Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Dodd: Treasury Officials Insisted On Weakening Bonus Provision

Posted by Sam Stein, Huffington Post at 4:18 PM on March 18, 2009.


The disclosure should put to rest one aspect of the debate over how AIG was allowed to dole out $165 million in bonus payments.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace in your
mailbox!

 

The Treasury Department demanded that Sen. Chris Dodd insert exemptions into the stimulus bill that allowed bailout recipients to receive bonuses, the Connecticut Democrat said on Wednesday.

According to Dodd, officials at Treasury expressed concern that if the government were to prohibit payouts, it risked being sued by companies like AIG, which had contracts stipulating that bonuses were to be paid.

At the urging of Treasury officials, Dodd modified a clause he had previously inserted into the stimulus that prohibited bonuses from being issued by bailed-out companies. An exemption was added to allow bonuses that applied to in-place contracts.

"The alternative was, in my view, losing the entire section on executive excessive compensation," he said. "Given the choice ... I agreed to a modification in the legislation, reluctantly. I wasn't negotiating with myself. I wasn't changing my own amendment. I was changing the amendment because others were insisting on it."

"I would have preferred that we kept my language, as it left the Senate unanimously," Dodd added. "In fact there were objections when I wrote the language even before it left the Senate. ... The administration expressed reservations with the amendment. They came to us and asked for modifications in the amendment. The alternative was, of course, losing the amendment entirely, which was a possibility. I didn't want to see that happen. I suspect we would be having a conversation tonight why we didn't include some language in here to deal with bonuses, golden parachutes and the like. ... I don't believe anyone had any idea, I certainly didn't, that a month and a half later from February we would be talking about AIG and the bonuses they are receiving for their retentions, these $165 million. So that was never a part of the consideration."

The disclosure should put to rest one aspect of the debate over how a company like AIG, which has received $170 billion in taxpayer funds, was allowed to dole out $165 million in bonus payments. Still unresolved is who in conference removed the amendment introduced by Sens. Wyden and Snowe that would have taxed bonuses exceeding $100,000 at 35 percent.

More detail in CNN's write up here.

Digg!

Tagged as: chris dodd, treasury department, geithner, timothy geithner, aig bailout, aig bonus, aig hearing, christopher dodd, dodd aig, ed liddy, edward liddy

Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C.


Good News on Jobs Front but Still no Signs of a "Robust" Recovery
Employers are cutting jobs at a much slower rate.
Post by Dean Baker. December 4, 2009.
10 Companies to Avoid This Holiday Season
Yes, there's Wal-Mart, but also a bunch of surprises, too.
Post by Tara Lohan. December 4, 2009.
A Friend of Mine Once Knew a Guy Who Was a Welfare Queen
True story.
Post by Joshua Holland. December 3, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?