Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Join Me for the No Impact Week Challenge

Posted by Tara Lohan, AlterNet at 12:00 PM on October 12, 2009.


Take part in a week-long project to learn about your environmental footprint and reduce what you use and buy.
lohanheadshotmedium
Tara Lohan is a senior editor at AlterNet.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Water in your
mailbox!

 

Next week I'm going to be participating in a little bit of an ecological/social experiment and I'm hoping you'll join me. By now you've likely heard about 'No Impact Man' Colin Beavan. Along with his wife and daughter, Colin and his family embarked on a year-long project to try to minimize their impact on the environment -- this included eating only local food (which meant no eating out and no coffee); only pedaling or walking to their destinations; not buying stuff, including no more clothes shopping or purchasing cleaning products from the store; no producing trash; and for about half of the year, not using electricity in their home (which was a New York City apartment).

Their project was a blog, a book and then a movie. And now, it's a challenge to us. For just one week you can participate in a modified version of Colin and his family's year-long adventure. There are a full set of instructions, here. But I'll run through the basic premise. I'll also be participating myself and blogging about the ups and downs of my week and I'd encourage you to do the same.

The week-long project, which is in partnership with the Huffington Post, starts on Sunday (October 18) and each day throughout the week a new concept is added -- so don't worry, you won’t have an abrupt lifestyle change all at once. Here's the basic plan: Sunday is consumption, Monday is trash, Tuesday is transportation, Wednesday is food, Thursday is energy, Friday is water, and on the weekend you are to spend one day as a day of volunteering in your community and one as an eco-Sabbath -- a time to unplug from everything.

If this sounds a little overwhelming, take a read through this guide -- it details how to do things step by step and helps provide tips and resources. The most important point of all this is not to see how much you can give up or get rid of in a week, but to actually stop and think for a little bit about your footprint on the environment and the resources that you are using. The project isn't really about eco-extremism but about asking people to be conscious of their impact. And for one week that sounds pretty manageable, right? Here's where you can sign up.

I'd love to hear from you if you are taking part. You can email me throughout the challenge at tara@alternet.org and let me know if I can share your thoughts and experiences with our readers.

Digg!

Tagged as: no impact man, no impact project, colin beavan

Tara Lohan is a senior editor at AlterNet.


Yes Men Strike Again, Launch New Coke Brand Bottled Water Called 'Deception' [with Video]
The best part is when they run into an actual Coke employee.
Post by Tara Lohan. November 18, 2009.
PETA Teams Up With Glenn Beck to Bash Al Gore
Apparently Beck thinks PETA is as rad as the NRA. Who knew?
Post by Tara Lohan. November 6, 2009.
Wait, We Just Bombed the Moon?
Doesn't anyone else in the universe get a say in this?
Post by Tara Lohan. October 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Climate Change
Posted by: tezza123 on Oct 13, 2009 1:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
climate change is key - a week of 'no impact' might have some difference but really its about every week!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Overpopulation?
Posted by: folkie on Oct 13, 2009 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
spencerh writes: "Environmentalist with children" is an oxymoron.

Colin and Michelle's two-year-old daughter, Isabella, took part in their no-impact project along with them.

When a person makes no impact on the environment, they are making no impact on the environment.

When two people make no impact on the environment, they are making no impact on the environment.

When three people make no impact on the environment, they are making no impact on the environment.

At the beginning of their project, Michelle wants them to have another child and Colin is dead set against it. Only after he has proven that it is possible for a family to live comfortably in New York without making an impact on the environment, does he come around to agreeing that two no-impact children would make no greater impact on the environment than one no-impact child.

Shifting the focus from overconsumption to overpopulation was a tactic used by Rockefeller to promote globalization and justify genocide.

Rockefeller and Mass Murder

Half of the world's current population lives on less than $2.50 a day. They do not fly, drive, or own cell phones or ipods, they use little or no electricity, they rarely buy packaged foods, and they produce almost no nonbiodegradable waste. Just as the richest 10% of the world's population has more money than the bottom 50% combined, the richest 10% do more permanent, irreparable damage to the environment than the bottom 50% combined.

In other words, one person who drives, flies, buys packaged imported foods, uses electricity, and owns many widgets made from petroleum products, does more to permanently and irreparably destroy our habitat and threaten the survival of life on earth, than one million people who do not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Overpopulation? Posted by: Tara Lohan
» RE: Overpopulation? Posted by: evasta7
Carbon Footprints?
Posted by: Mr. Richard on Oct 13, 2009 9:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets see, 9-11 planes hit buildings, sometime after which president says go shop/consume, good for country. Thruout term thieves hit every place they can ending in finacial meltdown. Economy in grave danger, so now we have don't impact or lessing your impact upon the planet. Yes, sheeople continue to be led around by fear and guilt and lies and scoundrels.
Now this doesn't mean that I don't thing we can do with less (and the way things are going we may well have no choice) but, be aware of how and what is going on. Dumpster diving? For edibles? Must be a better way. And the average 'merican uses 1100 gallons of water a day...yep and how is this figure arrived at?
Yes, becoming aware is a good thing, and of import to the country and planet. Many things can and should be changed, and maybe this week will be a starting point for accomplishing such. Yellow is mellow,
talk to and help out the other fellow, reuse what you can, develope a plan, and waste not want not, get by with less, leave no mess or footprints of carbon. HHHHmmm, now how am I supposed to breath only in, not out?
I really hope this accomplishes a beginning to awakening and understanding that there are other ways of doing things than just being mindless...consumers and otherwise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An easy solution.
Posted by: folkie on Oct 13, 2009 7:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe what we need are big balloons that can be attached to the exhaust pipes of cars so that instead of polluting the air that everyone breathes, drivers could take their pollution home with them and empty it into their houses at the end of the day.

As for high level radioactive wastes, we could dump a little of them in the living rooms of everyone who uses electricity that comes from nuclear power plants.

Some people will never understand the difference between sustainable and nonbiodegradable, so they have to be taught. A little harsh perhaps, but it's them or the planet and I'd prefer the planet. ;)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Environmental Footprint my ass
Posted by: jaglover on Oct 14, 2009 5:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a bunch of Al Gore, carbon footprint, bullshit. This Earth goes through cycles regardless of what humans do to it. IT adjusts as it always has. We're only here for a little while in the grand scheme of things and when we're gone it will adjust to us NOT being here. The ice cap is NOT melting, the sky is NOT falling so stop trying to scare people into changing their lives and giving YOU money!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]