technology and way of communication.

Chomsky neede to be pressed on his indeas and flesh them out more. Otherwise, the video was an ego stroking exercise of little merit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I have to disagree Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: I have to disagree Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: I have to disagree Posted by: hilaryuk
For an Anarchist...
Posted by: oregoncharles on Mar 31, 2009 11:54 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chomsky sounds an awful lot like a socialist.

As it happens, he told my wife, in an e-mail response, that he voted Green Party last year.

Admittedly, only because he lives in Massachusetts.

This calls for an essay on the perils of strategic voting that I don't have time to write right now, because I have to go to work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I lived in a Socialist Posted by: marid
» RE: I lived in a Socialist Posted by: Midway54
How to Repair the Value of Assets
Posted by: Xynyx on Mar 31, 2009 12:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The government keeps looking at ways to prop up the banks that have made all the loans that are now in trouble of defaulting, and they do it to the tune of billions of dollars. If they'd just throw that money at the people who need to continue paying those loans SO they could continue paying those loans, those assets would be secured.

But why help the little people when you can watch them starve on TV?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]