Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Dow Dips Below 8,000; Anxiety, Anger at all Time Highs

Posted by Joshua Holland, AlterNet at 11:36 AM on October 10, 2008.


The long-held dominant economic paradigm is under fire.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Is there anger out there? You betcha.

Think about how many people would have traded their left ... whatever to be the guy who punched out the head of Lehman Bros, Richard Fuld ...

Mr. Fuld, who has been testifying on the financial crisis before the US House Oversight Committee, was attacked on a Sunday shortly after it was announced that the banking giant was bankrupt.
Following rumors that the incident had occurred, Vicki Ward, a US journalist, said "two very senior sources - one incredibly senior source" had confirmed it to her. "He went to the gym after ... Lehman was announced as going under," she told CNBC. "He was on a treadmill with a heart monitor on. Someone was in the corner, pumping iron and he walked over and he knocked him out cold.
"And frankly after having watched [Mr Fuld's testimony to the committee], I'd have done the same too."
"I thought he was shameless ... I thought it was appalling. He blamed everyone ... He blamed everybody but himself."
There's a sea-change occurring in our political-economy.

What has basically been a decades-long slump for most working people -- with wages stagnating and the costs of education, health care and everything else rising -- has spread to those at the top, to the movers and shakers of the "new economy," and now we're all suddenly in the same boat.

It shouldn't come as a surprise, really. You can't continue to feed a consumer culture like ours with a declining middle class. But all that pain working America's experienced was obscured by the use of averages -- average incomes that included the immense share taken in by those at the top (In 1972, the top 1 percent of Americans took in 8.7 percent of all earned income, but that figure skyrocketed to more than 20% in 2006, while wages stagnated for nine out of ten U.S. tax-payers. Recently, The Wall Street Journal reported that "the richest 1 percent of Americans in 2006 garnered the highest share of the nation's adjusted gross income for two decades, and possibly the highest since 1929").

What's noteworthy is that the decline in economic security was a distant issue probed mostly by lefty bomb-throwers like me for years, and now questions about our economic paradigm are front and center.

Consider this mind-jangling fact: today, the Washington Post -- long a mouthpiece for the neoliberal economic establishment -- is running a prominently-placed story titled, "The End of American Capitalism?"

This is surely a sign of the apocalypse -- some highlights ...
The worst financial crisis since the Great Depression is claiming another casualty: American-style capitalism....

The Bush administration is considering a partial nationalization of some banks, buying up a portion of their shares to shore them up and restore confidence as part of the $700 billion government bailout. The notion of government ownership in the financial sector, even as a minority stakeholder, goes against what market purists say they see as the foundation of the American system...
"People around the world once admired us for our economy, and we told them if you wanted to be like us, here's what you have to do -- hand over power to the market," said Joseph Stiglitz, the Nobel Prize-winning economist at Columbia University. "The point now is that no one has respect for that kind of model anymore given this crisis. And of course it raises questions about our credibility. Everyone feels they are suffering now because of us."
This new found skepticism is a result of the crisis hitting the kinds of metrics that economic reporters most frequently cite hard -- the stock indexes, GDP and unemployment. Numbers like the Dow:
U.S. stocks continued a relentless sell off today, taking wild swings before falling back into the red, as fears of global recession continue to overtake government efforts to address the financial crisis.
After falling nearly 700 points within the first 30 minutes of trading, the Dow Jones industrial average regained some ground, but continued to bounce between positive and negative territory. It is down about 5.8 percent, or 498 points around the noon hour. It fell below 8,000 briefly today for the first time since March 2003 after falling below 9,000 for the first time since June 2003 yesterday.
I've taken an oath to stop writing about "Wall Street" and "Main Street" -- it's become so clichéd. So let me say that these kinds of numbers -- which have a far more distant impact on most people than, say, median income (the income in the middle of the distribution) -- are causing an unprecedented level of anxiety on Maple Street, especially given that the government's massive bailout package hasn't done much to calm the markets.

Gallup:
Despite passage of the Treasury bailout and a global reduction in interest rates, consumer pessimism hit a new record high early this week, with the percentage of Americans rating the economy as "poor" increasing by 21 percentage points from a month ago and the percentage saying the economy is "getting worse" increasing by 12 points.
confidence
A month ago, around the time of the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac bailout, 38% of consumers rated current economic conditions "poor." By the time of the Treasury's bailout proposal in mid-September, the percentage rating the economy poor had increased 15 points to 53%. Even with the congressional passage and president's signing of the Treasury proposal, consumer pessimism has continued to increase. Early this week, the percentage of Americans rating the economy "poor" hit a record new high of 59% -- up 21 points from the same time a month ago.
Here's consumer confidence:

confidence2

Those are the views of Americans, but this is a global crisis, and it's causing a worldwide re-evaluation of the status quo. From that same Washington Post article ...
At the same time, anger is mounting over the global spillover effect of the U.S. crisis. The Korean currency, the won, has fallen sharply in recent days as corporations there struggle to find dollars in the heat of a global credit crunch.
"Derivatives and hedge funds are like casino gambling," said South Korean Finance Minister Kang Man-soo. "A lot of Koreans are asking, how can the United States be so weak?"
In South Korea, rising criticism that the government is sticking too close to the U.S. model has roused opposition to privatizing the massive, state-owned Korea Development Bank.
*****


If you haven't signed up for my weekly Corporate Accountability and Workplace newsletter, now is the time. We can't fit all the economic coverage we're running on our front page, and if you're not getting the Special Coverage newsletter, you're missing out on some really important analysis. Sign up here.

Digg!

Tagged as: economic crisis, bailout

Joshua Holland is an editor and senior writer at AlterNet.


After 5 Weeks, 3 GOP Filibusters and 200,000 Americans Running Out of Bennies, Obama to Sign Unemployment Extension
This is how things work in DC these days.
Post by Steve Benen. November 6, 2009.
Unemployment Hits 10.2 Percent, Economy Sheds 190,000 Jobs
A run-down of the employment picture.
Post by Dean Baker. November 6, 2009.
Meet Some of the People Who Have Jobs Thanks to Obama's Recovery Act
640,329 jobs were created or saved. But the true significance of this number lies in the people behind it.
Post by Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins. November 4, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yup. A whole lot of anger
Posted by: tommy_slothrop on Oct 10, 2008 12:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But Fox News, Limbaugh and their ilk are having way too much success in blaming it on minorities. McCain/Palin campaign rallys are getting really, really ugly. Minorities are being harassed and expunged from voting registries.

There's going to be some nastiness over the next few weeks as the culture wars heat up, the economy tanks and the election comes up. We should be prepared to stand our ground.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not likely
Posted by: GuitarBill on Oct 10, 2008 12:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"What has basically been a decades-long slump for most working people -- with wages stagnating and the costs of education, health care and everything else rising -- has spread to those at the top, to the movers and shakers of the "new economy," and now we're all suddenly in the same boat."

We're "all suddenly in the same boat"?

Not likely.

Don't forget that the "movers and shakers" are multimillionaires if not billionaires. Unless the dollar goes the way of the Deutschmark, they'll never be in the "same boat" as the remainder of us.

And I think that announcing the death of the American economy is a tad premature, but what do I know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Boot to the head! Posted by: Crazy H
History repeating itself...
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Oct 10, 2008 1:03 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our national crisis reminds me of what history books say about pre-WWII Nazi Germany.

God help us if the goose-stepping, rightwing GOP stays in power next year, led by Fuhrer McKain and his race-baiting, scary sidekick, Sarah Goebbels.

One more thing for NEW AlterNet visitors. If you are an undecided voter, learn the truth about Songbird McCain and his treasonous POW record by clicking on: Vote Against McCain (one of the HOTTEST anti-McCain sites on the Web)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I've said it before . . . Posted by: Scientz
Middle East pushed up both oil and stock prices.
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Oct 10, 2008 1:20 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Usually, when oil goes down, the market goes up. However, the demand for goods and services has brought down both. Today, we saw how powerful a player the middle east is. As oil was nearing $76, it made a turnaround at the same time the Dow was down several hundred points. When oil made it beyond $80 and change, the Dow was in positive territory.

What really scares me is the amount of assets the middle eastern countries are grabbing and it's not just stocks and bonds. It's also ports, freeways, land and other hard assets. IMHO, these rich oil sheiks are floating the market now as well as commodities in the US and other nations. Oil is the only marketable product they own so this makes sense. However, it is disconcerting to know that OPEC may build up as much power as China if it hasn't already, and manipulate stocks, bonds and commodities to their liking.

Middle America looses as jobs continue to move overseas, median incomes continue to fall, universal health coverage looks like it will never happen (although it would be the fairest group insurance system), and money continues to be looted to the highest fraction of a percent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: thank you for noticing Posted by: Lauren
Don't Just Do Something - Talk!
Posted by: pdxjoe on Oct 10, 2008 1:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Slavoj Zizek weights in on the financial crisis in a recent London Review of Books article. Joshua, how can we or I go about getting this article re-printed on Alter-Net? Here are a few key passages from it:

"There is a close similarity between the speeches George W. Bush has given since the crisis began and his addresses to the American people after 9/11. Both times, he evoked the threat to the American way of life and the necessity of fast and decisive action to cope with the danger. Both times, he called for the partial suspension of American values (guarantees of individual freedom, market capitalism) in order to save the same values.

Faced with a disaster over which we have no real influence, people will often say, stupidly, ‘Don’t just talk, do something!’ Perhaps, lately, we have been doing too much. Maybe it is time to step back, think and say the right thing. True, we often talk about doing something instead of actually doing it – but sometimes we do things in order to avoid talking and thinking about them. Like quickly throwing $700 billion at a problem instead of reflecting on how it came about.

...

There is nothing new in strong state interventions into the banking system and the economy in general. The meltdown itself is the result of such an intervention: when, in 2001, the dotcom bubble burst, it was decided to make it easier to get credit in order to redirect growth into housing. Indeed, political decisions are responsible for the texture of international economic relations in general. A couple of years ago, a CNN report on Mali described the reality of the international ‘free market’. The two pillars of the Mali economy are cotton in the south and cattle in the north, and both are in trouble because of the way that Western powers violate the same rules that they impose so brutally on Third World nations. Mali produces cotton of the highest quality, but the US government spends more money to support its cotton farmers than the entire state budget of Mali, so it is small wonder that Mali can’t compete. In the north, the European Union is the culprit: the EU subsidises every single cow to the tune of five hundred euros a year. The Mali minister for the economy said: we don’t need your help or advice or lectures on the beneficial effects of abolishing excessive state regulations; just, please, stick to your own rules about the free market and our troubles will be over. Where are the Republican defenders of the free market here? Nowhere, because the collapse of Mali is the consequence of what it means for the US to put ‘our country first’.

What all this indicates is that the market is never neutral: its operations are always regulated by political decisions. The real dilemma is not ‘state intervention or not?’ but ‘what kind of state intervention?’ And this is true politics: the struggle to define the conditions that govern our lives.

...

What is even worse than ‘partisan politics’ is a partisan politics that tries to mask itself as non-partisan: by imposing itself as the voice of the Whole, such a politics reduces its opponents by making them agents of particular interests.

...

In the 1992 election, Clinton won with the motto ‘It’s the economy, stupid!’ The Democrats need to get a new message across: ‘It’s the POLITICAL economy, stupid!’ The US doesn’t need less politics, it needs more."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NWO Coming
Posted by: Godfather89 on Oct 10, 2008 2:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The blatant disregard for the NWO Conspiracy Theory is now becoming fact. These elite will have their world government and their will be nothing we can do about it.

America, NOW IS THE TIME TO ACT BEFORE MARTIAL LAW IS ENFORCED!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FASCIST ECONOMY for Organized Corporate Crime
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Oct 10, 2008 3:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What has "become so clichéd" is endlessly talking about symptoms and not the core cancer of this ongoing debacle.

That would be a parasite Monopoly Organized Corporate Crime State disguised to look like a "democracy" under "capitalism". (the disguise isn't looking so good lately)

In a word: FASCISM

As I keep saying, however horrible you might think free market "capitalism" is IT DOES NOT EXIST and did not exist when Karl Marx invented the word back when monopoly robber barons ruled the world. And I'm not that makes this obvious point.

"now we're all suddenly in the same boat" ???

As another blogger on this thread pointed out the article's assumption that "now we're all suddenly in the same boat" is absurd. Real wealth is never destroyed in financial crashes, it merely changes hands from those who usually rig crashes (the ruling class) to those that pay for them (the rest of us). If you don't think the usual sharks that own the "Federal Reserve" Corp (not federal, ZERO reserves) knew the crash was coming, I've got a subprime derivative to sell you.

That ruling class never left power. Its blood money greed has only grown and the cost for it is only beginning to be felt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

british role in the capital manipulation in the world-
Posted by: avatar_singh on Oct 10, 2008 5:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now thse british bastards through BBC are doing another propaganda. while they balied out htier nbanks-after first criticising Ireland for doing that-they said that they are now doing swedish model_after having critisied sweden in 90 for prtecting her economy. now the same british who were talking about swedish model has been giving [propaganda through BBC bastrdfs that thw world msut foolw the british model. first itis a swedish model by their own admission, second all thse ficnancial crisis is result of british orchestrated hedge funs and casyman island stationed stolen and drug money luandering lay which the britihs have always protected from regulation for europe.
now the same briths are claiaming that their way-complete opposite of what they have always been doing for last 40years-is the way!.
they try to take creedit for doing exactly opposite of what they preach.
WHERE IS imf AND WORLD BANK PEOPLE -WHY ARE THEY NOT FORCING THE BRITISH NOT TO BAIL THEIR BANKS OUT- AFTERALL IT WAS THE BRITISH MSOT WHO OPPOSED ANY INTERFERENCE BY GOVT IN THE THIRD WORLD AND WERE ASTRGON SUPPORTER OF SHOCK THERAPY.
HIGH TIME THAT THE BRITISH GET SHOCK THERAPY OF KIND THEY RECCOMDENDED FOR OTHERS.
[

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHERE ARE IMF AND WORLD BANK -WHY ARE THEY NOT GIVING SHOCK THERAPY TO BRITIAN AND AMERICA?
Posted by: avatar_singh on Oct 10, 2008 7:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WAFTERALL thse two organisations long with parastic nations england and america are primarily responsible for destruction of other economy the worl over in name of keeping market economy and liberalization. then why are iMf and worl bank not stopping britian and america to bail out their banks?in fact thse two bastrds organisation are encouring the bail out. which confirms that the two organisations are the tools of exploitation by the anglosaxon race.
why not britian should suffer as much or rather more for failure of banks as other have suffered?
why shoudl nto the bail out of british and american banks be made illegal and gfailing that world msut stop trading with britian and america.
after all these two nations have been preaching shock therapy to others-let them suffer the same consequnce of failure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Best guy here: thank you! Posted by: Bobsays
NAOMI KLEIN IS ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. THE CHICAGO SCHOOL AND
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Oct 12, 2008 7:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Friedman are wrong. So was his Vienese mentor.

The good news is that we have the opportunity to rewrite the NEW DEAL in better and stronger terms. If congress will allow a total revamp of campaign finance, we have a chance. Remember an all democratic congress trashed Bill Clinton's first round of idealism, campaign finance reform. An all democratic congress trashed Jimmy Carter's energy policy.

There is plenty of blame to go around. That is probably why 58% of our fellow citizens think we need a third party. In my state a third party candidate can't get on the ballot until they can get 43,000 legitimate signatures on a petition. We have a political colusive oligopoly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr. Fuld just held me up without a gun!
Posted by: bettyn on Oct 13, 2008 7:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our money market fund, which we thought was the safest kind of retirement investment was trashed by this PIG. Do I want to shake the hand of the guy who punched him out? You bet your *** I do! In fact, I'd like to do a whole lot worse damage to him then that! (I want to go Lorena Bobbitt on him..and put what I cut off of him down the garbage disposal!)

Someone needs to start posting the addresses (all of them) of these corporate pigs so we can find them before they have a chance to escape to Paraguay, Dubai, or wherever they try to go and hide. We can start with W's place in Crawford and Cheney's Wyoming ranch. Torch 'em all and tar and feather every last one of these greedy bastards!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]