Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

George Bush Is Using GM to Screw the Environment One Last Time

Posted by Jane Hamsher, Firedoglake at 2:34 PM on November 17, 2008.


Big Oil, still in the White House.
bushfingerweb2.thumbnail

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace in your
mailbox!

 


I was watching Dana "Pig Missile" Perino on CSPAN this morning, explaining how George Bush is in favor of helping GM.  But he wants to take the $25 billion in loans to automakers from the 2007 Energy Bill and repurpose them, he doesn't want to use funds from the $700 billion Wall Street bailout (which Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi have indicated they would like to do).

Congress approved the funds for a Department of Energy program that would help the automakers to develop fuel-efficient vehicles.  

Got that?   George Bush wants to kill the program that would build more fuel-efficient vehicles.

Nobody at the press conference called Perino on it.

Big Oil, still in the White House.

Digg!

Tagged as: george w. bush, gm, big oil in the white hous

Jane Hamsher is the founder of FireDogLake. Her work has also appeared on the Huffington Post, Alternet and The American Prospect.


After 5 Weeks, 3 GOP Filibusters and 200,000 Americans Running Out of Bennies, Obama to Sign Unemployment Extension
This is how things work in DC these days.
Post by Steve Benen. November 6, 2009.
Unemployment Hits 10.2 Percent, Economy Sheds 190,000 Jobs
A run-down of the employment picture.
Post by Dean Baker. November 6, 2009.
Meet Some of the People Who Have Jobs Thanks to Obama's Recovery Act
640,329 jobs were created or saved. But the true significance of this number lies in the people behind it.
Post by Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins. November 4, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Big Oil, Hmmm, Yeah I Get It NOW
Posted by: ranchero42 on Nov 17, 2008 9:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If big oil takes some of that huge profits it's been making, buy up all this "junk" auto stock, they could load up the boards and stockholder meetings with multi-millionaires hostile to reasonable fuel economy and any talk about global warming. Or has this already happened? I can't spot any other motive for this "help us or the country gets it" philosophy coming out of the rust belt right now. Congressional investigations need to be the lead-in to the bailout, or we're gonna wish cooler heads had prevailed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Changing diapers
Posted by: sawdust on Nov 18, 2008 5:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, "Pig Missle" is brilliant. Perfect. The administration has come down to a blonde twit who is not even good at insulting us with her lack of intelligence. Bailing out GM (or the industry) with tax-payer money is just like changing diapers with no toilet training. Paul Krugman has it right: let them file Chap. 11 bankruptcy and let the chips fall where they may, just like anybody else. It has been a sham industry with poor quality products and a disregard for the environment or long term public welfare for 100 years. Enough, already! Sell GM to Toyota in a fire sale and let it go on, reborn. Ford will manage and kiss the Chrysler dinosaur good-bye. A public bail-out will just fill the septic tank with more soiled Huggies. Not with my money, you don't!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Changing diapers Posted by: monkeywrench
Impeach
Posted by: robflam on Nov 18, 2008 8:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can you impeach a former president. I am sure not but if it were so

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Impeach Posted by: monkeywrench
caronome
Posted by: Bayardtom on Nov 18, 2008 2:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No big surprise here. If you remember,after 911, Bush got binLadin's family out of the country because they were in cahoots! And I'm sure you've all seen the photo of Bush(shrub) kissing and hugging the Arab man in the garden of the White House. The whole family was and is business with the middle east oil people. Yes, of course, they are in the oil business. Why have they all been against the greening of the continent? It beats me where they think they will live and breathe if we don't make the deadline for cleaning up the planet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sad Fact...
Posted by: djnoll on Nov 19, 2008 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Henry Ford (Yes, the guy who started it all) was against the use of gasoline as the major fuel for cars. In the last 1930's through the early 1950's, he developed a form of fuel for autos from soy and sunflowers. He allocated a great deal of Ford profits to a farm to growth fuel and process it, experimenting in alternative engines and fuel mixes, until his son, (Edsel, the one he later named a car for) took him to court to try and have him declared incompetent. Edsel led a Board of Directors coup against his father and had him ousted, thus ending the only automaker support of alternative fuels until the Toyota Prius. Pity the American auto industry did not listen to its first leader, maybe we wouldn't be in the mess we are in now! Edsel-lousy car, lousy son, and lousy visionary leader!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]